What's new

Featured Attack at IIOJK demography - India introduces new laws allowing non-residents to buy land in Indian occupied Kashmir

Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

ELITE MEMBER
May 28, 2018
13,212
5
28,312
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Hope without action means nothing, Kashmiri's wont pick up arms , Pakistan is unable to help them , our Politicians are corrupt as shit, our Army is Docile under Bajwa , who will free Kashmiri ? Even in Badr , 313 Muslims have to fight to survive , Allah wont send Angels while you sit and do nothing ..

India has occupied Kashmir they wont just pack and leave ..
Brother, can we talk in PM?

You are giving Indians ammo here for no reason. Look at your reactions.

I will talk w you in private and we will discuss this issue.

Non-Kashmiri Indians can now buy property in occupied Kashmir. But it is amazing that China has become the owner of thousands of square kilometers in Ladakh without buying


Non-Kashmiri Indians can now buy property in occupied Kashmir. But wowwwwww it is more than amazing that China has become the owner of thousands of square kilometers in Ladakh without buying
Indians still have to find a way to kick out Kashmiris and then purchase land there, that won't happen anytime soon.

All China had to do to take Indian occupied Ladakh was to show up with spiked clubs, the Indians chose to jump in freezing cold rivers to escape.

Experience shows us from a thousand and more years that this is the only way to deal with this unruly herd masquerading as a country.

jis ki lathi uski bhens
 

Figaro

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 17, 2017
5,493
8
10,053
Country
United States
Location
United States
Now, any Indian citizen can buy land in Jammu & Kashmir

NEW DELHI: In a significant move, the Centre has paved the way for people from outside Jammu and Kashmir to buy land in the Union territory (UT) by amending several laws.

The MHA notified what it calls UT of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Third Order, 2020. The Centre has repealed or substituted 26 state laws.

In a gazette notification, the Centre has omitted the phrase "permanent resident of the state" from Section 17 of the Jammu and Kashmir Development Act that deals with disposal of the land in the union territory.

Before repeal of Article 370 and Article 35-A in August last year, non-residents could not buy any immovable property in Jammu and Kashmir. However, the fresh changes have paved the way for non-residents to buy land in the union territory.

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha told reporters that the amendments did not allow transfer of agricultural land to non-agriculturists.

However, there are several exemptions in the Act which enable transfer of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes, including setting up of educational or health care facilities.

The MHA notification will come into force with immediate effect.

Reacting to the MHA notification, National Conference leader Omar Abdullah said that J&K is now up for sale.

"Unacceptable amendments to the land ownership laws of J&K. Even the tokenism of domicile has been done away with when purchasing non-agricultural land & transfer of agricultural land has been made easier. J&K is now up for sale & the poorer small land holding owners will suffer," Omar Abdullah said in a tweet.

India wants to escalate situation with Pakistan to help the opposition there.
Pakistan and China better strike fast before it is too late ...
 

terry5

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 16, 2014
2,523
-11
3,594
Country
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Location
Pakistan
Agreed with Mr Abdullah. Feeling sorry for the landoweners of kashmir who will become millionaires overnight by selling their land. Poor kashmiris
I think a man would sell he’s mother to have a thought like that
Yep... see the land prices sky rocket due to investment from all over the country.
People of Kashmir will reap the reward of this opportunity. Economic growth and small business growth will be tremendous.
May as well sell your mother to have such a thought process .

I own land in Occupied Kashmir

actually I don’t it’s my grandfathers land and he’s grandfathers before him everything I own is my grandfathers because without him and he’s sacrifices I would own nothing .

and my grandfather has been dead for decades

you think I’ll sell it ? and to a occupying pagan who committed untold atrocities to Kashmiris .

like I said only man who would sell he’s mother would entertain such a thought
 
Last edited:

Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

ELITE MEMBER
May 28, 2018
13,212
5
28,312
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
I think a man would sell he’s mother to have a thought like that


May as well sell your mother to have such a thought process .

I own land in Occupied Kashmir

actually I don’t it’s my grandfathers land and he’s grandfathers before him everything I own is my grandfathers because without him and he’s sacrifices I would own nothing .

and my grandfather has been dead for decades

you think I’ll sell it ? and to a occupying pagan who committed untold atrocities to Kashmiris .

like I said only man who would sell he’s mother would entertain such a thought
 

Silverblaze

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 25, 2012
2,115
3
2,476
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Hope without action means nothing, Kashmiri's wont pick up arms , Pakistan is unable to help them , our Politicians are corrupt as shit, our Army is Docile under Bajwa , who will free Kashmiri ? Even in Badr , 313 Muslims have to fight to survive , Allah wont send Angels while you sit and do nothing ..

India has occupied Kashmir they wont just pack and leave ..
I agree with most of your points about the legendary incompetence of Pakistani bureaucracy as it is a fact. If you read history, it was the sheer incompetence of this bureaucratic machine that let Kashmir slip away.

BUT
You are overestimating india. india has huge problems of its own. It is now effectively engaged in two theaters of war. This will take its toll. There exists a possibility that india will be militarily worn out by China coupled with internal instability and massive economic downturns. This could, however, dilute indias stranglehold on Kashmir which is more anti indian than before.
 

Kabira

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 12, 2014
14,123
-16
13,184
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This make sense. Look at Mehbooba and Abdullah, trying to restore art 370. Which is discriminatory law preventing Indians from buying land in IoK.

So according to them Kashmiris joined secular democratic India over Pakistan but at the same time want to restrict Indians from owning land in IoK? In what world does this make any sense?

Indian extremist RSS government on the other hand is hypocrite as they don't have problem not buying land in Himachal or Nagaland. But thats to be expected from bigoted Indians.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

undercover JIX

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 6, 2008
7,621
-1
7,015
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Attack at IIOJK demography
The change proves beyond any doubt that India has no intention of following the will of the Kashmiri people


October 28, 2020



India continues to trample on the rights of Kashmiris living in its reign of terror. The latest strike came in the form of legal changes that allow any Indian citizen to buy land in the disputed region. The change proves beyond any doubt that India has no intention of following the will of the Kashmiri people, even on the off chance that a plebiscite is ever held. At least earlier, New Delhi tried to use some sort of a facade to hide its contempt for international law. The last change to the property law only allowed “permanent residents” to buy property in the region, with the conditions for “permanent residents” essentially meaning that most of the eligible people were soldiers and government employees, and their children. Previously, non-Kashmiris were not allowed to buy property at all as that would throw off the region’s demographic makeup and invalidate or skew a future plebiscite.

The timing of the change was also not accidental. The announcement came as Kashmiris marked the Black Day that is October 27 — the anniversary of the date in 1947 when Indian forces first occupied the Muslim-majority state. While the condemnation from Pakistani political leaders was expected, even Kashmiri politicians loyal to India, have called the move “unacceptable”. Omar Abdullah, a former chief minister of the occupied state, noted that the Bharatiya Janata Party would force suffering upon “small landholding owners” through this move to put the region “up for sale.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has never had the interests of Kashmiris in mind while crafting policies for the occupied region. His priorities have always been, in no particular order, his corporate cronies, elections, and Hindutva. This is one of the rare moves that will help with all three. That is because fat cats can buy up the land for their own purposes while further depriving Kashmiri Muslims. The move will also revitalise the BJP’s base during the legislative assembly elections in Bihar. As for Hindutva, the fact that the legal change causes Muslims to suffer is enough to count as a win in that column.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 29th, 2020.

 

Cliftonite

FULL MEMBER
May 4, 2020
1,888
2
3,541
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
If worst comes to worst Kashmiris should call Indian Muslims to settle. Better than having some Ramesh Chajjuram from Patna atleast.
 

Gangetic

FULL MEMBER
Oct 25, 2018
317
0
582
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
If worst comes to worst Kashmiris should call Indian Muslims to settle. Better than having some Ramesh Chajjuram from Patna atleast.
No the point is to first allow Indian Muslims from UP/Bihar... then allow Hindus/Sikhs from Himchal/Punjab... then finally allow Gangu Hindus from the cow-belt. Then finally Kashmir is now a part of the cow-belt.
 

Cliftonite

FULL MEMBER
May 4, 2020
1,888
2
3,541
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
No the point is to first allow Indian Muslims from UP/Bihar... then allow Hindus/Sikhs from Himchal/Punjab... then finally allow Gangu Hindus from the cow-belt. Then finally Kashmir is now a part of the cow-belt.
Meaning it'll take another 70 years.

By that time, North India's Muslim population will be close to 40% of the total population. And WB and Assam will be Muslim majority.

So win win for us anyways.
 

Gangetic

FULL MEMBER
Oct 25, 2018
317
0
582
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Meaning it'll take another 70 years.

By that time, North India's Muslim population will be close to 40% of the total population. And WB and Assam will be Muslim majority.

So win win for us anyways.
Yeah I've heard Hindu birth rates are below replacement while Muslims are significantly above in most states. Indian Muslims are poorer and more ghettoised so they'll have high births for some time. Bangladesh border regions will be majority Muslim.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom