What's new

Fudging Figures - Comparson of First 9 Quarters of PMLN & PTI Government

muhammadhafeezmalik

FULL MEMBER
Jan 21, 2015
724
-6
640
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people about the true state of economy.


The debt trap, coupled with the prolonged state of stagflation, rising poverty and high unemployment, has become a serious threat for the economic security of Pakistan. Inconsistent policies, uncertainties, high costs of doing business and chronic circular debt have resulted in contraction after 68 years in the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $51 billion, bringing down economic gains of the past. Fiscal shocks have ballooned to an alarming level.


The country witnessed highest GDP growth in 11 years of 5.8 percent (provisionally revised by the PTI government to 5.53 percent) in 2018, the last fiscal year of the PML-N government. This was based on impressive growth in agriculture, industrial and services sectors. During the first two years of PTI’s government, economic meltdown has pushed down the GDP to 1.9 percent in fiscal year 2019 and to negative 0.38 percent in fiscal year 2020, having an average growth of 0.76 percent per annum. With the annual population growth of 2.4 percent, the current scenario is dangerous and unsustainable.


On November 14, the prime minister finance advisor publicly released official figures of net external debt, actual Forex reserves with State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), overall liabilities impact and external debt serviced with a comparison of first nine quarters of the PTI government with the last nine quarters of the PML-N government. By presenting such comparisons, the government created a false analogy, contrasting two different periods. Despite this, the finance advisor stated, “The PTI government has incurred 48 percent less external liabilities and 78 percent more debt servicing in its first nine quarters compared to last nine quarters of the PML-N government.” Unfortunately, the figures quoted by the finance advisor are selective, misleading and fudged. They neither reflect the true picture of the economy, nor present a fair comparison.


The following comparison depicts true position of first nine quarters of the PML-N government (June 30, 2013 to September 30, 2015) as opposed to the first nine quarters of the PTI government (June 30, 2018 to September 30, 2020):


Net External Debt (increase)


PML-N government: $5.557 billion


PTI government: $18.566 billion


Increase/Decrease (-) in SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $10.107 billion


PTI government: $-3.420 billion


Overall Liabilities Impact


PML-N government: $-4.550 billion


PTI government: $21.986 billion


Actual SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $13.860 Billion


PTI government: $ -0.620 Billion


(Source: SBP)


The finance advisor misstated SBP Forex Reserves figures to diminish impact of high external liabilities in the PTI government versus PML-N government, which is illogical and ethically wrong.


SBP’s borrowing from commercial banks under SWAPS/forward arrangements have surged to an alarming level of $8.774 billion as of September 30, 2020 which include Chinese currency SWAPS of $3 billion as per SBP Annual Report 2019-20.



The PTI government should have a clear goal to achieve the level of different macroeconomic indicators which were left by the PML-N in 2018
While calculating the actual Forex Reserves figure with SBP as on September 30, 2020, stock of SWAPS amounting to $8.774 billion as well as showcase deposits from Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. which stood at $4 billion have not been taken into account by the finance advisor. Therefore, net of SWAPS and showcase deposits, the actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at negative $620 million, as opposed to the publicly declared figure of $12.154 billion on September 30, 2020. The actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at $2.80 billion, i.e. Gross Reserves $9.765 billion less SWAPS $6.965 billion as on June 30, 2018. Therefore, the PTI government depleted $3.420 billion during its first nine quarters which ended on September 30, 2020 as opposed to an increase of $2.4 billion which has been misstated by the finance advisor in his tweet.


According to SBP, during first the nine quarters of PTI’s government, outstanding external debt grew from $95.23 billion on June 30, 2018 to $113.80 billion on September 30, 2020. Therefore, there was an increase of $18.57 billion in net external debt and when the aforesaid SBP forex reserves depletion of negative $3.42 billion is taken into account, the overall external liabilities impact stood at $21.99 billion. Consequently, the figure $ 16.11 billion of Overall External Liabilities Impact quoted by finance advisor is understated by $5.88 billion.


SBP forex reserves, net of SWAPS, stood at $3.75 billion (SBP Forex Reserves $6.008 billion less SWAPS $ 2.255 billion) on June 30, 2013. Whereas, this figure increased to $13.86 billion on September 30, 2015 (SBP Forex Reserves $15.245 billion less SWAPS $ 1.385 billion). Consequently, there was an increase of $ 10.11 billion in actual SBP forex reserves during first nine quarters of the PML-N government from which when deducted the net increase in the same period of external debt of $5.56 billion (outstanding stock of external debt $66.46 billion on September 30, 2015 less $60.90 billion on June 30, 2013 in first nine quarters of PML-N government), there has been a reduction of $4.550 billion in Overall External Liabilities Impact, as opposed to an increase of $18.56 billion (outstanding stock of 113.80 billion on September 30, 2020 less $95.24 billion on June 30, 2018) in first nine quarters of the PTI government.


It has been proved above with official SBP figures that both increase of $2.4 billion in SBP Forex Reserves as well as Overall Liabilities Impact of $16.1 billion figures have been misquoted by the finance advisor and the correct figures are negative $3.42 billion and $21.99 billion respectively.


Let us examine now the financial advisor’s last celebrative claim of External Debt Serviced figure of $29.7 billion by the PTI government during its first nine quarters to September 30, 2020. It appears that the advisor purposely did not disclose the detail of new external borrowings during the same period. When he has chosen to give only the figure of net increase of $18.5 billion in external debt during first nine quarters of the PTI government, then the External Debt Serviced is automatically taken care of as the PTI government has borrowed new external debt of $48.33 billion out of which repaid external debt of $ 29.77 billion, leaving a net increase $18.57 billion in external debt from $95.23 billion to $113.80 billion. Therefore, the advisor’s claim in this regard is redundant and irrelevant.


The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people as to the true state of economy, including SBP Forex Reserves, instead of focusing on boosting the GDP growth of the country, at least more than the Population Growth Rate of 2.4 percent, reduce inflation (CPI) which has jumped from four percent to above 10 percent, bring down food inflation which has shot up from two percent to around 15 percent and take measures to reduce massive unemployment and abject poverty. In the first phase, the PTI government should have a clear goal to achieve the level of different macroeconomic indicators which were left by PML-N in 2018 when the PTI took over the economy, but sadly grounded it well before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out and it only added salt to the economic injury.

The author, a UK Fellow Chartered Accountant, is former finance minister of Pakistan and former leader of opposition in the Senate of Pakistan. He can be contacted on Twitter @MIshaqDar50

 
Last edited:

Imad.Khan

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 24, 2015
6,302
9
9,082
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
The author, a UK Fellow Chartered Accountant, is former finance minister of Pakistan and former leader of opposition in the Senate of Pakistan. He can be contacted on Twitter @MIshaqDar50

Lol Ishaq Dar, the fudge master himself




And watch this video in which they explain it in detail

And check out what Business recorder have to say about him

The story of "impressive" performance of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) during the period 2013-18 needs a through probe. The jadoogar [magician] Ishaq Dar, we all know, is said to be master of figure fudging, for his shenanigans Pakistan was fined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) way back in 1999. Huge refunds blocked during Dar's tenure have not been paid till today. Now, the crafty tax bureaucrats, hoodwinking the Government of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lacking experience to deal with them, have acquired a new weapon to undo already created/paid refunds by amending the Sales Tax Rules through SRO 1320(I)/2018, issued on November 2, 2018.

 

TheSnakeEatingMarkhur

FULL MEMBER
Dec 26, 2018
1,223
0
1,144
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people about the true state of economy.


The debt trap, coupled with the prolonged state of stagflation, rising poverty and high unemployment, has become a serious threat for the economic security of Pakistan. Inconsistent policies, uncertainties, high costs of doing business and chronic circular debt have resulted in contraction after 68 years in the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $51 billion, bringing down economic gains of the past. Fiscal shocks have ballooned to an alarming level.


The country witnessed highest GDP growth in 11 years of 5.8 percent (provisionally revised by the PTI government to 5.53 percent) in 2018, the last fiscal year of the PML-N government. This was based on impressive growth in agriculture, industrial and services sectors. During the first two years of PTI’s government, economic meltdown has pushed down the GDP to 1.9 percent in fiscal year 2019 and to negative 0.38 percent in fiscal year 2020, having an average growth of 0.76 percent per annum. With the annual population growth of 2.4 percent, the current scenario is dangerous and unsustainable.


On November 14, the prime minister finance advisor publicly released official figures of net external debt, actual Forex reserves with State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), overall liabilities impact and external debt serviced with a comparison of first nine quarters of the PTI government with the last nine quarters of the PML-N government. By presenting such comparisons, the government created a false analogy, contrasting two different periods. Despite this, the finance advisor stated, “The PTI government has incurred 48 percent less external liabilities and 78 percent more debt servicing in its first nine quarters compared to last nine quarters of the PML-N government.” Unfortunately, the figures quoted by the finance advisor are selective, misleading and fudged. They neither reflect the true picture of the economy, nor present a fair comparison.


The following comparison depicts true position of first nine quarters of the PML-N government (June 30, 2013 to September 30, 2015) as opposed to the first nine quarters of the PTI government (June 30, 2018 to September 30, 2020):


Net External Debt (increase)


PML-N government: $5.557 billion


PTI government: $18.566 billion


Increase/Decrease (-) in SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $10.107 billion


PTI government: $-3.420 billion


Overall Liabilities Impact


PML-N government: $-4.550 billion


PTI government: $21.986 billion


Actual SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $13.860 Billion


PTI government: $ -0.620 Billion


(Source: SBP)


The finance advisor misstated SBP Forex Reserves figures to diminish impact of high external liabilities in the PTI government versus PML-N government, which is illogical and ethically wrong.


SBP’s borrowing from commercial banks under SWAPS/forward arrangements have surged to an alarming level of $8.774 billion as of September 30, 2020 which include Chinese currency SWAPS of $3 billion as per SBP Annual Report 2019-20.




While calculating the actual Forex Reserves figure with SBP as on September 30, 2020, stock of SWAPS amounting to $8.774 billion as well as showcase deposits from Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. which stood at $4 billion have not been taken into account by the finance advisor. Therefore, net of SWAPS and showcase deposits, the actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at negative $620 million, as opposed to the publicly declared figure of $12.154 billion on September 30, 2020. The actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at $2.80 billion, i.e. Gross Reserves $9.765 billion less SWAPS $6.965 billion as on June 30, 2018. Therefore, the PTI government depleted $3.420 billion during its first nine quarters which ended on September 30, 2020 as opposed to an increase of $2.4 billion which has been misstated by the finance advisor in his tweet.


According to SBP, during first the nine quarters of PTI’s government, outstanding external debt grew from $95.23 billion on June 30, 2018 to $113.80 billion on September 30, 2020. Therefore, there was an increase of $18.57 billion in net external debt and when the aforesaid SBP forex reserves depletion of negative $3.42 billion is taken into account, the overall external liabilities impact stood at $21.99 billion. Consequently, the figure $ 16.11 billion of Overall External Liabilities Impact quoted by finance advisor is understated by $5.88 billion.


SBP forex reserves, net of SWAPS, stood at $3.75 billion (SBP Forex Reserves $6.008 billion less SWAPS $ 2.255 billion) on June 30, 2013. Whereas, this figure increased to $13.86 billion on September 30, 2015 (SBP Forex Reserves $15.245 billion less SWAPS $ 1.385 billion). Consequently, there was an increase of $ 10.11 billion in actual SBP forex reserves during first nine quarters of the PML-N government from which when deducted the net increase in the same period of external debt of $5.56 billion (outstanding stock of external debt $66.46 billion on September 30, 2015 less $60.90 billion on June 30, 2013 in first nine quarters of PML-N government), there has been a reduction of $4.550 billion in Overall External Liabilities Impact, as opposed to an increase of $18.56 billion (outstanding stock of 113.80 billion on September 30, 2020 less $95.24 billion on June 30, 2018) in first nine quarters of the PTI government.


It has been proved above with official SBP figures that both increase of $2.4 billion in SBP Forex Reserves as well as Overall Liabilities Impact of $16.1 billion figures have been misquoted by the finance advisor and the correct figures are negative $3.42 billion and $21.99 billion respectively.


Let us examine now the financial advisor’s last celebrative claim of External Debt Serviced figure of $29.7 billion by the PTI government during its first nine quarters to September 30, 2020. It appears that the advisor purposely did not disclose the detail of new external borrowings during the same period. When he has chosen to give only the figure of net increase of $18.5 billion in external debt during first nine quarters of the PTI government, then the External Debt Serviced is automatically taken care of as the PTI government has borrowed new external debt of $48.33 billion out of which repaid external debt of $ 29.77 billion, leaving a net increase $18.57 billion in external debt from $95.23 billion to $113.80 billion. Therefore, the advisor’s claim in this regard is redundant and irrelevant.


The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people as to the true state of economy, including SBP Forex Reserves, instead of focusing on boosting the GDP growth of the country, at least more than the Population Growth Rate of 2.4 percent, reduce inflation (CPI) which has jumped from four percent to above 10 percent, bring down food inflation which has shot up from two percent to around 15 percent and take measures to reduce massive unemployment and abject poverty. In the first phase, the PTI government should have a clear goal to achieve the level of different macroeconomic indicators which were left by PML-N in 2018 when the PTI took over the economy, but sadly grounded it well before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out and it only added salt to the economic injury.

The author, a UK Fellow Chartered Accountant, is former finance minister of Pakistan and former leader of opposition in the Senate of Pakistan. He can be contacted on Twitter @MIshaqDar50

Patwari bahi we have all seen how hard you try show it as if it was PTIs fault these are all "gale sare" fruits of PMLNs blunder biggest being keeping dollar exchange rate artificially low which kept export based economy a dream only... instead we relied on huge amount of loans and and even the loans were used to give unaccounted subsidies...

Pakistan's net external debt increase
From 52 Billion to 94 Billion in PMLN while PTI is projected to add to it another 35 billion so stop this Quater per Quater BS to hide you dirty face and show the whole picture..

And lets also not forget how Nawazu left exchequer empty just to undermine PTI... Reserves were near to nil when Nawazu went..
 

Dark1

BANNED
Feb 29, 2020
1,321
-21
873
Country
India
Location
India
Why expect economic performance from a ex cricketer ?
Whats his expertise in managing the economy or a business ? None.
At best he could have been made the sports minister.
Nawaz was a experienced businessman and its obvious he had the necessary savviness to run a country.
 

Black.Mamba

FULL MEMBER
Oct 16, 2020
347
0
843
Country
Pakistan
Location
Germany
The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people about the true state of economy.


The debt trap, coupled with the prolonged state of stagflation, rising poverty and high unemployment, has become a serious threat for the economic security of Pakistan. Inconsistent policies, uncertainties, high costs of doing business and chronic circular debt have resulted in contraction after 68 years in the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $51 billion, bringing down economic gains of the past. Fiscal shocks have ballooned to an alarming level.


The country witnessed highest GDP growth in 11 years of 5.8 percent (provisionally revised by the PTI government to 5.53 percent) in 2018, the last fiscal year of the PML-N government. This was based on impressive growth in agriculture, industrial and services sectors. During the first two years of PTI’s government, economic meltdown has pushed down the GDP to 1.9 percent in fiscal year 2019 and to negative 0.38 percent in fiscal year 2020, having an average growth of 0.76 percent per annum. With the annual population growth of 2.4 percent, the current scenario is dangerous and unsustainable.


On November 14, the prime minister finance advisor publicly released official figures of net external debt, actual Forex reserves with State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), overall liabilities impact and external debt serviced with a comparison of first nine quarters of the PTI government with the last nine quarters of the PML-N government. By presenting such comparisons, the government created a false analogy, contrasting two different periods. Despite this, the finance advisor stated, “The PTI government has incurred 48 percent less external liabilities and 78 percent more debt servicing in its first nine quarters compared to last nine quarters of the PML-N government.” Unfortunately, the figures quoted by the finance advisor are selective, misleading and fudged. They neither reflect the true picture of the economy, nor present a fair comparison.


The following comparison depicts true position of first nine quarters of the PML-N government (June 30, 2013 to September 30, 2015) as opposed to the first nine quarters of the PTI government (June 30, 2018 to September 30, 2020):


Net External Debt (increase)


PML-N government: $5.557 billion


PTI government: $18.566 billion


Increase/Decrease (-) in SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $10.107 billion


PTI government: $-3.420 billion


Overall Liabilities Impact


PML-N government: $-4.550 billion


PTI government: $21.986 billion


Actual SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $13.860 Billion


PTI government: $ -0.620 Billion


(Source: SBP)


The finance advisor misstated SBP Forex Reserves figures to diminish impact of high external liabilities in the PTI government versus PML-N government, which is illogical and ethically wrong.


SBP’s borrowing from commercial banks under SWAPS/forward arrangements have surged to an alarming level of $8.774 billion as of September 30, 2020 which include Chinese currency SWAPS of $3 billion as per SBP Annual Report 2019-20.




While calculating the actual Forex Reserves figure with SBP as on September 30, 2020, stock of SWAPS amounting to $8.774 billion as well as showcase deposits from Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. which stood at $4 billion have not been taken into account by the finance advisor. Therefore, net of SWAPS and showcase deposits, the actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at negative $620 million, as opposed to the publicly declared figure of $12.154 billion on September 30, 2020. The actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at $2.80 billion, i.e. Gross Reserves $9.765 billion less SWAPS $6.965 billion as on June 30, 2018. Therefore, the PTI government depleted $3.420 billion during its first nine quarters which ended on September 30, 2020 as opposed to an increase of $2.4 billion which has been misstated by the finance advisor in his tweet.


According to SBP, during first the nine quarters of PTI’s government, outstanding external debt grew from $95.23 billion on June 30, 2018 to $113.80 billion on September 30, 2020. Therefore, there was an increase of $18.57 billion in net external debt and when the aforesaid SBP forex reserves depletion of negative $3.42 billion is taken into account, the overall external liabilities impact stood at $21.99 billion. Consequently, the figure $ 16.11 billion of Overall External Liabilities Impact quoted by finance advisor is understated by $5.88 billion.


SBP forex reserves, net of SWAPS, stood at $3.75 billion (SBP Forex Reserves $6.008 billion less SWAPS $ 2.255 billion) on June 30, 2013. Whereas, this figure increased to $13.86 billion on September 30, 2015 (SBP Forex Reserves $15.245 billion less SWAPS $ 1.385 billion). Consequently, there was an increase of $ 10.11 billion in actual SBP forex reserves during first nine quarters of the PML-N government from which when deducted the net increase in the same period of external debt of $5.56 billion (outstanding stock of external debt $66.46 billion on September 30, 2015 less $60.90 billion on June 30, 2013 in first nine quarters of PML-N government), there has been a reduction of $4.550 billion in Overall External Liabilities Impact, as opposed to an increase of $18.56 billion (outstanding stock of 113.80 billion on September 30, 2020 less $95.24 billion on June 30, 2018) in first nine quarters of the PTI government.


It has been proved above with official SBP figures that both increase of $2.4 billion in SBP Forex Reserves as well as Overall Liabilities Impact of $16.1 billion figures have been misquoted by the finance advisor and the correct figures are negative $3.42 billion and $21.99 billion respectively.


Let us examine now the financial advisor’s last celebrative claim of External Debt Serviced figure of $29.7 billion by the PTI government during its first nine quarters to September 30, 2020. It appears that the advisor purposely did not disclose the detail of new external borrowings during the same period. When he has chosen to give only the figure of net increase of $18.5 billion in external debt during first nine quarters of the PTI government, then the External Debt Serviced is automatically taken care of as the PTI government has borrowed new external debt of $48.33 billion out of which repaid external debt of $ 29.77 billion, leaving a net increase $18.57 billion in external debt from $95.23 billion to $113.80 billion. Therefore, the advisor’s claim in this regard is redundant and irrelevant.


The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people as to the true state of economy, including SBP Forex Reserves, instead of focusing on boosting the GDP growth of the country, at least more than the Population Growth Rate of 2.4 percent, reduce inflation (CPI) which has jumped from four percent to above 10 percent, bring down food inflation which has shot up from two percent to around 15 percent and take measures to reduce massive unemployment and abject poverty. In the first phase, the PTI government should have a clear goal to achieve the level of different macroeconomic indicators which were left by PML-N in 2018 when the PTI took over the economy, but sadly grounded it well before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out and it only added salt to the economic injury.

The author, a UK Fellow Chartered Accountant, is former finance minister of Pakistan and former leader of opposition in the Senate of Pakistan. He can be contacted on Twitter @MIshaqDar50

Dude the amount of threads you post everyday against PTI and in favour of PML N, makes me believe you do it as a job!? And how much do you get paid is it like a retainership or hourly or based on per thread you post? Genuinely asking as I am thinking of making a career shift so maybe some information from you might push me to make this shift.

Why expect economic performance from a ex cricketer ?
Whats his expertise in managing the economy or a business ? None.
At best he could have been made the sports minister.
Nawaz was a experienced businessman and its obvious he had the necessary savviness to run a country.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: And then they say India ranks low on happiness index
 
Last edited:

Norwegian

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 19, 2014
13,109
9
20,256
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people about the true state of economy.


The debt trap, coupled with the prolonged state of stagflation, rising poverty and high unemployment, has become a serious threat for the economic security of Pakistan. Inconsistent policies, uncertainties, high costs of doing business and chronic circular debt have resulted in contraction after 68 years in the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $51 billion, bringing down economic gains of the past. Fiscal shocks have ballooned to an alarming level.


The country witnessed highest GDP growth in 11 years of 5.8 percent (provisionally revised by the PTI government to 5.53 percent) in 2018, the last fiscal year of the PML-N government. This was based on impressive growth in agriculture, industrial and services sectors. During the first two years of PTI’s government, economic meltdown has pushed down the GDP to 1.9 percent in fiscal year 2019 and to negative 0.38 percent in fiscal year 2020, having an average growth of 0.76 percent per annum. With the annual population growth of 2.4 percent, the current scenario is dangerous and unsustainable.


On November 14, the prime minister finance advisor publicly released official figures of net external debt, actual Forex reserves with State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), overall liabilities impact and external debt serviced with a comparison of first nine quarters of the PTI government with the last nine quarters of the PML-N government. By presenting such comparisons, the government created a false analogy, contrasting two different periods. Despite this, the finance advisor stated, “The PTI government has incurred 48 percent less external liabilities and 78 percent more debt servicing in its first nine quarters compared to last nine quarters of the PML-N government.” Unfortunately, the figures quoted by the finance advisor are selective, misleading and fudged. They neither reflect the true picture of the economy, nor present a fair comparison.


The following comparison depicts true position of first nine quarters of the PML-N government (June 30, 2013 to September 30, 2015) as opposed to the first nine quarters of the PTI government (June 30, 2018 to September 30, 2020):


Net External Debt (increase)


PML-N government: $5.557 billion


PTI government: $18.566 billion


Increase/Decrease (-) in SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $10.107 billion


PTI government: $-3.420 billion


Overall Liabilities Impact


PML-N government: $-4.550 billion


PTI government: $21.986 billion


Actual SBP Forex Reserves


PML-N government: $13.860 Billion


PTI government: $ -0.620 Billion


(Source: SBP)


The finance advisor misstated SBP Forex Reserves figures to diminish impact of high external liabilities in the PTI government versus PML-N government, which is illogical and ethically wrong.


SBP’s borrowing from commercial banks under SWAPS/forward arrangements have surged to an alarming level of $8.774 billion as of September 30, 2020 which include Chinese currency SWAPS of $3 billion as per SBP Annual Report 2019-20.




While calculating the actual Forex Reserves figure with SBP as on September 30, 2020, stock of SWAPS amounting to $8.774 billion as well as showcase deposits from Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. which stood at $4 billion have not been taken into account by the finance advisor. Therefore, net of SWAPS and showcase deposits, the actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at negative $620 million, as opposed to the publicly declared figure of $12.154 billion on September 30, 2020. The actual SBP Forex Reserves stood at $2.80 billion, i.e. Gross Reserves $9.765 billion less SWAPS $6.965 billion as on June 30, 2018. Therefore, the PTI government depleted $3.420 billion during its first nine quarters which ended on September 30, 2020 as opposed to an increase of $2.4 billion which has been misstated by the finance advisor in his tweet.


According to SBP, during first the nine quarters of PTI’s government, outstanding external debt grew from $95.23 billion on June 30, 2018 to $113.80 billion on September 30, 2020. Therefore, there was an increase of $18.57 billion in net external debt and when the aforesaid SBP forex reserves depletion of negative $3.42 billion is taken into account, the overall external liabilities impact stood at $21.99 billion. Consequently, the figure $ 16.11 billion of Overall External Liabilities Impact quoted by finance advisor is understated by $5.88 billion.


SBP forex reserves, net of SWAPS, stood at $3.75 billion (SBP Forex Reserves $6.008 billion less SWAPS $ 2.255 billion) on June 30, 2013. Whereas, this figure increased to $13.86 billion on September 30, 2015 (SBP Forex Reserves $15.245 billion less SWAPS $ 1.385 billion). Consequently, there was an increase of $ 10.11 billion in actual SBP forex reserves during first nine quarters of the PML-N government from which when deducted the net increase in the same period of external debt of $5.56 billion (outstanding stock of external debt $66.46 billion on September 30, 2015 less $60.90 billion on June 30, 2013 in first nine quarters of PML-N government), there has been a reduction of $4.550 billion in Overall External Liabilities Impact, as opposed to an increase of $18.56 billion (outstanding stock of 113.80 billion on September 30, 2020 less $95.24 billion on June 30, 2018) in first nine quarters of the PTI government.


It has been proved above with official SBP figures that both increase of $2.4 billion in SBP Forex Reserves as well as Overall Liabilities Impact of $16.1 billion figures have been misquoted by the finance advisor and the correct figures are negative $3.42 billion and $21.99 billion respectively.


Let us examine now the financial advisor’s last celebrative claim of External Debt Serviced figure of $29.7 billion by the PTI government during its first nine quarters to September 30, 2020. It appears that the advisor purposely did not disclose the detail of new external borrowings during the same period. When he has chosen to give only the figure of net increase of $18.5 billion in external debt during first nine quarters of the PTI government, then the External Debt Serviced is automatically taken care of as the PTI government has borrowed new external debt of $48.33 billion out of which repaid external debt of $ 29.77 billion, leaving a net increase $18.57 billion in external debt from $95.23 billion to $113.80 billion. Therefore, the advisor’s claim in this regard is redundant and irrelevant.


The PTI’s economic team seems busy in confusing people as to the true state of economy, including SBP Forex Reserves, instead of focusing on boosting the GDP growth of the country, at least more than the Population Growth Rate of 2.4 percent, reduce inflation (CPI) which has jumped from four percent to above 10 percent, bring down food inflation which has shot up from two percent to around 15 percent and take measures to reduce massive unemployment and abject poverty. In the first phase, the PTI government should have a clear goal to achieve the level of different macroeconomic indicators which were left by PML-N in 2018 when the PTI took over the economy, but sadly grounded it well before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out and it only added salt to the economic injury.

The author, a UK Fellow Chartered Accountant, is former finance minister of Pakistan and former leader of opposition in the Senate of Pakistan. He can be contacted on Twitter @MIshaqDar50

Hahaha. You just posted an article by your favorite absconder Ishaq Dollar who did this to Pakistani economy. @ziaulislam @Mav3rick @koolio @Zibago @Indus Pakistan
IMG_0190.PNG
IMG_0213.jpg
IMG_0217.jpg
IMG_0272.JPG
IMG_5086.JPG
IMG_6666.JPG
 

muhammadhafeezmalik

FULL MEMBER
Jan 21, 2015
724
-6
640
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
didn't read the thread in detail .. but found this image on internet several days ago .
View attachment 691508
Source of this Photoshop???
You are posting same Photo-shopped crap again and again. IMF has not issued for NET FOREIGN Reserves for June 18 and for March 2018 it was $-730 million.
Have you forgotten that Pakistan was fined by IMF back in 1998 or 1999 because this guy provided them fudged figures.
No fine was imposed by IMF because of figure fudging in 1998-99. If it was imposed share the source.
 
Last edited:

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
6,490
7
9,737
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Nice job posting article from scum bag who ruined our economy left us with largest CA deficit, Trade deficit and converted reserves purely in to loans. Destroyed industry agriculture service and bought most expensive electricity and lng in history of Pakistan. Still he has phudu follower who believe him to be saviour which makes you text book definition of moron. Conviniently you seem to forget Historicly high CA deficit leaving PTI with external loans requirement of 18 billion which was on top of loans he already desposited as forex reserves and needed to be returned in ne t two years.
 

Pakistani sipahi

FULL MEMBER
Jun 28, 2012
314
0
381
Country
Pakistan
Location
Saudi Arabia
Why expect economic performance from a ex cricketer ?
Whats his expertise in managing the economy or a business ? None.
At best he could have been made the sports minister.
Nawaz was a experienced businessman and its obvious he had the necessary savviness to run a country.
According to what I know IK has a degree in Economics . Someone please correct me if I am wrong. . .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom