• Monday, August 26, 2019
Bhairava
Last Activity:
Mar 18, 2013
Joined:
Jun 8, 2010
Messages:
5,160
Positive ratings received:
0
Neutral ratings received:
4,673
Negative ratings received:
0

Post Ratings

Bhairava

SENIOR MEMBER

Bhairava was last seen:
Mar 18, 2013
    1. Dalai Lama
      Dalai Lama
      Great minds think alike. :D
    2. AgNoStiC MuSliM
      AgNoStiC MuSliM
      The Indian response was already posted in that thread - the Indian refusal to consider the proposal is what started the discussion on that thread today.
    3. Polemos
      Polemos
      Thanks man.
    4. SpArK
      SpArK
      Leave that thread.. its useless...let them argue with themselves..

      why bother?
    5. araboys
      araboys
      vanakam vera paadiya kada pomman ayiiya :) epadi nalama ?
    6. RPK
      RPK
      i haven't seen yet
    7. LaBong
      LaBong
      lol, congrats.

      and the last bit was not required. :P
    8. metro
      metro
      wait till june. political party will be formally announced.
    9. metro
      metro
      can u smell the change buddy ?
    10. AgNoStiC MuSliM
      AgNoStiC MuSliM
      The title is misleading. The extent of Indian contribution to the development of the FGFA has not even been determined, and the Russians are already flying a prototype and likely have the majority of their future development plans in place already. India is essentially just subsidizing the cost of continued development of the program, for the rights to add the term 'Indo' to 'Indo-Russian FGFA', and at best, at this time, it would appear that all India will do is perform another MKI on a Russian jet, perhaps with more Indian components instead of Israeli or European, and that is optimistic. Where can India offer technological expertise? Airframe? Engines? Flight Controls? Radar? In all of those areas the Russians are way ahead of India.

      Even the Indian contribution to avionics (on the Indian version of the FGFA) is likely going to be primarily based on American/European/Israeli technology transferred to India under the MMRCA contract (whoever the winner ends up being), with minimal 'pure indigenous' contribution.

      Joining any project this late in the game leaves little room for technological contributions by the junior partner, especially when the junior partner is far less technologically advanced than the senior partner- u are only fooling yourself if you think otherwise.
    11. BritishBangladeshi
      BritishBangladeshi
      There is one theory that has no mathematical fallacy:

      F(1)=1/2=1-1/2=1-1/(2^1)

      F(2)=1/2+1/4=3/4=1-1/4=1-1/(2^2)

      F(3)=1/2+1/4+1/8=1/8=7/8=1-1/8=1-1/(2^3)

      F(X)=1-1/(2^X)

      suppose x=infinity

      F(X)=1-1/(2^X)

      (check:))

      then

      2(F(X))=1+1/2+1/4+1/8....
      -(F(X))= 1/2+1/4+1/8....
      add

      F(X)=1
      and
      F(X)=1-1/(2^X)
      remember:x=infinity

      then 1=-1/(2^X)
      subtract 1
      multiply by 2 to the power of X
      1=0
      (absurd but logical)

      add four
      use additive theory
      then
      2+2=5
      and
      2+2=4

      (absurd but logical)
    12. Kinetic
      Kinetic
      Thanks. He deserved it. lol
    13. Iggy
      Iggy
      happy onam gounder :)..
    14. SpArK
      SpArK
      Nandri gounder sir... eppadi irukkae?? sawkyamaaa???
    15. nramesh1990
      nramesh1990
      Hi, my name is Ramesh, living in coimbatore me too gounder.
  • Loading...
  • Loading...