Did you take a vote and forgot to share with us? WhatÃ¢â¬â¢s so confusing about it? Israel has nukes and had proliferated too, but it still receives the best West has to offer. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t confuse Western hypocrisy with Indian so-called responsible behavior. Yes... I can, you are disconnected. I am also not surprised at your pathetic attempts to shift the blame. Your denials are immaterial and will not change the reality. Yes, it did and may still be doing. You may want to update your knowledge every now and then. It so happened, in summer of 2004, it was reveled between July and December 1981 SK extracted 0.3 grams of plutonium, and it was also revealed SK had conducted laser isotope separation experiments to enrich about 0.2 grams of uranium. In message 70 you said, Ã¢â¬ÅHe's given no supporting arguments. He just expects his readers to believe it because the great Mr. Gill has said it.Ã¢â¬Â To this nonsense, I responded in message 77, Ã¢â¬Åwhich part of Ã¢â¬Ësee Appendix - BÃ¢â¬â¢ do you find hard to read or comprehend? Could it be any simpler? Mr. Gill doesnÃ¢â¬â¢t expect his readers to believe it because the great Mr. Gill has said it, but he certainly makes a basic assumption that the readers could, at minimum, read English.Ã¢â¬Â If such deceptive comments of yours werenÃ¢â¬â¢t enough, you had to again add to your ignorance in a usual pathetic attempt to discredit the sources/in this case the appendix. 1. In case you are oblivious of all the forms of proliferation, it includes transfer of knowledge and even dual-use materials too. And NO, not even private companies are exempted to proliferate. Since India is guilty of knowledge transfer, technology transfer, and material transfer through state and private entities; therefore, India is guilty of nuclear proliferation. 2. It is not by mistake that the US has blacklisted Indian nuclear scientists and sanctioned Indian firms for selling prohibited items to Iran. Code: In 2004, the US State Department blacklisted two Indian scientists. The Indian nuclear scientists were charged with nuclear proliferation to Iran. The US State Department spokesman Richard Boucher explained, "The cases reflected poor Indian commitment to non-proliferation." In yet another instance, the US sanctioned two Indian firms for selling prohibited items to Iran. (Nukes for India) Here we go... yet in another cheap attempt to misquote you have presented half quote. The word Ã¢â¬ËnuclearÃ¢â¬â¢ was missed only by you. Here is another source: Ã¢â¬ÅIndian Foreign Minister Yashwant Sinha said... Ã¢â¬ËWe have nuclear energy plants in our country. There are other civilian uses of nuclear energy ... most certainly between Iran and India there would be collaboration, there is collaborationÃ¢â¬â¢Ã¢â¬Â. (India helping Iran with nuclear energy: FM) Unless, one is brain dead, in context of nuclear proliferation, Ã¢â¬ËcollaborationÃ¢â¬â¢ means everything.