• Tuesday, December 10, 2019

“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

Discussion in 'Middle East & Africa' started by t-birds, Aug 21, 2014.

  1. t-birds

    t-birds FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    320
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Ratings:
    +0 / 226 / -0
    “Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
    The Infamous "Oded Yinon Plan". Introduction by Michel Chossudovsky

    “Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East | Global Research

    The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment.

    According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

    upload_2014-8-21_17-57-44.png

    When viewed in the current context, the war on Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing war on Syria, not to mention the process of regime change in Egypt, must be understood in relation to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East. The latter consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of an Israeli expansionist project.

    “Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates.

    The Zionist project supports the Jewish settlement movement. More broadly it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine leading to the eventual annexation of both the West Bank and Gaza to the State of Israel.

    Greater Israel would create a number of proxy States. It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. (See map).

    According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article, The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:

    “[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.

    Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.


    The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.

    [​IMG]

    Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.

    “The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation… This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)

    Viewed in this context, the war on Syria is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion. Israeli intelligence working hand in glove with the US, Turkey and NATO is directly supportive of the Al Qaeda terrorist mercenaries inside Syria.

    The Zionist Project also requires the destabilization of Egypt, the creation of factional divisions within Egypt as instrumented by the “Arab Spring” leading to the formation of a sectarian based State dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood.





     
  2. Audio

    Audio SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,422
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 3,352 / -5
    Country:
    Switzerland
    Location:
    Slovenia
    That's some bad planner drawing that map no doubt. He took northern Saudi desert, but stopped short of taking the full "fertile crescent" between Euphrates and Tigris.
     
  3. BestUsernameEver

    BestUsernameEver FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    232
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 206 / -0
    Country:
    Holy See (vatican City State)
    Location:
    Holy See (vatican City State)
    There are at least 2 different versions of greater israel.

    The one already posted above:
    [​IMG]

    And this one:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The second version would at least border the fertile crescent...
     
  4. TankMan

    TankMan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,213
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2014
    Ratings:
    +57 / 5,939 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    There's no doubt that the US,NATO and Israel cause and fund instability in the middle east. It could be for this plan or it could be for some other. I'm still a bit sceptical of the theory that "ISIS is supported by the US". They caused the formation of ISIS, no doubt, but It doesn't look like they're directly supporting them. To me it looks more like the US didn't expect the militants to unite like this. ISIS is gaining power rapidly and they're united under their "Caliphate". Unity among the muslim militants is the opposite of what the "zionists" would want.

    Unless the plan is to unite all the militants and then suddenly destroy their command structure, there would be more chaos and it might give the zionists an advantage. But they already have so many advantages, this is pointless.

    Another theory would be that the formation of ISIS threatens US/NATO/Israeli interests, so they had some of their own people join ISIS and make them look like horrible villains by beheading people and all that stuff.

    Whatever the plan is, it is definitely bad for Muslims and the Middle East.
     
  5. Jf Thunder

    Jf Thunder ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,543
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Ratings:
    +6 / 8,018 / -10
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    everyone knows this, i think
     
  6. rockstar08

    rockstar08 BANNED

    Messages:
    11,117
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Ratings:
    +16 / 10,962 / -32
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    i will not be surprised if they took all this land
     
  7. TankMan

    TankMan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,213
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2014
    Ratings:
    +57 / 5,939 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The West bank? You mean the place where Palestinian suicide homes have been charging into peaceful Israeli bulldozers?

    Israel withdrew from the Sinai because of the Egyptian offensive to retake the land that belonged to them in the first place.

    Even if they withdrew from Gaza, they kept it under siege. Trying to starve your neighbour is not very peaceful.

    Again, South Lebanon never belonged to them.

    Israelis are not stupid, keeping South Lebanon or the Sinai would have resulted in constant insurgency and resistance movements, which would make Israel unstable from the Inside. This is one of the reasons I am skeptical of this "Greater Israel" theory, but there is no denying that Israel and the US have been creating and funding militants in the region. Whatever their plan is, it isn't peace.
     
  8. A.P. Richelieu

    A.P. Richelieu SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,558
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Ratings:
    +10 / 3,643 / -3
    Country:
    Sweden
    Location:
    Sweden
    Israel withdrew from Sinai, because the value of a Peace Agreement with Egypt had a higher value than
    keeping Sinai. This happened several years after the 73 War.
    This alone shows that the "Greater Israel" is not something that is relevant in Israeli policy.
    Obviously there are strong forces in right-wing Israeli politics that want to keep control over the West Bank,
    but "Greater Israel" is only in the mind of *maybe* a few fanatics without importance.
    Probably more people (and saner) that believe they are Napoleon.
     
  9. raptor22

    raptor22 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,930
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Ratings:
    +9 / 11,043 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    If those lands belong to you then you should not have withdrawn from them, a true patriot doesn't do that.
    And if those lands don't belong to you then you should not have invaded them in the first place to consider withdrawing from them as a peace loving gesture later on.
    You occupied those lands that's why you gave them up to get peace, but still there are lands that need to be returned in order to have a true permanent peace.
     
  10. Syrian Lion

    Syrian Lion SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,264
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Ratings:
    +3 / 13,628 / -0
    Country:
    Syrian Arab Republic
    Location:
    Syrian Arab Republic
    Israel have reach their goal, they prayed over the rivers in Iraq when the US invaded Iraq in 2003, now they have their own proxies in Syria such as F$A terrorists and their AQ partners...
     
  11. A.P. Richelieu

    A.P. Richelieu SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,558
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Ratings:
    +10 / 3,643 / -3
    Country:
    Sweden
    Location:
    Sweden
    In war, you do what is neccessary to win (within certain limits),
    and sometimes you do things to get bargaining chips.
    Sinai turned out to be a big bargaining chip, even if this was maybe not the intention from the beginning.
     
  12. C130

    C130 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,095
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2014
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,359 / -5
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    well that would be a Zionists wet dream
    :rofl:
     
  13. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,134 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    PDF at its best yet again. :lol:

    How many times have this useless map been posted? Israel will never formally annex any land from any Arab country or people other than what they have already taken from the defenseless Palestinians. Forget about acquiring most of the new land from annexing Saudi Arabian territory (Northern Hijaz and the Northern regions of KSA that historically have been a part of the nearby Levant) or Egyptian one. The Jews (real Hebrews) in what is now Hijaz and other regions of KSA were already assimilated, converted, migrated or were combated violently (when they declared their hostility) almost 1500 years ago.

    Give me a break.
     
  14. Echo_419

    Echo_419 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    13,132
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 9,552 / -6
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    Not to forget you guys are the only one capable of putting up a fight with Israel & also you are allies