What's new

Beating the Indian Navy without going broke

Foxtrot Delta

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 18, 2015
4,921
1
7,860
Country
Pakistan
Location
China
With what? Stop being delusional.. attacking USN CBG is beyond your capability..
They dont have a reason to attack us first. But like all battle hardened and strategic militaries . plans are available and all tech in place. There is not just 1 plan but multiple. But we hope there would not come such a time cuz it would cost us alot of sacrifices.
 

Ultima Thule

ELITE MEMBER
Jan 26, 2012
16,887
0
1,091
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Yes, it can. This kind of missile is not a real threat to modern AAW ships. This missile design is from the 1950s.
And your mighty brahmose is threat all the navies of the world @randomradio :lol::enjoy: rhe concepts remains same either for Brahmouse or CM-400AKG to reduce reaction time of the enemy by speed @randomradio :lol::enjoy:

Nope. Even PLAN have inferior missiles and radars compared to IN.

Right now, the most advanced AAW destroyers are Indian, French, Italian and British, primarily because of Barak and Aster.

All other navies, including PLAN and USN, use outdated missile designs that are very big and heavy. There is a generation difference between the outdated missiles and Barak/Aster in terms of design.
and how do you know that PLAN have a inferior missile and RADARs, you have too much false Indian superiority ego over the world @randomradio :lol:;):enjoy:

All other navies, including PLAN and USN, use outdated missile designs that are very big and heavy.
Then why Indian armed forces signed a deal for S-400 and using S-300 they are also very big and heavy @randomradio ;):enjoy: and as for your information SM-6. SM-3 is long range SAMs, long range then S-300, S-400, SM-6 have range of more than 600 km whereas S-4 have a range of more than 300 km @randomradio ;):enjoy:
 

Daghalodi

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 12, 2009
3,948
1
4,169
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
So any noob can post any BS here and call himself defence analyst.
This thread is about how PN should tackle Indian navy

BUT


I just learned that INdian Navy is more technologically advanced than United States Navy!!!

PN doesnt stand a chance,the Chinese navy is useless their weapons dont work even US navy ships are old and outdated compared to Indian Navy!!
 
Last edited:

randomradio

BANNED
Feb 14, 2016
6,990
-17
4,818
Country
India
Location
India
And your mighty brahmose is threat all the navies of the world @randomradio :lol::enjoy: rhe concepts remains same either for Brahmouse or CM-400AKG to reduce reaction time of the enemy by speed @randomradio :lol::enjoy:
Different class. But Brahmos isn't unbeatable.

and how do you know that PLAN have a inferior missile and RADARs, you have too much false Indian superiority ego over the world @randomradio :lol:;):enjoy:
Just read the specs.
 

UserUnknown2025

FULL MEMBER
Mar 9, 2018
475
-7
780
Country
China
Location
United States
This thread is about how PN should tackle Indian navy

BUT


I just learned that INdian Navy is more technologically advanced than United States Navy!!!

PN doesnt stand a chance,the Chinese navy is useless their weapons dont work even US navy ships are old and outdated compared to Indian Navy!!
This is because Indian ships always exist in the future and not the present :rofl:.
 

randomradio

BANNED
Feb 14, 2016
6,990
-17
4,818
Country
India
Location
India
This thread is about how PN should tackle Indian navy

BUT


I just learned that INdian Navy is more technologically advanced than United States Navy!!!

PN doesnt stand a chance,the Chinese navy is useless their weapons dont work even US navy ships are old and outdated compared to Indian Navy!!
Yes and no. But you got the gist of it.

The PN indeed doesn't stand a chance. PLAN and IN won't fight much due to geography and other limited capabilities.

And the USN is yet to get new generation ships and new generation missiles. They are still stuck with old gear which they are modernising the best they can. Like how they are still stuck with Super Hornets and the Aim-120.

PLAN's modernisation is better than USN's right now. But IN was able to secure new technologies because they had to start from scratch, unlike PLAN and USN.

Outdated doesn't mean obsolete. Just old. Everybody's tech will work as advertised. It's just that the PN is completely out of its league.

Hence, yes and no.
 

Ultima Thule

ELITE MEMBER
Jan 26, 2012
16,887
0
1,091
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Different class. But Brahmos isn't unbeatable.



Just read the specs.
Both Indian and Chinese has a similar Tech in the term of radar and missile, Chinese working alone while you working with west to improve your tech, they vast far far more advance military industrial Complex than India has, their radars and missiles are more compare to USN than india, india is no where near than China in the term of tech development @randomradio ;):enjoy:
 

randomradio

BANNED
Feb 14, 2016
6,990
-17
4,818
Country
India
Location
India
Both Indian and Chinese has a similar Tech in the term of radar and missile, Chinese working alone while you working with west to improve your tech, they vast far far more advance military industrial Complex than India has, their radars and missiles are more compare to USN than india, india is no where near than China in the term of tech development @randomradio ;):enjoy:
The problem is China is working alone. They haven't reached Western standards yet.

India does have advanced radars and missiles. That's how we developed the BMD.

Here's an example:
https://www.thehindubusinessline.co...ab-for-surveillance-radar/article24435805.ece
RAWL-03 will be offered in both ship-borne and land-based configurations.

The system is based on the latest GaN TR Module technology and incorporates the latest signal processing techniques.


So we already have GaN tech, which came from Saab. So the stuff that's going on our ships is extremely advanced. The Americans are still using PESA radars.

IAF recently said they will no longer import radars. So we already have all the world class stuff.
 

danger007

ELITE MEMBER
May 30, 2011
10,013
-27
8,288
Country
India
Location
India
They dont have a reason to attack us first. But like all battle hardened and strategic militaries . plans are available and all tech in place. There is not just 1 plan but multiple. But we hope there would not come such a time cuz it would cost us alot of sacrifices.

Fascinating?? Are you aware PN is very small navy compared to IN let alone USN... no you don't have strategies or the equipment or the training to face might of USN...
 

Ultima Thule

ELITE MEMBER
Jan 26, 2012
16,887
0
1,091
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
The problem is China is working alone. They haven't reached Western standards yet.

India does have advanced radars and missiles. That's how we developed the BMD.

Here's an example:
https://www.thehindubusinessline.co...ab-for-surveillance-radar/article24435805.ece
RAWL-03 will be offered in both ship-borne and land-based configurations.

The system is based on the latest GaN TR Module technology and incorporates the latest signal processing techniques.


So we already have GaN tech, which came from Saab. So the stuff that's going on our ships is extremely advanced. The Americans are still using PESA radars.

IAF recently said they will no longer import radars. So we already have all the world class stuff.
but they (China) have both standards Russian as well as from west, they know how to improve it, GaN is extremely new tech which will be mature in at least in 10 more years as your senior member saying, and as American system is based on networks they have lot of AESA/PESA over the horizon radars, and recently SABR radar is GAN based tech For F-16 @randomradio ;):enjoy:

and last word for you thanks to west to import these tech @randomradio :p:;):enjoy::agree:

Fascinating?? Are you aware PN is very small navy compared to IN let alone USN... no you don't have strategies or the equipment or the training to face might of USN...
First you to come close to PLAN than you think about USN @danger007 ;):enjoy:
 

randomradio

BANNED
Feb 14, 2016
6,990
-17
4,818
Country
India
Location
India
they know how to improve it, GaN is extremely new tech which will be mature in at least in 10 more years as your senior member saying, and as American system is based on networks they have lot of AESA/PESA over the horizon radars, and recently SABR radar is GAN based tech For F-16 @randomradio ;):enjoy:
We already have GaN. If you read the link, it's talking about marketing GaN radars.

SABR is GaAs.

First you to come close to PLAN than you think about USN @danger007 ;):enjoy:
We are way ahead of the PLAN. Did you forget that China bought their tech from Israel?
 

FuturePAF

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 17, 2014
3,601
18
4,365
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Read this thread
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chinas-assassins-mace-weaponry.243996/

Here are 5 Stated in the First Post:
1. Anti-Ship ballistic Missile
2. Conventional EMP
3. Stealth Cruise Missile
4. Stealth UCAV
5. Hypersonic Missiles

Add on their maneuvering warheads, Cyber Attacks, Psyops, and other weapons and tactics the Chinese have been studying for the past 22 years (Since the 1996 Taiwan straits crisis).
 

danger007

ELITE MEMBER
May 30, 2011
10,013
-27
8,288
Country
India
Location
India
but they (China) have both standards Russian as well as from west, they know how to improve it, GaN is extremely new tech which will be mature in at least in 10 more years as your senior member saying, and as American system is based on networks they have lot of AESA/PESA over the horizon radars, and recently SABR radar is GAN based tech For F-16 @randomradio ;):enjoy:

and last word for you thanks to west to import these tech @randomradio :p:;):enjoy::agree:


First you to come close to PLAN than you think about USN @danger007 ;):enjoy:

I Never claimed anything against any Navy.. might not be in PLAAN speed but IN adding more teeth every year..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom