What's new

Do you think ancient India should have been like China?

faithfulguy

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 29, 2009
13,174
-1
13,609
Country
Taiwan, Province Of China
Location
United States
But we became independent and China couldn't. They are filled by dectatorial Xinping & his goons.
China couldn’t become independent as it never was colonized like India, the subcontinent. And out of the colonization, the British granted India independence after Indians beg for it. No wonder India can’t fight, why fight if you can beg and get what you want.
 

faithfulguy

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 29, 2009
13,174
-1
13,609
Country
Taiwan, Province Of China
Location
United States
hmm China as a nation should be counted from Zhou Dynasty?
Since all kings of these kingdoms were designated by Zhou's "son of heaven".
And all kings recognized Zhou as a their ruler in name.

What I'm trying to say is Chinese share the same ID is way before Qin Dynasty and is naturally formed.
It's not created by Qin Shi Huang, not at all.

Hence not very relevant to OP's point regards India ID.
actually, if Qin Shi Huang never unite China, its possible that China might be like India today. It takes a strong man to unite a nation. Since Indians are feeble, they needed the British to create India.Their biggest blunder is to deny that fact.
 

Figaro

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 17, 2017
5,448
8
9,915
Country
United States
Location
United States
What a stupid thread ... why would the Indians need to learn from the much inferior Chinese? How dare the OP criticize a civilization that invented the internet 9000 years ago and is currently the world's leading supa powa :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: . India is so advanced that its civilization has evolved from using toilets to instead resorting to natural means of excrement, just like it ought to be in the wild :enjoy: .
 

SuperStar20

FULL MEMBER
Jun 6, 2020
896
-1
343
Country
India
Location
United States
China couldn’t become independent as it never was colonized like India, the subcontinent. And out of the colonization, the British granted India independence after Indians beg for it. No wonder India can’t fight, why fight if you can beg and get what you want.
What are the HongKong and Macau?

Little bit search on internet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_of_humiliation

After that Mao killed 45 million
But both Hitler and Stalin were outdone by Mao Zedong. From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now Xi owns china till he dies.
 
Last edited:

Beefeatergin

FULL MEMBER
Jul 10, 2020
425
0
520
Country
China
Location
China
What are the HongKong and Macau?

Little bit search on internet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_of_humiliation

After that Mao killed 45 million
But both Hitler and Stalin were outdone by Mao Zedong. From 1958 to 1962, his Great Leap Forward policy led to the deaths of up to 45 million people – easily making it the biggest episode of mass murder ever recorded.

Now Xi owns china till he dies.
Indians surrendering till this day
1601351533687.jpeg
 

Surya 1

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 6, 2016
3,031
-47
1,931
Country
India
Location
India
China couldn’t become independent as it never was colonized like India, the subcontinent. And out of the colonization, the British granted India independence after Indians beg for it. No wonder India can’t fight, why fight if you can beg and get what you want.
If you are colonialized, you can draw them out and be free but if you are enslaved by a party from your country, you do not even cry.
 

Figaro

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 17, 2017
5,448
8
9,915
Country
United States
Location
United States
If you are colonialized, you can draw them out and be free but if you are enslaved by a party from your country, you do not even cry.
But then why can Chinese citizens freely travel to other parts of the world though? If they were enslaved, surely the government would prohibit all outbound travel to prevent a refugee crisis right? Believe me I am not saying the Chinese gov has good human rights or anything but what you're saying simply makes zero sense at all. In slavery, do you think the master would allow slaves to freely travel?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top