What's new

White House once again weighing intervention options in Syria.

The reason why US is weighing its intervention option is

  • US does not want to confront Russia

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • Budget allocation issues.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Elections are approaching

    Votes: 4 66.7%

  • Total voters
    6

Levina

BANNED
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
15,278
Reaction score
59
Country
India
Location
United Arab Emirates
White House once again weighing intervention options in Syria.

defense-large.jpg


BY GAYLE TZEMACH LEMMON

After $500 million train-and-equip effort fails, what comes next?

It is now official: the program to arm and train Syrian moderates, the one that leapt from “fantasy” to policy priority between August and September of last year is now officially winding down. Its failure leaves the administration facing options it doesn’t care for in a war it doesn’t want to enter in a world that has made American inaction almost as hard to imagine as American intervention.



Elected to end wars, not begin new ones, President Barack Obama has shied away from heavy intervention in Syria ever since the uprising began more than four years ago. The White House’s numerous Syria-policy discussions have almost always ended with a decision against greater support to Syrian moderate opposition or no decision at all, according to current and former administration officials working on Syria policy.



“It wasn’t a very rich debate about Syria writ large, it was just a very flat, stale predictable set of discussions at the highest levels and that didn’t change from year to year all that much,” said one former senior administration official. “We were a little detached from the conflict because we had the impression we could keep the lid on it, and looking back, I think that was clearly wishful thinking.”


Said this former official, “The goal of U.S.policy from day one was not to get engaged and that has failed. We are there.”



Now, with ISIS showing no signs of collapse, a humanitarian catastrophe spilling into Europe, and Russia launching its own military operations in Syria, the Obama administration is once again deliberating policy options.



Last week, the President met over lunch with Robert Ford, the former ambassador to Syria who publicly broke with the administration over its Syria policy; and Ryan Crocker, a storied diplomat who served in Syria and turned down the Syrian envoy role in 2013.



“I don’t want to comment on last week at all except to say that for a long time my sense of what needs to be done in Syria and the impact of Syria on regional interests has not always been the same as other people in the administration,” Ford said. “That is why I needed to leave. And that hasn’t changed.”



Ford, like other former administration officials, said that the reluctance to intervene began at the very top — with the president.



“There has always been in this administration a deep reluctance to get very involved in Syria. And they view even providing material assistance to elements of the opposition a form of deep involvement,” Ford said. “Of course, in the end what has happened is that they have often waited for the perfect at the expense of the good, so by 2014, instead of having Syria indigenous forces fighting the Islamic State and prevailing, we had to use American air power, which is more expensive and will damage our credibility even more if it is not successful.”



Administration officials now working on Syria policy say they are hashing out what further intervention might look like and what kind of support to offer those who have received American training.



“This is no longer about moderates or not moderates, because the Russians are taking them out,” says one administration official familiar with current conversations. “So people say, ‘Okay, we cede Syria to Iran, Hizbollah and Russia,’ or we feel we need to be involved in this game so we can continue to have a hope of countering ISIL and having enough leverage to influence the search for a political solution.”



Conversations are said to be underway now that will be “resolved by next week” surrounding the CIA-backed program to support rebel fighters and how much support those fighters might hope to receive.



“The final moment of truth is if they fail at adequately protecting the moderates the Russians are seeking to destroy,” the official said.
article-end.png

White House Once Again Weighing Intervention Options in Syria - Defense One

*******


@Penguin @Psychic (moved our discussion to this thread :) )

@jhungary @Gabriel92 @Hurshid Celebi
 
It was a mess with many countries involved in it. Assad should have left like Mubarak but he didn't and the Syrians suffered. Now the war in Syria has become a war of annihilation.
 
With the way things are going, I think some time around 2020 US probably will invade Syria.
 
Once Russia showed real presence again in NE, other Super Powers will never leave that Region;

the Near East and Africa conflicts can cause a real refugee catastrophe for the EU and of course for Türkiye;
change whole societies and regions.

We don't know plans for Africa behind the doors, just now ?


Russian and Chinese doctrines are the same like the of the other Superpowers ( EU / France, GB and Germany)
and the almighty Hyperpower USA.

Nigeria, Eritrea, Somalia, Sudan , Mali, Libya everywhere where a rich resources

Russia and China are arming and modernizing very fast.
Who rules the seas will rule the globe ! Now it is obviously the USA.
But in the next 15-20 years the facts will change.



@Bismarck @Neptune
 
Last edited:
The situation in Syria is too complicate for anyone without direct stake to get involved. As I said numerous time here and some other place, the Russian own involvement will only further complicate the situation in Syria. And would do the situation no good but only intensify fighting.

I was talking to a Political Commentator the other day, the situation in Syria is much like the TV show "Keeping Up with the Kardashian" it is all just for show, and meanwhile, normal people suffer.

I am against any US or Russian involvement.
 
LOL...... fvck....... I just stopped there! :D
Well the author meant America considers them "moderates".
For example, what I consider right, might be wrong for you. Isnt it?
The world's definition of moderates could be very different from America's. :)

It was a mess with many countries involved in it. Assad should have left like Mubarak but he didn't and the Syrians suffered. Now the war in Syria has become a war of annihilation.
Frankly speaking I think the Syrian war has many layers to it. Its not just about Assad and a few rebels, there's a lot of money involved or else US and Russia would not have shown any interest in it. Agree?

the situation in Syria is much like the TV show "Keeping Up with the Kardashian" it is all just for show, and meanwhile, normal people suffer.
Its unfortunate that what is entertainment for a few, is tragedy for many.
 
Frankly speaking I think the Syrian war has many layers to it. Its not just about Assad and a few rebels, there's a lot of money involved or else US and Russia would not have shown any interest in it.
.

What did the US get out of intervention in Libya.
 
Kindly speculate on the money trail. Thanks

This should explain things better.

151012130201-oil-prices-putin-syria-780x439.png


The oil prices have touched the highest since July, this is good news to energy reliant GCC countries and Russia.
Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed discusses regional issues with Putin in Sochi | The National
What did the US get out of intervention in Libya.
Many reasons, but the main reason according to me was that Libya had the weakest regime, the largest oil reserves in Africa, and produced the best quality oil. Those reasons are good enough i suppose.
 

Back
Top Bottom