What's new

Bangladesh Army

Buddhistforlife

FULL MEMBER
Jul 10, 2018
1,914
-38
1,083
Country
Nepal
Location
Nepal
Simply because it is not a fighter jet.

Kidding aside: We need a missile command under BAF responsible for R&D and O&M of all BMs and long range CMs. SRBMs are not artillery.
Ballistic missile is controlled by a separate department known as strategic forces command in India, Aerospace forces in Iran, Army strategic forces command in Pakistan.
 

Avicenna

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 18, 2016
4,736
3
7,453
Country
United States
Location
Bangladesh
Air force and ballistic missile? Dude do you even know what is a ballistic missile?
Not to pile on the hate coming your way but....



ICBMs are under the charge of the USAF.

Even though the geographic scale is smaller of course, it makes sense for the BAF to have SRBM or MRBM if they choose too.
 

Destranator

FULL MEMBER
Jul 20, 2018
1,124
-2
1,948
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Ballistic missile is controlled by a separate department known as strategic forces command in India, Aerospace forces in Iran, Army strategic forces command in Pakistan.
Not to pile on the hate coming your way but....



ICBMs are under the charge of the USAF.

Even though the geographic scale is smaller of course, it makes sense for the BAF to have SRBM or MRBM if they choose too.
Two main reasons why the AF should be owning BMs:

- Engineering - Aeronautics, aerial guidance and jet/eocket propulsion are AF areas of expertise.

- Administration - At present, the amount responsibility BA and BN shoulder are enormous. The missile command will offer BAF justification for parity with the other two forces.
 

Michael Corleone

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2014
7,939
-5
7,185
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Ukraine
- Administration - At present, the amount responsibility BA and BN shoulder are enormous. The missile command will offer BAF justification for parity with the other two forces.
Army doesn’t even want to depend on Air Force. They’re trying to expand their transport logistics and be independent of BAF
I reckon if things goes on like the way they’re, it will not be long before there won’t be any need for BAF to exist anymore.
 

SpaceMan18

FULL MEMBER
Aug 10, 2020
416
0
163
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
Army doesn’t even want to depend on Air Force. They’re trying to expand their transport logistics and be independent of BAF
I reckon if things goes on like the way they’re, it will not be long before there won’t be any need for BAF to exist anymore.
I agree , during WW2 the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air force hated each other for some odd reasons which of course didn't help them.

BAF is honestly a joke , glad the Army is trying to improve their logistics via their own cargo aircrafts or helicopters.

Our air supremacy is pretty much gone
Two main reasons why the AF should be owning BMs:

- Engineering - Aeronautics, aerial guidance and jet/eocket propulsion are AF areas of expertise.

- Administration - At present, the amount responsibility BA and BN shoulder are enormous. The missile command will offer BAF justification for parity with the other two forces.
A dog has better leadership than the BAF
 

Michael Corleone

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2014
7,939
-5
7,185
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Ukraine
I agree , during WW2 the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air force hated each other for some odd reasons which of course didn't help them.

BAF is honestly a joke , glad the Army is trying to improve their logistics via their own cargo aircrafts or helicopters.

Our air supremacy is pretty much gone


A dog has better leadership than the BAF
Nah it was navy and the army since Air Force of japan was mainly integrated into navy. Navy wanted investment in sea to protect territory, army wanted navy to ferry the army around to protect the territories. Imo same is happening in bd’s case albeit now it’s army vs airforce
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)


Top Bottom