What's new

Balakot air strike: Why IAF used 907-kg ‘penetrator’ bombs to target Jaish terror camp

Status
Not open for further replies.

Keysersoze

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 13, 2006
4,600
2
1,239
IAF wont announce all weapons purchasing details .
Only thing available in public domain is big ticket items .Small development they wont publish.And Indian institutions have a reputation in developing best by combining bests that available to them.
So DRDO might developed a penetrator and added spice kit in to that weapon.

Again penetrator will only use for high precise attack for high value target.

GoI must have to avoid any kind of civilian or military casualities .Because if anything like that happens ,we cant justify that to outside world.
Rest of those trees and wind are just assumption only .No proof.

A simple problem still remains,PA still not allowing international medias in that building complex.
If the attack was just outside somewhere .
They only had to relocate all those inhabitants to some other place .And just allow them to take picture of the building .
Why that is still not happening .?

6 weapons they deployed .One was not clear to launch .5 weapons they launched .4 hit the area precisely .One may be missed .
Everyones attention was towards Balakot but two other targets where in Muzzfarabad and Chakoti .




Entire ops purpose was non military pre emptive strike .
So zero tolerance towards civilian and military casualities.
And yet is not mentioned until now......lol.Sounds like an excuse for not hitting anything.
 
Aug 19, 2012
9,060
119
18,394
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
@The Deterrent .A good read .
Perhaps you can criticise this one
the article covers the explosive parts well, thumbs up to the author atleast he knew what he was writing.
but with all this being said there are all lot of Ifs & Buts, all lot of assumptions.

If the hall is compartmentalized this changes everything because the 'Peak-Overpressure' generated from the detonation will be absorbed by the walls and the softer sub soil, reducing the number of causalities. In that case there will be structural damage to the roof / silo created because the pressure generated will be vented through the vertical silo as it is contained because of the walls. in that case the roof top will not be intact as shown in the satellite imagery.
The author calculated the Overpressure of 14kpa for the detonation at depth, which to be honest is not enough to kill the people in numbers as being claimed.
according to expermental data a 2 psi Overpressure will cause significant damage to the space it is contained in i.e damage to the roof, shattered windows and damage to soft tissue. Lungs in human body are able to take in the pressure in excess of 100kpa - lungs will collapse at 105 kpa (if i recall correctly). so good luck trying to kill people with that.
The entire calculation will change if we consider the factor that there were was just one big hall on the ground floor , that will expose the building to greater impact of Blast Overpressure. The aftermath of such a force will eventually cause the walls to collapse.

the author thinks he can create a smoke screen with the calculations and all but its a joke.

The amount of Intel (taking Indian version) they had, why would they risk using a penetrator bomb when their 'maths' was clearly telling them that it is not enough, yet they decided to go with such type? some geniuses you have in your IAF

Edit:
Came across this study that was done by Pakistani engineers, purpose was to demonstrate the impact of blast on masonry structures.
Below is the picture of 2m x 2m brick wall after it was exposed to 8.4kg of TNT (q). as you can see in the picture, the wall developed a sever crack when charge detonated at mere 3mtr distance. Considering the fact that the article you quoted mentions compartments, then such explosion would have not only caused the walls to collapse but also cause the roof to collapse too because the roof structures are supported by the walls with in too.

As I have said earlier that the entire calculation would change if it was the case of a big hall......
 
Last edited:

Nasr

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 9, 2018
2,201
1
3,948
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The myth of israel's invincibility cannot be discounted, as it stands, their weapons may really work, but apparently not in the "capable" hands of indians. But as the saying goes, "don't ever underestimate your enemy." So to, Pakistan should keep its hawk eyes, focused on its prey.
 

Keysersoze

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 13, 2006
4,600
2
1,239
I think Occams razor should be applied here. Either the IAF missed or they used a mystical weapon that does no damage and yet kills 300 people...
 

The Deterrent

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 7, 2011
3,174
39
6,377
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
IAF wont announce all weapons purchasing details .
Only thing available in public domain is big ticket items .Small development they wont publish.And Indian institutions have a reputation in developing best by combining bests that available to them.
So DRDO might developed a penetrator and added spice kit in to that weapon.

Again penetrator will only use for high precise attack for high value target.

GoI must have to avoid any kind of civilian or military casualities .Because if anything like that happens ,we cant justify that to outside world.
Rest of those trees and wind are just assumption only .No proof.

A simple problem still remains,PA still not allowing international medias in that building complex.
If the attack was just outside somewhere .
They only had to relocate all those inhabitants to some other place .And just allow them to take picture of the building .
Why that is still not happening .?

6 weapons they deployed .One was not clear to launch .5 weapons they launched .4 hit the area precisely .One may be missed .
Everyones attention was towards Balakot but two other targets where in Muzzfarabad and Chakoti .




Entire ops purpose was non military pre emptive strike .
So zero tolerance towards civilian and military casualities.
 

Maarkhoor

ELITE MEMBER
Aug 24, 2015
16,169
42
26,980
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan



Opinion
Balakot air strike: Why IAF used 907-kg ‘penetrator’ bombs to target Jaish terror camp
The Israeli SPICE 2000 used by IAF has an advanced electrical fuze, which accurately predicts the impact sequence and delay required to activate.
SAMEER JOSHI
13 March, 2019 5:33 pm

Illustration by ThePrint Team

At around 3.30 am on 26 February, Mirage 2000s of the Indian Air Force made shallow incursions inside Pakistan and targeted Jaish-e-Mohammed camps at Balakot, along with Muzaffarabad and Chakothi (in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). The strike on the Markaz Syed Ahmad Shaheed madrasa complex located on Jaba hill-top in Balakot was the most significant amongst them, especially considering that the Indian Air Force had struck a target inside Pakistan for the first time since the 1971 war. The strikes were a direct response to the attack by the Pakistan-based terror proxy – JeM – on a CRPF convoy at Pulwama on 14 February in which over 40 Indian jawans had lost their lives.

The IAF used the Israeli made SPICE 2000 stand-off glide bomb to target Balakot. The SPICE 2000 is a glide bomb kit, fitted on a 2000 lb (907 kg) bomb. The IAF uses both the SPICE 1000 and 2000 kits. As per Indian Air Force sources, 5 x SPICE 2000s were utilised to target Balakot, while one bomb was brought back. These bombs fell within 2 metres of their designated mean points of impact (DMPI) in the targeted area. The Indian Air Force has publicly stated that it has synthetic image radar (SAR) imagery of the post-strike battle damage analysis, which confirms its claim that all targets were accurately hit.

Location of JeM’s Balakot terror training camp on Google Maps | Sameer Joshi
Meanwhile, Pakistan has denied any damage or casualties at Balakot, and said that the Indian payloads landed in the nearby forest, missing the targets completely. International satellite experts based on their reading of data available with private satellite networks post-strike, have ridiculed Indian claims that the bombs fell anywhere on the target. This has been widely supported by a large section of the western media, who have been sceptical about the accuracy of the attack. Pakistan, on its part, has completely sealed the targeted camp in Balakot, discouraging any independent verification of the damage.

What has baffled the world is why the 2000 lb bombs, which hit the madrassa complex, did not cause widespread explosive damage over the target. George William Herbert, an international weapon’s expert, tweeted a few days ago that a 2000 lb/907 kg bomb like the Mk 84 made of 428 kg trinitol high explosive core and a 479 kg of metal casing, would have obliterated the building, destroying it completely due to the shock wave travelling at over 1.83–2.13 km/s. Typically, it would double the pressure inside a standard three-storey building around 25 meters wide, further contributing to the damage.

Also read: Pakistan’s entire navy has been out at sea after India bombed Balakot

Latest OSINT data reveals that while at least two of the targeted structures are still standing – with dark smudges or holes visible on the rooftop of the biggest target — they also suggest that SPICE bombs have indeed penetrated the building. While the imagery is synonymous with SPICE strikes seen in Syria, this does not match up to the damage assessment for an Mk 84 or an equivalent bomb carried as part of the SPICE 2000 glide kit as brought out by George Herbert. Also, suspected use of Fuel Air Explosive (FAE) through the SPICE 2000 mission, supported by dark smudges seen in the target area imagery, is also seen as a possibility by some experts. In addition, there is indication of a deep penetration SPICE bomb hit north of the big hall, where a seeming heap of soil is present, which suggests that either the building collapsed after being targetted or the Pak Army has razed it to the ground post strike to hide the damage.

Post Strike Analysis of the target | Col Vinayak Bhatt | ThePrint
Also read: First satellite images show likely damage to Jaish Balakot camp but no massive destruction

IAF sources have recently confirmed that the Mirages had used the ‘penetrator’ version of the SPICE 2000 glide bomb, which has a 907 kg hard metal reinforced casing with an embedded ‘low mass’ TNT warhead of 70–80 kg of net explosive quantity (NEQ). This version is designed to target reinforced concrete installations like C2 centres, penetrating deep before carrying out a low mass explosion to eliminate all with shrapnel and a blast over pressure wave, and not necessarily collapsing the targeted installation. The IAF is confident that this is what has happened at Balakot. This theory is reinforced by the statement of Maulana Ammar, the younger brother of the JeM boss Masood Azhar, that the madrassa complex at Jabba top has indeed been hit by Indian bombs; as well as through discreet interviews with eyewitnesses in the area amid a media clampdown by the Pakistani army, which confirms witnessing at least 35 bodies of killed JeM militants and ISI operatives being taken out post-strike. Indian intelligence had estimated more than 250-300 individuals active inside the camp before the strike. Details of actual number of casualties remains sceptical as of now.

However, rather than being taken at a face value, this revelation has been further given an unwarranted spin within the media and intersecting theories. This is because even a 70–80 kg low mass TNT explosion would send shrapnel and corresponding shock waves upward of 1 km/s as dictated by the Gurney equation out to around 14 meters, enough to cause very significant damage to the targeted structure. Let’s hence diagnostically analyse the usefulness of the penetrator version of the SPICE 2000 as the bomb used by the IAF in its strike at Balakot.

The right deal for the job at hand?
The weapon to target matching suggests that the IAF was specifically looking to carry out a precision strikes and avoid large area collateral damage. As described after strike by the Indian Foreign Secretary, the ‘non-military preemptive strikes’ was aimed at targeting the JeM cadre while avoiding civilian and Pakistani military casualties. Hence the ‘penetrator’ version of the Spice 2000, with a low mass TNT warhead was the right fit for the mission as compared to the high mass Mk 84 bomb equivalent version, which would have inflicted significantly more area damage. The SPICE 2000 is an all-weather 1000 kg glide bomb kit, which uses 12 control surfaces to achieve a definitive range of 60 kilometres. It navigates with the help of IN/ GPS and approaching the target reduces the GPS errors using its electro optical/ infra-red terminal attack sensor. This matches what it sees with pre-loaded satellite/ drone imagery of the target through ‘scene matching’, rapidly reducing the margin of errors and impacting the target within a CEP of less than 3 meters.

Also read: BJP’s backroom warriors are realising they can’t bank on Balakot and are changing gears

The SPICE 2000 used by the IAF has an advanced electrical fuze, which accurately predicts the impact sequence and delay required to activate. This is especially useful when penetrating multiple floors of a building, before exploding on the right level. A microphone embedded with a microcontroller in the smart fuze is used, with the microphone measuring the number of impacts and the microcontroller counting the floors, until the bomb breaks through the desired number of floors. Used extensively by the Israeli Air Force in Lebanon and Syria against tactical battlefield targets and in urban areas, the SPICE 2000 has a near perfect operational reliability record. These fuses would be critical in penetrating the various targeted buildings with at least 2 levels.

The focus of SPICE 2000 strike was the madrasa complex at the north edge of Jaba top, dominated by a huge 30 meters (length) x 30 meters (width) x 8 meters (max height) white/gray main Madrassa building, used mostly for imparting lessons by the instructors to their trainees. This would possibly be the target for a solitary Spice 2000 bomb. Connected to this main hall is a set of buildings. Another concrete structure with two storeys 12 meters (length) x 10 meters (width) x 8 meters (height) is located to the north of the big hall, which housed the under-training ab-initio cadre of the JeM. This building would have been targeted with a SPICE 2000 bomb. There was a twin storey mosque to the right of this building and a shed further to the north. To the south of the big hall, across the training ground was a robust ‘U’ shaped concrete structure with sloped roof, housing the instructors, senior trainees and a guest house in each component. One SPICE 2000 bomb each, would certainly have been earmarked for the Guest House, the Instructor’s quarter and the senior trainee accommodation. The last target was the house of Umar Ghouri, the local JeM boss, who lived across the dirt track. This would be a certain target for a single SPICE 2000 bomb. It is believed that one of the SPICE 2000s malfunctioned and could not be launched by the Mirage 2000s. Hence in all probability, one of the targets out of the GH, instructors and senior trainee buildings would not have been engaged.

Pre-strike vintage images of the buildings show thin metal roofs, with light concrete layer and two storeys. The walls would be a mix of concrete, local bricks and mortar, reinforced by rough iron pillars and concrete for support as is common in the construction characteristics found in Balakot region. While viewing historic satellite imagery of the place, it’s interesting to note the camp mostly survived the 2005 Balakot earthquake which caused widespread devastation in the area.

Possible targets for IAF in the JeM Camp | Sameer Joshi
Post-strike imagery analysis done from the images available, has revealed that all the bombs impacted the roofs of the various targets at near vertical position. This would have been tactically planned by the IAF to achieve maximum penetration, before the bombs exploded. This may also explain the reason behind the IAF’s shallow incursions in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, aiming to fire the SPICE 2000 well within its launch envelope to achieve the optimal vertical trajectory over the target, rather than launch it at the fringe range of 60 kilometres from Indian territory.

To be or not to be…
Let’s analyse the science of what happened post impact on 26 February at Jabba top, Balakot. If we compare the Israeli made SPICE 2000’s penetrator casing volume and weight; it is closest to the USAF’s BLU 116 penetrator used on the GBU 24/27 series 2000 lb bunker busting munition. As per information, the BLU 116 can penetrate 3.4 meters of reinforced steel (or 15 meters of earth) using a nickel cobalt steel alloy core. The Spice 2000 penetrator bomb has similar capabilities. Assuming that the SPICE 2000 hit the target at a near nadir point, it would have easily sliced through the thin metal/ light concrete roof and at least one semi concrete floor to hit the base floor with a decent foundation in the ground, which is largely made up of Bafliaz volcanic rock in the Balakot region. For the sake of calculating the impact force on a bunker class target, we will assume the SPICE 2000 is able to penetrate at least 3 meters of 500 PSI reinforced concrete (a figure which is certainly less than the actual) and 10m of earth.

We reverse calculate the average impact force on a reinforced concrete target as follows –

Average impact force = mgh ÷ d
m — Weight of the penetrator (907 kg)
g — Acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s)
h — AGL height where the bomb transitioned from glide mode to vertical drop trajectory (a minimal 500 metres estimated for the Balakot attack)
d — Depth of penetration

Therefore, Average impact force of SPICE 2000 on reinforced concrete is 1474 kN and on earth is 442 kN. Incidentally, the more a bomb penetrates into the ground, the lesser will be its average impact force. The Bafliaz volcanic rock at Balakot is composed of at least three quarters of alkaline basalt, which has a density of 2.8 g/cm3. The approximate density value for 500 PSI reinforced concrete is 2.9 g/ cm3, which is close to basalt. Taking the margins in error and chemistry of basalt, it can safely be assumed that after penetrating the roof and another possible floor, the impact value would have increased from the 442 kN on the roof and the first level to (taking an approx. 15 percent jump within margin of error) to 508 kN. However, with the penetrator intact and no major loss in momentum, the same 15 % error margin can be applied to the 1474 kN standard 500 PSI reinforced concrete penetration figure, this time reducing the average impact force to 1253 kN, giving us a penetration distance of 3.5 meters in the Bafliaz rock geology at Jaba top.

The SPICE 2000 flight profile and penetration into the rocky surface explained | Sameer Joshi
The smart fuze of the SPICE 2000 would have been set to explode after penetrating two layers as per the intelligence available before the strike. After digging deep 3.5 meters below the big hall, it would have triggered the explosion of 80 kilograms of TNT, with the Gurney equation estimating shrapnel release at nearly 1 km/ sec for an explosive equivalent of the TNT. At the same time, the expansion of the intensely hot gases at extremely high pressures in the fireball would have caused a shock wave to form, moving upward out of the dug in silo at nearly the same velocity out to an effective range of 14 meters. The main characteristic of this wave is that the pressure rises very sharply at the moving front, and falls off toward the interior region of the explosion. The variation of the pressure with distance from the centre of the fireball, at a given instant, is ideal for (instantaneously rising) shock front, which will eliminate any soft target in the region and cause significant damage to the structure and depending on the distance, will cause the structure to collapse.

Now let’s calculate the overpressure caused by the explosion of the 80 kg warhead — Overpressure in an enclosed space is determined using Weibull’s formula –

Overpressure Δp=2410(m/V) to the power 0.72 where: 2410 is a constant based on 1 bar (100 kPa; 15 psi); M = Net explosive mass calculated using all explosive materials and their relative effectiveness; V = Volume of given area (primarily used to determine volume within an enclosed space).

We have two zones to measure the overpressure, the first inside the 3.5 m silo created by the SPICE 2000 penetrator. This gives us a value of approx. 12631 kPA for the overpressure wave within the dug-up silo. This overpressure wave would have resonated through the rocky side, ejecting upward at a high velocity towards the single/ twin floors of the targets. Post expansion, the shrapnel and the overpressure wave would have killed all soft tissue targets and penetrated the walls and roofs with deadly effect.

But was that enough to collapse the buildings? As per experimental data, a minimal overpressure of around 14 kPA is required to cause the collapse of a non-concrete structure. Since the volume of the building was very large with two floors inside the building, the overpressure blast wave from the 80 TNT kg warhead, had it exploded at the base of the building (not accounting for the penetration to 3.5 meters), would be in the tune of 19.28 kPA. This overpressure would probably have brought down the buildings to implode and collapse. However, the explosion of the warhead 3.5 meters below the surface, with the rocky sides, walls bearing partial explosion and blast overpressure effects; will significantly drop the overpressure value inside the compartmentalised hall. What would also be noteworthy is that the foundation and support beams would have been dug in the solid basalt rock, hence will require a significantly greater charge to knock down core load bearing members, than the low mass 80 kg TNT of the penetrator version.

Also read: What Pulwama-Balakot proves: A ‘third’ actor can still push India and Pakistan into a war

Though not basing assumptions on an empirical relationship and keeping well within the error margin, it can safely be assumed that the value of the blast overpressure wave would have fallen far below 14 kPA, which — while causing extensive kinetic energy based shrapnel and overpressure pressure damage to the roof and the sides, would not have been sufficient to break open or collapse the side walls with intermixed concrete, and the main roofs of the building. Compartmentalised damage would have occurred in the individual bomb’s sphere of influence.

Yes, there would be significant casualties within the confines of the targets due to shrapnel, intense heat and overpressure waves.

One piece of the puzzle is still not clear: why are multiple entry points visible on the roof of the big hall, when the building may have been targeted only by a single SPICE 2000 as per the data available on the number of bombs and the speculated targets? In all probability, these would be the result of inside to outside blast incursions.

One can, however, clearly see the result of the attack on the trainee accommodation north of the main hall (Refer Target 1), where the building has been destroyed with deep ingestion marks and a lot of loose soil unearthed, the classic tell-tale signs of a penetrator warhead entering the ground and making a mould of earth around it. This indicates that there was more sub soil present than basalt rock, underneath the structure as mentioned or a cover-up operation underway by the Pakistani Army post blast. Since the IAF points out that all the SPICE 2000 bombs hit within the CEP, impact points on the other targets would indicate clean penetration and deep explosions, which while killing all, would not be sufficient to get the complete buildings down as is seen at other locations.

Possible Target Post Strike Analysis by the author. Image courtesy Planet Earth Labs
Did the IAF SPICE 2000s strike at the target ?  Yes, they did. This assessment is based on the science of it all, which can be debated by explosive experts for its worth. The Indian Air Force has done its job; let’s not overreact to anything and everything of it. One day we will know what happened below that roof.

So, when the Indian Air Chief says ‘We hit the targets’, believe me, he means serious business!

The author is an former fighter pilot with extensive experience on the Mirage 2000 and MiG 21 aircraft of the IAF.

This article was first published on Medium.

Want to hear experts engage over the big issues of the day? We bring you Talk Point.

Tags: Balakot air strikesIndia-Pakistan relationsIndian Air ForceMirage 2000Pulwama attack
Next article »Probe Robert Vadra, but also investigate PM Modi's alleged role in Rafale: Rahul Gandhi
« Previous articleDelhi police arrests alleged Khalistan militant & associate of Bhindranwale

View Comments




    • Khan :
      13 March, 2019 at 6:17 pm
      Oh my God.
      Well... I am really happy to read all bogus and propaganda articles in Indian media, all most all paid by BJP & their supporter. But that’s good sign, how Indian manipulating their own people. I am shocked to see how famous name of India journalism, all are part of this propaganda paid by ruling party.

      All these articles, of course help to get BJP more vote (that’s the main goal right now) but for international community, they want hard core proof & evidence, which don’t exists.

      Keep the propaganda and get more vote for BJP and get more advertisement & money ;-)
    • Jerry :
      14 March, 2019 at 6:56 pm
      It is amazing to read how advanced warfare has gone in terms of scientific innovation. Proves the point when the External Ministry Spokesperson mentions that it was targeted at Terrorist infrastructure.
      For a pakistani this might be a fiction out of an Issac Assimov novel and rightly so. In a country where science books are all about Thr Supreme Lord and perhaps science at best means suicide belt and phd in science means someone who wears it and blows himself, such a frustration is understandable Mr. Khan.
      The truth about all the previous wars including Kargil have been told by some of the sensible journalists and surprisingly Army generals, so give this also some time and truth will come out.
      In India, we bow before our armed forces because of RESPECT and not FEAR( unlike with our neighbours).
Leave a Comment


Copyright © 2019 Printline Media Pvt. Ltd. All Rights ReservedView Non-AMP Version



@Joe Shearer
Can you explain this phenomena ?
 

Jinn Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
Jul 16, 2015
2,884
-1
4,700
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Always find an excuse to save face.
Exactly!

SirJiKal Strike 1.0 - big claims, no evidence to date.

SirJiKal Strike 2.0 - big claims, no evidence to date. Your "experts" are having to rely on patches on roofs to claim a strike was done, then retracting their own analysis. See my post above.

But just a simple question.
Its been 2 weeks right?
Still international medias is not allowed by PA inside the building complex?
Why?
Just clear all inhabitants and building and allow AJ or Reuters inside the building to t
It's been two weeks right?

Why has IAF not released a shread of evidence to prove they did the strikes? No one, other than Indians, believes them. Why dont they prove the world wrong?

Pakistan has no burden of proof to discharge. You are the one making the claim, you prove it!

Your entire argument is a logical fallacy, read what that means.

If the attack was in some other place why the PA is not doing that so that everyone can convinced ?
Everyone IS convinced! Read all the reports from non-Indian sources - they all agree that there was no strike.

Read the article you yourself posted. Read what I wrote. The writer retracts his initial analysis about smudges on the roof of the main complex. There is NO EVIDENCE of an Indian strike.
 

graphican

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 21, 2009
11,934
44
19,356
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Understand indian intent here, they are trying to ask a second question without establishing the first one. They want you to accept there were training/Jud camps and then answer why did India use a particular kind of weapon against them.

Its like saying "you are taking wrong medicine for your fever", without first establishing you had fever, and intent-fully shifting question to medicine being right or wrong. Understand what they're trying to do here.
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,382
77
32,362
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
@The Deterrent @Jinn Baba @DESERT FIGHTER have poster clear rebuttals to the Indian claim. Please refer to their posts on this page and the previous page.

International sat image analysis and media reports back up Pakistan’s position.

Thread closed. Contact me if there is new information supporting the Indian claims and thread will be reopened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom