StraightEdge
FULL MEMBER
Even if Chinese decoy costs 5K, it is still a win for the Chinese as the US will spend 500K to destroy it.
Not to mention the amount of brain cells the entire country lost to debate this balloon-shit.
Even if Chinese decoy costs 5K, it is still a win for the Chinese as the US will spend 500K to destroy it.
Then we will know it is a decoy.
Sorry for not using Indian sources which are full of divine truth.My man did you seriously cite daily mail as a source?
Their articles are garbage and clickbait 99.9% of times.
Nice whataboutism
The real thing to notice is that an object that size moving that slow was detected and hit by a missile.
Exactly any radar has to be amazing to spot something round and this small from a far distance.
For the Chinese surveillance balloon, how much money do you think they invested then lost? Now, if you want to invest in a fleet of balloons, some real and some decoys, how much money do you think that venture would cost you?
Surveillance tech doesn't cost $15 mateWith Chinese industrial and manufacturing capabilities $15 the most
Nice whataboutism
Most Indian sources are crap but everyone and their mother knows dailymail is a fricking cringe tabloid whose main source of income is clickbaits. It's reliability is like citing 4 chan as your source of info.
My man this is just an conspiracy theory plus your website heading itself says "feared" and then the context talks about something else and those balloons don't fly at that altitude.Hobby Club’s Missing Balloon Feared Shot Down By USAF | Aviation Week Network
Although the club is not pointing fingers, there are suspicions among other prominent members of the small, pico-ballooning enthusiasts community.aviationweek.com
M
My man this is just an conspiracy theory plus your website heading itself says "feared" and then the context talks about something else and those balloons don't fly at that altitude.
That cheap, we will definitely know it is a decoy.With Chinese industrial and manufacturing capabilities $15 the most