• Sunday, June 7, 2020

H6K for Pakistan Strategic Forces

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by maverick1977, Apr 15, 2020.

  1. maverick1977

    maverick1977 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,599
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,680 / -0
    Folks, lets be honest to ourselves. Pakistan need deep strike heavy load strike group that can carry 12 tons of ammunition and can strike enemy naval assets and southern tips with maximum punch or their concentrated forces ... H6K can do that job for Navy and for strategic deployment. With 3000 miles extended radius with refueling probe carrying 12 tons of weapons cruise missiles and anti ship weapons this beast can destroy enemy from far away.

    its a mere discussion, wants to see how this beast can be deployed by Pakistan?

    http://www.military-today.com/aircraft/h6k.htm
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  2. AZADPAKISTAN2009

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    31,225
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +64 / 31,580 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    China
    :pop: We both think similarly, I also believe firmly on complete destruction of opponent
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  3. Imad.Khan

    Imad.Khan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,917
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Ratings:
    +7 / 8,470 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  4. khansaheeb

    khansaheeb SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,903
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Ratings:
    +2 / 8,894 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It's ok for bashing terrorists and third world countries but won't last long in a conventional war against a powerful air force.
     
  5. Pandora

    Pandora SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,388
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Ratings:
    +8 / 7,149 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    RCS is too big and will easily be targeted by airdefense assets. Such planes are good for softening the battles field after air defense assets have been neutralized. For a country like Pakistan which purely under defense offense doctrine such an assets is useless. Better invest all that money in extending range of cruise missiles and produce them en masse to level any strategic assets of enemy making them think twice.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  6. ÇölKaplanı

    ÇölKaplanı FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    663
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2020
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,167 / -0
    Country:
    Turkey
    Location:
    Turkey
    Are you guys being serious?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  7. IceCold

    IceCold PDF VETERAN

    Messages:
    15,460
    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Ratings:
    +7 / 16,798 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    It will require a lot of cover from fighter aircrafts against Indian airforce however during 65 war we did modified our C-130s for bombing missions. An aircraft like this along with a proper air cover can cause havoc in India. But are defensive nature will never allow us to go for such an aircraft purchase. We never went for a twin engine aircraft either apart from those F-6s which was more of necessity than range.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  8. maverick1977

    maverick1977 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,599
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,680 / -0
    if we can leverage P3c Orions for antiship anti sub role then we can leverage H6ks as well. the arguments allow for both situations. this plane can give Pakistan the capability to go over Arabian seas for massive anti ship role. Secondly this bomber can be leveraged to go into chinese airspace and strike from north avoiding airdefences and around srilanka and back over arabean sea...

    in wave attacks once pakistan take out air defenses or FoB at a standby range they can go for deep strikes and turn back..
     
  9. Pakistani Fighter

    Pakistani Fighter SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,801
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,524 / -4
    We need Destroyers with Long Range SAMs. India has about 14 Destroyers. We need about 6 Type 052Ds.

    I would give H6Ks to Pakistan Navy for Anti Ship Role
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. sparten

    sparten SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,660
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1,081 / -0
    Probably not, but the general point that hypersonic weapons which are coming online are too big to be carried on fighter-sized aircraft remains.
     
  11. maverick1977

    maverick1977 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,599
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,680 / -0
    how long is pakistangoing to act like a coward state... the word defence never works.. the only thing in a war an emery understands is offense ... instead of fightingn war on your territory, pakiatan ahould plan to fight war on enemy territory.. for crying out loud, are we going to say that our nukes are for defensive purposes.. how about pakistan start selling bangals to enemy troops..

    it will give 3 times the load carrying capacity of P3Cs and is at the same class at P8I of Indian Navy .. will create a completw blocakage of Indian navy or its destruction in Arabian sea ..
    secondly, the mischievous weatern coubtry Isreal will know that this plane can go in Saudi and can atrike with standby weapons and be back, more capacity than an BM

    it will be a great plane for anti terrorist role, whereas Pakistan could have completely destroyed Daesh with them, couldve protected their spread, for massive airdrops .. 16 to 18 of these could deploy whole unit or two with heavy weapons and followed by logistical support.

    Omara, Turbat will be the best location for their deploymebt
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2020
  12. Pakistani Fighter

    Pakistani Fighter SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,801
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,524 / -4
    P3C and P8I are MPA. H6K is a bomber
     
  13. maverick1977

    maverick1977 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,599
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,680 / -0
    sorry, china has them for anti ship role with 10 to 12 C802s deployed in that configuration
     
  14. Shabi1

    Shabi1 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,523
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Ratings:
    +5 / 2,214 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I agree we need a missile truck for naval anti surface role to launch saturated missile strikes to overwhelm defences. Even a pair of H-6Ks when inducted would pack a huge offensive punch. Karakoram AWACs could designate targets and vector fighters for air cover.

    H-6K is good but the P-3C does a similar job with Harpoons. PN has a jet LRMP program for which there was a recent tender. A off the shelf jet will be procured which would be refitted for MPA use and likely since this is a customized solution we could likely have it with the ability to carry Raad-2 or Chinese antiship missiles.

    So this role is something PN has intentions of fulling but with a rather multirole platform instead of purely specialized.
     
  15. Pakistani Fighter

    Pakistani Fighter SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,801
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,524 / -4
    Do they have radars to lock ships? What about Anti Sub role?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1