• Saturday, December 7, 2019

If North Korea can why can't we

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by Fawadqasim1, Jun 8, 2019.

  1. ZAC1

    ZAC1 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    790
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 493 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Chalay chori sa li ya sirf chiz asemble ki ho ta TOT...kuch bi ho...we dnt need made in ...... label...we need the weapons for our enemies...thats the right approch...baki sab batien bakwas hain
     
  2. LeGenD

    LeGenD ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    9,007
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Ratings:
    +22 / 8,367 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    ISKANDER - A NEW CLASS OF TBM

    TBM = Theater Ballistic Missile
    Iskander-M = Russian exclusive (500 KM range)
    Iskander-E = Export (280 KM range)

    DPRK most likely received knowhow of Iskander-E from Russia.

    1. Iskander derivatives execute a depressed ballistic trajectory.

    [​IMG]

    https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9db30e9644ca9660b59d1be7ee055184.webp

    2. Iskander derivatives have a small CEP (< 25 feet) or incredibly accurate; these can take cues from GLONASS (or GPS) for midcourse corrections (if necessary), and can also be equipped with a terminal phase guidance system for excellent engagement results (radar or EO/IR).

    3. Iskander derivatives do not feature a separating warhead but the cone is large enough to accommodate submunitions or decoys (optional).

    ---

    Iskander derivatives at a glance below.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Ukraine = Grom
    Hyungmoo-2 = South Korea
    Iskander-M = Russia
    Iskander-E (refined) = DPRK

    South Korean Hyungmoo-2 in action



    [​IMG]

    - nearly pinpoint accuracy. ;)

    @Horus

    Qualities of Iskander derivatives highlighted above, can be accurate like a cruise missile and difficult to defeat in theory.

    HOWEVER

    South Korea will receive PAC-3 MSE class interceptors which are designed to defeat Iskander-M types and more.

    FYI: https://www.defensenews.com/global/...ew-pac-3-interceptors-to-counter-north-korea/

    "The MSE's exact range and altitude capabilities against various types of targets are classified, but it's clear that the updated missile will allow MIM-104 Patriot batteries to cover far more area and have greater defensive capabilities against tactical ballistic missiles than its progenitors. The upgrades to the missile's motor, control system, software, front-end thermal protection, among other modifications, result in a far more effective weapon." - Tyler Rogoway

    Even the original PAC-3 standard interceptors are capable of defeating maneuverable warheads and missiles in general.



    A PAC-3 standard interceptor defeat another PAC derivative in a GTA style show of spectacular maneuvers (PAAT phenomenon); objective was to stress-test the interceptor in all aspects.



    A PAC-3 standard interceptor defeat Perishing II MaRV (STORM MTTV) in a show of operationally-relevant maneuvers.

    Storm Maneuvering Tactical Target Vehicle

    The Storm Maneuvering Tactical Target Vehicle (MTTV) rocket, which performed its mission as planned, was used as a target to test the Patriot missile defense system.

    "It has been an extraordinarily busy and successful two-week period for our launch teams, culminating with the successful MTTV launch for the Missile Defense Agency," said Mr. Ron Grabe, Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Company's Launch Systems Group.

    "We are very proud of our record of supporting MDA's flight test programs with the most reliable target vehicles in the industry. We look forward to our future missions that will help MDA develop, test and deploy effective missile defense systems."

    Orbital provided and tested the rocket's guidance and separation systems, performed all vehicle design, production and integration activities and conducted all launch day mission operations.

    The MTTV rocket is a single stage vehicle which uses a retired U.S. government rocket engine from the Minuteman ICBM program and a modified Pershing II reentry vehicle.


    Details in this link: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/bmdo-04zl.html

    In summary:-

    "The mission sequence was a two missile ripple-fire against the modified PAAT, closely followed by a two missile ripple-fire against the Storm target. Once the targets were intercepted and destroyed, the two remaining PAC-3s executed a preplanned self-destruct sequence."

    NOTE: The MIM-104 Patriot defense system featuring improved AN/MPG-63 radar system, and the PAC-3 family of interceptors, is absolutely capable of target discrimination (telling numerous types of decoys and submunitions apart from actual warheads). ;)

    "Raytheon is upgrading the US Army Patriot radars. The upgrade kits provide greater power for the radar and the addition of a wideband capability for improved target discrimination."

    Link: https://www.army-technology.com/projects/patriot/

    In fact, the MIM-104 Patriot defense systems are receiving cutting-edge AN/TPS-80 (GaN technology) radar systems which will open a new chapter of 'intercept possibilities' with the PAC-3 family of interceptors. :)

    Link: https://www.janes.com/article/82186/usmc-takes-delivery-of-first-gan-g-ator

    THEREFORE

    It would be much better for DPRK and South Korea to shake hands and bring an end to this madness.

    Link: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...s-letter-president-trump-190623061535080.html

    Iskander derivatives will make no difference whatsoever, in the Korean peninsula to say the least.

    ADDITIONALLY

    A ballistic missile equipped with an MARV (concealed design), shown in this post: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/if-north-korea-can-why-cant-we.622238/#post-11529010

    - simulated the flight capabilities of the Chinese DF-21D ASBM (maneuverability aspect including) for an Arleigh Burke class destroyer in a complex live-fire event in 2016. Guess what was the outcome? ;)

    Link: https://defense-update.com/20161215_df21d_target.html

    [​IMG]

    --- --- ---

    @Fawadqasim1
    @The Deterrent

    SEE ABOVE

    Meaningful information surfacing in the public domain, thanks to declassification policy and better publicity. American weapon-testing regime is definitely incorporating operationally-realistic scenarios.

    Disarmament lobbies are busy fooling people with typical acronyms (wobbling/tumbling/maneuvering/dangerous/depressed :lol:), most likely funded by Russian sources.

    KGB officials were active in fueling mass protests in Europe against the deployment of Pershing II MaRV tipped ballistic missiles in the region.

    Link: https://www.nytimes.com/1983/07/26/world/kgb-officers-try-to-infiltrate-antiwar-groups.html

    I do not mind Pakistan improving its defenses over time, these investments are worth every penny in the light of an increasingly aggressive (fundamentalist) India.

    US always had a soft corner for India (people were not paying sufficient attention). However, US-India relations are not supposed to be at the expense of US-Pak relations, IMHO.

    FATF and COIN notwithstanding, Pakistani leaders need to engage US with the mindset of inviting more American companies to invest in Pakistan, American companies new manufacturing plants in Pakistan, and tourism opportunities (increased levels of people-to-people engagements).

    Nothing is easy in life, you have to STRUGGLE to make ends meet. Country-to-Country engagements are a CONSTANT WORK as well.

    Whatever happens in the long-term, Pakistan should try its best to adopt a neutral course and stay away from the COLD WARS of superpowers.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  3. Fawadqasim1

    Fawadqasim1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,524
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,596 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    On this one I absolutely agree with you without any reservations.
     
  4. 925boy

    925boy SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,165
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,098 / -20
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Why not China? CHina that has an active "mutual friendship"treaty with North Korea? China might be more covert in its help to North Korea, but for multiple reasons, it definitely supplies North Korea with more strategic deterrent help than Russia is. Afterall, doesnt North Korea get all its oil/gas from China? well that already tells you who controls, literally, their economy. Russia helped North Korea too, esp via doing biz via North Korean embassy in Moscow. UN wrote report about it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Bilal Khan (Quwa)

    Bilal Khan (Quwa) SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,313
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Ratings:
    +21 / 8,814 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    You can also field integrated firing units comprising of QBMs, GLCMs, and MLRS, each backed by an airborne SAR/GMTI for real-time situational awareness and target inputs.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1