What's new

SM-6 Cleared for International Sale; Australia, Japan, Korea Could Be Early Customers

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
January 10, 2017 1:54 PM

An artist’s concept of the planned Japanese 27DD guided missile destroyer. Image via Navy Recognition

Raytheon’s Standard Missile 6 has been cleared by the Pentagon for international sales and a trio of potential Pacific nations are likely the first customers.

SM-6 — currently in limited initial production – is a key weapon in the both the Navy’s emerging distributed lethality concept and the service’s Naval Integrated Fire Control Counter-Air (NIFC-CA) for its ability to strike air, surface and limited ballistic missile targets.

Of the five international Aegis combat system operators, three are in the process to have the upgraded combat system to field the SM-6 – Australia, Japan and South Korea.

All three countries to have guided missile combatants upgraded to Aegis Baseline 9. Baseline 9 replaces the Aegis combat system older military specific computers with commercial-off-the-shelf servers to handle the data the ships absorb through its radar and adds a multi-signal processor. The modifications allow an Aegis ship to take targeting information from a third party to interdict air and sea warfare threats using the SM-6.

Concerns with both North Korean and Chinese military expansion have driven countries in the region to likewise expand their military capability — particularly at sea.

“These are international Aegis shipbuilding program that are under construction today or new construction,” Thad Smith with Raytheon told reporters on Tuesday.


Royal Australian Navy guided missile destroyer Hobart shortly after its launch on May 23, 2015. Government of Australia Photo

Australia’s three under construction Hobart-class guided missile destroyers are set to acquire an extended range active anti-air missile as well as an upgrade of its combat system to Baseline 9.

Japan has two new construction 27DDG guided missile destroyers, which will field Aegis Baseline 9 combat system and Japan’s two existing Atago-class destroyers are set to receive a Baseline 9 upgrade.

Korea’s three planned new Sejong the Great-class guided missile destroyers are also being built with Baseline 9 and will also field the SM-3 ballistic missile defense interceptor.


ROKS Sejong the Great (DDG-991) in 2008. RoK Navy Photo

While the three countries all could field the SM-6 its unclear if each country will be allowed to use all three modes of the missile – anti-air warfare, anti-surface and a limited ballistic missile defense capability.

While the missiles will all have the inherent capability for all three missions, the U.S. government will determine which of those features will be activated for international sales, Smith said.

Over the last several years, Japan, Australia and South Korea have made defense buys that could conceivably share targeting information and other data easily with U.S. forces that could create a much more linked network of allies in the Western Pacific.

https://news.usni.org/2017/01/10/sm...al-sale-australia-japan-korea-early-customers
 
With SMART-L and S1850M equipped vessels moving up to SMART-L Early Warning Capability (EWC) or better, I would expect SM-2 using navies that have this radar to also adopt SM6 (and possibly SM3 too) for BMD/ABM and long-range anti-shipping tasks. This could be particularly interesting for Denmark and the Netherlands, which have adopted F-35A Jont Strike Fighter as their next main air force plane (would require NIFC-CA capability).

Denmark - Huitfeldt class (3)
Netherlands - Zeven Provincien class (4)
Germany - Sachsen class (3)

UK, France and Italy could also adopt it e.g. if they deem Aster-30 or its follow-on isn't suitable. Although the Aster 30 is anti-ballistic missile capable, an Aster Block 2 BMD (Ballistic Missile Defence) variant of the Aster 30 missile, with hit-to-kill technology and exo-atmospheric capability, is currently being developed.
 
With SMART-L and S1850M equipped vessels moving up to SMART-L Early Warning Capability (EWC) or better, I would expect SM-2 using navies that have this radar to also adopt SM6 (and possibly SM3 too) for BMD/ABM and long-range anti-shipping tasks. This could be particularly interesting for Denmark and the Netherlands, which have adopted F-35A Jont Strike Fighter as their next main air force plane (would require NIFC-CA capability).

Denmark - Huitfeldt class (3)
Netherlands - Zeven Provincien class (4)
Germany - Sachsen class (3)

UK, France and Italy could also adopt it e.g. if they deem Aster-30 or its follow-on isn't suitable. Although the Aster 30 is anti-ballistic missile capable, an Aster Block 2 BMD (Ballistic Missile Defence) variant of the Aster 30 missile, with hit-to-kill technology and exo-atmospheric capability, is currently being developed.
I heard it needs at least some SPY radar variant, since it works with AEGIS mostly..
 
I heard it needs at least some SPY radar variant, since it works with AEGIS mostly..
Why? Smart-L is a 3D volume search radar. It has already demonstrated its ability to detect and track ballistic missiles off Hawaii. SM-6 is active radar homing (no need for target illumination). Besides, even for SM-3, consider that there is no problem whatsoever using the semi-active homing SM-2 in combination with APAR and SMART-L at present (including its present BMD use). SM-3 guidance is by GPS/INS/semi-active radar homing/passive LWIR infrared homing seeker (KW).

http://asia-defense.blogspot.nl/2011/10/dutch-frigates-to-gain-bmd-capability.html
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/january-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4766-future-belgian-navy-frigates-may-have-ballistic-missile-defense-capabilities.html
http://www.atlcom.nl/ap_archive/pdf/AP 2013 nr. 7/De Jonge.pdf

http://cepa.org/sites/default/files/documents/CEPA Issue Brief No. 129, European Missile Defense-.pdf

Seaforth World Naval Review 2013: pdf
Conrad Waters
https://books.google.nl/books?id=63muCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA191&lpg=PA191&dq=Netherlands+BMD+frigate&source=bl&ots=AH5CFOcQdV&sig=LEpnI881L8ydv9-4IbIr-hQlztI&hl=nl&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwis57TlsbzRAhXBtRoKHVxvDecQ6AEIbTAJ#v=onepage&q=Netherlands BMD frigate&f=false
 
Last edited:

Previously, the SM-6 was only configured to fire from the most recent Aegis radar combat weapons system on Navy ships, a system called Aegis baseline nine. The Navy’s new authorization allows the SM-6 to integrate with the software and electronics used in Aegis Combat Weapon System baselines 5.3 and 3.A.0.

The Navy’s Aegis Weapon System, currently deployed on cruisers and destroyers, is a command and control technology using computers linked to a multi-function, phased array AN/SPY-1B radar. The high-powered, four megawatt Aegis radar is able to search and track more than 100 potential targets, Navy officials said.

We came to the realization that we can do AAW(anti-air warfare) with baseline 5. That opened up a world of potential for concept of operations for the Navy –for fleet defense and area defense strategies,” said Mike Campisi, SM-6 program director, Raytheon.

The SM-6, which first became operational in December of last year, is engineered with both an active and semi-active seeker, giving it an increased ability to discern and discriminate targets when compared to other missiles, Campisi explained.

It has capabilities to go over-the-horizon,” he said.

In addition to missile defense and defense against fixed and rotary wing aircraft, the SM-6 can also defend against land-attack and anti-ship cruise missiles in flight. Having an over-the-horizon ability against anti-ship cruise missiles could prove extremely advantageous as it brings the possibility of destroying them at much greater ranges.

“As we pursue the multi-mission role for SM-6, we’re trying to understand the entire kill chain,” Campisi.

Also, by having active guidance technology engineered into the missile, the SM-6 extends the range of the ship’s radar and also frees up the ship’s radar to focus on additional potential targets.

