• Monday, December 11, 2017

Did Maryam and Nawaz Sharif Orchestrate the TLY Dharna at Faizabad?

Discussion in 'Pakistani Siasat' started by RiazHaq, Nov 28, 2017.

  1. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/249603-the-surrender-at-faizabad

    The surrender at Faizabad

    Listen

    [​IMG]



    After almost three weeks of blackmail, hand-wringing, cowardice, thuggery and incompetence, the government of Pakistan and the violent extremists who had camped out at Faizabad under the leadership of Khadim Hussain Rizvi have reached an agreement. A national crisis triggered by a few dozen hoodlums and exacerbated by the incompetent who supposedly run this asylum was over.

    Yet rather than celebratory, the mood in English-medium Pakistan is sombre. After weeks of demanding the writ of the state, we watched the state stutter and stumble into a half-baked and ill-conceived ‘operation’ to clear the protest area, only to have the tension explode. A blanket ban on all news channels and social media ensued. The army issued a tweet, unbelievable in its brazenness and audacity, equating a bunch of criminals and the government – whilst distancing the army from it all. Predictably, the whining in English-medium Pakistan reached a crescendo. Then, suddenly, a major general signed the dotted line and the crisis was over. You would think we would have been happy and broken out into song and dance. But the reaction to the agreement that brought an end to the drama at Faizabad is far from jubilant. It’s like someone close to us has died.

    Many business-class Pakistanis can barely read the Urdu script of the agreement, much less fathom what was just reinforced by its substance. The dream of a modern and pluralistic state is dead. Long live Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. His dream is dead. His Pakistan is dead.

    It has been dead for a long time. But English-medium Pakistan, or essentially Jinnah’s Pakistan, doesn’t want to bury the body. Every so often, someone or the other comes along and pokes around at the rotting carcass. Obviously, this creates a stink. We all plug our noses and demand ‘writ of the state’. When the state does anything, it is ugly. It has to be. We are dealing with a rotting carcass after all. When reality hits us full-frontal, we then mope about a surrender, about the gaping hole in our praxis: we are democratic in spirit, and certainly by dint of constitution, but not when the rubber hits the road. When it really matters, our democratic ethos is not very useful at all. Time and time again, it is our armed forces that do the heavy lifting. Our civil-military divide widens in these testing moments. It doesn’t help that often, the people behind the wheel in the GHQ do not have the soft hands of surgeons, but wield instead the heavy hands of soldiers that have both sent the enemy to their graves and carried the coffins of young soldiers that were martyred in the name of our great country.

    Among the various insults to the memory of Quaid-e-Azam that are packed in the agreement between this latest permutation of violent extremists in Barelvi clothing and the government is the immeasurable disequilibrium between our military and the elected civilian leadership. Ahsan Iqbal is a decent, patriotic and deeply religious man. A democrat. And highly educated to boot. He has contested elections. He has stood by the political leader of his choice consistently. He has tried to serve the country. Mistakes? He has made plenty. We all have. But seeing his name on that agreement, equated with the likes of Khadim Hussain Rizvi. It is an unpleasant jolt of reality.

    A federal minister is reduced to being treated by the same metric as the violent and uncouth thugs that illegally occupied public space, in direct violation of court orders. The kicker? An officer of the armed forces equivalent to no higher than BPS-21, or additional secretary, has underwritten and supervised this equivalence.

    Of course, why lament the elected representative from Narowal alone? Zahid Hamid, the elected representative from Sialkot has won three elections in a row from NA-114. He is not only no longer a federal minister, but also unlikely to be able to continue being an effective constituency politician. The Faizabad crisis is going to claim many scalps, Hamid’s is the first and most obvious one. But what this entire story is going to create, in terms of election narratives, is the unreliability of the PML-N in matters to do with important religious personalities and symbols in Pakistan. Pakistanis have almost never been single-issue voters, but the Mumtaz Qadri narrative in politics is not really about what it seems to be about: there is no debate on any religious or spiritual matter in Pakistan. It is all already firmly decided in favour of those whose outrage was centre-stage for almost three weeks in Faizabad. So what does Khadim Hussain Rizvi really want? He wants his share.

    In English-medium Pakistan, if you want your ‘share’ you should work hard and play by the rules. But the maali, the driver, the maasi and the bus conductor do work hard and, for the most part, do play by the rules. And they do not really get their share. In English-medium Pakistan, it should be no secret why the maali, the driver, the maasi and the bus conductor do not get their share. Hint: they are medium incompatible.

    Bhutto came along and promised a social contract in which they would be rewarded for their labour. Instead, he transformed the state into a job-awarding entity. Zia came along and needed something even better than dignity and free jobs (BPS 1- BPS 16). He found it in Islam. He put a burqa on a state that had no problems turning tricks for the Americans. Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif came along and promised everything Bhutto and Zia promised, just more of it. More free jobs and more Islam. The Khadim Hussain Rizvis and Sufi Muhammads of this land came of age in this era. By the time General Musharraf had decided to take the burqa off the state (but turn tricks all the same), we all began to realise that there aren’t enough jobs and there isn’t enough Islam for everyone. But unlike jobs, which are tangible and can be measured, there is no measure for religious faith and devotion. It is both unlimited, and immeasurable.

    This gives religious politics in Pakistan both unlimited potential as well as the potential for immeasurable damage. The assault on Jinnah’s Pakistan has two fronts, both of which are pure genius. The first is the Mumtaz Qadri narrative: it can be deployed on anyone, at any time, to manage the spectrum of domestic discourse. The second is the Kashmir narrative: it is the remainder from the clumsy long-division that the GHQ conceived of in the 1990s, and that Pakistanis not yet born will be paying for at airports around the world for the foreseeable future. It may have only been incidental that Hafiz Saeed was released from house arrest as the Faizabad dharna was reaching its climax – but all good Muslims know that there is meaning in everything.

    We didn’t like Maulana Fazlur Rehman because he is an exceptionally good politician (which naturally means bad guy) who was happy to work within the broad spectrum of Jinnah’s Pakistan. We didn’t like the Jamaat-e-Islami because it makes us uncomfortable, what with their retrograde twentieth century colonial hangover and contradictory anti-American tirades. Now we have to contend with things like the Tehreek-e-Labbaik and the Milli Muslim League.

    The army will not rein them in, because the army is a coherent institution that is in the middle of a war. It will not open new fronts at a time when it is hard enough to manage morale, discipline and unity of command. It will also not challenge the unlimited potential and immeasurable potency of people’s faith.

    The source of new ideas can never be a bureaucracy; no matter how many guns we give them. The eroded writ of the state and the abject surrender that the Faizabad agreement represent cannot be repaired by lamenting our civil-military divide or the irrationality of an unhinged religiosity in our national discourse. Jinnah’s Pakistan is dead because Jinnah is dead. Nations don’t find renewal in newspaper op-eds or WhatsApp groups. They find them in leaders. Pakistan does not have any. What it does have is plenty more of where the Faizabad crisis came from. Buckle up.

    The writer is an analyst and commentator.
     
  2. Solomon2

    Solomon2 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    16,434
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Ratings:
    +10 / 8,834 / -18
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Or maybe the Army won't "rein them in" because it doesn't want to establish a precedent: that like normal countries' militaries it should obey the lawful orders of the elected civilian leadership.

    What are they defending, exactly? Other than themselves, I mean.
     
  3. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Of course the answer is that the Army is defending Pakistan.
     
  4. The Eagle

    The Eagle MODERATOR

    Messages:
    8,746
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +77 / 10,876 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Don't know it can get your attention but this time it is a politician saying so.... I am sure you will make more out of it too...

     
  5. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    No need to make anything out of this, as the Doctrine of Necessity is a tried-and-true philosophy that always comes to Pakistan's rescue whenever summoned.
     
  6. The Eagle

    The Eagle MODERATOR

    Messages:
    8,746
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +77 / 10,876 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    You missed the word Politician contrary to what you said. However, this doctrine is not limited to Pakistan but every country in this world even few invaded others believing as such.
     
  7. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Sir, the Doctrine can be used by anyone when needed, such is its utility.
     
  8. The Eagle

    The Eagle MODERATOR

    Messages:
    8,746
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +77 / 10,876 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Therefore, one cannot be labeled in other way for the use of the same. Why negative if used in Pakistan. The same doctrine runs every country.
     
  9. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Yes, that is why I said there is no need to make anything of what you posted above in this regard.
     
  10. The Eagle

    The Eagle MODERATOR

    Messages:
    8,746
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +77 / 10,876 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Your posts Sir and your words that you can understand well, then. Regards.
     
  11. Syed.Ali.Haider

    Syed.Ali.Haider ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,965
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Ratings:
    +52 / 27,020 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    My words are very clear and consistent in their meaning, and I stand by them. Is there anything wrong in what you have quoted above? The Army can indeed do whatever it wants to ensure Pakistan's salamatee, and there is absolutely no need to contest that right.
     
  12. war&peace

    war&peace ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    12,354
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Ratings:
    +6 / 19,736 / -11
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Sweden
    German :)
    By the way can you please translate the wording on your DP in Urdu or English?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. AZADPAKISTAN2009

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    21,366
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +29 / 18,752 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    China
    Just attempt to destabalize country to point where the criminal politicians can all get together and claim in order to bring security to country we must accept Nawaz sharif as a political party head again and (NRO 2)

    Recalling NRO 1 was just a idea to close all pending corruption cases against politcians because that is the greater good for Pakistan

    PPP , PML have continuously used such "deals" to forgive each other's grave violations & corruptions over decades

    The decision to specifically Choose Eid Milad Ul Nabi as the flash point to make changes in Constitution , goes to show you how deligently the planning was done to maximize anger in people
     
  14. DESERT FIGHTER

    DESERT FIGHTER ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    39,801
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Ratings:
    +99 / 69,758 / -21
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Tuhadi paen di Siri
     
  15. war&peace

    war&peace ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    12,354
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Ratings:
    +6 / 19,736 / -11
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Sweden
    Well what I got from my "deep" knowledge of Punjabi it means "Your sister's head". But who is he referring to? Maryam Nawaz?