• Tuesday, September 17, 2019

15th Khordad vs PAC-3

Discussion in 'Iranian Defence Forum' started by T-72B, Jun 10, 2019.

  1. PAC-3

    1 vote(s)
    16.7%
  2. Khordad 15th

    5 vote(s)
    83.3%
  1. T-72B

    T-72B FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    267
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 199 / -0
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Let's compare both of this AD system
    One another from it's statistics, combat capability, etc
     
  2. T-72B

    T-72B FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    267
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 199 / -0
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Let's compare both statistics and capability both of these AD system
    Shall we
     
  3. AZADPAKISTAN2009

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    29,607
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +39 / 29,180 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    China
    Hard to tell what the new Iranian system can do or not do
     
  4. Yaseen1

    Yaseen1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,103
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Ratings:
    +3 / 5,067 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    How can it protect itself against u.s cyber and electric attack and may be jammed by u.s fighter jets
     
  5. Arminkh

    Arminkh SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,712
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2014
    Ratings:
    +15 / 6,379 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Canada
    I'd say Iran's military should be very confident about the specs it revealed and they also must think that the specs are so top notch that they would add another big risk to US military calculations.

    Otherwise why would they give so much details about performance and range? Normally these things are secret.
     
  6. Invictus.inc

    Invictus.inc FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    9
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 13 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Lol what's there to Compare?
    Iranian Systems are more propaganda than Actual up to date Systems anyways
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  7. Bahram Esfandiari

    Bahram Esfandiari FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    770
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,419 / -1
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Canada
    Go look up the Patriot missile's success rate form the 1st Gulf war if you want to see some real propaganda!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  8. T-72B

    T-72B FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    267
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 199 / -0
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Indonesia
    And also you should know that Iran as a Country is totally propaganda, there's no such country called Iran or Persia, Cyrus the Great was actually an Hollywood actor and the whole Iran as a country is actually is a stage by Hollywood, Iran Supreme leader is also a Hollywood actor and also those Iranians in this forum actually actors to mate!!!1111
    (For Iranians this is a sarcasm and pls dont banned because of this)
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 9
  9. Hack-Hook

    Hack-Hook ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    9,995
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 11,210 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    I wouldn't compare those two . if you used PAC-2 it was a better comparison as the modification in PAC-3 resulted in lesser chance in countering aircraft and higher chance in intercepting balistic missile while 15th khordad is designed for aircraft and cruise missile and nobody talked about ballistic missiles.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  10. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,653
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 6,360 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    we shall but you can compare PAC_2 with Sayyad 2A and Sayyad 3C, if you want to compare PAC_3 anti_missile system then you can compare it only with Sayyad 4 so which one do you want to do?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  11. LeGenD

    LeGenD ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,696
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Ratings:
    +20 / 7,850 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    :disagree:
     
  12. Hack-Hook

    Hack-Hook ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    9,995
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 11,210 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    I knew , You believe comparing 15th khordad with PAC-3 is wrong but because PAC even PAC-1 eat 15th Khordad alive not because they have different mission..
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Pandora

    Pandora SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,738
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Ratings:
    +6 / 5,987 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    PAC is a matured system with billions spent on its development and improvements. Iran has just stepped into this arena it will take them at least another decade to build a reliable system capable of intercepting with high success rate. Needless to say Iran is marching toward the right direction of a indigenously developed defense systems but this is just a start.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  14. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,653
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 6,360 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    PAC_2 vs 15th Khordad



    PAC_2 SAM


    name of the missiles: MM-104D (PAC-2/GEM) vs Sayyad 3C


    MM-104D (PAC-2/GEM): Long-range, all-altitude, all-weather air defence system, four Patriot missiles, Lenght missile 5.8 m, weight missile 900 kg, warhead weight 91 kg, range against fighter jets and drones 160 km, range against ballistic missiles 20 km, altitude against fighter jets and drones 24 km, altitude against ballistic missiles 12 km, PAC-2/PAC-3 Mach 4.1, Guidance system MM-104D enjoies track-via-missile (TVM) guidance subsystems and enhanced fuzing or proximity fuse.

    [​IMG]




    Radar: AN/MPQ-53 or -65 Radar Set, the AN/MSQ-104 Engagement Control Station (ECS), the OE-349 Antenna Mast Group (AMG), and the EPP-III Electric Power Plant, range 180 km, tracking and engaging 8 targets simultaneously.


    [​IMG]






    15th Khordad SAM


    Sayyad 3C: Long-range, all-altitude, all-weather air defence system, four Sayyad 3C missiles, Lenght missile 5.9 m, weight missile 1030 kg, warhead weight 150 kg, range against fighter jets and drones 120 km, range against ballistic missiles 7_75 km, altitude against fighter jets and drones 27 km, altitude against ballistic missiles is unknown, Sayyad 3C speed is Mach 5_6, for guidance system Sayyad 3C enjoies track-via-missile (TVM) guidance subsystems and proximity fuse, missile it self has SARH guidance active radar in case the mine radar loses the target missile will start searching for a target for it self and infrared seeker.


    [​IMG]







    Radar: Najm 804 AESA radar/Control Station , range 150 km against fighter jets and drones and helicopters and bombers and 85 km range against ballistic missiles and stealth cruise missiles and stealth fighter jets and stealth bombers, tracking and engaging 6 targets simultaneously.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]



    PLZ tell me if i had a mistake any were.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 10
  15. T-72B

    T-72B FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    267
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 199 / -0
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    Indonesia
    o_O

    Does 15th Khordad and other Sayyad,Talaash AD system really have any capabilities against Ballistic missile?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1