Which part of the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement from Articles I till IX even mention the word 'Jewish State' or the 'Balfor Declaration' ?
"Jewish national home"...
Furthermore, as is stated by the page you posted, Faisal conditioned his acceptance on the fulfillment of British wartime promises to the Arabs & stated 'Provided the Arabs obtain their independence as demanded in my [forthcoming] Memorandum dated the 4th of January, 1919, to the Foreign Office of the Government of Great Britain, I shall concur in the above articles. But if the slightest modification or departure were to be made [regarding our demands], I shall not be then bound by a single word of the present Agreement which shall be deemed void and of no account or validity, and I shall not be answerable in any way whatsoever' - Which was after all not fulfilled as stated by the same page you referenced !
That was an agreement with the British Empire. Sykes Picot agreement was made public much later, around the late twenties, by the time of which Jews had already immigrated in very large numbers and anti Jewish massacres were taking place.
So, how exactly do you hold the jews responsible for something done by the British empire?
You're right the agreement went void. Not because it was "torn apart", but because Faisal I was overthrown.
Furthermore what is the standing of the Balfor Declaration with a parallel Anglo-French Treaty that made the very promises made to Faisal & Hussein a joke that were never meant to be abided by either the Brits !
If you hold the British responsible, why blame the Jews then? British did many antagonistic things to the Jews as well. They openly favored the Arabs. THat's another story, however.
Thirdly on what basis was the authority given to the Faisal or Hussein to decide the future of the entire Middle East with countless Arabs not under their influence & they themselves being little more than British propped monarchs of necessity ? Surely a referendum would've been better !
Dude.. this debate is about whether Jews "conquered" israel, as you previously claimed. Not about the integrity of the Arab leaders, nor about anything wrong that the Brisith/french might've done.
-----------
Dear, I'm not disrespecting your respected self, but how could you expect us to take you seriously after you changed your nationality, religion, and political views several times. Every time, you claimed that you are the right one.
I repeated numerous times before, mature debates are not suited to kids like you. Would you stay out?