What's new

Syria's Assad accused of boosting Al-Qaeda with secret oil deals

Bubblegum Crisis

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
2,612
Reaction score
5
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
United Arab Emirates
:pop:

Quote :


Syria's Assad accused of boosting Al-Qaeda with secret oil deals

Western intelligence suggests Bashar al-Assad collaborating with jihadists to persuade West the uprising is terrorist-led

By Ruth Sherlock, in Istanbul and Richard Spencer
7:53PM GMT 20 Jan 2014


The Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad has funded and co-operated with al-Qaeda in a complex double game even as the terrorists fight Damascus, according to new allegations by Western intelligence agencies, rebels and al-Qaeda defectors.

Jabhat al-Nusra, and the even more extreme Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS), the two al-Qaeda affiliates operating in Syria, have both been financed by selling oil and gas from wells under their control to and through the regime, intelligence sources have told The Daily Telegraph.

Rebels and defectors say the regime also deliberately released militant prisoners to strengthen jihadist ranks at the expense of moderate rebel forces. The aim was to persuade the West that the uprising was sponsored by Islamist militants including al-Qaeda as a way of stopping Western support for it.

The allegations by Western intelligence sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, are in part a public response to demands by Assad that the focus of peace talks due to begin in Switzerland tomorrow be switched from replacing his government to co-operating against al-Qaeda in the “war on terrorism”.

“Assad’s vow to strike terrorism with an iron fist is nothing more than bare-faced hypocrisy,” an intelligence source said. “At the same time as peddling a triumphant narrative about the fight against terrorism, his regime has made deals to serve its own interests and ensure its survival.”

Intelligence gathered by Western secret services suggested the regime began collaborating actively with these groups again in the spring of 2013. When Jabhat al-Nusra seized control of Syria’s most lucrative oil fields in the eastern province of Deir al-Zour, it began funding its operations in Syria by selling crude oil, with sums raised in the millions of dollars.

“The regime is paying al-Nusra to protect oil and gas pipelines under al-Nusra’s control in the north and east of the country, and is also allowing the transport of oil to regime-held areas,” the source said. “We are also now starting to see evidence of oil and gas facilities under ISIS control.”

The source accepted that the regime and the al-Qaeda affiliates were still hostile to each other and the relationship was opportunistic, but added that the deals confirmed that “despite Assad’s finger-pointing” his regime was to blame for the rise of al-Qaeda in Syria.

Western diplomats were furious at recent claims that delegations of officials led by a retired MI6 officer had visited Damascus to re-open contact with the Assad regime. There is no doubt that the West is alarmed at the rise of al-Qaeda within the rebel ranks, which played a major role in decisions by Washington and London to back off from sending arms to the opposition.

But the fury is also an indication that they suspect they have been outmanoeuvred by Assad, who has during his rule alternated between waging war on Islamist militants and working with them.

After September 11, he co-operated with the United States’ rendition programme for militant suspects; after the invasion of Iraq, he helped al-Qaeda to establish itself in Western Iraq as part of an axis of resistance to the West; then when the group turned violently against the Iraqi Shias who were backed by Assad’s key ally, Iran, he began to arrest them again.

As the uprising against his rule began, Assad switched again, releasing al-Qaeda prisoners. It happened as part of an amnesty, said one Syrian activist who was released from Sednaya prison near Damascus at the same time.

“There was no explanation for the release of the jihadis,” the activist, called Mazen, said. “I saw some of them being paraded on Syrian state television, accused of being Jabhat al-Nusra and planting car bombs. This was impossible, as they had been in prison with me at the time the regime said the bombs were planted. He was using them to promote his argument that the revolution was made of extremists.”

Other activists and former Sednaya inmates corroborated his account, and analysts have identified a number of former prisoners now at the head of militant groups, including Jabhat al-Nusra, ISIS and a third group, Ahrar al-Sham, which fought alongside Jabhat al-Nusra but has now turned against ISIS.

One former inmate said he had been in prison with “Abu Ali” who is now the head of the ISIS Sharia court in the north-eastern al-Qaeda-run city of Raqqa. Another said he knew leaders in Raqqa and Aleppo who were prisoners in Sednaya until early 2012.

These men then spearheaded the gradual takeover of the revolution from secular activists, defected army officers and more moderate Islamist rebels.

Syrian intelligence has historically had close connections with extremist groups. In an interview with The Daily Telegraph after he defected, Nawaf al-Fares, a Syrian security chief, told how he was part of an operation to smuggle jihadist volunteers into Iraq from Syria after the 2003 invasion.

Aron Lund, editor of a website, Syria in Crisis, used by the Carnegie Endowment to monitor the war, said: “The regime has done a good job in trying to turn the revolution Islamist. The releases from Sednaya prison are a good example of this. The regime claims that it released the prisoners because Assad had shortened their sentences as part of a general amnesty. But it seems to have gone beyond that. There are no random acts of kindness from this regime.”

Rebels both inside and outside ISIS also say they believe the regime targeted its attacks on non-militant groups, leaving ISIS alone. “We were confident that the regime would not bomb us,” an ISIS defector, who called himself Murad, said. “We always slept soundly in our bases.”


The Telegraph


Continue... See other link :

US secretly backs rebels to fight al Qaeda in Syria


...
 
No surprise in this at all. ISIS headquarters were never attacked by the Child-Murderer despite their headquarters being far from secretive. While he could bomb civilian areas not far from such headquarters.
Of course this works right into his plan. ISIS was the best thing that could have happened for him. Now the millions of Syrians that oppose him or the hundreds of thousands who rose up against him are labelled as "Al-Qaeda" and that's it. End of discussion.

Many rebels leaders on the ground and "foot soldiers" have reported the same thing. This is no secret.

ISIS has obviously been infiltrated too by the Syrian intelligence and other outsiders. Anyone who does not believe this is naive.
We also know that Al-Asshead has used Islamists to fight his wars abroad. Such as in Iraq after 2003.

 
Last edited:
This is nonsense, I'm not so sure about ISIL but they may have collaborators...however the accusations against the Nusra front are nothing more than false allegations to demonize them.

Beware of such things by western intelligence falsified information appearing in media, they seek to root out all people who believe in self determination of Muslims. All these western nations want is for the rebels to do the job for them and after that they need to abandon their whole cause and ideology are the US will backstab them as they do with everyone and will join Israel in threatening the rebels and demanding that they disarm.

They want us living under dictator rule or under Western demands, this is the only option the oppressed people of the region have from these so called 'upholders of democracy'.

Don't deal with crusader militaries and intelligence services who are against Muslim self determination. They want to prevent us from behaving as an Ummah.

I say to hell with them! @al-Hasani
 
Last edited:
This is nonsense, I'm not so sure about ISIL but they may have collaborators...however the accusations against the Nusra front are nothing more than false allegations to demonize them.

Beware of such things by western intelligence falsified information appearing in media, they seek to root out all people who believe in self determination of Muslims. All these western nations want is for the rebels to do the job for them and after that they need to abandon their whole cause and ideology are the US will backstab them as they do with everyone and will join Israel in threatening the rebels and demanding that they disarm.

They want us living under dictator rule or under Western demands, this is the only option the oppressed people of the region have from these so called 'upholders of democracy'.

Don't deal with crusader militaries and intelligence services who are against Muslim self determination. They want to prevent us from behaving as an Ummah.

I say to hell with them! @al-Hasani

I am only talking about the ISIS 7abibi. They are far away from Islam. Just look at their actions. I mean it is like they have been infiltrated in the last few months. Before they were not my cup of tea to say the least but now they have completely lost it.

Did you see how they killed fellow Muslims and members of the Syrian opposition due to petty differences and because they wanted to dominate everything?

USA are only caring for their own interests obviously and do not care about the Syrians but neither do ISIS I believe.

But no outsiders can hold the will of the majority of Syrians down if they chose the Syrian opposition which is mostly Islamic. They can sabotage it but they will fail. Just look at Afghanistan.

I am only saying that there is more than just meets the eye.

ISIS is the best thing that could have happened for Al-Asshead. I find it very suspicious that Al-Asshead did never bomb their headquarters which were all very well-known but targeted civilian areas not far away from those headquarters instead. All the other groups are legitimate and they have my support when against Al-Asshead.
 
I am only talking about the ISIS 7abibi. They are far away from Islam. Just look at their actions. I mean it is like they have been infiltrated in the last few months. Before they were not my cup of tea to say the least but now they have completely lost it.

Did you see how they killed fellow Muslims and members of the Syrian opposition due to petty differences and because they wanted to dominate everything?

USA are only caring for their own interests obviously and do not care about the Syrians but neither do ISIS I believe.

But no outsiders can hold the will of the majority of Syrians down if they chose the Syrian opposition which is mostly Islamic.

I'm also with you and can't help but point out the double standard of the West who want to prevent us from behaving as one nation while they have a joint NATO treaty.
 
I'm also with you and can't help but point out the double standard of the West who want to prevent us from behaving as one nation while they have a joint NATO treaty.

Just to end this ISIS talk. There have been a former member (high-level) from them who defected and he tells about the organization from the inside. The top leadership of ISIS is made up by Iraqis, some former officers under the Ba'athi rule, and they do not trust outsiders. Al-Baghdadi runs it like his own kingdom and his rule is absolute.

Whether the "article" below is true or not we cannot know but some of it at least makes sense.

Twitter user @wikibaghdadi is exposing what he calls "the secrets of Baghdadi's state," revealing the hidden affairs of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s rule. The person behind the account shadows Baghdadi, the emir of ISIS, and recounts the story of al-Nusra Front’s emergence.

Since December 10, a new Twitter account has come to light, claiming to publish the "secrets of Baghdadi's state," better known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The sequence of information on the page indicates that the leaks are coming from a former leader of ISIS, before he defected and joined al-Nusra Front. The account reveals momentous information on the formation of al-Nusra and the secrets behind the ongoing conflict with ISIS.

The account exposes the State by posing several questions and replying to them. He provides answers about the identity of the ISIS “emir,” Baghdadi, and the names of members of his council, their plans, and funding sources. It recounts how Baghdadi rose to the top in ISIS, the reasons behind expanding their activities to Syria, and the policies adopted by the organization's commanders.

The appearance of the colonel, "a beardless western imitator," next to Abu Bakr, irritated members, so he grew a beard and changed his appearance and mannerisms.It also speaks of the pivotal role of an Iraqi officer, who accompanies him all the time, and a Syrian officer called Bandar bin Shaalan, who plays a major role in supporting ISIS.
In brief, @wikibaghdadi provides a detailed account of names, pseudonyms, evidence, and facts about interrelated events. Whether true or not – and Al-Akhbar was not able to verify the accuracy – the information is fit for a documentary, exposing the secrets of clandestine jihadi groups and their modus operandi.

Who Is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?

The leaks maintain that he is Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Bou Badri bin Armoush, known as Abu Awwad or Abu Doaa. Abu Bakr is an alias.

According to the leaks, Baghdadi worked in Fallujah and served as an imam in a mosque in Diyala. Baghdadi is not from Baghdad, since he belongs to the Bou Badri clan, which is a part of the Bou Abbas clan from Samarra, which claims to be a descendant of Imam al-Hassan Bin Ali. This means Abu Bakr has roots in the Quraish tribe, which is a condition for becoming an emir in a jihadi group. However, the Alawi Heritage Validation Organization, which authenticates Hashemite heritage, published a statement in 2009 maintaining that the Bou Badri are neither descendants of Mohammed al-Jawad nor of Bin Idris, and thus do not belong to the Hassans as they claim.

The page indicates that the ISIS leadership council is 100 percent Iraqi, saying that Baghdadi would not accept any other nationality, since he does not trust anyone. The number of people in the council always changes, ranging between eight and 13 people. The leadership of the council is held by three former Iraqi army officers who served during the regime of Saddam Hussein.

They are commanded by a former Iraqi army colonel called Hajji Bakr, who joined ISIS when it was under the command of Abu Omar al-Baghdadi (killed in 2010). Hajji Bakr was appointed as a consultant to Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and Abu Hafs al-Muhajir, after providing them with military information about combat plans and communication methods with former Baath commanders.

The leaks mention that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was not a member of the former leadership council of the Islamic State of Iraq, headed by Abu Omar, although he was part of the organization and lived in Fallujah. However, after the killing of Abu Omar and his deputy, Hajji Bakr surprised everyone in the military council by supporting Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as a new emir of the organization.

Colonel Bakr feared that they would start going to Syria to fight, leading to the collapse of the group and opening the door, through Syria, for officers in the organization who were thinking of defecting.A new phase of the State began under two leaders, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in public and Hajji Bakr behind the scenes. The appearance of the colonel, "a beardless western imitator," next to Abu Bakr, irritated members, so he grew a beard and changed his appearance and mannerisms. However, the members are not allowed to inquire about the leadership, "since inquiring is doubting, and doubting is a break in ranks, which calls for blood."
The Islamic State of Iraq began working on two tracks. The first guaranteed the cohesion of the group and its safeguarding from inside, by creating security detachments to eliminate any internal faction which posed a danger. In parallel, Baghdadi and Hajji Bakr agreed that the former would stop meeting with secondary officers in the organizations and start giving his orders through a shura council established by the colonel. The second track focused on building a security apparatus to conduct assassinations and secret killings. It began with 20 members and reached a hundred in a matter of months, under the command of a former officer, Abu Safwan al-Rifai, and directly under the leadership of the organization. The role of this apparatus was limited to assassinating dissenters and defectors from the main figures of the group, in addition to local leaders and Sharia scholars.

In terms of financial sources, they continued the work of Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, confiscating the belongings of Shia, Christians, other non-Muslims, and regime collaborators, even if they were Sunni. In addition, they took over oil sources, energy and fuel plants, government factories, and any other financial source owned by the Iraqi state. That which they were not able to completely confiscate, they would threaten to kill their owners or blow up the company, unless they paid monthly protection money under the moniker of taxation. Installing checkpoints on the long highways, they also collected money from commercial trucks.

Al-Nusra Front was split into three groups. The first joined Baghdadi, the second chose Golani, and the third remained neutral.The financial returns of the group started rising, allowing it to pay enticing salaries and reward military operations. This led to an increased interest in joining the organization. During that time, Colonel Bakr appointed a shura council with all Iraqi members. This continued until the events of Syria, which began in 2011.
Al-Nusra Front and ISIS

How did ISIS start and whose idea was it? Why did Baghdadi send Abu Mohammed al-Golani to Syria, and why was he quick to announce the disbanding of al-Nusra Front and its merger with ISIS? What is the threat he sent to Golani, prior to the announcement of the State? The unknown source answered these questions in hundreds of tweets, as follows.

When the Syrian revolution began, members of the Islamic State of Iraq began looking to Syria. Colonel Bakr feared that they would start going to Syria to fight, leading to the collapse of the group and opening the door, through Syria, for officers in the organization who were thinking of defecting. Thus, Baghdadi forbade going to Syria and considered all those who disobeyed his order to be defectors. He justified this by saying that the situation was still not clear and patience was required.

At the same time, Bakr proposed the idea of forming a non-Iraqi battalion to go to Syria under the command of a Syrian. Thus, no Iraqi officer would be able to join the Syrian front without prior consent and this would guarantee that Iraqis would not defect from the group. The new leadership in Syria could attract non-Iraqi fighters from abroad.

This was the beginning of al-Nusra Front, under Golani. The Front soon became famous worldwide, attracting "jihadists" from the Gulf, North Africa, Yemen, and even Europe. Hajji Bakr and Baghdadi feared this quick rise, since the new recruits to al-Nusra Front owed their allegiance to the "State of Iraq," or Baghdadi.

This led Golani to seek the head al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, to solve the dispute and save al-Qaeda from embarrassment.Hajji Bakr proposed to Baghdadi to order Golani to announce in a voice recording that al-Nusra is officially under the "State of Iraq" and Baghdadi’s leadership. Golani promised to think about it, but many days passed without any announcement, so Baghdadi sent him a warning. Golani reiterated his promise to think about it and consult the mujahideen and scholars around him, before sending Baghdadi a letter saying that this would not be in the interest of the revolution, based on the opinion of the Front's shura council.
Baghdadi and Bakr were furious, especially after the United States decided to include al-Nusra Front on its terrorist list, making Golani the most wanted person in Syria. This raised the anxiety of Baghdadi and the colonel, who believed the Front would become a direct competitor to the State.

Politically, Golani was being pragmatic, but the fears of the colonel and Baghdadi were bigger than his assurances, which led Bakr to consider taking advanced steps to incorporate al-Nusra Front into the State. At a meeting in Turkey, Baghdadi asked Golani to conduct a military operation against the leadership of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), under the pretext of "targeting the future councils of US agents before they become big in Syria."

Al-Nusra Front's shura council held a meeting and unanimously rejected the orders. Baghdadi and the colonel considered this a clear act of disobedience. Baghdadi sent a strongly worded letter to Golani giving him two options: obey the orders or al-Nusra will be disbanded and a new entity created. They waited for Golani's reply, which never arrived, so Baghdadi sent an envoy to Golani, who refused to meet him.

Baghdadi began feeling the threat, since Golani was getting out of control. He then sent Iraqi commanders from the State to meet the leaders of the Front, to entice them with the dream of an Islamic state from Iraq to Syria, under a unified leadership. Some of them were supportive, but most were muhajireen, or foreigners. However, al-Nusra Front soon threw some of them in jail, accusing them of spreading takfir.

Baghdadi was determined to announce the merger. The leadership council of the State agreed he should go to Syria to give greater impetus to the announcement. The Iraqi emir met with influential leaders in the Front, claiming that the reason behind the announcement was to unify the ranks of jihadis, and summoned Golani to a meeting.

Golani apologized for security reasons, so Baghdadi asked him to publish a statement in his name, to safeguard unity, announcing the disbanding of al-Nusra Front and its merger into a new entity under the name of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Golani replied saying this would be a grave mistake, which would tear apart the popularity he built among Syrians.

Here, Bakr suggested that Baghdadi issue a statement in his name announcing the dissolution of al-Nusra, but without isolating Golani, hoping he would return to his senses. They communicated the date of announcement with leaders from al-Nusra, to prepare them to announce their allegiance to Baghdadi in his presence, since he would be in Syria. Baghdadi exploited the fact that Golani was hidden from the main leaders and sheikhs in the Front.

Al-Nusra Front was split into three groups. The first joined Baghdadi, the second chose Golani, and the third remained neutral. This was the beginning of the war of mutual accusations of breaking the ranks of Muslim jihadis. This was the time when a Saudi officer, called Bandar al-Shaalan, appeared. He became the link between Baghdadi and al-Nusra officers who later joined him.

At the same time, Bakr and Baghdadi found out that Golani would not submit to the orders to disband al-Nusra and was preparing a press statement to announce his rejection. The colonel suggested that Baghdadi form a security detail with two tasks. First, they would take over all the arms depots controlled by the Front and eliminate all those who refused to hand them on the spot. This would deny al-Nusra ammunition and arms, leading their people to reject them and join Baghdadi's state.

The second mission was to eliminate Golani and his close associates through explosives under their cars. Thus, the main leaders of al-Nusra were targeted. This led Golani to seek the head al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, to solve the dispute and save al-Qaeda from embarrassment. Zawahiri called on jihadi figures from Yemen and Saudi to mediate between the two sides, but Baghdadi avoided meeting them. This made the situation worse, in light of the constant threats against Golani, so he issued a statement refusing to disband al-Nusra Front, putting the issue in the hands of Zawahiri.
The rest of the story became well known in the media.
 
Just to end this ISIS talk. There have been a former member (high-level) from them who defected and he tells about the organization from the inside. The top leadership of ISIS is made up by Iraqis, some former officers under the Ba'athi rule, and they do not trust outsiders. Al-Baghdadi runs it like his own kingdom and his rule is absolute.

Whether the "article" below is true or not we cannot know but some of it at least makes sense.

I advise you to stay away from media reports as of now because there is clear bias and too much manipulated information. What we can agree on is ISIL needs to get something's straight while also the actions of other rebels is not justified. Who knows what's really going on, what I can tell you though is CIA collaborators are all over Syria.

كلها صارت جواسيس ي اخي انتبه منهوم هدول

They will work to screw things up at given times....especially you will see in post war Syria how they will not accept fully functioning Islamic organizations that would be united.
 
Good try zionists, Assad making zionist Al Qaeda to attack himself for 3 years

No surprise in this at all. ISIS headquarters were never attacked by the Child-Murderer despite their headquarters being far from secretive. While he could bomb civilian areas not far from such headquarters.
You all scream Allah Ackbar

Your infightings are pure BS, you attack the SAA for 3 years
 
Very good MOSSAD document

Yes we know Iran is under JEW embargo & zionist Al Qaeda attack their syrian ally but is friend with the JEWS and Al Qaeda

KSA, Qatar wahabit traitors are not under embargo and do nothing
 
As you can see, Assad has given them the latest technology to refine oil. :)
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
 

Back
Top Bottom