• Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Afghan official accuses top U.S. envoy - US responds in kind, to Kabul

Discussion in 'Afghanistan Defence Forum' started by Jyotish Kailashkumar, Mar 14, 2019.

  1. Jyotish Kailashkumar

    Jyotish Kailashkumar FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,855
    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2018
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1,188 / -6
    Country:
    Suriname
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Afghan official accuses top U.S. envoy of undermining Ghani government with colonial intentions

    MARGARET BRENNAN

    MARCH 14, 2019

    [​IMG]
    A photo posted to Twitter by former Afghan Deputy Foreign Minister Hekmat Khalil Karzai, now chairman of the Kabul-based Centre for Conflict and Peace Studies, shows him (center right) attending negotiations between members of the Taliban, seated with him, and U.S. officials including government envoy Zalmay Khalilzad (rear left), in Doha, Qatar, in January 2019.

    Washington - In an extraordinary accusation made here in the U.S. capital, Afghanistan's top national security official asserted on Thursday that the Trump administration is conspiring to unseat elected Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and replace him with a colonial style government led by American diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad.

    Hamdullah Mohib, National Security Adviser to Ghani, said he flew to Washington specifically to bring the concerns about Khalilzad to the White House's attention. He was told that his counterpart John Bolton was too "busy" to meet with him to discuss the concerns, however. He was still hoping that Bolton might drop in on his meetings scheduled for Friday at the White House.

    Ambassador Khalilzad, the Trump administration's special envoy to Afghanistan, is currently negotiating a peace deal with the Taliban to end the 17-year conflict. Those discussions have thus far excluded the Afghan government.

    "Zal," as he is known, indicated this week that his team of negotiators had reached a draft agreement with the Taliban on a plan for the withdrawal of the roughly 12,000 U.S. troops still in Afghanistan.

    In a tweet Wednesday, Khalilzad said, "Peace requires agreement on four issues: counter-terrorism assurances, troop withdrawal, intra-Afghan dialogue, and a comprehensive ceasefire. In January talks, we "agreed in principle" on these four elements. We're now "agreed in draft" on the first two." He went on to say that once the agreement is finalized, the Taliban and "other Afghans including the government" will begin talks.

    Mohib accused Khalilzad of deliberately withholding information about the talks from the Afghan government.

    "We think either Zal -- Ambassador Khalilzad -- doesn't know how to negotiate or in fact there may be other reasons behind what he is doing. What he is doing is not getting a deal that will result in peace in Afghanistan," Mohib told CBS News. "The Taliban are in no mood to negotiate with the Afghan government and there is no reason for them to do so. They're gaining. Their sole aim and expectation and reasons in wanting to talk directly with the United States is to give themselves legitimacy."

    "He is not negotiating a withdrawal," Mohib asserted. "He has said that clearly. He is negotiating to stay, but he thinks the Taliban will give them (U.S.) bases… How am I supposed to tell my security forces that they are not being sold out? What am I supposed to tell them?"

    [​IMG]
    Afghanistan's National Security Adviser Hamdullah Mohib listens during the first meeting of national security secretaries of Afghanistan, China, Iran, India and Russia, in the Iranian capital Tehran on September 26, 2018.

    Mohib said his government had offered the Trump administration various options to reduce the cost of keeping U.S. forces in Afghanistan and continuing the security relationship. He even suggested the U.S. envoy has personal ambitions to lead his native Afghanistan himself.

    Khalilzad is an Afghan-born U.S. diplomat who served during the administration of President George W. Bush and was brought back into the fold by Mr. Trump, to help end U.S. involvement in the conflict he helped start.

    "Knowing Ambassador Khalilzad's own history, personal history, he has ambitions in Afghanistan. He has wanted to run for president twice, in 2009 and 2014," Mohib said, suggesting the U.S. envoy was deliberately undercutting the Ghani government to create a crisis, and then install a colonial-style government that he would oversee.

    "The perception in Afghanistan," including in the government, Mohib said, was that "perhaps all of this talk is to create a caretaker government, of which he will then become the viceroy. We're only saying this because this is the perception."

    But "this is not the Afghanistan that he was born in," Mohib said, suggesting Khalilzad may be overcome with "nostalgia" for not having done a better job during the Bush years. He said there had been frequent meetings between Khalilzad and former Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who remains an influential force in the country's politics.

    A State Department official denied Mohib's accusation Thursday. "Mr. Mohib's comments are inaccurate and unhelpful, and we will be responding to them privately today," the official said. "His comments do not in any way reflect the high level of U.S.-Afghan coordination on all matters involving peace in Afghanistan. It is vital that the Afghans take this opportunity for peace."

    The National Security Council did not respond to a request for comment at the time of this post.

    Ghani faces an election battle in July. Mohib said there had been no request by the U.S. to delay the voting.

    Last month in an interview on CBS News' "Face the Nation," host Margaret Brennan asked President Trump whether he could trust the Taliban. He responded by questioning why the U.S. got involved in Afghanistan in the first place, and then gave the following answer: "We're fighting harder than ever before. And I think that they will-- I think they're tired. And I think everybody's tired. We got to get out of these endless wars and bring our folks back home. Now, that doesn't mean we're not going to be watching with intelligence. We're going to be watching, and watching closely."

    When pressed as to whether there is a scenario under which he would consider keeping a U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan, the president replied in the affirmative. "Yes. And I'll leave intelligence there. Real intelligence, by the way. I'll leave intelligence there. And if I see nests forming, I'll do something about it. But for us to be spending $51 billion, like last year, or if you average the cost, it's -- I mean, you're talking about numbers that nobody has ever heard of before,"

    The reference to "nests" appeared to be about terror groups forming inside Afghanistan. That country is where the 9.11 attacks were launched from as al Qaeda was given safe haven by the government which at the time was under Taliban control.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/afghan...ilzad-undermining-ghani-hamdullah-mohib-says/
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. Ghareeb_Da_Baal

    Ghareeb_Da_Baal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,410
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Ratings:
    +6 / 3,679 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    lol
     
  3. hussain0216

    hussain0216 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    12,077
    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Ratings:
    +5 / 13,475 / -25
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Dumb dumb afghans
     
  4. The Eagle

    The Eagle MODERATOR

    Messages:
    11,742
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +99 / 15,386 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Seems like himself isn't aware that who brought Ghani & his predecessor before him after Taliban rule. A puppet government can't claim as such.

    However, US responds and in kind.

     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. shahbaz baig

    shahbaz baig SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,444
    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Ratings:
    +3 / 2,718 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Netherlands
    I heard that talibans too are not happy with Afghan Govt. I don't see any fruitful result of peace negotiations between US & Taliban because of Afghan Govt.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  6. Clutch

    Clutch SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,185
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Ratings:
    +6 / 8,398 / -1

    The Taliban just want the Americans out... The Americans just want out but with some face-saving i.e. a base or two.

    Nobody gives 2 $hits about the current Kabul government.
     
  7. Path-Finder

    Path-Finder ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    13,473
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Ratings:
    +4 / 17,422 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The problem is, in the US Taliban talks the kabul gov is a divorced entity that survives on the US. Taliban will not recognize the phoney kabul gov so their annoyance is understood.
     
  8. Pakistansdefender

    Pakistansdefender FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,521
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2016
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1,218 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    These are the people thriving on us aid and power.
    Their whole system is about to collapse.
    Sure they would squeal.
     
  9. maximuswarrior

    maximuswarrior ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    9,298
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2016
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,229 / -6
    Country:
    Netherlands
    Location:
    Netherlands
    LOL the Americans are now finding out the kind of snake they have been nurturing. A snake that has the audacity to question its master.

    On the up side, an absolute joy to see this Hamdullah Mohib burn up like ash.