• Saturday, January 25, 2020

China readies for a sharp short war with Japan

Discussion in 'China & Far East' started by Yzd Khalifa, Feb 21, 2014.

  1. Yzd Khalifa

    Yzd Khalifa ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    12,250
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +11 / 16,162 / -1
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    China readies for ‘short, sharp’ war with Japan | Missile ThreatMissile Threat

    China readies for ‘short, sharp’ war with Japan
    The Washington Times
    Originally published at
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...harp-war-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

    Posted on February 19, 2014 by editor
    China’s recent military exercises revealed that it is preparing for a short war with Japan over disputed islands in the East China Sea, a Navy intelligence official recently warned.

    Navy Capt. James Fanell, director of intelligence and information operations for the U.S. Pacific Fleet, said during a conference in San Diego that the People’s Liberation Army’s large-scale war games last fall showed that the island of Taiwan is no longer Beijing’s lone major target.

    “In addition to a longstanding task to restoreTaiwan to the mainland, we witnessed the massive amphibious and cross-military region exercise, Mission Action 2013, and concluded that the PLA has been given new task: To be able to conduct a short, sharp war to destroy Japanese forces in the East China Sea, followed by what can only be expected [as] a seizure of the Senkakus, or even the southern Ryukus,” he said.

    The uninhabited Senkakus islands are located north of Taiwan and south of Japan’s Ryuku islands. China claims the chain as its “Diaoyu” islands.

    Capt. Fanell, who last year warned that China was escalating its bullying of regional neighbors, said security in the Asia Pacific over the past year has worsened, reaching a nadir in November withChina’s imposition of an air defense zone over much of the East China Sea.

    Earlier, Chinese coast guard and naval forces had conducted a coordinated series of provocations aimed at intimidating nearby nations, he said.

    The provocations included China’s harassment of a U.S. warship. The encounter led to the near-collision between the guided-missile cruiser USS Cowpens and a Chinese amphibious ship in the South China Sea. Officials said the incident could have triggered a larger conflict between the U.S. and China.

    China asserted the Cowpens had violated a defense zone around its aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, near Hainan Island. But Capt. Fanell said the U.S. ship was 50 miles away when the Chinese amphibious ship sailed within 100 yards of the Cowpens and stopped in front of it, forcing the U.S. ship to make an emergency turn to avoid collision.

    The Chinese also continued “expansionism” throughout the region last year, he said.

    “Tensions in the South China and East China seas have deteriorated, with the Chinese coast guard playing the role of antagonist, harassing China’s neighbors, while PLA navy ships, their protectors, conduct port calls throughout the region, promising friendship and cooperation,” Capt. Fanell said at the Feb. 13 conference.

    Capt. Fanell also expressed concern about a report published last fall in China’s state-run Global Times that highlighted, with graphics, the effects of submarine-launched nuclear missile attacks on West Coast cities. The article said the JL-2 missile attacks would kill up to 12 million Americans.

    “Imagine the outrage if a similar statement had been made by any U.S. media outlet,” he said, noting that China’s first ballistic missile submarine patrols are expected to begin this year.

    Capt. Fanell noted that the late Gen. Liu Huaqing, considered the father of the Chinese navy, in 1983 outlined Beijing’s timetable for naval hegemony: By 2010, China will achieve naval supremacy over the what its call the “first island chain” — waters near its coast — and by 2020 will expand to control waters around the “second island chain” located hundreds of miles from China.

    Liu predicted that by 2040 “China will have the power to contain the dominance of the U.S. Navyin the Pacific and Indian Oceans,” Capt. Fanellsaid, noting that Liu was known for directing forces that killed unarmed protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in 1989 and engineered the naval attack that killed 70 Vietnamese sailors at the South China Sea’s Johnson South Reef in 1988.

    “I think they are ahead of schedule,” Capt. Fanellsaid.

    Another speaker, Rear Adm. James G. Foggo, said he is leading a Navy effort to update a maritime strategy that will be released in the spring.

