What's new

Can Pakistan protect Itself from Indian Ballistic Missiles?

El Sidd

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 5, 2017
65,470
1
52,165
Country
Pakistan
Location
Germany
Pakistan cannot defend itself from rogue Indian missile launches. The strategic command has not been tasked to formulate a deterrent policy or doctrine.
 

Thəorətic Muslim

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 5, 2012
4,786
17
4,845
Country
United States
Location
United States
What's with Indians attempting to hide their identities under western names?

I mean for a proud people who's history goes back to the genesis of Earth you'd think there would be potential names that aren't European.
 

Bleek

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 21, 2021
5,931
6
7,434
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Forget Indian mijjile, we are still figuring out ways to counter the Indian super pilots like Abhinandan who take down F-16s in their MiG 21s.

Powerful India, keep going.
 

SQ8

INACTIVE
Mar 28, 2009
40,424
508
90,221
Country
United States
Location
United States
Pakistan has 4 cities and its done - with its current state it really doesn’t have much to lose. India with its many many more cities and a LOt LoT more to lose is the protection.

And despite all the BMd purchases and investment - India still cannot protect itself from Pakistan’s arsenal.

Pakistan is not looking to win - just ensuring come hell and high water that India loses as well when it comes to a nuclear exhange.

Any Bhaktora who wishes to make a snide comment on economic conditions and so on when it is NOT the scope of discussion will find themselves kicked out
 

Primus

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 27, 2020
3,790
2
5,314
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Pakistan has 4 cities and its done - with its current state it really doesn’t have much to lose. India with its many many more cities and a LOt LoT more to lose is the protection.

And despite all the BMd purchases and investment - India still cannot protect itself from Pakistan’s arsenal.

Pakistan is not looking to win - just ensuring come hell and high water that India loses as well when it comes to a nuclear exhange.

Any Bhaktora who wishes to make a snide comment on economic conditions and so on when it is NOT the scope of discussion will find themselves kicked out
I'm getting mad killzone vibes from this
 

Johny D

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 18, 2010
3,607
-15
2,583
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
neither pak nor india...neither US nor China..neither Isreal nor Iran..neither South Korea nor North Korea can fully protect itself from massive modern WMD attacks
 

SQ8

INACTIVE
Mar 28, 2009
40,424
508
90,221
Country
United States
Location
United States
I'm getting mad killzone vibes from this
Its basic MAD and frankly it favors Pakistan many more times than India. A banana republic has a lot less value then the supposed next superpower and India knows it. Hence all bets are off a military option unless Pakistan gives up its nukes. Enter Pakistanis(because they tolerate their leaders) who are ok with a ruined economy, mismanagement and everything that allows powers that be to force(IF such motivations are provided sufficiently by India) if nothing else a blanket neutering of the nuclear arsenal
 

Primus

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 27, 2020
3,790
2
5,314
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Its basic MAD and frankly it favors Pakistan many more times than India. A banana republic has a lot less value then the supposed next superpower and India knows it. Hence all bets are off a military option unless Pakistan gives up its nukes. Enter Pakistanis(because they tolerate their leaders) who are ok with a ruined economy, mismanagement and everything that allows powers that be to force(IF such motivations are provided sufficiently by India) if nothing else a blanket neutering of the nuclear arsenal
Killzone vibes.


When the ISA repelled the initial Helghast invasion of Vekta during the second extrasolar War, the ISA launched operation archangel to invade the Helghast homeworld to end the war. The helghast vowed to annihilate the ISA invasion force and to pretty much cause irreparable damage to the ISA (and later Earth), which does happen as they completely slaughter the ISA invasion fleet (but were unable to launch their nukes off at Earth).
 

Abid123

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 1, 2021
2,412
-7
3,326
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
No country in the world can protect itself from a large scale nuclear attack.

No country in the world can protect itself from a large scale nuclear attack.
 

M.Bison

FULL MEMBER
Mar 2, 2019
1,079
1
1,647
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Ballistic missiles will be redundant with new technologies, India should just increase the capital expenditure on acquisition of new defense tech.

Pakistan is no longer a threat.

What is your opinion on Russian technology after insights from the Ukraine war? Do you think India should rapidly divest in Russian technology and start investing in more traditional western weapon systems? I wonder, if you believe American and Western European weapon systems would be much better suited for the Indian armed forces?
 

SQ8

INACTIVE
Mar 28, 2009
40,424
508
90,221
Country
United States
Location
United States
Ballistic missiles will be redundant with new technologies, India should just increase the capital expenditure on acquisition of new defense tech.

Pakistan is no longer a threat.
Maybe not making a comment was more valuable than making one in your case because that added nothing to the supposed redundancy.
 

Olympus81

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 18, 2022
3,354
2
4,598
Country
Pakistan
Location
Thailand
A salvo of say 5 ballistic missiles each on India’s power centers. Followed by salvo of cruise missiles. Then the cities near the border facing MRLS missiles.

Not even factoring delivery through air force, navy.

You think Indian missile defense can protect against that?
 

Enigma SIG

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 20, 2009
7,937
-5
11,840
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
GHQ will only protect if missile is fired toward DHA.

All other missiles will be given full guidance by GHQ to explode wherever required.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom