What's new

US Sanctions, Pakistan Response is correctly low key

PDFChamp

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
489
Reaction score
6
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
VOA reports:
Pakistan Plays Down Defense-Related US Sanctions

ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN —
Pakistan says that the United States did not share evidence of wrongdoing before placing recent sanctions against certain defense-related Pakistani entities, but that it has pledged to work with Washington to address all concerns.

A December 15 notification by the Department of Commerce named the entities and added them to the Export Administration Regulations list, saying "these government, parastatal and private entities in Pakistan are determined to be involved in activities that are contrary to the national security and/or foreign policy of the United States."

The facilities in question are thought to be associated with Pakistan's missile development program, though officials in Islamabad have not acknowledged it. The U.S. government has not revealed details of violations these entities are alleged to have committed.

Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesman Nafees Zakaria told VOA on Saturday that the government was aware of the sanctions.

"This means that for any transfers of technology to these entities, U.S. exporters will need a license," he said, adding that Pakistani authorities were examining the case to ascertain the facts behind the listing.

Ready for discussions

Zakaria called the timing of the sanctions "intriguing." He told VOA that Pakistan was ready to work with the U.S. at the level of experts to devise mutually agreed-upon procedures for end-use guarantees.

"This will help in assuring nondiversion of high-technology exports from the U.S. without hampering our legitimate imports for socioeconomic development activities," the Pakistani spokesman said.

Pakistan officials insist their missile and nuclear programs are "completely indigenous," and that U.S. sanctions will have "little bearing" on them.

"It means nothing for us," said a senior official associated with the projects. He requested not to be named because he was not authorized to speak to reporters.

The officials described the sanctions as a politically motivated move aimed at creating problems for the incoming Donald Trump administration's relations with Pakistan.

Islamabad has developed and equipped its armed forces with a variety of short-, medium- and long-range missiles, capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads.

The program has raised concerns in Washington about the safety of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, though Islamabad dismisses such issues as misplaced.

Since Obama administration's days are numbered, this is the perfect approach: acknowledge the sanctions and move on.

http://www.voanews.com/a/pakistan-plays-down-defense-related-united-states-sanctions/3658282.html
 
Now you know how wise was decision of buying F-16s, but as usual hardly any lesson learnt and kickbacks win.
 
The program has raised concerns in Washington about the safety of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal
I have always read that the U.S. official standing was that they are confidant in the security of the nuclear weapons. So, this part struck me as arbitrary.
 
Well if we made 99.99% item already in Pakistan , you know smart people should know Tipu is coming
I personally dont see there is any benefit in launching ICBM right now. Pakistan does not need ICBM. Our missile system is enough for its purpose.
We need to focus on other projects and prioritize things accordingly.
Nuclear Submarine and next generation fighter jets should be the focus presently.
 
Since Obama administration's days are numbered, this is the perfect approach: acknowledge the sanctions and move on.

US policy is not run by Obama. Its just an impression, which is pefectly inline with US interests.
President may be free to decide on FEW domestic issues, whereas to play international theater is not the job of one person.
Look at the list of institutions.... only Indians are affected by their produce and only they should be obssesed about them, whereas US has not even provided the chargesheet. So its quite clear, how much of Obama's brain cells are involved in this matter.
 
glad that response to this poncy sanction is 0. this is nothing more than obama showing his deflated ego before he side steps into history as a penalised president that will not be leaving a legacy worthy of this world.
 
Last edited:
Nice to see Pakistan able to just laugh at this action.


That's because unlike years gone by, Pakistan is FAR more self sufficient in high tech weapons production, economically stronger and has more diversified sources in obtaining top of the line high-tech advanced weapons systems technology. Therefore we are no longer vulnerable to such actions by the americans.
 
This sanction is Indian script so Pakistan should ignore this crap & continue working in its missiles & keep testing them.
 
What is the likelihood, that China wont provide the same technology to Pakistan?

China would be glad to.
The US lost its business.
So this seems meaningless & nugatory.
 
Perhaps our learning is coming from Russian response , I agree Obama administration is trying to create hurdles for new elect president Mr Trump but i believe Trump is business man and he understands how important Pak is going to be for American companies in coming days

http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielr...the-next-colombia-success-story/#4436d4753b60

Pakistan has the potential to be a global turnaround story. I recently spent time in-country listening to a wide range of perspectives and I am convinced that U.S. policymakers and business leaders need to look at Pakistan beyond the security lens. Getting our relationship right will require deeper thinking and action on issues around trade and investment, education, and broader economic development. The United States ought to be Pakistan’s preferred partner given its 70-year relationship. But in order to participate in the upside of the Pakistan story, the United States will need to view Pakistan not as a problem to be solved but as a potential partner. There are several changes that suggest the United States should soon act on this opportunity.
 

Back
Top Bottom