What's new

Truth on who killed Maulvi Farooq, Lone by Hurriyat made public

EjazR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
5,148
Reaction score
1
news.outlookindia.com | Our Own Killed Lone, Maulvi Farooq, Not India: Bhat

Exonerating the Indian forces of long-held allegations of assassinating prominent Hurriyat leaders- Mirwaiz Maulvi Muhammad Farooq, Abdul Gani Lone and JKLF ideologue Prof. Abdul Ahad Wani, leader of the Hurriyat Conference's moderate faction Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat admitted for the first time today, that the killings were actually 'an insider's job'.

Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat, who was the chairman of the Hurriyat Conference when it was split into the hardline and moderate factions, categorically stated at a seminar on Sunday that the security forces had played no role in the killings of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq, Abdul Gani Lone as well as Prof. Abdul Ahad Wani.

"Lone sahib, Mirwaiz Farooq and Prof. Wani were not killed by the army or the police. They were targeted by our own people. The story is a long one, but we have to tell the truth," he asserted, stopping short of naming any terrorist group which killed them or delving into the circumstances under which the murders took place.

The separatist leader was addressing a seminar on 'Role of intellectuals in the Kashmir movement' organised at a local hotel by JKLF chairman Muhammad Yasin Malik to commemorate Wani's death anniversary. The slain Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq's son, present Hurriyat Conference chairman Umar Farooq also did not contradict Bhat when he spoke at the seminar after him.

Speaking at the meet, Bhat, a professor of Persian at Sopore Degree College, said: "if you want to free the people of Kashmir from sentimentalism bordering on insanity, you have to speak the truth. Former Prime Minister of Pakistan Zulfikar Ali Bhutto once said that sometimes truth escapes the mouth. Here I am letting it out." He was also forthcoming in saying that the present movement against India was started by "us killing our intellectuals".

He added: "wherever we found an intellectual, we ended up killing him. Let us ask ourselves: was Prof Wani a martyr of brilliance or a martyr of rivalry?"

Mr Bhat, considered a moderate separatist, also seemed to be criticisng hardline leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani, when he said: “There was a hartal for five months and 112 people died. And at the end of it there is nothing by way of achievement. This is what happens when there is no thinking, no strategy. If you want to rid people of Kashmir of sentimentalism bordering on insanity, you have to speak the truth.”

Mr Bhat also criticised those who have been politicisng the deaths of Kashmiris: “These leaders still hail these sacrifices as if their only purpose is to get people killed... for the sake of it.”

Taking potshots at the rival Hurriyat group for adopting double standards, he said: "when we entered into talks with New Delhi, we were accused of being kafir (non-Muslim), and when you (the hardliners) talk you get away scot-free. This dichotomy in Kashmir politics should end."

Bhat also refused to be a part of any unity process between the separatist groups initiated by Umar Farooq. He avowed he would not be associated with any such move that would mean the "hegemony or aggrandisement of any person", making an oblique reference to Geelani.

Commenting on the five-month long protests and strike which jolted Kashmir in 2010, he said the Kashmiris did not achieve anything through this, adding that the local intellectuals refrained from writing on the issue.

Bhat, also expressed doubts if Pakistan would ever fight a war over Kashmir with India, "it is unlikely as both the nations understand its consequences." He also advocated against an armed movement against India in Kashmir, saying: "It will not have support from any quarter. What next? We should do the talking," he said.

Spelling out the benefits, he said negotiation was an art and the right way to move forward.

Earlier, JKLF chairman Muhammad Yasin Malik, in his address, said Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah was the tallest leader Kashmir produced in the past 63 years. But added the Kashmir conflict dwarfed even the Sheikh.

"This holds true for all of us. Not one among the present crop of leaders should think that we are above Kashmir," he said.

Malik felt that in the past six decades, the Kashmiris had gained nothing, "we have given sacrifices and gone through bitter experiences. But there has been no achievement," he said.

Local Kashmiris as well as secessionists have long held the security forces responsible for the killings of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq, Wani and Lone, slain in three separate incidents.

Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq was murdered in cold blood on May 21, 1990 when unidentified gunmen barged into his Srinagar residence and assassinated him. Later, more than 60 people were killed when CRPF personnel fired upon his funeral procession near Islamia College in Srinagar. The firing on the mourners reinforced the ordinary Kashmiri's suspicions, aired by the separatists, that that government was behind Mirwaiz's killing.

A TADA court, however, jailed former militant Muhammad Ayub Dar last year for the killing. The CBI charge sheet said Dar, along with two other terrorists, shot the Mirwaiz. Its charge sheet named five Hizbul commanders also.

Wani was killed on December 31, 1993, by unknown gunmen. He was a professor of law in Kashmir University and an advocate of the JKLF's views. The academic was in the vicinity of the Hazratbal shrine en route to the university when he was shot.

Moderate Hurriyat Conference leader Lone, the father of Sajjad (the first separatist leader to stand in a general election) and Bilal, was killed on May 21 in 2002. He was gunned down by unidentified assailants at a rally to mark the death anniversary of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq at Eidgah ground in old Srinagar city.

The leader was fired upon seconds before the ceremony was to end. Bhat, then the Hurriyat Conference chairman, was also present at the rally. No charge sheet was filed either in the case of Wani's or Lone's killings.
 
comments from pakistani members are welcome ,nthing new although
 
Hurriyat leader says ‘end lies’, our own killed Lone, Mirwaiz Sr
RIYAZ WANI

In the first such admission by a separatist leader in the state, top Hurriyat leader Prof Abdul Ghani Bhat said here today that Abdul Ghani Lone and Maulvi Farooq weren’t killed by government forces but “their own people”.

“Time has come to speak the truth. Neither the Army nor the police killed Lone sahib and Maulvi Farooq sahib but our own people,” Bhat said while addressing a seminar on the role of intellectuals in the separatist movement.

Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, the son of Maulvi Farooq, didn’t contradict Bhat in his subsequent speech, and neither did Bilal Lone, the son of Abdul Ghani Lone.

“This movement started with the assassinations of thinkers and the people who held an opinion,” Bhat said, adding that if the separatist movement had to get anywhere, its leaders in the state needed to take into account their own follies.

“We have to first accept and speak the truth about ourselves. We can’t build a movement on lies,” Bhat said in what may be one of the boldest criticisms of the separatist movement. A former Hurriyat chairman, Bhat is a moderate separatist and one of the ideologues of the conglomerate.

Maulvi Farooq and Lone were killed in 1990 and 2002, respectively.

The seminar was organised by the JKLF in the memory of academician Abdul Ahad Wani, a JKLF ideologue who was also assassinated by unidentified gunmen in December 1993.

Bhat said Wani too was the victim of “mutual rivalry” between militant organisations. “India didn’t kill him either.”

Bhat also obliquely took on Hurriyat hawk Syed Ali Shah Geelani, saying the policy of hartals and martyrdom, without any strategy, had only damaged the Kashmir cause. “There was a hartal for five months and 112 people died. And at the end of it there is nothing by way of achievement. This is what happens when there is no thinking, no strategy,” Bhat said. “If you want to rid people of Kashmir of sentimentalism bordering on insanity, you have to speak the truth.”

Criticising deaths of people in endless strikes, Bhat said: “These leaders still hail these sacrifices as if their only purpose is to get people killed... for the sake of it.”

Ruling out unity between the Hurriyat factions, he said the Geelani camp only wanted a “unity of hegemony”. “We are ready for unity. But if it is unity for dominance and unity for aggrandisement, we don’t want it,” Bhat said, referring to Geelani’s insistence that his hardline policies on Kashmir be the agenda of a united separatist alliance.

He criticised Geelani for rejecting a dialogue with the Centre when it comes to other separatists, but expressing himself game for it. “When Geelani sahib meets parliamentarians, it is okay. When we do it, we are infidels,” Bhat said. “This dichotomy in Kashmir politics has to go.”
 
?Rivalry behind separatists? killings? - Hindustan Times
Peerzada Ashiq, Hindustan Times


Senior Hurriyat leader Abdul Ghani Bhat said on Sunday that separatist leaders Mirwaiz Muhammad Farooq and Abdul Ghani Lone, and prominent Kashmiri lawyer Abdul Ahad Wani were victims of an internal rivalry and had not been killed by the Army or the state police. Bhat was speaking at a seminar
organised by the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) to commemorate the death of Wani, shot dead on December 31, 1993.

“If you want to rid the people of Kashmir of sentimentalism bordering on insanity, you have to speak the truth. Was Wani sahib a martyr of brilliance or a martyr of rivalry? Neither the Army nor the police killed Mirwaiz, Lone sahib and Wani sahib, but our own people,” the septuagenarian leader said.

Moderate Hurriyat’s chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, People’s Conference chairman Bilal Lone, JKLF chief Yasin Malik and senior lawyer Zafar Shah attended the seminar.

The junior Mirwaiz has claimed that Indian agencies killed his father, Muhammad Farooq, on May 21, 1990.

On Farooq’s death anniversary in 2002, Hurriyat leader Lone, the father of Bilal and Sajjad Lone, was killed by unidentified gunmen in front of the junior Mirwaiz in Srinagar’s Eidgah area. This killing was also blamed on Indian agencies.

Bhat, who was part of the moderate Hurriyat Conference group that held talks with the Central government in 2001, attacked hardline Hurriyat chairman Syed Ali Shah Geelani for failing to achieve anything through his five-month-long agitation since June 2010 “except inflicting losses”.

“Those who were averse to talks with Delhi when we engaged with them are now meeting parliamentarians and civil society members. Such political contradictions have to end,” Bhat said.

The Mirwaiz, who spoke after Bhat in the seminar, chose not to touch the controversial subject. But he did not describe the 2010 summer unrest as a waste.

“A movement goes through ups and downs. If there are shortcomings and the

leadership is not able to deliver, then the intellectual class should come forward with suggestions rather than mere criticism for the sake of it,” said the Mirwaiz.

Malik, who organised the seminar, criticised hardline voices of Kashmir. “It goes against the (dispute) resolution process when we take aggressive tone and threaten to conquer the world. It suits our rivals,” he said.
 
Ek ke baad ek rahasya ka khulasa ho raha hai... I am sure there are many other incidents where innocent Kashmiris were killed in the name of political victory and mileage gained out of putting the blame on the Indian security forces.
Shame on these politicians.
 
comments from pakistani members are welcome ,nthing new although

Dnt wary in their views its also our propaganda


Just like some time before one separatist leaders accept that Geelani providing money for protest aka stone pelting but but every one here call it propaganda
 
Ek ke baad ek rahasya ka khulasa ho raha hai... I am sure there are many other incidents where innocent Kashmiris were killed in the name of political victory and mileage gained out of putting the blame on the Indian security forces.
Shame on these politicians.

Der se hi sahi par sach sabke samne aa hi jata hai ....

This is the reality of so called protest

That was heavily funded by Geelani
 
It was an open secret.

The Pakistan backed militants who were not happy at the separatist leaders wanting 'independence' and not 'accesion to Pakistan' were said to have carried out this assasination.
 
Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat bhat has been suitably paid by GOI to propogate their propaganda.
 
Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat bhat has been suitably paid by GOI to propogate their propaganda.

Welcome to the thread. The Bee found the Honey :)

So you do agree that money is involved in whatever happens in Kashmir?
 
Welcome to the thread. The Bee found the Honey :)

So you do agree that money is involved in whatever happens in Kashmir?
All money is paid of by GOI to discredit the genuine freedom movement and freedom fighters.for past few week GOI's propaganda is on full swing.But dont worry GOI cant win and break the resolve of kashmiris for Azadi.
 
It was an open secret.

The Pakistan backed militants who were not happy at the separatist leaders wanting 'independence' and not 'accesion to Pakistan' were said to have carried out this assasination.

Precisely, I have long believed this is a 3 front tussle and we will start to see rifts and infighting in between the Kashmiri leaders and the people, with our "well-wishers" trying to take undue advantage of.
 
Prof. Abdul Gani Bhat bhat has been suitably paid by GOI to propogate their propaganda.

ajtr has been suitably paid by GOP to propogate their propaganda.


Now go ahead prove it otherwise. ;)
 
All money is paid of by GOI to discredit the genuine freedom movement and freedom fighters.for past few week GOI's propaganda is on full swing.But dont worry GOI cant win and break the resolve of kashmiris for Azadi.

I am not the one worrying. I only worry for the people caught in between the politicians and the nations who are more than willing to exploit any situation to politicize their agendas.
I am happy that the truth is slowly coming out. Hope the civilians realize this is a big political game and stay out of it.
 
unfortunately moderate voices within hurriyat goes unheard.. 'cause it doesn't serve the purpose of hardliners.. any voices wants to be heard will be eliminated & the blame will be passed on to indian security agencies!! that's how you can keep the situation on the boil all the time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom