What's new

9/11 & Mumbai attacks were inside jobs: a detailed analysis by Elias Davidson

Faqirze

BANNED
Sep 17, 2021
887
-8
979
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Phases of a cover up and false flag operation, Mumbai

(1) Immediate fingering of the perpetrator

When officials claim to know the identity of a perpetrator (individual or group) prior to any serious investigation, this suggests that a false narrative is being initiated and that strenuous effort will soon be made to implant it in the mind of a population.

Thus, for example, Lee Harvey Oswald was identified by officials of the executive branch as the killer of President John F. Kennedy–and as a lone wolf with no associates–on the afternoon of the assassination day, long before an investigation and even before he had been charged with the crime.

Betrayal of India


And we had major news media pointing with confidence, by the end of the day of September 11, 2001, to Osama bin Laden and his group–in the absence of evidence.

In the Mumbai case the Prime Minister of India implied, while the attack was still in progress, that the perpetrators were from a terrorist group supported by, or at least tolerated by, Pakistan (65; 228; 478; 512; 731).

The Taj Mahal Hotel burning after the terrorist attacks in Mumbai (Source: Haunted India)

Likewise, immediately after the attacks Henry Kissinger attempted to implicate Pakistan. Three days prior to the attack on the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel in Mumbai, one of the main attack sites, Kissinger had been staying in the hotel. He “sat with top executives from Goldman Sachs and India’s Tata group in the Taj to ‘chat about American politics’” (331).

Kissinger’s presence on the scene with Indian elites (the Tata family is one of India’s wealthiest, and the Tata Group owns the Taj) would be peculiar enough to cause raising of the eyebrows, but when combined with his immediate fingering of Pakistan it becomes extremely suspect.

As Davidsson shows, what investigation there was came much later, and even today the case against Pakistan remains full of contradictions, unsupported allegations, and absurdities.

(2) Grotesque failure by official investigators to follow proper procedures

Incompetence is a fact of life, but there are times when the incompetence theory is strained to the breaking point and it is more rational to posit deliberate deception. In the case of the Mumbai investigation, Davidsson depicts its failures as going well beyond incompetence.

  • Neither the police, nor the judge charged with trying the sole surviving suspect, made public a timeline of events (188-189; 688-689). Even the most basic facts of when a given set of attacks began and when they ended were left vague.
  • Key witnesses were not called to testify. Witnesses who said they saw the terrorists commit violence, or spoke to them, or were in the same room with them, were ignored by the court (e.g., 279 ff.).
  • Contradictions and miracles were not sorted out. One victim was apparently resurrected from the dead when his testimony was essential to the blaming of Pakistan (229-230). A second victim died in two different places (692), while a third died in three places (466). No one in authority cared enough to solve these difficulties.
  • Eyewitnesses to the crime differed on the clothing and skin color of the terrorists, and on how many of them there were (328-331). No resolution was sought.
  • At least one eyewitness confessed she found it hard to distinguish “friends” from terrorists (316). No probe was stimulated by this odd confusion.
  • The number of terrorists who committed the deeds changed repeatedly, as did the number of terrorists who survived (29 ff.; 689).
  • Crime scenes were violated, with bodies hauled off before they could be examined (682-683).
  • Identity parades (“line-ups”) were rendered invalid by weeks of prior exposure of the witnesses to pictures of the suspect in newspapers (101; 582).
  • Claims that the terrorists were armed with AK-47s were common, yet forensic study of the attack at the Cama Hospital failed to turn up a single AK-47 bullet (156).
  • Of the “hundreds of witnesses processed by the court” in relation to the attacks at the Café Leopold, Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, Oberoi-Trident Hotel or Nariman House, “not a single one testified to having observed any of the eight accused kill anyone” (40).
  • Indian authorities declined to order autopsies on the dead at the targeted Jewish center in Nariman House. The dead, five out of six of whom were Israeli citizens (427), were instead whisked back to Israel by a Jewish organization based in Israel, allegedly for religious reasons (453). Religious sensitivity seems to have extended to a large safe at the crime scene, which the team also transported to Israel (454).

(3) Extreme secrecy and the withholding of basic information from the population, with the excuse of “national security”

  • The surviving alleged terrorist had no public trial (661).
  • No transcript of his secret trial has been released (670).
  • One lawyer who agreed to defend the accused was removed by the court and another was assassinated (670).
  • The public was told there was extensive CCTV footage of the attacks, despite the mysterious malfunctioning of the majority of CCTV cameras on the days in question (97-98; 109 ff.; 683 ff.); but only a very small percentage of the claimed footage was ever released and it suffers from serious defects–two conflicting time-stamps and signs of editing (111).
  • Members of an elite Indian commando unit that showed up with between 475 and 800 members to battle eight terrorists (534) were not allowed to testify in court (327; 428-429).
  • The “confession” of the suspect, on which the judge leaned heavily, was given in secret. No transcript of this confession has been released to the public and the suspect later renounced the confession, saying he had been under threat from police when he gave it (599 ff.; 681).
  • The suspect, after being convicted and sentenced to death, was presumably executed, but the hanging was done secretly in jail and his body, like the bodies of the other dead “terrorists,” was buried in a secret place (37; 623).
It is difficult to see how the investigation described above differs from what we would expect to see in a police state. Evidently, the “world’s largest democracy” is in trouble.

Meanwhile, motives for the “highly plausible” false flag attack, Davidsson notes, are not difficult to find. The attacks not only filled the coffers of national security agencies, creating as they did the impression of a permanent threat to India, but also helped tilt India toward those countries claiming to take the lead in the War on Terror (809 ff.; 847). The FBI showed great interest in the attacks from the outset.

It actually had a man on the scene during the attacks and sent an entire team directly after the event (812 ff.). The Bureau was, remarkably, given direct access to the arrested suspect and to his recorded confession (before he even had a lawyer), as well as to eyewitnesses (651-652; 815). The New York Police Department also sent a team after the conclusion of the event (816-817), as did Scotland Yard and Israeli police (651; 851).

There seems to have been something of a national security fest in relation to Mumbai as ideas of closer cooperation in matters of security were discussed (e.g., 822). In case Israel seems too small to belong with the other players in this national security fest, Davidsson reminds us that India is Israel’s largest customer in defense sales (853).

So, what can we learn from Davidsson’s book? For patient readers, a great deal: this 900-page study is as free of filler and rhetoric as it is rich in detail.
 

MultaniGuy

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 6, 2017
11,286
-1
10,965
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
I too laughed when the terrorist said "Bhagwan."

Lol which Muslim would say "Bhagwan."

Muslims say "Allah" or "God."
 

Joe Shearer

PROFESSIONAL
Apr 19, 2009
26,740
162
43,932
Country
India
Location
India
Last edited:

Goritoes

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 20, 2021
4,396
0
6,650
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
We common civilians will never know the real truth behind high profile attacks, Agencies and Govt show people evidences, block a lot of material in the name of National security or classified stuff, A lot of things that we see today can be done by people who benefitted from the deaths and misery of people, To all this I will say what I always say, May Allah Curse and Punish people who did all that whether in the name of religion or false flags, whoever did it May Allah burn them in hell and expose their faces to the world in this world and the next.
 

Faqirze

BANNED
Sep 17, 2021
887
-8
979
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
A blogger on a blogsite.
Possibly paid but certainly a desperate attention seeking conspiracy theorist and a fantasist.
Lool, I bet you didn't even bother reading the content of the post, does it hurt having years of Bollywood and Indian media delusions and brainwashing shattered?
 

N.Siddiqui

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 21, 2015
7,910
8
14,584
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Light...Camera, Action.

Clearly this pic is taken by a photographer with a good quality camera, and not a CCTV footage, you don't get this clarity and proper colors in a CCTV shot.

And the angle also tells this is a professionally taken picture.

CCTV's are not placed at this low, almost eye level, they are always placed higher on the roof corner or around.

1647614259586.png





A normal CCTV footage looks like this, unclear, pixelated, and blurred.

1647614537891.png
 

Faqirze

BANNED
Sep 17, 2021
887
-8
979
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Light...Camera, Action.

Clearly this pic is taken by a photographer with a good quality camera, and not a CCTV footage, you don't get this clarity and proper colors in a CCTV shot.

And the angle also tells this is a professionally taken picture.

CCTV's are not placed at this low, almost eye level, they are always placed higher on the roof corner or around.

View attachment 825239




A normal CCTV footage looks like this, unclear, pixelated, and blurred.

View attachment 825240
Funny how they managed to click a crisp 1080p quality photo of the supposedly surviving terrorist in action but there are no photos or footage out there whatsoever of the supposed 9 other terrorists. Oh what a coincidence! it is totally not suspicious that his trial was held in secret and the suspect (patsy) was executed behind closed doors despite the case being the biggest trial in Indian history. The whole sequence of events reads like a typical recycled Bollywood script that can only come from the warped and brainwashed minds of Indians.
 

VkdIndian

FULL MEMBER
Jan 6, 2021
1,259
-6
1,131
Country
India
Location
India
- 9/11 was and inside job.
- Mumbai was an inside job.
- US didn’t make any landing on the moon.
- Earth is flat.

The list is quite long.
 
Last edited:

N.Siddiqui

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 21, 2015
7,910
8
14,584
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Any terror attack truth and reality can be measured by a very simple question.

Who, and which country benefitted from the Mumbai attacks.??

Did Pakistan benefitted in anyway from the Mumbai attacks, absolutely NO!!!
Why would Pakistan insanely committ an attack when it was under all sorts of media attacks and epicenter of terror vibes those day.

It benefitted the US, India moved from the Russian block to a US bloc.

RSS and Hindu hardliners benefitted the most, a renaissance of RSS, VHP and all the Senas and Sanghs popularity risen, Pakistan and Muslim(Indian) hatred makes and breaks Indian govts. Add to this the Gujarat massacre, the Ayodhya episode...a chain of events led to the rise of RSS and the downfall of seculars and liberals.

Israel also took all the benefit, India and Israel got closer.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom