What's new

Typhoon submarine, the World's Largest Nuclear Submarine!

WMD & Missiles
Discussions related to Pakistan's civilian and military nuclear capability, various military missiles, space capability, etc

please respect the forum rules.
mods, it need your attention

regards!
 
A bit confusion here:

What the NATO assigned as Akula, the Russians call them as Typhoons.
What the NATO assigned as Typhoon, the Russians call them as Akula.

So which one are we actually talking about?

Russian Name=Akula

NATO Reporting Name=Typhoon:smokin:
 
A bit confusion here:

What the NATO assigned as Akula, the Russians call them as Typhoons.
No, what NATO assigned as "Akula" the Russians call "Shuka-B".

What the NATO assigned as Typhoon, the Russians call them as Akula.
Thats correct.

Here a size comparsion:

9551.jpg


front - the new Borei class SSBN (its about Ohio size), rear - Typhoon(Akula) SSBN.
 
A bit confusion here:

What the NATO assigned as Akula, the Russians call them as Typhoons.
What the NATO assigned as Typhoon, the Russians call them as Akula.

So which one are we actually talking about?

Actually it is about 941 Typhoon class SSBN, not 971 Akula class SSN.
 
No, what NATO assigned as "Akula" the Russians call "Shuka-B".


Thats correct.

Here a size comparsion:

9551.jpg


front - the new Borei class SSBN (its about Ohio size), rear - Typhoon(Akula) SSBN.

BOREI class looks like an infant in front of Typhoon class.
BTW there was no need for a sub of that size imo..
 
BOREI class looks like an infant in front of Typhoon class.
BTW there was no need for a sub of that size imo..

R-39 missile which Typhoon used was too big - 90 tons compare to 32 tons for Trident I and 59 tons for Trident II.
 
Sheesh! Typhoons are COLOSSAL! Wonder what would IN sailors say after being used to the luxuries of this monster and getting into Arihant which is about half of this..:P
 
R-39 missile which Typhoon used was too big - 90 tons compare to 32 tons for Trident I and 59 tons for Trident II.

Sir; you are mistaken. Mind if you look at the following link where I did a comparison of US/Russian ICBMs DefenceDog: Weapon Races-Strategic Ballistic Missile
++
your figures are extremely misleading:
25uqp1y.jpg

Updated Skiff is Sineva SLBM with 10 warheads & updated range of 7175 miles[+10000km] in service 2007–present. 2008 Oct. 11: The K-114 Tula submarine launched the R-29RM Sineva missile from Barents Sea to the equatorial region of the Pacific Ocean, demonstrating the maximum range of the vehicle, reaching 11,547 kilometers
guess what its lighter than US counterparts:azn:
 
Sir; you are mistaken. Mind if you look at the following link where I did a comparison of US/Russian ICBMs DefenceDog: Weapon Races-Strategic Ballistic Missile
++
your figures are extremely misleading:
25uqp1y.jpg

Updated Skiff is Sineva SLBM with 10 warheads & updated range of 7175 miles[+10000km] in service 2007–present. 2008 Oct. 11: The K-114 Tula submarine launched the R-29RM Sineva missile from Barents Sea to the equatorial region of the Pacific Ocean, demonstrating the maximum range of the vehicle, reaching 11,547 kilometers
guess what its lighter than US counterparts:azn:

Too bad it is liquid fueled.
 

Back
Top Bottom