What's new

The problem with Pakistani liberals

Huda

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,694
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Mullah bashing has become very fashionable in the drawing rooms of the so-called secular and liberal Pakistanis. Many of this clan are either themselves in power or are the beneficiaries of power.

In almost every discussion in these drawing rooms on the serious problems Pakistan is facing today, the first and the foremost issue mentioned is the rise of religious extremism. Thus, there are demands ranging from lynching all the “Taliban Types” to negotiating with them to reach some kind of peace.

There is no denying the fact that religious extremism is doing a great deal of damage to the country. But let’s conduct a small “thought experiment”. Imagine that all religious extremists have either been wiped out or have seen the light and converted to law-abiding citizens of Pakistan. What will change in such a scenario?

Well, certainly the suicide attacks will stop. Also the murderous drone attacks will halt. Women’s life in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will improve somewhat (not that their life was a bed of roses when there were no Taliban).

What else will change? Will the Baloch hug and kiss the army and the civilian leaders? What about the power and gas crisis? I do not see 6,000 MW of power shortage disappear or a huge surge of gas flowing the pipelines with the burial of the last bad guy carrying a Kalashnikov. Also, no sane person would expect that the political malaise and the dirt-poor governance would improve as a result of de-Talibanisation. Will the Pakistan army, freed from the chore of fighting the bad guys, go back to the barracks and behave like the army of Switzerland? I see no chartered planes bringing back tons of cash from Swiss banks.

So, it will be business as usual, only the Taliban will be out of business.

The truth is that the Talibanisation of Pakistan is not the cause but the symptom of the problem. Religious extremists do not descend from the sky with bombs strapped to their chests. Every effect has a cause, and the responsibility for the creation of the bigots falls squarely on those who call themselves secular and liberal.

Look at the civilian and military governments in place since 1947. With the exception of General Ziaul Haq all other rulers were liberal and secular. From Mr. Jinnah to Gen. Ayub Khan, from Mr. Z. A. Bhutto to Gen. Pervez Musharraf and from Mr. Nawaz Sharif to Mr. Asif Ali Zardari, they were far from being religious fundamentalists. The responsibility for driving the first nail in the coffin of religious intolerance rests squarely with Mr. Bhutto who bent over backwards to accommodate the small number of religious fanatics by banning alcohol and declaring Ahmedis as non-Muslims. He refused to hold re-elections in the very few constituencies where there were serious allegations of rigging. There is little doubt that the PPP would have won those seats even if there was re-polling.

Following the good riddance from Ziaul Haq, courtesy his love for mangoes, our ‘liberal’ leaders did not lift a finger to repeal the barbarous blasphemy laws. Both the military and civilian rulers failed to resolve the problems facing the common man. And when some young people in Balochistan rose up against the injustices in their province they were made to simply disappear from the face of the earth. These are the acts of self-serving rulers and not those of true liberals.

The only true liberals and seculars of the country are the people of Pakistan who continue to vote for non-religious political parties. They understand that choosing even a putatively liberal and secular party is better than handing over the country to those who stand for the imposition of their version of a religion.

How long will it be before the people’s hope and optimism runs out?

Mend your ways rulers, you, all-powerful, who push aside the humans like sheep when you travel in your cars with windows blackened and sirens screaming while your henchmen point automatic weapons at the same people who voted you into power.

You who are as dreadful as the Taliban; just that the mode of violence is different.
 
The liberals the author is speaking of - those that continuously vote for religious parties, are they really liberal? I cannot make much of it this column, except it's very confusing.

If the liberals are not liberals, then what are they?

And if Islam is too much ingrained into society in a negatively manner and there are people who vote for non-religious parties at large, then what does this tell you about the 'liberal' or 'secular' character of those parties? If they do not oppose (wrongful) Islamist influences on society, they do not sound much liberal or secular to me.
 
Mullahism is one of the root problems that is causing damage to fabric of the society... the problem with liberal lot is that they speak about it, as the society is turning unlivable with a difference of opinion..
 
Mullahism is one of the root problems that is causing damage to fabric of the society... the problem with liberal lot is that they speak about it, as the society is turning unlivable with a difference of opinion..

The article basically talks about people like you, who blame mullahs for everything while nurturing or condoning some of the views that leads to violence.
The center has shifter to center right, so only the leftists remain liberal now (and they will be very few as expected)
 
When I had first read the article, I dd not think it was worth posting on the forum, because it's stupid and disingenuous - consider:

Imagine that all religious extremists have either been wiped out or have seen the light and converted to law-abiding citizens of Pakistan. What will change in such a scenario?

Well, certainly the suicide attacks will stop. Also the murderous drone attacks will halt. Women’s life in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will improve somewhat (not that their life was a bed of roses when there were no Taliban).

What else will change? Will the Baloch hug and kiss the army and the civilian leaders? What about the power and gas crisis?

Are people doing bombing and murder and insurrection due to power and gas crisis??

What the author does is, set up a straw man argument -- see the problem is an ideology that is at it's core about "the truth" and because that's what it's about, everything else must by definition be falsehood and be opposed because "the truth" is of a Divine origin, and the opposition must be murderous -- and the author concedes this fact.
 
Mullahism is one of the root problems that is causing damage to fabric of the society... the problem with liberal lot is that they speak about it, as the society is turning unlivable with a difference of opinion..

This article is about people like you who thinks every problem in this country is created by mullahs :sad:
 
Are people doing bombing and murder and insurrection due to power and gas crisis??
Doubtless matters will improve somewhat without the Talibs but not much. Consider Swat: the military drove them out but no improvement in governance was offered to alleviate the conditions that made its people desire an alternative to Pakistani rule in the first place.

The more one looks at them the more Pakistan's "liberals" make a bad impression on Americans, from me to Angelina Jolie: sweet words without sweet deeds. Feigned pity rather than the real thing. Power hunger and greed. True, it's not all their fault - the mafia always insists on its members committing crimes - but there's room to do a lot better.
 
This article is about people like you who thinks every problem in this country is created by mullahs :sad:

I said one of the root problems. reading carefully will help..
 
i think pakistan is fast approaching a point of no return.
once no return is touched anything can happen.
people here think that a further vivisection is the worst thing that can happen, but i think a nuclear war where the pakistanis nuke their own people is a worst case scenario. but what will happen is that there will be some pain to india and we will need to manage that.
 
this article makes a for a nice read.
 
I went to university in a small town in the US. It was a lower middle class town, and the university was a bunch of rich kids who, sadly like all juveniles, mocked the townspeople. It was a 'liberal arts' college and most of the students fancied themselves as educated liberals.

Point being: liberal is not a label that you smugly assign to yourself; it is a description of a mindset that must be reflected in your thoughts and actions.

Pakistani liberals are anything but liberal. Just because they regurgitate anti-Muslim vomit coming from Western media does not make them liberal or sophisticated. It actually does more harm than good because it plays right into the extremists' hands that they are the saviors of Islam from a nefarious Western agenda.

The article hits the nail on the head: the core problem facing Pakistan is lack of governance; fix that -- fix the law enforcement apparatus -- and the mullahs will become meek as a mouse.

P.S. To be fair, this disease of illliberal mindset masquerading as liberalism is endemic of all self-righteous crowds, from the ultra-liberal to the ultra-conservative, not just in Pakistan, but the world over.
 

Back
Top Bottom