I think the J-10CE and JF-17 Block-3 are now the de-facto, go-to options for ITAR-free modern fighters. In fact, not only are the fighters themselves filled to the rim with current tech (e.g., AESA radars, ECM, HMD, etc), but China also invested in the munitions stack. So, the end-user has a huge variety of munitions to choose from without worrying about special integration or qualification needs (e.g. PL-15E, PL-10E, SD-10, PL-5EII, YJ-9E, C-802A, HD-1A, GB500, LD-10, etc, etc). There'll be exceptions, like Pakistan's need to integrate Ra'ad II ALCM, but that's a one-off strategic asset; but in general, there's probably an analogous Chinese option for most Western munition solutions.You might want to read about the reality of Mig-35 and AESA radar
The latest-generation Fulcrum should have been in service by now, so why isn’t it and what went wrong?www.thedrive.com
There is a huge difference between promoting things for export and actually having it in production and on aircraft. Russians are very good at showing prototypes on air shows, but not very good at delivering it into production. For AESA radar, they simply haven't been able to get the cost of producing T/R modules down due to their backward electronics industry.
What China has is a relatively modern electronics industry along with a lot of investment in military radar. That started with AESA radar on KJ-2000 and Type 052C over 15 years ago. With continued investment and improving domestic industry, they have been able to put AESA radar on all their recent aircraft since 2015. That's really only behind America and France. EFT still does not have AESA radar. Just think about that. JF-17 will get AESA radars before EFT.
Again, look at what's in production rather than what's promoted in air shows. Huge difference. Don't fall for capabilities that sales teams are promising to be ready in a couple of years
IMO we'll probably see an upswell of J-10CE and JF-17B3 purchases, especially from Algeria, Egypt, a couple of Central Asian countries, etc.
One problem I find with how people assess Chinese tech is that they look at it from the "East vs West" lenses. They basically use what they know about the Soviets and Russia, and then superimpose that on China. This is a totally incorrect way to look at China. In reality, China's industrial engine is more patterned along Western lines (due to the heavy cross-trade), but with a better handle on supply-chain management, cost control, and horizontal integration. Ironically, the more apt comparison of China could be WW2-era USA in the sense that both used their expertise in non-defense areas (especially consumer) to undertake defense R&D and production at a more efficient level.
The Pakistani way is more like the Soviet way -- @JamD gets it.