What's new

Exclusive: Ukraine sanctions on Russia virtually ground Pak’s JF-17 fighter programme (Yeah Right).

Trailer23

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2012
4,848
121
15,126
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Please hold your laughs till the end of the article - if you can control yourself.

I thought i'd be appropriate to post this Topic in the Indian Defence Thread 'cause they get off on this kind of articles.



HTimes.jpg



Aug 23, 2022

Pakistan has bypassed its partner China and directly approached Russia for procuring spare parts for Klimov RD 93 engine for JF-17 fleet and is now trying to arrange US dollars as original equipment supplier M/s Rosoboronexport has been hit by western sanctions.

image_(10)_1661237961593_1661237973425_1661237973425.png

Sino-Pak JF-17 fighter is facing severe engine serviceability issues with Russian original equipment manufacturer under Western Sanctions.


A day after the Indian Air Force (IAF) successfully targeted the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terror training camp at Balakot on February 26, 2019, to avenge the Pulwama terror strike, the Pakistanis launched a counter with US F-16 fighters and Chinese JF-17 fighters south of Pir Panjal in Jammu and Kashmir.

There is documentary evidence that the Pakistan Air Force relied only on F-16s to target unspecified targets in the Nowshera-Rajouri-Poonch sector across the LoC with JF-17 fighters not involved in the action at all.

The Pakistani strike was intercepted by Indian fighters with Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman shooting down a much superior F-16 before crashing his vintage MiG-21 Bison in Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir). While the US F-16 fired air-to-air missiles at Indian fighters, the much-touted Sino-Pak developed JF-17 was just for show and did not see the air battle and remained hidden behind the American fighters. The JF-17 programme today is in the doldrums due to a lack of spare parts for the Russian-made Klimov RD 93 aircraft engine.

Stung by multiple failures of JF-17 aircraft, primarily due to the serviceability of RD-93 engines, Pakistan had directly approached Russia for procuring the RD-93 engines, bypassing China. In the aftermath of multiple negotiations by Islamabad with Moscow, Russian engine company Kilmov has now indicated its willingness to supply RD-93 engines and its associated repair systems and maintenance facilities to JF-17 aircraft.

However, in 2018, M/s Rosoboronexport, which is authorised to export defence equipment including RD- 93 engines and spares, was sanctioned by the US, thereby adversely affecting the sourcing of RD-93 engine spares by the PAF. The sanctions restrict Rosoboronexport from undertaking US dollar transactions, which the two governments and the concerned banks have now been attempting to sort out.

Russia has been strengthening its defence ties with Pakistan by allowing it to procure the RD-93 engine directly from it as opposed to using China as an intermediary as was the case previously. However, international relations are in a state of flux and strategic equations are changing fast with Russia coming under pressure from the West and looking for support from others. It is apparent that Russia is moving close to China in the evolving geo political matrix which is sought to be exploited by Pakistan.

Pakistan Air Force saddled with underperforming JF-17 aircraft

The JF-17 fighter jets, developed jointly by Pakistan and China, which was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight, all-weather, multi-role fighter with a Chinese airframe, has now become a liability for Islamabad as it failed to keep up with the hype of being the best fighter aircraft in the world. Islamabad's experience with the JF-17 aircraft, particularly its Russian-made RD-93 engines, tells a completely different story besides casting serious doubt on the quality of these aircraft.

The Pakistan military leadership had expected a fighter aircraft, something akin to the Russian Su-30 MKI or the French Mirage 2000 but the JF-17 aircraft fell well short of their high hopes as the aircraft performed poorly against the Indian Air Force's Mirage 2000 and Su-30s.

Incidentally, since its induction into the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 2009, the JF-17 recorded a string of crashes, casting serious doubts on the fitness of the aircraft as the PAF found much to its chagrin, that the JF-17 aircraft is nowhere near the boastful claims made by China due to problems encountered in the performance of Russian made RD-93 engines, installed in the aircraft.

Compounding the problem, the PAF has been encountering challenges in the serviceability of the aircraft due to a shortage of spares and engines. A large number of Russian RD 93 engines, installed in the JF-17 aircraft have developed cracks in guide vanes, exhaust nozzles and flame stabilisers, and the PAF has been struggling hard to replace these engines due to contractual obligations which forces Pakistan to procure the RD-93 engines from Russia only through China. Adding to the woes of the PAF, the China National Aero Technology Export & Import Corporation's (CATIC) tepid response in providing necessary spares and support for the RD-93 engines of PAF's JF-17 aircraft led to the grounding of more than half of the total number of these aircraft (137) held by the PAF.

Gupta.jpg


#:rofl:

Yaar, koi ees chamaar ko tweet tou karey. India has been peddling this JF-17 Engine issue for 5 Years now. In that period, we got a B-Variant & the Block III is just around the corner - as per my "Source".

The word "Underperforming" was though used for the JF-17, but the author failed to mention the achievements of TeJa in terms of operation & Sale to Foreign Nations.

As for the word 'Sanction', let me know if you've heard this before. "Sanctions do not apply to us because our deal was made before CAATSA was imposed". Sorry Ukraine.

@araz @airomerix @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Bilal. @ghazi52 @Talon @Irfan Baloch @Imran Khan @Jango @Windjammer @The Eagle @AeroEngineer @akramishaqkhan @aliyusuf @AMRAAM @Cookie Monster @Desert Fox 1 @Falcon26 @FuturePAF @Ghessan @GriffinsRule @HRK @Hakikat ve Hikmet @iLION12345_1@NA71 @Nasr @Nomad40@Path-Finder @PanzerKiel @PWFI @Rafi @Riz @Stealth @StormBreaker @TheSnakeEatingMarkhur @Viper27 @White and Green with M/S @Yasser76 @Zarvan @ziaulislam @PakSword @Maarkhoor @Super Falcon @PradoTLC @khail007 @War Thunder @ZedZeeshan
 

Maarkhoor

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 24, 2015
16,783
45
28,387
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Please hold your laughs till the end of the article - if you can control yourself.

I thought i'd be appropriate to post this Topic in the Indian Defence Thread 'cause they get off on this kind of articles.



View attachment 872816


Aug 23, 2022

Pakistan has bypassed its partner China and directly approached Russia for procuring spare parts for Klimov RD 93 engine for JF-17 fleet and is now trying to arrange US dollars as original equipment supplier M/s Rosoboronexport has been hit by western sanctions.

image_(10)_1661237961593_1661237973425_1661237973425.png

Sino-Pak JF-17 fighter is facing severe engine serviceability issues with Russian original equipment manufacturer under Western Sanctions.


A day after the Indian Air Force (IAF) successfully targeted the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terror training camp at Balakot on February 26, 2019, to avenge the Pulwama terror strike, the Pakistanis launched a counter with US F-16 fighters and Chinese JF-17 fighters south of Pir Panjal in Jammu and Kashmir.

There is documentary evidence that the Pakistan Air Force relied only on F-16s to target unspecified targets in the Nowshera-Rajouri-Poonch sector across the LoC with JF-17 fighters not involved in the action at all.

The Pakistani strike was intercepted by Indian fighters with Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman shooting down a much superior F-16 before crashing his vintage MiG-21 Bison in Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir). While the US F-16 fired air-to-air missiles at Indian fighters, the much-touted Sino-Pak developed JF-17 was just for show and did not see the air battle and remained hidden behind the American fighters. The JF-17 programme today is in the doldrums due to a lack of spare parts for the Russian-made Klimov RD 93 aircraft engine.

Stung by multiple failures of JF-17 aircraft, primarily due to the serviceability of RD-93 engines, Pakistan had directly approached Russia for procuring the RD-93 engines, bypassing China. In the aftermath of multiple negotiations by Islamabad with Moscow, Russian engine company Kilmov has now indicated its willingness to supply RD-93 engines and its associated repair systems and maintenance facilities to JF-17 aircraft.

However, in 2018, M/s Rosoboronexport, which is authorised to export defence equipment including RD- 93 engines and spares, was sanctioned by the US, thereby adversely affecting the sourcing of RD-93 engine spares by the PAF. The sanctions restrict Rosoboronexport from undertaking US dollar transactions, which the two governments and the concerned banks have now been attempting to sort out.

Russia has been strengthening its defence ties with Pakistan by allowing it to procure the RD-93 engine directly from it as opposed to using China as an intermediary as was the case previously. However, international relations are in a state of flux and strategic equations are changing fast with Russia coming under pressure from the West and looking for support from others. It is apparent that Russia is moving close to China in the evolving geo political matrix which is sought to be exploited by Pakistan.

Pakistan Air Force saddled with underperforming JF-17 aircraft

The JF-17 fighter jets, developed jointly by Pakistan and China, which was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight, all-weather, multi-role fighter with a Chinese airframe, has now become a liability for Islamabad as it failed to keep up with the hype of being the best fighter aircraft in the world. Islamabad's experience with the JF-17 aircraft, particularly its Russian-made RD-93 engines, tells a completely different story besides casting serious doubt on the quality of these aircraft.

The Pakistan military leadership had expected a fighter aircraft, something akin to the Russian Su-30 MKI or the French Mirage 2000 but the JF-17 aircraft fell well short of their high hopes as the aircraft performed poorly against the Indian Air Force's Mirage 2000 and Su-30s.

Incidentally, since its induction into the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 2009, the JF-17 recorded a string of crashes, casting serious doubts on the fitness of the aircraft as the PAF found much to its chagrin, that the JF-17 aircraft is nowhere near the boastful claims made by China due to problems encountered in the performance of Russian made RD-93 engines, installed in the aircraft.

Compounding the problem, the PAF has been encountering challenges in the serviceability of the aircraft due to a shortage of spares and engines. A large number of Russian RD 93 engines, installed in the JF-17 aircraft have developed cracks in guide vanes, exhaust nozzles and flame stabilisers, and the PAF has been struggling hard to replace these engines due to contractual obligations which forces Pakistan to procure the RD-93 engines from Russia only through China. Adding to the woes of the PAF, the China National Aero Technology Export & Import Corporation's (CATIC) tepid response in providing necessary spares and support for the RD-93 engines of PAF's JF-17 aircraft led to the grounding of more than half of the total number of these aircraft (137) held by the PAF.

View attachment 872813

#:rofl:

Yaar, koi ees chamaar ko tweet tou karey. India has been peddling this JF-17 Engine issue for 5 Years now. In that period, we got a B-Variant & the Block III is just around the corner - as per my "Source".

The word "Underperforming" was though used for the JF-17, but the author failed to mention the achievements of TeJa in terms of operation & Sale to Foreign Nations.

As for the word 'Sanction', let me know if you've heard this before. "Sanctions do not apply to us because our deal was made before CAATSA was imposed". Sorry Ukraine.

@araz @airomerix @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Bilal. @ghazi52 @Talon @Irfan Baloch @Imran Khan @Jango @Windjammer @The Eagle @AeroEngineer @akramishaqkhan @aliyusuf @AMRAAM @Cookie Monster @Desert Fox 1 @Falcon26 @FuturePAF @Ghessan @GriffinsRule @HRK @Hakikat ve Hikmet @iLION12345_1@NA71 @Nasr @Nomad40@Path-Finder @PanzerKiel @PWFI @Rafi @Riz @Stealth @StormBreaker @TheSnakeEatingMarkhur @Viper27 @White and Green with M/S @Yasser76 @Zarvan @ziaulislam @PakSword @Maarkhoor @Super Falcon @PradoTLC @khail007 @War Thunder @ZedZeeshan
Bro don't post sh#t sources, totally a biased sh#t that you have posted.

Delete your thread

@waz
 

PAKISTANFOREVER

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 15, 2015
17,176
-6
28,075
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Pakistan
Please hold your laughs till the end of the article - if you can control yourself.

I thought i'd be appropriate to post this Topic in the Indian Defence Thread 'cause they get off on this kind of articles.



View attachment 872816


Aug 23, 2022

Pakistan has bypassed its partner China and directly approached Russia for procuring spare parts for Klimov RD 93 engine for JF-17 fleet and is now trying to arrange US dollars as original equipment supplier M/s Rosoboronexport has been hit by western sanctions.

image_(10)_1661237961593_1661237973425_1661237973425.png

Sino-Pak JF-17 fighter is facing severe engine serviceability issues with Russian original equipment manufacturer under Western Sanctions.


A day after the Indian Air Force (IAF) successfully targeted the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terror training camp at Balakot on February 26, 2019, to avenge the Pulwama terror strike, the Pakistanis launched a counter with US F-16 fighters and Chinese JF-17 fighters south of Pir Panjal in Jammu and Kashmir.

There is documentary evidence that the Pakistan Air Force relied only on F-16s to target unspecified targets in the Nowshera-Rajouri-Poonch sector across the LoC with JF-17 fighters not involved in the action at all.

The Pakistani strike was intercepted by Indian fighters with Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman shooting down a much superior F-16 before crashing his vintage MiG-21 Bison in Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir). While the US F-16 fired air-to-air missiles at Indian fighters, the much-touted Sino-Pak developed JF-17 was just for show and did not see the air battle and remained hidden behind the American fighters. The JF-17 programme today is in the doldrums due to a lack of spare parts for the Russian-made Klimov RD 93 aircraft engine.

Stung by multiple failures of JF-17 aircraft, primarily due to the serviceability of RD-93 engines, Pakistan had directly approached Russia for procuring the RD-93 engines, bypassing China. In the aftermath of multiple negotiations by Islamabad with Moscow, Russian engine company Kilmov has now indicated its willingness to supply RD-93 engines and its associated repair systems and maintenance facilities to JF-17 aircraft.

However, in 2018, M/s Rosoboronexport, which is authorised to export defence equipment including RD- 93 engines and spares, was sanctioned by the US, thereby adversely affecting the sourcing of RD-93 engine spares by the PAF. The sanctions restrict Rosoboronexport from undertaking US dollar transactions, which the two governments and the concerned banks have now been attempting to sort out.

Russia has been strengthening its defence ties with Pakistan by allowing it to procure the RD-93 engine directly from it as opposed to using China as an intermediary as was the case previously. However, international relations are in a state of flux and strategic equations are changing fast with Russia coming under pressure from the West and looking for support from others. It is apparent that Russia is moving close to China in the evolving geo political matrix which is sought to be exploited by Pakistan.

Pakistan Air Force saddled with underperforming JF-17 aircraft

The JF-17 fighter jets, developed jointly by Pakistan and China, which was supposed to be a low-cost, lightweight, all-weather, multi-role fighter with a Chinese airframe, has now become a liability for Islamabad as it failed to keep up with the hype of being the best fighter aircraft in the world. Islamabad's experience with the JF-17 aircraft, particularly its Russian-made RD-93 engines, tells a completely different story besides casting serious doubt on the quality of these aircraft.

The Pakistan military leadership had expected a fighter aircraft, something akin to the Russian Su-30 MKI or the French Mirage 2000 but the JF-17 aircraft fell well short of their high hopes as the aircraft performed poorly against the Indian Air Force's Mirage 2000 and Su-30s.

Incidentally, since its induction into the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 2009, the JF-17 recorded a string of crashes, casting serious doubts on the fitness of the aircraft as the PAF found much to its chagrin, that the JF-17 aircraft is nowhere near the boastful claims made by China due to problems encountered in the performance of Russian made RD-93 engines, installed in the aircraft.

Compounding the problem, the PAF has been encountering challenges in the serviceability of the aircraft due to a shortage of spares and engines. A large number of Russian RD 93 engines, installed in the JF-17 aircraft have developed cracks in guide vanes, exhaust nozzles and flame stabilisers, and the PAF has been struggling hard to replace these engines due to contractual obligations which forces Pakistan to procure the RD-93 engines from Russia only through China. Adding to the woes of the PAF, the China National Aero Technology Export & Import Corporation's (CATIC) tepid response in providing necessary spares and support for the RD-93 engines of PAF's JF-17 aircraft led to the grounding of more than half of the total number of these aircraft (137) held by the PAF.

View attachment 872813

#:rofl:

Yaar, koi ees chamaar ko tweet tou karey. India has been peddling this JF-17 Engine issue for 5 Years now. In that period, we got a B-Variant & the Block III is just around the corner - as per my "Source".

The word "Underperforming" was though used for the JF-17, but the author failed to mention the achievements of TeJa in terms of operation & Sale to Foreign Nations.

As for the word 'Sanction', let me know if you've heard this before. "Sanctions do not apply to us because our deal was made before CAATSA was imposed". Sorry Ukraine.

@araz @airomerix @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Bilal. @ghazi52 @Talon @Irfan Baloch @Imran Khan @Jango @Windjammer @The Eagle @AeroEngineer @akramishaqkhan @aliyusuf @AMRAAM @Cookie Monster @Desert Fox 1 @Falcon26 @FuturePAF @Ghessan @GriffinsRule @HRK @Hakikat ve Hikmet @iLION12345_1@NA71 @Nasr @Nomad40@Path-Finder @PanzerKiel @PWFI @Rafi @Riz @Stealth @StormBreaker @TheSnakeEatingMarkhur @Viper27 @White and Green with M/S @Yasser76 @Zarvan @ziaulislam @PakSword @Maarkhoor @Super Falcon @PradoTLC @khail007 @War Thunder @ZedZeeshan

If the source is indian than it is more worthless than used toilet paper. Please delete this thread. It is completely worthless and absurd.
 
Last edited:

Trailer23

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2012
4,848
121
15,126
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Bro don't post sh#t sources, totally a biased sh#t that you have posted.

Delete your thread

@waz
Please delete this thread. It I completely worthless and absurd.
Guys, all of their Topics are biased.

Is it too much to have a laugh (in these times)?

Its just for tafree.

Had I not done it out of jest, some Indian would have to pass it off as credible.

Anyways, if the Mods want, they can 'Delete' it... Seriously, we have got far more sh!tty Topics making the rounds on this Forum.
 

KampfAlwin

FULL MEMBER
Mar 9, 2021
226
0
487
Country
Brunei Darussalam
Location
Brunei Darussalam
"Underperforming Aircraft" - Yes, so 'underperforming' that many countries decided to buy it instead of advanced 6th gen LCAss Tejunk.

Also has the author never heard of the WS-21? The engine that China flew on their old FC-31 prototype and now upgraded it for their new J-35? That engine which is basically in the same class as the RD-93?
 

iLION12345_1

SENIOR MEMBER
May 1, 2016
2,289
16
7,070
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Don't worry, there will be some Pakistanis to trust this news and claim , " You see, that is the consequences of collaborating with China on defence projects or buying Chinese junk weapon! "

@Metal 0-1 @iLION12345_1
@Super Falcon
Man, this guy is so Butthurt, I bet his descendants will still be tagging me in posts long after all of us die. I guess my work here is done then.
 

PAKISTANFOREVER

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 15, 2015
17,176
-6
28,075
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Pakistan
Guys, all of their Topics are biased.

Is it too much to have a laugh (in these times)?

Its just for tafree.

Had I not done it out of jest, some Indian would have to pass it off as credible.

Anyways, if the Mods want, they can 'Delete' it... Seriously, we have got far more sh!tty Topics making the rounds on this Forum.



Okay. Understood.

"Underperforming Aircraft" - Yes, so 'underperforming' that many countries decided to buy it instead of advanced 6th gen LCAss Tejunk.

Also has the author never heard of the WS-21? The engine that China flew on their old FC-31 prototype and now upgraded it for their new J-35? That engine which is basically in the same class as the RD-93?

The article in the OP is indian. So facts, evidence, honesty, integrity, credibility and authenticity don't apply. indians on PDF claim ALOT of things but as soon as you ask them for evidence, they disappear............ :disagree:
 

Black.Mamba

FULL MEMBER
Oct 16, 2020
1,570
4
4,978
Country
Pakistan
Location
Germany
The Indian jokes aside.

The question is how will Russia react to the supply of RD93 considering Pakistan is arming Ukraine? Russian are ultra-nationalist and our supplying to Ukraine will not be brushed aside for the sake of a few million$ contracts.
 

PAKISTANFOREVER

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 15, 2015
17,176
-6
28,075
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Pakistan
The Indian jokes aside.

The question is how will Russia react to the supply of RD93 considering Pakistan is arming Ukraine? Russian are ultra-nationalist and our supplying to Ukraine will not be brushed aside for the sake of a few million$ contracts.



How is Pakistan arming Ukraine?...........could you provide the evidence as well......... :disagree:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom