What's new

Can Pakistan Reboot Its ‘Belt and Road’ Partnership With China?

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 16, 2012
10,860
-16
18,779
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Michael Kugelman

Friday, Sept. 25, 2020

After a series of setbacks, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, a multibillion-dollar assortment of infrastructure projects that constitutes the Pakistani component of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, is poised for a resurgence. Or is it? Last month, the Pakistani investigative news site FactFocus published a damning expose about Asim Bajwa, the head of a government body overseeing CPEC. It claims that Bajwa’s family developed an extensive overseas business empire, without declaring many of those assets. The allegations come at an inconvenient time for Islamabad, just as it tries to right CPEC’s ship.

Launched in 2015, CPEC is a logical partnership for China and Pakistan—two close allies keen to cooperate on much-needed infrastructure projects in Pakistan, while contributing to China’s strategic goal of facilitating access to far-flung markets and expanding its global footprint.

However, when Prime MInister Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party took control in 2018, the Belt and Road Initiative was coming under increasingly sharp global criticism for a lack of transparency, for burdening host countries with high debts and for questionable investment practices that included excessive use of imported Chinese labor.

Resistance to CPEC emerged even in Pakistan, where public sentiment is strongly pro-China and media outlets are pressured not to criticize the high-stakes initiative. There was particularly sharp opposition from marginalized communities in underdeveloped areas of Sindh and Balochistan provinces. They feared that CPEC projects would displace locals and exploit precious natural resources. Khan had also inherited a serious debt crisis from the previous government, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party, heightening concerns that Pakistan lacked the fiscal capacity to manage Chinese loans.

In the early weeks of its term, in the summer of 2018, Khan’s government telegraphed its own anxieties. In a revealing Financial Times interview, the prime minister’s adviser for investment, Abdul Razak Dawood, blamed the previous administration for negotiating unfairly advantageous terms for Chinese companies. “I think we should put everything on hold for a year so we can get our act together,” he stated.

Razak later claimed he was quoted out of context, and other senior officials insisted that Islamabad was not deferring the project. However, the risks of Chinese investment came into sharper relief in April, when a Pakistani government commission looking into high electricity costs in Pakistan released a report highlighting how Chinese independent power-generating projects were mired in corruption.

That same month, the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies released a report showing that only about a quarter of 122 announced CPEC projects—valued at $20 billion out of nearly $90 billion in total funding—had been completed.

And yet, despite all of the bad press and setbacks, recent domestic and external developments are injecting momentum into CPEC, positioning it for a resurgence. In October 2019, President Arif Alvi issued an ordinance establishing the CPEC Authority, a coordinating body meant to streamline the initiative’s policymaking process. Under the leadership of Bajwa, a recently retired lieutenant general, the CPEC Authority enabled Pakistan’s powerful military to assert more control over CPEC, which it fervently supports. The CPEC Authority may not make its projects more democratic, but by appointing the most highly qualified people to manage it and to make sure it stays on track, it can make CPEC more effective.

Following this institutional reboot, CPEC ramped up its operational plans. China’s ambassador to Pakistan announced a “second phase” of the scheme last fall, which began implementation in January, with a focus on special economic zones and agricultural investments. This summer, the two countries signed $11 billion in new deals, including a $7 billion renovation of Pakistan’s colonial-era railway infrastructure. Pakistan’s recent success in containing its COVID-19 outbreak means that officials will have ample policy bandwidth to build out these projects, and future ones.

Amid the recent indications that CPEC’s fortunes are changing for the better, Pakistan’s government has unsurprisingly sought to sweep a corruption scandal under the rug.
New geopolitical realities provide further fuel for CPEC’s resurgence. A fatal border standoff between China and India in June plunged relations between those two countries to their lowest level in decades, giving added incentive to Beijing and Islamabad to double down on a project bitterly opposed by New Delhi. Indeed, one of the new investments announced this summer entails nearly $4 billion in hydropower projects in Pakistan-administered Kashmir—a region claimed by India.

There are other potential opportunities for expanding CPEC to other countries, though they are still far off. China is reportedly on the verge of signing a strategic partnership with Iran that entails Chinese infrastructure assistance for Tehran. This raises the possibility that Beijing could help develop Iran’s strategic Chabahar port on the Gulf of Oman—a project to which India was committed until stepped-up U.S. sanctions on Iran cast doubt on New Delhi’s role—and possibly link it to the Gwadar port in Pakistan, a linchpin CPEC initiative only 45 miles from Chabahar. Furthermore, Islamabad’s deepening relations with Turkey and Russia could result in those countries contributing to the project. Finally, recently launched Afghan peace talks raise the possibility of an eventual settlement that enables CPEC to expand into a more stable Afghanistan.

Certainly, CPEC still faces major challenges. Recent attacks on Chinese interests in Pakistan, and a new alliance between violent Sindhi and Baloch nationalists opposed to CPEC, underscore the security risks. Pakistan’s economy, despite some encouraging signs, remains severely stressed. Old problems like opacity, debt risks and questionable investment practices persist.

Then, there are the allegations against Bajwa. The FactFocus report, written by the Pakistani journalist Ahmad Noorani, alleges that Bajwa’s family oversees a business empire of 99 companies in four countries—including ownership of 133 Papa John’s pizza shops valued at nearly $40 million. It also claims that Bajwa stated in an official declaration in June—just weeks after he was appointed to an additional role as special assistant to Khan for information and broadcasting—that neither he nor his wife hold assets outside Pakistan.

Bajwa has denied the report’s allegations, calling them “baseless,” yet he recently announced his resignation from his position as a special assistant to Khan, while retaining his post at the CPEC Authority. However, in a notable twist, Khan rejected Bajwa’s resignation, and he continues to serve in both roles.

Amid the recent indications that CPEC’s fortunes are changing for the better, Islamabad has unsurprisingly sought to sweep the scandal under the rug. Khan’s government has dismissed the allegations against Bajwa as propaganda and, in the words of a post on the ruling party’s official Twitter account, “a heinous conspiracy against Pakistan.” Indeed, thanks to India’s ever-worsening relations with Pakistan and China, Islamabad can conveniently—and, in the eyes of many Pakistanis, convincingly—declare that these allegations are just an Indian-orchestrated plot to undermine CPEC. Pakistan’s compliant media has helped by featuring little coverage of the allegations.

The government has other reasons to keep the allegations out of the public eye: shielding Pakistan’s military from accountability for its economic empire, and guaranteeing that CPEC continues to be upheld as sacrosanct in a nation where it is rarely criticized publicly.

Given the many well-documented cases of lax accountability and opacity in China’s overseas infrastructure investments, it isn’t a great look for the top official in Pakistan charged with overseeing CPEC investments to be mired in a corruption scandal. The optics are also problematic for Khan and his party, which has a strong anti-graft platform.

With all that’s at stake, Islamabad can scarcely afford to let an ill-timed distraction mushroom into a full-fledged crisis. Pakistani leaders will thus be keen to ensure that a troubled but critical infrastructure initiative maintains its newfound momentum.

Michael Kugelman is deputy director of the Asia Program and senior associate for South Asia at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C.

 
Last edited:

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 16, 2012
10,860
-16
18,779
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Reading through the usual American BS one can only conclude that the US deep state is in panic mode as far as CPEC development goes. The Americans had secretly hoped that PTM and BLA proxies would halt the progress considerably to a point where Pakistan and China would be discouraged to continue. Instead, CPEC is re-energized and ready to move to new phases.

The US deep state has waged a war spanning almost two decades in neighboring Afghanistan with the sole purpose to destabilize, balkanize and denuclearize Pakistan. After almost two decades, president Trump has decided that enough is enough. This move wasn't meant to appease Pakistan, but rather to put an end to a pointless war which hasn't yielded desired outcomes. The US deep state still remains skeptical of the Taliban talks, but has little to offer in face of domestic hostility and opposition to a failed war. The US deep state believes it can turn the tide and control Pakistan as it once used to. Today, the Pakistan challenge for the US deep state has grown immensely. What was initially supposed to be a fairly simple job to subdue the Pakistan army, now seems a rather colossal undertaking. Hence the US deep state has to partner with India in order to challenge Pakistan and China. The "you are with us or against us" blackmail just has no weight. With China and Pakistan partnering up in many areas, the US is employing various propaganda techniques to undermine CPEC. From Uyghur propaganda to PTM and BLA terror support. Many PTM and BLA terrorists are seeking refuge in Western capitals. They are being groomed and nurtured to further the propaganda.

Pakistan and China need to remain wary. India and the US are the chief CPEC spoilers. Both are going to support terrorist groups such as BLA and PTM to disrupt CPEC progress. The US deep state doesn't hide its frustration and opposition against CPEC. The US deep state has a big problem with an assertive China. Since the Americans have identified CPEC as the main pilot project in the OBOR undertaking, the US deep state has every stake in disrupting the template project. CPEC success means US/India defeat.
 
Last edited:

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
5,349
20
13,109
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
The US and its Regional allies have been meddling and funding political unrest to sabotage CPEC, for some time now. Unfortunately they can easily find accomplices in Pakistan in all walks of life to further their agendas.
 
Last edited:

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 16, 2012
10,860
-16
18,779
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
The US and its Regional allies have been meddling and funding political unrest ,to sabotage CPEC for some time now. Unfortunately they can find accomplices in Pakistan in all walks of life to further their agendas.
These accomplices need to be checked. There is always going to be opposition from Western quarters regarding Chinese undertakings all over the world. We understand the rivalry. China is now the new enemy and focus of the Western established order. Pakistan receives the brunt because the West regards Pakistan as geographically important. Additionally, unfortunately Pakistan has been a reluctant Western ally during the Cold War. There is a history. The US deep state and its actors in crime have a specific plan with Pakistan. Just like they have a plan for China. Just because this malicious plan could not be implemented through the Afghan war doesn't mean this bloc is going to throw the towel in the ring. The plan is to demote Pakistan as a colony of India. India is the sheriff in town for the Western bloc. China and Pakistan are on the right track realising that India cannot have its way.
 
Last edited:

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
5,349
20
13,109
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
I don't believe it is that bad. We have spoilers on our side, but the civilian rulers and armed forces are generally speaking on the same page.
Hopefully you are right, our top brass are known to travel in two boats at the same time historically. I just hope our CPEC picks up again.
 

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
5,349
20
13,109
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
I agree. We used to have this trend during the US WoT. I believe at this time the trend has changed.
We Pakistanis love our armed forces EXPONENTIALLY, but historically a handful of our top brass always tend to relocate their families to the US when they retire. Why do they do it ,must be left to the historians to dig out the truth. The US establishment will never be our FRIENDS, i hope people on the top realize this as well.
 

Mav3rick

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 4, 2008
5,665
9
3,960
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
All said and done and all things aside, why isn't the economy reaping benefits of the multiple Billions invested by the Chinese in the past 10 years? When will CPEC start returning profit on all the investment? We were promised a much stronger economy on the back of CPEC alone and yet we are worse off then we were even 2 years ago. I have so much hope with CPEC, am I crazy to believe CPEC will rid us of all our debt eventually?
 

Mav3rick

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 4, 2008
5,665
9
3,960
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
We Pakistanis love our armed forces EXPONENTIALLY, but historically a handful of our top brass always tend to relocate their families to the US when they retire. Why do they do it ,must be left to the historians to dig out the truth. The US establishment will never be our FRIENDS, i hope people on the top realize this as well.
I think once they reach that elite circle of 0.0001 or something, the top 20-30 of the Military, their focus shifts towards multiple goals; and perhaps at times it is possible for external forces to hoodwink them into doing things which are not beneficial to Pakistan in the long run.
 

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 26, 2018
5,349
20
13,109
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
I think once they reach that elite circle of 0.0001 or something, the top 20-30 of the Military, their focus shifts towards multiple goals; and perhaps at times it is possible for external forces to hoodwink them into doing things which are not beneficial to Pakistan in the long run.
You just nailed it bro, May Allah give them Hidayat.
 

Patriot forever

FULL MEMBER
Jun 2, 2020
581
1
1,010
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Hopefully you are right, our top brass are known to travel in two boats at the same time historically. I just hope our CPEC picks up again.
Sir CPEC is going full throttle and has assumed a course which is beneficial to Pakistan, see the stark difference in the nature of projects as well as the cost of contracts. During the past government CPEC was compromised and became a tool for political interests and kick backs, ignoring the long term feasibility and financial impact.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top