Separate names with a comma.
All conspiracy crapola; no proof.
Is there any proof of such a deal being made?
It is good of you to offer such a plan, it really is. I appreciate it. But reality remains as I said.
Yes, that sounds very nice. It's okay. Let's see how the situation evolves in the coming months. As I said, no rush.
We still have some time till the elections.
It all depends on how the economy is doing in the run up to the elections.
So the answer is no rush at all. :D
What's the rush?
Not legally binding. Says it all. (Just like some other ones.)
America will do whatever serves its national interests and that would make perfect sense. This "soft merger" that you mention will remain a pipe...
It simply does not have the economic gravitas to assume such a role either.
Does Kabul want to be appointed as a warden of the Af-Pak area?
Pakistan simply does not have the economic gravitas to assume such a role.
There can be no contraindications in a system that is working as designed to deliver the results desired. I am of course referring to the Indian...
How strong is this "order" when "the vote is not legally binding"? :D
We are long overdue for a recession anyways, the timing of which will play a great part in the next elections and hence subject to many influences.
The outcomes will be interesting to observe, that is for sure.
It doesn't really matter. Such perceptions, and their opposites, will be shaped more on the economic front rather than any rhetoric on either side.
Notice the blatant dishonesty.
The IMF research, published on Thursday, found that “tariff revenue collected has been borne almost entirely by...