Separate names with a comma.
Thread is closed, i can't respond to your reply .. have a great day bro
How effective and efficient is the AC-130 Spectre in terms of 1)COIN and 3)Conventional War? Are there other countries who have something of equivalence of this platform? If not, then why? Thanks
In warfare is that there is a constant desire to attack from directions and dimensions that the enemy either cannot respond or does not have access to.
If one side that do not have airpower, the advantage goes to the one that do have. Same with denial. If one side is somehow denied access to the 3rd dimension, the advantage goes to the side that do have access.
That is high level view.
At the lower level is the specific tool and in this case it is the AC-130. Insurgencies usually do not have airpower and in a conventional war, if one side lost access to the 3rd dimension, advances on the ground will be severely hindered if not outright stopped.
As to whether any other country have something similar to the AC-130, one is the AC-295 from Airbus. Other types of the gunship concept lies with the helo. You can go back to WW II with the B-25 gunship.
But to date, the best execution of the gunship concept is still the AC-130. It is best because of the base platform, the C-130 itself.
Gambit, you reckon J-20 poses a credible threat to F-22 or F-35? Just talking about the machines, i.e. no force multipliers such as AWAC involved.
Yes, I do believe it is a credible threat. Contrary to what the PDF Chinese may say about me, I have never said the J-20 is 'junk' or even a 'bad' aircraft. An aircraft that is a lesser performer in some areas, in comparison to another, does not mean it is a poor product.
You have good, excellent, and outstanding. China have done an excellent, if not outstanding, job with the J-20. The US takes it seriously.
I had another question in regards to what's known as "super-manoeuvrability". Time and again we have witnessed (mostly) Flankers and some other aircraft performing them. Do they have any practical advantage in the modern aerial warfare? Or they're merely good for airshows?
It depends on the INITIAL airspeed approach to the maneuver. That is what experienced pilots have been criticizing. For those airshows, those maneuvers really are worthless, the jet's airspeed was approaching stall prior to the 'cobra' or whatever maneuver itself. In BFM, nobody does that.
On hindsight, I believe my remark is overboard, not meant to insult.
I have respect for Vietnam.
Of course you meant to insult. This is not a verbal face to face engagement. This is a message board that requires a person to make extraordinary effort -- typing -- to present his arguments. You exposed yourself for what you really are -- a racist to the core.
Hello sir, it’s enriching reading some of your posts. Just wanted to know your observation on India’s LCA aircraft.
i am interested in discussing AESA, PESA and PD radars with you.
We can do that in many threads relating to the subject.
Just want to say that I always like your perspective and we often think the same way about VN. I often feel frustrated because if I say all that I really think, I'll end up deported. Come to Da Nang sometime, you'll like it.
LOL! That thread on brainwashing got killed quick!!!!
For the Chinese-Americans and the Chinese who have lived in America, there can be only two choices: Either they can be embarrassed or they can be intellectually dishonest.
Well I'm glad you saw it before it got yanked. It certainly was nice to see people breaking from the unified wall. Although I wonder if it was the videos of the brainwashed and poor children that really struck a nerve.
Hey amigo, I just found this article about Boing doing research on anti gravity propulsion, so it may be something about that after all; check out the link: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/rocketscience-02t.html
Thank you man.
Also, one person that wrote a comment to an article claimed that he was in desert storm and saw such aircraft using new advance weapons on the Iraqis.
Hey amigo, I'd like to ask you a sort of private question (I can delete this later).
I've been reading some stories online about the USAF having aircraft (black projects) that are using anti gravity propulsion, sometimes in addition to the standard propulsion. The say that the B-2 is one of such aircraft. Some eyewitnesses claim to have seen it silently hovering, etc. Any truth to those stories?
No truth to that. Am not saying that because I want to keep secrets. Am saying that because of science and common sense. The B-2 does not have any kind of anti-g technology.
Dude I wouldn't post pictures of yourself on a internet forum. There's some crazy fucks out there. I would delete it, everyone is just screwing around having fun so you don't need to prove anything.
I thank you and appreciate your concern. That pix is 30 yrs old, my face is partially obscured by shadows. And last, I am well armed.
Lol you know how this shit goes right? Just do reverse image search and all kinds of info show up. Then you sign up on gay mags to your house. Nevertheless thanks for your service.
Happy new year sir
And the same to you, sir.
Hello Gambit, -- This must be said -- I like your FEISTINESS -- It will be less FUN, if U stay quiet and Not Fighting back.
Fight back ? Kid, [b]NONE[/b] of you can handle me in a rational debate. On the other hand, in an irrational debate, I readily admit defeat since I am neither crazy nor ignorant.