• Wednesday, August 21, 2019

9/11: The Rothschild Zionist Connection

Discussion in 'Middle East & Africa' started by al-Hasani, Jan 13, 2014.

  1. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    MUST WATCH



    I happen to be a chemical engineering student in Copenhagen and I have been taught by one of the professors in that video above.

    Dr. Niels Harrit

    It is not only about the 9/11 but just Zionism in general. I will update this thread from time to time without doubt.

    Let us hope for new infiltrations in the US and preferably Israel to put more information forward.
     
  2. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    Just admit it. You hate me and all Arabs and want us dead.
     
  3. Mitro

    Mitro SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,375
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,603 / -6
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Zionist Arubs Executed the Rothchild Zionist Plan so they can Blame innocent Muslim People and Country .
    Zionist Saudi is partner in this crime against Muslim and because of them we saw million of muslim innocent lost their life in Iraq,Afghanistan & Pakistan.
    Now Zionist Saud and Qatar[Gutter] are trying to please their zionist master by committing more muslim murder in Libya and syria to allow israel to wage big war .
    after that Saudi is of no use Zionist will wipe their sh$$y A$$ and discard them :o:
     
  4. Broccoli

    Broccoli FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    792
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Ratings:
    +1 / 706 / -0
    Country:
    Finland
    Location:
    Finland
    9/11 terrorists were from KSA and whole strike was funded my Saudi money.

    KSA = Al-Qaeda
     
  5. airmarshal

    airmarshal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,701
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Ratings:
    +9 / 9,383 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    There is a lot of info and reports regarding 9/11 being an inside job.

    Even many Americans say it. I did read the whole article. I cannot imagine such a big operation can be carried out on directions of someone sitting in far away mountains. this operation was sophisticated and well planned.

    The flight from Boston to New York isn't long but long enough to know a plane has been hijacked. Hijacking two planes for the towers, knowing the planes will be loaded with fuel as they were traveling west coast cant be a coincidence.

    Also, it was mentioned several times the alleged bombers trained on single engined planes. I dont know any pilot in my family who masterfully flew a jet liner direct from a single engines plane like Cessna! Not possible.

    The most interesting video is the one with camera pointing upwards and plane hitting the tower! Its just that in this story, there are too many coincidences to believe them to be.

    The planes hit the towers but even at that time, the collapse of adjoining buildings was quite perplexing!
     
  6. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,644 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    Admit what? How can you hate somebody that you don't even freaking know? And Can you say that I hate arabs, when we share blood and culture... For a supposed learned individual, you are really lacking in social skills. Sometimes, you act like an imbecile..and you are showing it here...
     
  7. SALMAN F

    SALMAN F BANNED

    Messages:
    4,368
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 5,195 / -25
    Country:
    Iraq
    Location:
    Lebanon
    Saudis blame their terrorism on others I heard that hashimate from Saudi Arabia funded the hijackers :lol:
     
  8. Anubis

    Anubis SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,489
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 4,967 / -3
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    United States
    The only conspiracy I know of which is related to 9/11 was that it was used to justify Iraq war!
     
  9. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    Exactly.

    Please watch this video bro:





    My point is that I do not believe in the official theory of 9/11 nor do I believe that such a huge attack (biggest attack on USA EVER) could have taken place without insight knowledge or outside involvement by a few people hiding in caves in Afghanistan of all places. That's all.

    It is not really a conspiracy to begin with. After all the Bush administration lied about the Iraq war 2 years later so why are people so surprised if we don't believe in the whole official story of 9/11?

    There are simply too many shady circumstances. The ends don't met in other words. Fully that is.


    Let me put it in other words.

    The attack happened, AQ was behind it (itself a organization closely tied since its birth to CIA and other foreign intelligence services which we know is a fact that even the Americans have admitted) but the Americans together with their Jewish counterparts (rather Zionist) permitted it to happen in order to create a completely new world order that would enable a aggressive American foreign policy which resulted in a illegal war imposed on Iraq which was based on lies etc.

    At the same time Israel benefitted hugely from all this.
    The last chapter has not been written and I believe that we will know about the truth sometime in the future. We will not know when but we will know it ultimately or at least large portions of it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2014
  10. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    Does not seem like that Ceylal. You are always badmouthing Arabs despite your claim of blood ties and culture (which is correct) but when we return the favor you get all angry. But it is ok.

    Arabs and Berbers are closely related people anyway and the relations are good by large. I for instance don't know Arabs that have any problems with Berbers but maybe some Berbers have that with Arabs? What do I know? You at least seem like such one individual. Maybe I am wrong?
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2014
  11. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,644 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    Like I said above, You act like an imbecile ...and you are showing it again..
     
  12. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    So is that reaction based on you being ashamed of your past comments or what is it? I can be many things in your eyes (not that I care) but I am not an imbecile, rather the opposite. Chemical engineers are never that. You know this as well anyway. Chemical engineer or not.

    I like you anyway despite some political differences.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2014
  13. Ceylal

    Ceylal ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,024
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 7,644 / -14
    Country:
    Algeria
    Location:
    United States
    I am not ashamed, I stand by what I wrote, because I am a straight shooter. And If I wrong someone , I am a big enough of a man, to apologize.
     
  14. al-Hasani

    al-Hasani ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,060
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +52 / 25,125 / -11
    Country:
    Saudi Arabia
    Location:
    Denmark
    You are not alone. I just wanted a clarification and after your posts I take your past criticism as a "criticism of the day" rather than real hatred. I have no problem with being direct or getting direct replies. I think you and everyone else that know me on this forum knows this. I like sincere people and I take feelings and sometimes heated replies/debates as a sign of that.
     
  15. Ahriman

    Ahriman BANNED

    Messages:
    402
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 473 / -1
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    This article is fairly recent.

    Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup

    After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

    But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

    It was kept secret and remains so today.

    President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

    A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

    Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

    Some information already has leaked from the classified section, which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.

    The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war.
    The findings, if confirmed, would back up open-source reporting showing the hijackers had, at a minimum, ties to several Saudi officials and agents while they were preparing for their attacks inside the United States. In fact, they got help from Saudi VIPs from coast to coast:

    LOS ANGELES: Saudi consulate official Fahad al-Thumairy allegedly arranged for an advance team to receive two of the Saudi hijackers — Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi — as they arrived at LAX in 2000. One of the advance men, Omar al-Bayoumi, a suspected Saudi intelligence agent, left the LA consulate and met the hijackers at a local restaurant. (Bayoumi left the United States two months before the attacks, while Thumairy was deported back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11.)

    SAN DIEGO: Bayoumi and another suspected Saudi agent, Osama Bassnan, set up essentially a forward operating base in San Diego for the hijackers after leaving LA. They were provided rooms, rent and phones, as well as private meetings with an American al Qaeda cleric who would later become notorious, Anwar al-Awlaki, at a Saudi-funded mosque he ran in a nearby suburb. They were also feted at a welcoming party. (Bassnan also fled the United States just before the attacks.)

    WASHINGTON: Then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar and his wife sent checks totaling some $130,000 to Bassnan while he was handling the hijackers. Though the Bandars claim the checks were “welfare” for Bassnan’s supposedly ill wife, the money nonetheless made its way into the hijackers’ hands.

    Other al Qaeda funding was traced back to Bandar and his embassy — so much so that by 2004 Riggs Bank of Washington had dropped the Saudis as a client.

    The next year, as a number of embassy employees popped up in terror probes, Riyadh recalled Bandar.

    “Our investigations contributed to the ambassador’s departure,” an investigator who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in Washington told me, though Bandar says he left for “personal reasons.”

    FALLS CHURCH, VA.: In 2001, Awlaki and the San Diego hijackers turned up together again — this time at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, a Pentagon-area mosque built with funds from the Saudi Embassy. Awlaki was recruited 3,000 miles away to head the mosque. As its imam, Awlaki helped the hijackers, who showed up at his doorstep as if on cue. He tasked a handler to help them acquire apartments and IDs before they attacked the Pentagon.

    Awlaki worked closely with the Saudi Embassy. He lectured at a Saudi Islamic think tank in Merrifield, Va., chaired by Bandar. Saudi travel itinerary documents I’ve obtained show he also served as the official imam on Saudi Embassy-sponsored trips to Mecca and tours of Saudi holy sites.

    Most suspiciously, though, Awlaki fled the United States on a Saudi jet about a year after 9/11.

    As I first reported in my book, “Infiltration,” quoting from classified US documents, the Saudi-sponsored cleric was briefly detained at JFK before being released into the custody of a “Saudi representative.” A federal warrant for Awlaki’s arrest had mysteriously been withdrawn the previous day. A US drone killed Awlaki in Yemen in 2011.

    HERNDON, VA.: On the eve of the attacks, top Saudi government official Saleh Hussayen checked into the same Marriott Residence Inn near Dulles Airport as three of the Saudi hijackers who targeted the Pentagon. Hussayen had left a nearby hotel to move into the hijackers’ hotel. Did he meet with them? The FBI never found out. They let him go after he “feigned a seizure,” one agent recalled. (Hussayen’s name doesn’t appear in the separate 9/11 Commission Report, which clears the Saudis.)

    SARASOTA, FLA.: 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta and other hijackers visited a home owned by Esam Ghazzawi, a Saudi adviser to the nephew of King Fahd. FBI agents investigating the connection in 2002 found that visitor logs for the gated community and photos of license tags matched vehicles driven by the hijackers. Just two weeks before the 9/11 attacks, the Saudi luxury home was abandoned. Three cars, including a new Chrysler PT Cruiser, were left in the driveway. Inside, opulent furniture was untouched.

    Democrat Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who chaired the Joint Inquiry, has asked the FBI for the Sarasota case files, but can’t get a single, even heavily redacted, page released. He says it’s a “coverup.”

    Is the federal government protecting the Saudis? Case agents tell me they were repeatedly called off pursuing 9/11 leads back to the Saudi Embassy, which had curious sway over White House and FBI responses to the attacks.

    Just days after Bush met with the Saudi ambassador in the White House, the FBI evacuated from the United States dozens of Saudi officials, as well as Osama bin Laden family members. Bandar made the request for escorts directly to FBI headquarters on Sept. 13, 2001 — just hours after he met with the president. The two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony while discussing the attacks.

    Bill Doyle, who lost his son in the World Trade Center attacks and heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families, calls the suppression of Saudi evidence a “coverup beyond belief.” Last week, he sent out an e-mail to relatives urging them to phone their representatives in Congress to support the resolution and read for themselves the censored 28 pages.

    Astonishing as that sounds, few lawmakers in fact have bothered to read the classified section of arguably the most important investigation in US history.

    Granted, it’s not easy to do. It took a monthlong letter-writing campaign by Jones and Lynch to convince the House intelligence panel to give them access to the material.

    But it’s critical they take the time to read it and pressure the White House to let all Americans read it. This isn’t water under the bridge. The information is still relevant today. Pursuing leads further, getting to the bottom of the foreign support, could help head off another 9/11.

    As the frustrated Joint Inquiry authors warned, in an overlooked addendum to their heavily redacted 2002 report, “State-sponsored terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more lethal attacks within the United States.”

    Their findings must be released, even if they forever change US-Saudi relations. If an oil-rich foreign power was capable of orchestrating simultaneous bulls-eye hits on our centers of commerce and defense a dozen years ago, it may be able to pull off similarly devastating attacks today.

    Members of Congress reluctant to read the full report ought to remember that the 9/11 assault missed its fourth target: them.

    Paul Sperry is a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of “Infiltration” and “Muslim Mafia.”


    I guess they are coming after your assets. :coffee:
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2014