    Adm. Foggo, assistant deputy chief of naval operations, noted that in 2007 the Navy’s maritime strategy failed to mention China, an omission unlikely for the upcoming strategy as the Obama administration shifts its focus to Asia and the military concentrates on its new Air Sea Battle concept.

    Adm. Foggo was involved in the new battle concept that seeks to better coordinate naval and air forces to counter what the Pentagon callsChina’s anti-access, area-denial weaponry — missiles, submarines and other high-technology arms.

    Air Sea Battle “scares a lot of people, including the Chinese,” he said.

    The admiral said the military is seeking to follow the policy that came out of last year’s meeting between President Obama and Chinese PresidentXi Jinping to develop closer military ties.

    Adm. Foggo said it is very important for the two militaries to develop norms, standards of behavior and rules of the road so that a military “miscalculation” is avoided.

    A third speaker, Navy Capt. David A. Adams, director of the Captain’s Initiatives Group of the 7th Fleet, headquartered in Japan, warned thatChina’s nuclear buildup and the lack of any dialogue about its strategic forces are a dangerous mix.

    Capt. Adams said U.S. “strategic deterrence remains important” in the strategy for the Pacific region.

    China is pursuing what he termed a “hybrid approach” to warfare that combines traditional and non-traditional capabilities, including economic warfare and cyber warfare, and the U.S. must do more to prepare for it.

    “They are pursuing a hybrid approach to warfare, not the big war, but it could be high-tech, hybrid, low-tech, legal, financial, cyber,” Capt. Adamssaid. “And we’re already losing that war in the South China Sea today. And we’re not focused on that, and our strategy, that peripheral conflict.”

    To better deal with China, the United States needs to bolster strategic advantages of submarines and air power, he said. More aircraft carriers and submarines should be based in the Asia Pacific as well.

    “We have to think unconventionally, hedge against the big war, and be ready to win a hybrid war that we’re not even thinking about,” Capt. Adams said. “And if we lose a war, if the Navy has its Vietnam, it’s going to be a dirty, hybrid paramilitary war in the Pacific.”

    The panel discussion on China was held at the annual Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association conference. Video of the conference was posted by the U.S. Naval Institute.

    ‘insidious’ cyber war

    Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Tuesday warned of a new form of conflict that he said poses a major national security threat.

    Speaking at the Beth El Synagogue in Bethesda,Mr. Hagel said cyber warfare is one type of future conflict that could destroy societies without traditional military strikes.

    “Cyber warfare is a significant threat to the security of our country or any organized society or nations because it has the risks for all the obvious reasons,” he said.

    “And it’s particularly insidious because it is stealthy, it’s unseen — you can bring down literally an economy of a country, wipe out an electric grid, or paralyze your banking system; You can go after computers on national security platforms with ships and planes.”

    The problem is that the source of cyberattacks is difficult to identify.

    “There’s not one bullet fired and it is a very dangerous prospect,” he said. “That’s a new kind of threat that’s very real.”

    On the problem of multibillion dollar defense cuts,Mr. Hagel said the budget agreement reached in December will help stabilize Pentagon spending.

    The agreement pared back scheduled cuts of $40 billion this year and $50 billion next year to $30 billion this year and about $40 billion in 2015.

    “It gives us some budget certainty for two years,” he said, noting the funding problem will return under the Budget Control Act in 2016.

    U.S.’ ‘fatal weakness’

    A Chinese military analyst this month revealed one of the People’s Liberation Army’s secrets for defeating the U.S. in a future conflict: space warfare.

    Yang Minqing, an analyst at the World Affairs Research Center of the state-run Xinhua News Agency, said despite its advanced weaponry, theU.S. military overly relies on “protection and support from its infrastructure in space.” He called this over-reliance the United States’ “fatal weakness.”

    As a result, nations like China, Russia and advanced nations in Europe are ready to take advantage of the weakness and could “crush” theU.S. military in “localized attacks” on space systems, communications links and ground facilities.

    China has developed several space weapons, including anti-satellite missiles, lasers and directed energy guns, and maneuvering satellites.

    U.S. officials have said the military could be crippled in operating over long distances if up to 20 of its communications, intelligence and navigation satellites were knocked out.
     
  2. BoQ77

    BoQ77 BANNED

    Messages:
    8,707
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Ratings:
    +5 / 4,383 / -4
    Country:
    Viet Nam
    Location:
    Viet Nam
    That's reality to expect a short and massive war from China ... That's their style ...
    During border conflicts with Russian, Indian, Vietnamese ...
     
  3. xunzi

    xunzi SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,744
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Ratings:
    +4 / 10,976 / -6
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    United States
    We would only go to war if Japan fires the first shot. You can guarantee on that.
     
  4. bolo

    bolo SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,748
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,031 / -13
    Liu Huaqing, China need more generals like him.

    that's not a good strategy. Other countries can lay claims to islands that are historically Chinese and as long as they don't fire the first shot, the islands will never belong to China.

    Sometimes you need to make the first move to take back things that belong to you.
     
  5. Viet

    Viet ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    20,155
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 15,871 / -2
    Country:
    Viet Nam
    Location:
    Germany
    yes, China should start the war by preemptive strikes on Okinawa and Hawaii. Go China go.
     
  6. ChineseTiger1986

    ChineseTiger1986 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,644
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Ratings:
    +12 / 39,905 / -1
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Canada
    small conflict = destroy the navy and air force of jsdf
     
  7. Fukuoka

    Fukuoka SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,035
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 928 / -8
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    France
    You support them now?
     
  8. ChineseTiger1986

    ChineseTiger1986 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,644
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Ratings:
    +12 / 39,905 / -1
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Canada
    In fact, Japan should thank us if there is a small war between us and them.

    Since they always want to become a normal country with its own military, so China will do a favor for them.

    The modern China doesn't really fear Japan regardless they are fascist or democratic, they are too small to pose a threat to an industrialized China.

    While China's only goal is to kick USA out of Asia, so a small war between China/Japan with USA being helpless will break the US/Japan alliance.

    In the end, USA will be out of Asia, China will achieve its goal, while Japan can have the excuse re-militarize themselves again.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2014
  9. Khan_patriot

    Khan_patriot SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,617
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Ratings:
    +5 / 2,583 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I believe the Chinese can win the war against the Japs, but when you factor in the Japanese Mutual Defense Pact with the US things change dramatically, I doubt the US will get into such a conflict which has potential US involvement......
     
  10. karan.1970

    karan.1970 BANNED

    Messages:
    14,781
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Ratings:
    +1 / 20,182 / -21
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Expecting China to be stupid enough to throw away their peaceful growth trajectory for a dick measuring contest with Japan is simply insane...
     
  11. ChineseTiger1986

    ChineseTiger1986 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,644
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Ratings:
    +12 / 39,905 / -1
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Canada
    US will be in total dilemma when facing this situation.

    - If they get involved, then it will definitely trigger a nuclear war with China.

    - If they don't get involved, then they will totally lose their place in the Asia-Pacific, they will be totally out.

    So that's why China will refrain the attack on the Japanese soil if there is no necessary, and the primary goal is to destroy the air force and navy of JSDF.

    US has no invalid reason to enter into the war if the Japanese soil has been touched.
     
  12. Hypersonicmissiles

    Hypersonicmissiles FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    684
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,010 / -2
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    US is our main threat. All others are too weak to mess with China. Dismantling the US must be our first priority. That's why we must be happy when the US economy does bad. The weaker they get, the better for us.
     
  13. arp2041

    arp2041 BANNED

    Messages:
    10,406
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Ratings:
    +5 / 27,152 / -14
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    China won't be fighting Japan.............

    It would be fighting Japan & US of A
     
  14. Viet

    Viet ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    20,155
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 15,871 / -2
    Country:
    Viet Nam
    Location:
    Germany
    LOL...no, I only support Vietnam.
    according to some delusional Chinese, you can easily take down Japan. So why hesitate?
     
  15. ChineseTiger1986

    ChineseTiger1986 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,644
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Ratings:
    +12 / 39,905 / -1
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Canada
    When USA is out of Asia, then it is Game Over.