What's new

Imran Khan can face treason charges for subverting constitution: Marriyum Aurangzeb

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 16, 2012
17,183
-20
32,427
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Ok - Grow them balls and charge him for treason then.


this ain't about punjabi or sindhi. IK represents entire pakistan and that's his narrative people are attached him for.
Also - this will be the end of mafias of pakistan, not pakistan. why? because all cover has been blown. mission is compromised.

It is 100% about Sindhi and Punjabi that want to dominate. PPP and PML-N are the two most corrupt parties in Pakistan and both belong to Sindh and Punjab.
 

shayyman

FULL MEMBER
Feb 6, 2022
308
-6
559
Country
United States
Location
Sweden
It is 100% about Sindhi and Punjabi that want to dominate. PPP and PML-N are the two most corrupt parties in Pakistan and both belong to Sindh and Punjab.
So Now it's about sindh also? Actually for racist ppl like you whose dream is further break up of pakistan, it's next to impossible to see simplest things without a racist lens (hens the confusion) but to any kid it's clear that this deep rooted mafias do not operate on race basis, rather on interests solely. Money knows no cast creed and religion.

Sadly it wont come true for you because this is not the angle of this struggle. and IK is working on a level beyond Pakistan even.

PMLN does not give a hoot about punjabi and PPP does not give a hoot about sindhis.

But you can remain stuck in your prehistoric cocoon and keep harping cliched "punjabi" "sindhi" "pathan" "balochi" card.
 

Asimzranger

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 6, 2016
2,919
3
6,631
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
FWR4mNDXEAI2I1Q.jpg
 

Keisha Bryant

MEMBER

New Recruit

Jun 21, 2022
8
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Shitty people. whenever she is doing a presser, I just turn my tv to Netflix for better entertainment. I wonder who listens to her by looking at her face on national Tv channels knowing that she is telling all the lies on the orders of her mistress.
 

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
12,245
19
26,474
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
With the detailed SC ruling, some suggest the SC has paved the way for invoking article 6 on IK, Alvi, Suri, Asad and Fawad chaudhry. Let's see what the parliament decides.
 

Norwegian

BANNED
Aug 19, 2014
19,002
11
31,075
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
With the detailed SC ruling, some suggest the SC has paved the way for invoking article 6 on IK, Alvi, Suri, Asad and Fawad chaudhry. Let's see what the parliament decides.
It's the view of one judge only. Majority of judges are not for invoking treason charges on different interpretation of the constitution. PTI govt was merely following SC's own past judgments that judiciary is not constitutionally allowed to interfere proceedings of parliament. Latest SC verdict now says it can. Maybe in future when neutrals want, SC will say otherwise. So it all depends on the mood of neutrals at the time
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom