What's new

Aukus: UK, US and Australia launch pact to counter China

FuturePAF

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 17, 2014
5,788
20
6,797
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
This transfer of Nuclear technology to Australia despite being a signatory to the NPT, may normalize such transfers between countries; and could allow Pakistan to form a small fleet of 3-4 SSN armed with a dozen or more DF-100 class Hypersonic cruise/ballistic missiles (1000+ km range) via VLS tubes behind the sail, which would be a potent second strike capability.

China may step up SSN production based on this news from Australia, and that could drop the price of each submarine to one which Pakistan maybe able to afford if spread out over a couple of decades.

It’s not unlikely, IMHO, Pakistan could lease a Type 093 for a modest minimum second strike capability, until these submarines are built, and this single submarine could be put to sea in times of uncertain, to signal to the world, that Pakistan has the resolve.

In peace time, these SSNs could be used by the PN to protect the SLOCs between East Africa, all the way up Pakistan. while the same area could be a bastion in which Pakistan’s second strike force patrols, especially if the DF-100 has the 3000 km range some sources claim.

Btw, info on China’s most advanced operational submarine:

1631835778493.jpeg

This is not theoretical, here is the actual submarine, the Type 093G. Notice the raised section behind the sail for VLS tubes. If Pakistan leases just one and gets a dozen or so DF-100s it could hold a dozen of India’s largest cities in check. That would at a minimum bog down a large part of the Indian navy in an attempt to chase down.
 
Last edited:

aziqbal

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Aug 26, 2010
3,979
8
5,961
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Australia: Strategic shifts led it to acquire nuclear subs

Australia: Strategic shifts led it to acquire nuclear subs

By ROD McGUIRKtoday


In this photo provided by U.S. Navy, the Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Illinois (SSN 786) returns home to Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam from a deployment in the 7th Fleet area of responsibility on Sept. 13, 2021.Australia decided to invest in U.S. nuclear-powered submarines and dump its contract with France to build diesel-electric submarines because of a changed strategic environment, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said on Thursday, Sept. 16, 2021. (Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Michael B. Zingaro/U.S. Navy via AP)
1 of 2
In this photo provided by U.S. Navy, the Virginia-class fast-attack submarine USS Illinois (SSN 786) returns home to Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam from a deployment in the 7th Fleet area of responsibility on Sept. 13, 2021.Australia decided to invest in U.S. nuclear-powered submarines and dump its contract with France to build diesel-electric submarines because of a changed strategic environment, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said on Thursday, Sept. 16, 2021. (Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Michael B. Zingaro/U.S. Navy via AP)


CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — Australia has canceled a contract with France for conventional submarines and instead will build nuclear-powered submarines using U.S. technology because of changing strategic conditions in the region, Prime Minister Scott Morrison said Thursday.
President Joe Biden announced on Wednesday a new U.S. security alliance with Australia and Britain that will help equip Australia with a nuclear submarine fleet.
The agreement would make Australia the first country without nuclear weapons to obtain nuclear-powered submarines.
Morrison said U.S. nuclear submarine technology wasn’t available to Australia in 2016 when it entered a 56 billion Australian dollar ($43 billion) deal with France to build 12 of the world’s largest conventional diesel-electric submarines. The United States has previously only shared the technology with Britain.
ADVERTISEMENT


Biden did not mention China by name in announcing the new security alliance, but it is likely to be seen as a provocative move by Beijing, whose military strength and influence have grown rapidly.
Peter Jennings, head of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank, said Australia’s decision to acquire nuclear submarines was a response to China’s increasing military might, aggressive bullying of Australia and intimidation of Japan and Taiwan.
“We should call the first submarine in this new category the ‘Xi Jinping,’ because no person is more responsible for Australia going down this track than the current leader of the Chinese Communist Party,” Jennings said.
Australia notified France that it will end its contract with DCNS, a majority state-owned company, to build the conventional submarines. Australia has spent AU$2.4 billion ($1.8 billion) on the project since 2016. The first of the French-designed submarines was to have been delivered in 2027.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian expressed “total incomprehension” at the decision and criticized both Australia and the United States.
“It was really a stab in the back. We built a relationship of trust with Australia, and this trust was betrayed,” Le Drian said Thursday on France-Info radio.
Morrison said he told French President Emanuel Macron in June that there were “very real issues about whether a conventional submarine capability” would address Australia’s strategic security needs in the Indo-Pacific.
“Of course they’re disappointed,” Morrison said. “They’ve been good partners. This is about our strategic interest, our strategic capability requirements and a changed strategic environment and we’ve had to take that decision.”
Unlike nuclear-powered submarines, conventional subs that are traveling long distances must spend time on the surface, where they are most vulnerable, using their diesel engines while they recharge their batteries. The batteries propel them underwater.
Morrison said he expects the first of the nuclear subs, which are to be constructed in the Australian city of Adelaide, will be built by 2040.
He said Australia hasn’t decided which class of nuclear submarines it will select and does not know how much the fleet of at least eight submarines will cost. But the country’s defense budget will grow above the current 2.2% of gross domestic product, he said.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Parliament on Thursday that the alliance with Australia and the U.S. is a “new pillar of a strategy demonstrating Britain’s generational commitment to the security of the Indo-Pacific.”
Stressing Britain’s long-standing close relationship with Australia, he said the alliance also shows “how we can help one of our oldest friends to preserve regional stability.”
Paul Keating, a former Australian prime minister from the opposition Labor Party and an adviser to the state-owned China Development Bank, slammed the new nuclear alliance, saying “materiel dependency on the United States robbed Australia of any freedom or choice in any engagement Australia may deem appropriate.”
Left out of the new alliance is Australia’s South Pacific neighbor New Zealand, which enacted policies in the 1980s to ensure it remains nuclear-free. That includes a ban on nuclear-powered ships entering New Zealand ports, a stance which has seen it clash at times with the U.S.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said Thursday that New Zealand wasn’t asked to be part of the alliance and wouldn’t have expected an invitation.
“The centerpiece, the anchor of this arrangement are nuclear-powered submarines,” Ardern said. “And it will be very clear to all New Zealanders, and to Australia, why New Zealand would not wish to be a part of that project.”
Ardern said the new alliance doesn’t diminish its close ties to the U.S., Britain and Australia.
Morrison said Ardern was the first foreign leader he called to explain the new alliance. He later called the leaders of Japan and India, which together with the United States and Australia form the Quad security dialogue.
“She was my first call because of the strength of our relationship and the relationship between our countries,” Morrison said. “All in the region will benefit from the peace and the stability and security that this partnership will add to our region.”
The Chinese government has long suspended minister-to-minister contact with Australia because of soured bilateral relations. But Morrison said he was willing to discuss the new alliance with President Xi Jinping.
“There’s an open invitation for President Xi to discuss these and many other matters,” Morrison said.
“I believe and hope we would both share the same objective of a peaceful Indo-Pacific where the sovereignty and independence of nations is understood and respected and that enables their own citizens to flourish,” he said.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Zhao Lijian said it was “highly irresponsible” for the U.S. and Britain to export the nuclear technology, and that Australia was to blame for a breakdown in bilateral relations.
“The most urgent task is for Australia to correctly recognize the reasons for the setbacks in the relations between the two countries, and think carefully whether to treat China as a partner or a threat,” Zhao said.
___
Associated Press journalists Nick Perry in Wellington, New Zealand, Angela Charlton in Paris and Sylvia Hui in London contributed to this report.
___
A previous version of this story has been corrected to show that the first submarine will be built by 2040, not within a decade.
 

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 16, 2012
15,165
-16
28,604
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Is this the new trio? We already have a quad.

This will force China to build up its armed forces to a whole new level. The Americans need to understand that resources aren't an issue for China. The more the Americans and its cheerleaders agitate China the more motivated China will become to face the challange. The Americans are fighting a lost war.
 

Arulmozhi Varman

FULL MEMBER
Oct 14, 2018
1,500
-14
1,214
Country
India
Location
Canada
Lulz we operate SSN &SSBN ,second SSBN is getting launched within 5 months.

This is more like US Navy umbrella over Australia which India clearly doesn't need.

Chinese and their cheerleaders should have panic sweats ,this news just broke their Pacific ambitions.
Correction. 3rd SSBN likely getting launched next year prolly delayed due to covid. The 2nd SSBN is already under sea trails.

Please have pity on Chinese cheerleaders as that is the only thing they can do.
 

Stryker1982

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 5, 2016
2,510
-2
4,128
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Canada
And Australia is betting the US is going to win
Sometimes it seems like the Aussie government is firmly in the pocket of China due to high immigration of Chinese people, and Chinese wealth that has bought large swathes of real estate and assets. Same with Canada, selling the country to the highest bidder.
 

Ali_Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
May 27, 2018
3,037
-1
4,342
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
French Tantrums ...





French are throwing a tantrum hoping to get this nuclear sub deal cancelled and the previous order re-instated or have things thrown their way to "shut up". Lets see if the USA/UK bow down to the usual French drama ...

Arrogant EU wanted to be "consulted first"... WTF ...


Deal was finalisd during Cornwall summit (over British Fish I hope .. ):

 
Last edited:

Ali_Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
May 27, 2018
3,037
-1
4,342
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
French RIPOFF pricing of their products ...


Australia is now set to get its hands on at least eight nuclear-powered submarines which will likely cost less than the $7.5billion-per vessel that France was offering. While the exact design and costs of Australia's subs have yet to be revealed, US Virginia-class nuclear subs cost around $4.5bn each and UK Astute-class $2.6bn each.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom