Secular means unrelated to religion [Google it's meaning]. You can't claim secularism while espousing Hindutva. Where is the secular principle in Hindutva? Islam declares it. Quran 109-6 To you your religion, to me mine.is land).
A India's idea of secularism is one that of Hinduism, 'Sarva dharma sama bhava'. Yes, foundational idea of secularism in Indian constitution is one of the Hindutva.
Contrary to popular belief original constitutional draft was prepared by Benegal Narsing Rau a Brahmin and Ambedkar only signed off on it by making some political compromises.
Ambedkar wasn't the one who wrote the constitution. The original draft was prepared by sir Bengal Narsing Rau, a brahmin. Ambedkar was allowed to make a final call because he represented the Dalits who were around 20% of Bharat at the time and were most marginalized.
You are proudly championing the Brahmin person and disliking Ambedkar. Is it because Ambedkar chose to adopt Buddhism instead of remaining in an oppressed position as a Lower Caste within Hinduism / Sanatan Dharm / Hindutvad ?Ambedkar alone didn't decide on constitution by the way. lol.
1. So where is the 15 lakhs promised to me by Modi during his 2014 election campaign ? Where became of the 100 Smart Cities program ? What about the "Sabka saath, Sabka vikaas" ( Together with all, Progress for all ) slogan coined by Modi ? Wasn't this supposed to signify secularism ?All of it because of stupid secular policies adopted by congress for 70 years of our country. Had they been forthright with no appeasement and corruption India would have been much more inclusive and developed by now.
India is definitely progressing better under this government than anytime in its life.
Since the end of World War 2 there have been quite a few Muslim-majority countries that have had leftist governance. My user-name comes from my understanding of a person who fowards the Jamahiriya political theory that comes from Libya which was Socialist from 1969 till the NATO invasion in 2011 and overthrow of the Jamahiriya system. You should really read that Nadeem Paracha article I linked earlier. Another example is that in the USSR there were some Muslim-majority SSRs and some Muslim-majority regions within the Russian SSR.Leftist nature of Islam is no where to be seen in any of the Muslim countries. Please fix it there before you start patronizing us.
You should ask Modi to say this at the UNO General Assembly.India is a Dharmic land and not a seat of Islam. Indian policies and its governance will be Hinduism centric. Don't like it, there are other countries.
Some of the people lynched or have had their business destroyed since 2014 have been Dalits and some of these Dalits were disposers of dead cattle. And they were attacked by cow-protecting viraat Hindutvadis. What would Ambedkar's reaction have been ?For all anti-hindu assertions you ascribe to Ambedkar, he is the one who added India that is Bharat to the preamble. He allowed for cow protection in the directive principles.
From this Wiki :And he most certainly didn't refer to Quran or communism in any of the debates.
Where do you think this idea came from ? From the Manusmriti ?
1. If Ambedkar had known that India would become an unscientific, disharmonious and irrational society decades on he would not have gone in for the "democracy" system that the founding fathers set then.He and other founding fathers chose majoritarian democracy for India knowing fully well that it is Hindu who is going to rule this land.
You are being contradictory and just repeating vague statements produced by Hindutvadi "intellectuals".India was also not christian secular, it had secular principles because of its Hindu tradition.
top brass have already knee down to hindutva and now no one can object if modi can use a blast and kill 40 CRPF then can use mirage2000 for attack and sacrifice a mig21 and mi17 for just elections then think where they have reached .And will Indian Army as an institution accept any such measures?
Will it agree to abandon its secular triditions?
No resitance from them?
Not much cost, for winning an election.top brass have already knee down to hindutva and now no one can object if modi can use a blast and kill 40 CRPF then can use mirage2000 for attack and sacrifice a mig21 and mi17 for just elections then think where they have reached .
yes for politicians but for officers modi just drag them in political mud . how they feel to be beaten by pakistanis ? taken as POW . then frindly fire killed 7 ? its all black spots of officers uniforms .Not much cost, for winning an election.
Not much cost, for winning an election.
You know I feel jealous when i see Indian people like this gentleman and few journalist like Abhisar Sharma and Ravish Kumar. These people will not let India disintegrate while we should appreciate the Godi media for doing what we were unable to do in India for last 70 years.