US 'bunker buster' bomb (MOP) to be ready soon: Pentagon

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by r0ck, Oct 16, 2009.

Share This Page

  1. r0ck
    Offline

    r0ck FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    112
    Ratings:
    +0 / 32 / -0
    Aaj TV
    Thursday, 8 Oct, 2009 9:52 am

    WASHINGTON : The Pentagon said on Wednesday a giant ‘bunker buster’ bomb will be ready within months, adding a powerful weapon to the US arsenal amid tensions over Iran's nuclear program. The 30,000-pound massive ordnance penetrator (MOP) is designed to knock out fortified sites buried deep underground, like those used by Iran and North Korea to protect its nuclear work.

    "It is under development right now and should be deployable in the coming months," press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.

    The Defense Department had said in August it wanted to speed up production plans for the super bomb, asking Congress to shift funds to the project.

    Congress approved the request and the Pentagon announced Friday it awarded McDonnell Douglas Corporation a 51.9-million-dollar contract to enable B-2 aircraft to carry the enormous MOP.

    The bomb, which holds 5,300 pounds of explosives, is designed "to defeat hardened facilities used by hostile states to protect weapons of mass destruction," Morrell said.

    But he declined to comment whether the weapon's development was in response to Iran's disputed nuclear program.

    "I don't think anybody can divine potential targets or anything of that nature. This is just a capability that we think is necessary given the world we live in these days," he said.

    "The reality is that the world we live in is one in which there are people who seek to build weapons of mass destruction and they seek to do so in a clandestine fashion."

    The United States has refused to rule out military action against Iran if diplomacy fails though President Barack Obama's administration has played down the possibility.

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates said last month that a military strike against Iran would only "buy time" and delay a nuclear weapons program by about one to three years.

    The earth-penetrating MOP is often cited as a potential weapon to take out Iran's underground centrifuge facilities in Natanz. Iran admitted last month it had been building a new uranium enrichment plant near the holy city of Qom, sparking international outrage. In subsequent talks with world powers, Tehran has adopted a more conciliatory stance and agreed to UN inspections of the new plant.

    In an earlier request to Congress, the Pentagon comptroller had cited an "urgent operational need" to develop a weapon against buried targets in "high threat environments," ABC television news reported.

    The request for the MOP was backed by US Pacific Command, which oversees an area that includes North Korea, and Central Command, which covers the Middle East, including Iran, it said.

    Aerospace giant Boeing manufactures the MOP, which could become the biggest conventional bomb ever used by the US military.

    More information :
    Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) / Direct Strike Hard Target Weapon / Big BLU

    Any thoughts about this bomb's effect on :pakistan: bunkers?
  2. r0ck
    Offline

    r0ck FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    112
    Ratings:
    +0 / 32 / -0
    Image of the affected area (courtesy of globalsecurity.com):

    [​IMG]
  3. TruthSeeker
    Offline

    TruthSeeker PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    8,707
    Ratings:
    +3 / 4,675 / -0
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Something doesn't add up here! Surely something called a 30K lb bomb has more than 5.3 K lb of explosives! I read somewhere that even if this bomb cannot reach some chambers of a very deep site, it can cause so much mayhem in the entrance areas above the deep chambers, that the "protected" equipment would be ruined and the site would be discouragingly "sealed". I don't think I would want to be "on duty" at the site when the MOP arrived, even if I was in the deepest room!
  4. S-2
    Offline

    S-2 PROFESSIONAL

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,228
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,501 / -0
    " I don't think I would want to be "on duty" at the site when the MOP arrived, even if I was in the deepest room!"

    Yeah and who's to say that's the only one. If it has a guidance package that's satelliate-based there might be one right behind it by a minute or two.

    If not, watch out for when the dust settles.
  5. Gin ka Pakistan
    Offline

    Gin ka Pakistan SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,032 / -0
    Bad news for Iran
  6. gambit
    Offline

    gambit PROFESSIONAL

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    16,234
    Ratings:
    +29 / 11,536 / -3
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    I can see several variations on this. One MOP to create the initial weakened condition of this buried bunker, assuming this is the type of target, then several smaller bombs, with equal degree of accuracy, to further weakened the cracks in the concrete, or bents in the columns, or anything, and let the bunker collapse upon itself. Either destroy this buried bunker, or make it extremely difficult to access it. On the Osirak attack, the first 'dumb' bomb created the hole in the dome, other 'dumb' bombs followed thru the same hole. For targets like this, guidance and basic flight controls are necessary for the bombs.