What's new

Chinese hypersonic research

Do you believe this news is true?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 24 85.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • Well ,There is such a project, but the speed performance is hardly faster than SR-71.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    28

Globenim

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2011
3,438
-4
5,827
Country
China
Location
Thailand
Five people familiar with the test said the Chinese
If I got Dim sum for every American report (that includes its overseas based proxies like Nikkei) about China based entirely on "people familiar" with the report about China.
 

52051

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 9, 2016
2,250
-9
7,323
Country
China
Location
China
China tests new space capability with hypersonic missile

Launch in August of nuclear-capable rocket that circled the globe took US intelligence by surprise

China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile in August that circled the globe before speeding towards its target, demonstrating an advanced space capability that caught US intelligence by surprise.

Five people familiar with the test said the Chinese military launched a rocket that carried a hypersonic glide vehicle which flew through low-orbit space before cruising down towards its target.

The missile missed its target by about two-dozen miles, according to three people briefed on the intelligence. But two said the test showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and was far more advanced than US officials realised.


The test has raised new questions about why the US often underestimated China’s military modernisation.

“We have no idea how they did this,” said a fourth person.

The US, Russia and China are all developing hypersonic weapons, including glide vehicles that are launched into space on a rocket but orbit the earth under their own momentum. They fly at five times the speed of sound, slower than a ballistic missile. But they do not follow the fixed parabolic trajectory of a ballistic missile and are manoeuvrable, making them harder to track.

Taylor Fravel, an expert on Chinese nuclear weapons policy who was unaware of the test, said a hypersonic glide vehicle armed with a nuclear warhead could help China “negate” US missile defence systems which are designed to destroy incoming ballistic missiles.

“Hypersonic glide vehicles . . . fly at lower trajectories and can manoeuvre in flight, which makes them hard to track and destroy,” said Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Fravel added that it would be “destabilising” if China fully developed and deployed such a weapon, but he cautioned that a test did not necessarily mean that Beijing would deploy the capability.

Mounting concern about China’s nuclear capabilities comes as Beijing continues to build up its conventional military forces and engages in increasingly assertive military activity near Taiwan.

Tensions between the US and China have risen as the Biden administration has taken a tough tack on Beijing, which has accused Washington of being overly hostile.

US military officials in recent months have warned about China’s growing nuclear capabilities, particularly after the release of satellite imagery that showed it was building more than 200 intercontinental missile silos. China is not bound by any arms-control deals and has been unwilling to engage the US in talks about its nuclear arsenal and policy.

Last month, Frank Kendall, US air force secretary, hinted that Beijing was developing a new weapon. He said China had made huge advances, including the “potential for global strikes . . . from space”. He declined to provide details, but suggested that China was developing something akin to the “Fractional Orbital Bombardment System” that the USSR deployed for part of the Cold War, before abandoning it.

“If you use that kind of an approach, you don’t have to use a traditional ICBM trajectory. It’s a way to avoid defences and missile warning systems,” said Kendall.

In August, General Glen VanHerck, head of North American Aerospace Defense Command, told a conference that China had “recently demonstrated very advanced hypersonic glide vehicle capabilities”. He warned that the Chinese capability would “provide significant challenges to my Norad capability to provide threat warning and attack assessment”.

Two of the people familiar with the Chinese test said the weapon could, in theory, fly over the South Pole. That would pose a big challenge for the US military because its missiles defence systems are focused on the northern polar route.

The revelation comes as the Biden administration undertakes the Nuclear Posture Review, an analysis of policy and capabilities mandated by Congress that has pitted arms-control advocates against those who believe the US must do more to modernise its nuclear arsenal because of China.

The Pentagon did not comment on the report but expressed concern about China. “We have made clear our concerns about the military capabilities China continues to pursue, capabilities that only increase tensions in the region and beyond,” said John Kirby, spokesperson. “That is one reason why we hold China as our number one pacing challenge.”

The Chinese embassy declined to comment on the test, but Liu Pengyu, spokesperson, said China always pursued a military policy that was “defensive in nature” and its military development did not target any country.

“We don’t have a global strategy and plans of military operations like the US does. And we are not at all interested in having an arms race with other countries,” Liu said. “In contrast, the US has in recent years been fabricating excuses like ‘the China threat’ to justify its arms expansion and development of hypersonic weapons. This has directly intensified arms race in this category and severely undermined global strategic stability.”

One Asian national security official said the Chinese military conducted the test in August. China generally announces the launch of Long March rockets — the type used to launch the hypersonic glide vehicle into orbit — but it conspicuously concealed the August launch.

The security official, and another Chinese security expert close to the People’s Liberation Army, said the weapon was being developed by the China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics. CAAA is a research institute under China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, the main state-owned firm that makes missile systems and rockets for China’s space programme. Both sources said the hypersonic glide vehicle was launched on a Long March rocket, which is used for the space programme.

The China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, which oversees launches, on July 19 said on an official social media account that it had launched a Long March 2C rocket, which it added was the 77th launch of that rocket. On August 24, it announced that it had conducted a 79th flight. But there was no announcement of a 78th launch, which sparked speculation among observers of its space programme about a secret launch. CAAA did not respond to requests for comment.

Subscribe to read | Financial Times (ft.com)
 

Ali_Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
May 27, 2018
3,018
-1
4,320
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
The missile "missed" it target by some distance(some reports suggest 2 x dozen miles ) so lets see if it did or didnot ( you really dont know what the missile was targetted to aim at in real terms! )
 

firohot4321

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Sep 1, 2021
31
0
15
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Single war effortlessly avoid all ABMS to hit its target. China has 400 nuke warhead.

Last I heard some troll claim US can easily nuke China while China cant do anything to destroy US.....

@Oldman1
@Hamartia Antidote
@F-22Raptor

DZ-17 warhead fit into a DF-31A ICBM and you will have global strike capabilities avoiding all US ABMS deploy...

Hypersonic glide missile cannot be intercepted becos its path is unpredicted and travel at high speed of 6-7 mach.
Even chances of intercepting traditional ICBMs is low since in practice it would be loaded with countermeasures like decoys chaff jammers
 

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
26,461
-39
61,034
Country
China
Location
China
Even chances of intercepting traditional ICBMs is low since in practice it would be loaded with countermeasures like decoys chaff jammers
The US even have problem intercept a single warhead ICBM and not to mention MIRV.

Now the worst part is even dealing with hypersonic glided warhead... While US fanboys only delude themselves by claiming they will be immune to China nuke counterstrike to comfort themsevles.
 

Leishangthem

FULL MEMBER
Mar 12, 2019
1,601
-6
1,685
Country
India
Location
India
Single war effortlessly avoid all ABMS to hit its target. China has 400 nuke warhead.

Last I heard some troll claim US can easily nuke China while China cant do anything to destroy US.....

@Oldman1
@Hamartia Antidote
@F-22Raptor

DZ-17 warhead fit into a DF-31A ICBM and you will have global strike capabilities avoiding all US ABMS deploy...

Hypersonic glide missile cannot be intercepted becos its path is unpredicted and travel at high speed of 6-7 mach.
to be more threatening ,China needs dozens of nuclear sub prowling the west pacific underwater and defence pact with south American nation,Cuba or Venezuela.
 

Yasser76

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 28, 2017
2,474
1
3,728
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
to be more threatening ,China needs dozens of nuclear sub prowling the west pacific underwater and defence pact with south American nation,Cuba or Venezuela.
No, with Hypersonic missiles SSBNs become less of an issue, important but only as a second strike weapon, as Hypersonic missiles can surpise very quickly now
 

baqai

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 28, 2006
2,368
1
3,129
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The missile "missed" it target by some distance(some reports suggest 2 x dozen miles ) so lets see if it did or didnot ( you really dont know what the missile was targetted to aim at in real terms! )
even if it missed by say 24-30 miles (which by the way in case of nuclear warhead would not make a difference) i am sure they did managed to wet many pants around the globe with this test
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom