• Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Imran Khan, don't give your stupidity the name of humanitarianism

Discussion in 'Pakistani Siasat' started by veg, Dec 1, 2017.

  1. veg

    veg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Ratings:
    +2 / 545 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    Humanitarianism means standing for an "innocent" life even if your own life is endangered, or even you have to kill thousands of evil terrorists for saving a single innocent life.

    Humanitarianism means going even going against the TIDE in order to save an innocent life.


    Salman Taseer Shaheed showed an act of humanitarianism when he stood for that poor women, who was not getting justice due to the pressure of Mullahs.


    The Evils that Imran Khan's cowardice brought to Pakistan:

    (1) It was Imran Khan who stood against the operation in Lal mosque.

    (2) It was Imran Khan who again stood against operation in Faizabad.

    (3) It was Imran Khan who was the biggest supporter of Shariat-e-Muhammadi of Maulana Fazlullah in Swat.

    Imran Khan was misguiding the whole nation and telling it that Shariat-e-Muhammadi will solve all the problems in Swat, and government should pull out it's troops from Swat.

    Due to this extreme stupidity of Imran Khan, Swat was handed over to Fazlullah, and within 2 days Taliban got control of whole of Swat.

    And due to this extreme stupidity of Imran Khan, for the next couple of months, innocent Swat people were slaughtered by Taliban in the Bazars of Swat.

    And due to this extreme stupidity of Imran Khan, Taliban started capturing the nearby areas and started marching towards Islamabad and hundreds of people died in the fighting.

    At the end, Army had to start the operation to end this Fasaad, but then hundreds of thousand people got displaced, thousands of them died, whole Swat got destruction and destroyed.

    All that happened due to the extreme stupidity of the Politicians, of which Imran Khan got the biggest share.


    (4) Still Imran Khan kept on opposing the operation against Taliban in FATA (along with other politicians).
    What was the result?
    Result was killing of hundreds of innocent children in Peshawar School.

    Taliban alone should not be blamed for this bloodbath, but Imran Khan also share the blame of this bloodbath.

    Not only Peshawar school, but Taliban were killing people in whole of FATA right and left.

    It was only the operation, after which the life of the people of FATA became safe and up till now there is constant growth and progress in both Swat and FATA.


    (5) Imran Khan said that 2 Million British people came to the street against Iraq War.
    Mr. Imran, please tell us why didn't then you come out in millions (of your party) when Army then started the operation against Taliban in Swat?

    Where you humanitarianism went against the military operation in Swat?

    Again why didn't you come out in millions against military operation and bloody war in FATA? What happened to your humanitarianism at that time?


    We don't need selfish and coward leaders like Imran Khan who don't have the courage to go against the tide, but for their personal political gains, they put the life of millions of people at risk and give them under the control of extremists, and then came up with false excuse of humanitarianism.


    Mr. Imran Khan, you must know that the Constitution of Pakistan is also blood thirsty Liberal.

    Yes constitution of Pakistan is also blood thirsty liberal while it gives full right to the state to kill all the Fasadies and their Fitna, which is against your stupid humanitarianism.

    Even the constitution of England (even not written) is also blood thirsty liberal, while it also gives the full right to the state to kill all the Fasaadies and their fitna.



    Imran opposing operation against Taliban:

    LAHORE, April 25, 2009 (Frontier Star) -- Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf Chairman Imran Khan has said that the government should not talk about military operation against Taliban after peace pact in Swat signed between government and Maulana Sufi Muhammad. Talking to a private TV channel here on Saturday, Imran Khan said that war on terror was not a war of Pakistan. He said that government had further deteriorated situation in the country after it called the war on terror its own war, adding that it was not the war of Pakistan. Imran Khan said that the military operation could be carried out at any time against Taliban but use of military forces was not make solution for maintaining the peace in the region. All issues should be resolved through negotiations with Taliban, he added. He stressed that government should not carry military operation against its own people over pressure of foreign countries.

    Link:


    And here listen to Imran Khan direct how he is strongly advocating the imposition of Sharia Law in Swat, without even giving the chance to the poor people of Swat to show their will.

     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2017
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  2. Kaptaan

    Kaptaan PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    7,310
    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Ratings:
    +146 / 18,362 / -5
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Yeh, I agree. IK is evil. We need angels like these instead who go around building hospitals for the poor and impress the world with their charm. And that other buddy NS running from the law right now.


    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 21
  3. Jinn Baba

    Jinn Baba FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    938
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 934 / -3
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    But that's not what the author is saying. You'd have to be insane to think AH is a good man; and NS isn't exactly 'sharif' either.

    Similarly, there are those of us that don't share the popular view that IK is some sort of angel. I personally think he would be worse than Zardari or Sharif if he ever came to power.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  4. Zibago

    Zibago ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    25,029
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Ratings:
    +9 / 39,084 / -3
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    So back to the old manjan huh baboon?Google Lashkar e Jhangvi and their relation with pmln
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Mrc

    Mrc SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,644
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Ratings:
    +3 / 5,540 / -5
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Qatar
    A person who is up to 70 years old and does not have clear idea between right and wrong and once opposed military op against these scums and still is not clear in his mind..... cannot become premier of country....
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  6. Zibago

    Zibago ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    25,029
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Ratings:
    +9 / 39,084 / -3
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    :lol: download (1).jpg
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  7. saiyan0321

    saiyan0321 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,774
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Ratings:
    +26 / 7,482 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Its absolutely funny how nooners forget that their own very leader was against operation and backed peace talks when the taliban were beheading our soldiers until general raheel called enough and told nawaza enough. So that gets removed from history.

    Plus i dont remember imran being so influential as to stop operations in swat nor gather support for terrorists. The operations stopped bcz PPP and the people of Pakistan supported the terrorists.

    As for khooni liberals. C grade Pak liberals support terrorists and separatists and enjoy death of soldiers. What's wrong there.

    Despite everything Imran is the best of the worst. Who else. Nawaza the corrupt fool, zardari the corrupt genious, traitor altaf, mustafa kamal or Islamic parties.

    Plz I would chose Imran above all of them
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  8. veg

    veg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Ratings:
    +2 / 545 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    What a lame excuse from you.

    We send Lanat upon Nawaz Sharif. We send lanat upon PML-N for having links with Taliban and any other extreme group.

    Now do you have the courage to say Lanat upon Imran Khan for facilitating the militants through his extreme stupidity?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  9. xyxmt

    xyxmt ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,651
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ratings:
    +5 / 11,898 / -9
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    this is pure Evil, Imran on the other hand is stupid
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. Kaptaan

    Kaptaan PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    7,310
    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Ratings:
    +146 / 18,362 / -5
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    You know I am utterly against the mullahs but if for sake of argumant I became leader of PK honestly I would have to show some apologetic behaviour to the far right. Pakistan has tilted too far right, the extremist forces have got too embedded. So to move forward requires a a very cautious approach. That is why all our leaders or those that harbour ambition to rule the country adopt a softly, softly approach to the mullahs including even the army as we saw in recent Faizabad impasse.

    Even I have sobered to the reality that things are far worse than I thought in Pakistan. The cancer of extremism is here to stay for another two generations at least. IK know this. So to swim in this pool he has to grow the gills. Or else his political enemies would accuse him of being a Westen Jew stooge.

    Between PML, MQM, PTI who has best performed in their respective 'homebase'? Peshawar, Lahore or Karachi? In the list of Altafs, Sharifs, Bhuttos his the best shot. Unless you guys can genetically make a perfect leader in a science lab and field him in 2018. Fair play to you then.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 11
    • Positive Rating Positive Rating x 2
  11. veg

    veg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Ratings:
    +2 / 545 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    Any one who made the State weak through his actions, is stupid and not worthy of being a leader. Either it is Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan, it does not make a difference.

    It would be big hypocrisy if you abuse Nawaz for supporting the extremists, but not criticize Imran Khan for his extreme stupidity and polishing the boots of extremists and giving full support in order to hand over the Sawat to them.

    If Imran Khan would have been influential, would then the results were different?

    I mean Imran Khan was with full voice campaigning for handing out the whole Sawat Area to Mullah Fazullah, without even asking the people of Sawat their opinion through any polls.

    Why do you think Imran would have done any thing else if he had got more powers?

    With more powers, Imran Khan would have only increased his stupidity and caused much more damage and destruction to the State of Pakistan, and perhaps still there would have been no Swat Operation and Taliban would have been ruling that Area.


    Lanat upon those liberals who support the terrorists and enjoy the death of soldiers.

    But what about the people (irrespective of them being religious or liberal or non muslims) who wanted an end to the extremist terrorists and wanted operation against them so that the State writ would have been installed and the bloodshed of civilians at the hands of Taliban would have stopped?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  12. Hareeb

    Hareeb FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    874
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,265 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Nobody is perfect.
    Actually I like his idea is to win extremists'hearts with love, resolve issues through dialogues and bring them into mainstream without firing a single bullet.

    Dont you see what KPK govt has done to bring Madrassa-Haqania and others in the existing system? Now, those madrassas give wordly education to their students along religious teachings, and teachers and imams there are appointed by provincial govt.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  13. veg

    veg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Ratings:
    +2 / 545 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    No, we need Leaders who have the courage to face the Fitna of the extremists, not those who start supporting their Fitna in order to become prime minister.

    The way politicians (including Imran Khan) support the Fitna of extremists, then not in even 1000 generations this extremism is going to end.

    There is absolutely no other option than to destroy the fasaad, otherwise every time fitna will keep on increasing many folds as we saw in case of Mumtaz Qadiri and Taliban march towards Islamabad after getting control of Swat.

    And every time it will lead to APS kids death.

    There is no compromise upon the writ of the Law.


    So, should we stop criticizing the harmful and destructive role of Imran Khan while he is one eyed king among the blinds?
    اندھوں میں کانا راجا

    Wrong.

    Imran Khan should be criticized and stopped from this stupid role where he is causing the weakening of the State by supporting the extremists and opposing the operations against them.
     
  14. Syed1.

    Syed1. FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    951
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,254 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    Noora kay pass ab yehi manjan reh gaya hai....



    Rotay raho nahi ahraha wapis Nawaz Sharif :lol:



    Next PM is Immy.... rok saktay hoto rok lo :partay:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  15. Kash_Ninja

    Kash_Ninja FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,392
    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,548 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    His party has performed well in KPK, and as prime minister I'd rather have him at the helm over Nawaz or Zardari. He's probably the only political leader in Pakistan that's the right combination of anti-imperialist, pro-military, and charismatic, making him a great leader to represent Pakistan on an international stage.

    If you started judging leaders based on their previous positions/speeches then no politician in Pakistan would ever fit the bill, so I say that you should judge based on actions instead: Imran Khan has built cancer hospitals for the poor, brought a corrupt prime minister to justice, and greatly improved the environment in KPK through the Billion tree tsunami.

    You and I know for a fact that the other major political leaders have done/said far worse, and have done almost no philanthropy in their long careers. Do you think they would make better prime ministers?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3