What's new

Govt supports prosecution of Subramanian Swamy for promoting hatred between Hindus, Muslims

INDIAPOSITIVE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 20, 2014
7,367
-6
7,539
Country
India
Location
India
New Delhi: Justifying before theSupreme Courtretention of penal provision for hate speeches and pitching for stern action against the defaulters, the Modi government on Tuesday recommended prosecution of BJP leaderSubramanian Swamyfor promotinghatredbetweenHindusand Muslims.

In a surprising turn of events, the government has told the Supreme Court that a book on terrorism authored by the BJP's firebrand leader is behind this provocation.

The affidavit filed by the government today was in response to Swamy's petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Indian Penal Code Section 153A on the grounds that it violates free speech.

Also Read: Sonia Gandhi vows to fight "diabolical design" of hate mongers

According to a report published in TOI, Swamy had earlier challenged before the SC various provisions of the Indian Penal Code dealing with offences of 'hate speech', saying they were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech.

Swamy had contended in his plea that Sections 153, 153A,153B, 295, 295A, 298 and 505 of the IPC in respect of so-called "hate speech" were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

Government's recommendation, against one of the senior BJP leaders, has come at a time when the governing body itself is being criticised for not being able to rein in its ministers and leaders of ruling party who are making provocative speeches.

As per the report, the Centre further said that the validity of the penal provisions cannot be questioned as the Constitution allows reasonable restriction on citizen's right to freedom of speech and the provisions are meant to maintain peace and harmony in the society.

Also Read:SC stays execution of non-bailable warrant against Swamy over 'hate speech'

"It is respectfully submitted that our country is inhabited by persons belonging to different religions, castes and classes. Our Constitution is base upon the principle that persons of all castes, creed and religion must live together in harmony and that in the long run prosperity and salvation are in union and not in division," the Centre told the court.

Notably, Swamy is also facing various criminal proceedings in Delhi, Mumbai, Assam, Mohali and Kerala for expressing views on terrorism which was termed as hate speech under the IPC provisions. He alleged that the provisions dealing with offences of 'hate speech' were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and were being were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

However, opposing Swamy's plea, the Centre said "the provisions are very clear and neither too widely worded nor is indefinite and intended to punish those who either attempt to promote class hatread or class enmity,"

It also justified criminal proceedings against Swamy saying "he made hate speech against a community" in his book. "The book is to be considered in all its aspects as it contains matter which promotes feeling of enmity and hatred between Hindus and Muslims in India. Therefore the petitioner has violated Sections of IPC," the affidavit said.

Section 153 deals with provoking people with the intent to cause riot and Section 153A talks about promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc. Section 295 makes injuring or defiling places of worship with the intent to insult the religion of any class an offence. Section 298 covers cases of hurting religious sentiments deliberately.

Agreeing to decide constitutional validity of penal provision in respect of hate speech, the Supreme Court in July had issued notice to Centre and sought its response.

Swamy in his petition contended that under the present law, a person couldn't attempt to initiate a public debate to modify people's perception as the person was "chilled or gagged" under the present law.

Govt supports prosecution of Subramanian Swamy for promoting hatred between Hindus, Muslims | Zee News
 
May 10, 2013
18,420
7
30,273
Country
India
Location
India
New Delhi: Justifying before theSupreme Courtretention of penal provision for hate speeches and pitching for stern action against the defaulters, the Modi government on Tuesday recommended prosecution of BJP leaderSubramanian Swamyfor promotinghatredbetweenHindusand Muslims.

In a surprising turn of events, the government has told the Supreme Court that a book on terrorism authored by the BJP's firebrand leader is behind this provocation.

The affidavit filed by the government today was in response to Swamy's petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Indian Penal Code Section 153A on the grounds that it violates free speech.

Also Read: Sonia Gandhi vows to fight "diabolical design" of hate mongers

According to a report published in TOI, Swamy had earlier challenged before the SC various provisions of the Indian Penal Code dealing with offences of 'hate speech', saying they were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech.

Swamy had contended in his plea that Sections 153, 153A,153B, 295, 295A, 298 and 505 of the IPC in respect of so-called "hate speech" were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

Government's recommendation, against one of the senior BJP leaders, has come at a time when the governing body itself is being criticised for not being able to rein in its ministers and leaders of ruling party who are making provocative speeches.

As per the report, the Centre further said that the validity of the penal provisions cannot be questioned as the Constitution allows reasonable restriction on citizen's right to freedom of speech and the provisions are meant to maintain peace and harmony in the society.

Also Read:SC stays execution of non-bailable warrant against Swamy over 'hate speech'

"It is respectfully submitted that our country is inhabited by persons belonging to different religions, castes and classes. Our Constitution is base upon the principle that persons of all castes, creed and religion must live together in harmony and that in the long run prosperity and salvation are in union and not in division," the Centre told the court.

Notably, Swamy is also facing various criminal proceedings in Delhi, Mumbai, Assam, Mohali and Kerala for expressing views on terrorism which was termed as hate speech under the IPC provisions. He alleged that the provisions dealing with offences of 'hate speech' were violative of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and were being were used to penalise people for expressing their views even within the bounds of reasonable restrictions and they should be set aside.

However, opposing Swamy's plea, the Centre said "the provisions are very clear and neither too widely worded nor is indefinite and intended to punish those who either attempt to promote class hatread or class enmity,"

It also justified criminal proceedings against Swamy saying "he made hate speech against a community" in his book. "The book is to be considered in all its aspects as it contains matter which promotes feeling of enmity and hatred between Hindus and Muslims in India. Therefore the petitioner has violated Sections of IPC," the affidavit said.

Section 153 deals with provoking people with the intent to cause riot and Section 153A talks about promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc. Section 295 makes injuring or defiling places of worship with the intent to insult the religion of any class an offence. Section 298 covers cases of hurting religious sentiments deliberately.

Agreeing to decide constitutional validity of penal provision in respect of hate speech, the Supreme Court in July had issued notice to Centre and sought its response.

Swamy in his petition contended that under the present law, a person couldn't attempt to initiate a public debate to modify people's perception as the person was "chilled or gagged" under the present law.

Govt supports prosecution of Subramanian Swamy for promoting hatred between Hindus, Muslims | Zee News
LOL at the title by Zee. :haha:
 

Sky lord

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 20, 2015
3,149
1
4,254
Country
India
Location
India
Swami wanted the hate speech law to go and filed a petition to SC. He plans to go on a rampage. :D

You know what he will do with true freedom of expression. :devil:
OK :tup:

So something like those very publicized ghar wapsi events to bring attention to the anti conversion laws!

Hmmm...you guys are sneaky.
 

rubyjackass

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 29, 2008
3,610
0
2,044
Country
India
Location
India
I am with Swamy on this. Laws banning hate speech should be there. But the definition of hate speech is being twisted in India to even ban reasonable criticism of religious practices for example.
It should be the society's responsibility to ignore and set aside religion-baiters/bigots. Not the government's. Similarly it should be society's responsibility to ignore blasphemers and not kill them. After all one religion is blasphemous to another.
 

rubyjackass

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 29, 2008
3,610
0
2,044
Country
India
Location
India
Ask what Islamists think about Ahmedis. What radical Hindus think about cousin marriage(it is banned by Hindu personal law) more common among muslims. What Christians think about entering a temple(akin to idol worship and multiple God worship).
 

raktaka

BANNED
Oct 16, 2015
910
-1
899
Country
India
Location
India
Ask what Islamists think about Ahmedis. What radical Hindus think about cousin marriage(it is banned by Hindu personal law) more common among muslims. What Christians think about entering a temple(akin to idol worship and multiple God worship).
If cousin marriage is banned by Hindu personal law then how does this "radical hindu" come into the picture ?


"Radicle hindu" what ever that means wants cousins to marry ? :cheesy:
 

ranjeet

BANNED
Jun 7, 2013
18,313
-59
39,030
Country
India
Location
India
It is practiced. Frowned upon. Not blasphemous. Hence my point stands.

Btw, I agree with Subbu Swami on this. Hate speech law is lame.


Already returned awards. Nothing left anymore. :cray:
I want Shobha De to come out and support swamy on this one.
 

LaBong

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 4, 2010
8,506
3
8,166
Country
India
Location
India
There shouldn't be a law banning hate speech since a person is entitled to his/her hatred.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top