What's new

Balakot air strike: Why IAF used 907-kg ‘penetrator’ bombs to target Jaish terror camp

Status
Not open for further replies.

Qutb-ud-din Aybak

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 22, 2015
6,926
1
7,889
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

SrNair

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 6, 2013
16,677
-27
15,997
Country
India
Location
India
@SrNair

"The British news agency Reuters says high-resolution satellite images show buildings which India claimed its warplanes had hit in Balakot killing a large number of militants still standing at the site.

The images produced by Planet Labs, a San Francisco-based private satellite operator has shown at least six buildings on the site six days after the airstrike.

The image is virtually unchanged from an April 2018 satellite photo of the facility.

There are no discernible holes in the roofs of buildings, no signs of blown-out walls, displaced trees around the site or other signs of an aerial attack."

OR are you suggesting that all the international media and independent groups performing satellite imagery analysis are faking this?
Well ,after that what happened?
Reuters complained few times that they dont have access.

Then all of those assumption on the basis of that it was a Mk84 but it was not .
This a different kind pentrator either full package from Israel or just only kit but rest of the penetrator designed in India.

He even mentioned the soil type of Balakot .
Then eyewitness said that entire earth was shaking.
Had it been a MK84 the building will oblierate and shock was less .
This just pentrated deep inside to thecm earth and explode causing more shock to
Earth but less harm to building
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,382
77
32,362
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Look at the maths man.
Read carefully then raise your points
You do realize that after all the calculations he provided, he ended the piece with outright assumptions (that the force of the explosion would be less than required to collapse the building) and has no answers to the independent (non Indian) satellite image analysis that shows NO holes in the roof and NO other destroyed structures, as he claims.

The fact that the author is making at least 2 claims that have already been debunked by international media and satellite image analysts really puts the credibility of the author in doubt.

Well ,after that what happened?
Reuters complained few times that they dont have access.

Then all of those assumption on the basis of that it was a Mk84 but it was not .
This a different kind pentrator either full package from Israel or just only kit but rest of the penetrator designed in India.

He even mentioned the soil type of Balakot .
Then eyewitness said that entire earth was shaking.
Had it been a MK84 the building will oblierate and shock was less .
This just pentrated deep inside to thecm earth and explode causing more shock to
Earth but less harm to building
Doesn't matter if they got access or not. Interviews with the local residents indicated no damage to the madrassa and satellite imagery analysis show no holes.
 

SrNair

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 6, 2013
16,677
-27
15,997
Country
India
Location
India
I'm pointing out that unless these bombs also have the ability to patch the holes in the ceiling/roof behind them as they enter, and douse the flames etc caused by the explosion instantly, as to not leave any remnants of any kind of an explosion behind, they did not hit the intended target, or the intended target was in fact the trees, with Modi's plan being to hide the fact that nothing was actually hit behind his massive Indian media manipulation.
Holes on the big roof is actually a mystery as per this author.
He is saying perhaps that one is sharpnels .

He is also raising several points that medias pointed out.

Regarding proof ,They wont release it
India wont release ops details .
 

Vapnope

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 11, 2015
3,873
15
6,346
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Indians claim to have one of the best satellite image resolution however there are still no pictures of funeral of 300 dead terrorists. I wonder what happened to the space power prowess?
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,382
77
32,362
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Holes on the big roof is actually a mystery as per this author.
He is saying perhaps that one is sharpnels .

He is also raising several points that medias pointed out.

Regarding proof ,They wont release it
India wont release ops details .
This author can say whatever he wants, but multiple international analyses of satellite imagery show NO holes and NO destroyed structures, tertiary or primary. So without any evidence of holes, all his calculations mean nothing.

Indians claim to have one of the best satellite image resolution however there are still no pictures of funeral of 300 dead terrorists. I wonder what happened to the space power prowess?
Cloud cover, or maybe Modi farted at just the right time and ended up blinding their satellites.
 

undercover JIX

ELITE MEMBER
Dec 6, 2008
8,191
0
7,774
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Wait for the final version, which will be released by bollywood.

daily new drama. if it was 2012 the super power India would have used invisible Fighters, bombs etc and deadboys would have vanished without leaving any traces, and not even a scratch to the building, structure and in the area. ohhh and everything silent, no sound so dont ask for any witnesses.
 

newb3e

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 25, 2007
10,369
-22
10,050
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
pissfull indians,caring indians used that bomb so poor Pakistan doesnt suffer any infrastructure damage and dont waste any resources rebuilding.The bomb was dipped in ganga water and only killed jesh terrorist inside all 350 of them but dint even damage a brick.
 

SrNair

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 6, 2013
16,677
-27
15,997
Country
India
Location
India
This author can say whatever he wants, but multiple international analyses of satellite imagery show NO holes and NO destroyed structures, tertiary or primary. So without any evidence of holes, all his calculations mean nothing.


Cloud cover, or maybe Modi farted at just the right time and ended up blinding their satellites.
Those multiple authors didnt try to dissect the points raised by Indian side.
All of those are some paid medias and non existent thinkers
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,382
77
32,362
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Those multiple authors didnt try to dissect the points raised by Indian side.
All of those are some paid medias and non existent thinkers
There are no points that need 'dissecting'

Multiple international media organizations and journalists reported directly from the site of the attacks.
- They viewed the craters and saw fragments of Indian bombs in the craters. The journalists saw the craters which means the bombs landed in that location and not on the Madrassa (really simplifying it for you)
- They interviewed multiple local residents as to the events that occurred. All the residents offered largely the same narrative of events in terms of what had occurred and the number of explosions they heard and that no one was injured besides one individual hurt from glass from his shattered window and cracks in the walls of some homes.
- Multiple media & other organizations have done satellite imagery analysis that show no damage and no holes in the buildings in the Madrassa compound.

What is there to dissect? If there are no holes and no damage to the structures in the Madrassa compound per independent satellite imagery analysis, there is obviously no damage to the compound, and it's backed up by the other things I mentioned above.
 

Jinn Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
Jul 16, 2015
2,884
-1
4,700
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
I'm at work, but fully intend to rip this piece of garbage in a few hours when I get a chance. That's if someone else hasn't beat me to it.
 

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 9, 2009
35,889
166
125,890
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Some basic hard facts that debunk Indian lies.
India crossed the LOC, violated Pakistan air space by a few KMs.... launched weapons and hit some Forrest area.....no loss of lives.
Pakistan replied by going about 10 KMs across the LOC.....launched weapons at six different selected targets.....but deliberately aimed at the empty grounds adjacent to the targets.
Conclusion: Had the Indian attack caused any loss of Pakistani lives, then Pakistan could have easily paid back in the same coin. India now just trying to cover up the humiliation by either waving a piece of a missile or coming out with different and ridiculous versions of it's failed exercise.
 

SrNair

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 6, 2013
16,677
-27
15,997
Country
India
Location
India
There are no points that need 'dissecting'

Multiple international media organizations and journalists reported directly from the site of the attacks.
- They viewed the craters and saw fragments of Indian bombs in the craters. The journalists saw the craters which means the bombs landed in that location and not on the Madrassa (really simplifying it for you)
- They interviewed multiple local residents as to the events that occurred. All the residents offered largely the same narrative of events in terms of what had occurred and the number of explosions they heard and that no one was injured besides one individual hurt from glass from his shattered window and cracks in the walls of some homes.
- Multiple media & other organizations have done satellite imagery analysis that show no damage and no holes in the buildings in the Madrassa compound.

What is there to dissect? If there are no holes and no damage to the structures in the Madrassa compound per independent satellite imagery analysis, there is obviously no damage to the compound, and it's backed up by the other things I mentioned above.
Sirji ,
Just be calm and read it .He addressed all of your queries
 

scionofPakwattan

FULL MEMBER
Aug 26, 2016
433
0
327
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
So you are saying that all those calculation is wrong?
That guy is a professional
The journalists that visited the site and the Pakistani officials that actually visited the site post-botched bombing raid are also professionals and they are reporting the damage as they've witnessed, not speculating from thousands of miles away, imagery as we all know can be very misguiding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom