• Friday, December 6, 2019

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions

Discussion in 'Indian Defence Forum' started by EagleEyes, Mar 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    All LCA News & Discussions
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. Lilo

    Lilo FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    200
    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 56 / -0
    ______:tup:______
     
  3. Neo

    Neo RETIRED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,929 / -0
    Can someone please post the chronology of LCA's development?
    Thanks!
     
  4. Lilo

    Lilo FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    200
    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 56 / -0
  5. Goodperson

    Goodperson SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,860
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 472 / -0
    Their is no denying that LCA is behind schedule, Kaveri tests failed radar is not finalized.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    If LCA is ever succeded that basically means that Russians finally did it!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Goodperson

    Goodperson SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,860
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 472 / -0
    Hmm not true LCA uses GE F404 US engine same which is used in Grippen
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Actually, without Russian assitance. LCA will never get to fight in the air. Right now it has no hope. :( While JF-17 numbers have increased from 150 to 200-250. Thats what you call a successful aircraft.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  9. Goodperson

    Goodperson SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,860
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 472 / -0
    I thought you opened the thread for LCA.

    LCA does use some western technologies but has lots of Indegeneous content LCA is made in India yes its behind schedule but is not a failure unlike JF-17 which was made by chinese for Pakistan.
     
  10. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    You call an aircraft a failure which is supposed to be built 250 times in Pakistan and 300-500 times in China? Go do some research, and while your at it search the meaning of joint venture.

    LCA is an aircraft which is denied by the air force which it was made for. There is nothing in LCA that India has made, except for solving the puzzle and putting it together successfuly, about 8 of them for the museum.

    This thread will be fun. :)
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  11. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Another thing i forgot to wrote. What "Indegeneous content" has India made for LCA? Nevermind, you should be the last person i should ask this who can't spell "indigenous" and calls aircraft components "contents".
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  12. Adux

    Adux SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,856
    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 123 / -0
    300-500 times in PLAAF, source please; they hate the aircraft as far as I know.
    I can see you are complelty uneducated on the LCA, Delays apart it is far ahead of Airforce's requirements. Composite Tech etc

    Goodperson,

    Weaponisation has just started, THe radar is Elta-2032 and as well as the Elta 2052.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Adux

    Adux SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,856
    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 123 / -0
    I can see that this thread is LCA BAshing thread, though in very aspect it is far ahead of the JF-17, Ah Patriotism
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  14. Goodperson

    Goodperson SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,860
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 472 / -0

    ha ha ha now you have come down to finding spellos nevermind my IE7 browser does not have spellcheck plugin unlike mozilla, Put it in perspective contents and component can be used in tandem otherwise all the components would have been imported and you have a plane ready where is the knowledge transfer and reaserch ?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  15. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,614 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Yet, your own air force dont want it. Far ahead of getting operational is probably correct in that context. :P

    They hated the aircraft thats why they spent 48% of Research & Development.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.