Semi-Active mode means the radar has to see what it’s shooting at and guide in the missile. A ship’s radar won’t see over the horizon and won’t be able to guide in to anything that is beyond the horizon. Active mode is not tied to radar,” Campisi said.

http://defensetech.org/2015/01/20/navy-expands-use-of-sm-6-missile/
 
@The SC: It is AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEM (ACS), which comprises AEGIS WEAPON SYSTEM. Its computers and software using radar and other sensor data to create situation awareness and make decisions on what and how many weapons or soft kills measures to use when.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis_Combat_System#Overview
Aegis_Combat_System.png

https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/aegis.htm
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2100&tid=200&ct=2
https://news.usni.org/2014/05/07/next-act-aegis

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis...se_System#SM-3_and_SM-2_Block_IV_interceptors

The Aegis BMD uses the RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 mid-course interceptors and the RIM-156 Standard Missile 2 Block IV (SM-2 Block IV) terminal-phase interceptors developed by Raytheon. The Standard Missile 3 is capable of intercepting ballistic missiles above the atmosphere (i.e., exo-atmospheric intercept) during the midcourse phase of a hostile ballistic missile's flight. The missile is launched from the MK 41 vertical launching system (VLS) of the warships. It receives in-flight target updates from the ship. The kinetic warhead (KW) is designed to destroy a ballistic missile's warhead with more than 130 megajoules of kinetic energy by colliding with it. The existing SM-3 Block IA version will be upgraded to SM-3 Block IB, SM-3 Block IIA and SM-3 Block IIB to counter future ballistic missile threats. The SM-2 Block IV can engage the ballistic missiles within the atmosphere (i.e., endoatmospheric intercept) in the terminal phase of a missile's trajectory. The missile carries a blast fragmentation warhead. The SM-2 Block IV will be replaced with a new extended range RIM-174 (Standard Missile 6) interceptor

The equivalant system on the Dutch, German and Danish ship is SEWACO.

Thales, in Hengelo the Netherlands, designed and build the AAW system for the LCF, which is combined in the SEWACO X (Sensors, Weapon and Command) information management system. One of the most advanced of its kind; it features the APAR (Active Phased Array Radar) system, designed by Thales, in close cooperation with the German and Canadian industry. Although smaller, it's considerably more powerful, than the American Aegis SPY-1 phased array radar. Tracking up to 250 targets at one time, it can simultaneously function as illumination radar for up to 16 simultaneous engagements and 30 SM-2 and ESSM missiles in the air. Thales also supplies the long-range air search and early warning radar, the SMART-L. Its ADT track file can carry up to 1000 air, 40 surface and 32 jammer tracks simultaneously. It is integrated with the Scout radar for surface surveillance. Mounted above the APAR, at the very top of the ship is a long-range dual band IR surveillance system, called Sirius. This can carry over 500 tracks and provides automatic alerts on the 32 most threatening tracks. Mounted on that same mast is a combined optical/IR surveillance system, Mirador. With its main sensor, a 3rd generation Focal Plane Array camera, made by DeIft Signaal Optronics, its mainly added to improve target acquisition and recognition during brown water operations. Thomson Racals UAT system provides Sabre, the ESM/ECM sensor on the LCF. It represents one of the most advanced integrated naval EW systems available worldwide.
The LCF is capable of storing and launching an incredible variety of missiles. It has an onboard, ready-to-fire, launch capability of 40 SM-2 block IV or 160 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) or any combination thereof in a 40 cell Mk-41 Vertical Launch System (VLS), designed and build by United Defense in the US. The SM-2 Block IV is the developmental stepping-stone to SM-2 Block IVA, the future RNLN TBMD missile.
http://www.dutchdefencepress.com/lcf-dutch-pride-at-sea/

Germany uses the Sewaco FD combat system on its Sachsen class. On the Huitfeldt class, the Danes use
the Terma C-flex command and control system in combination with the SMART-L long-range surveillance radar and the APAR multifunction radar.

Clearly, any combat system that will be working with a new missile will need to be given the physical and flight characteristics of that new missile, in order to properly use it. I doubt the missile is configured for a specific combat system (SM1, SM2 missiles of various block as well as Sea Sparrow and ESSM have worked with AEGIS as well as the Dutch SEWACO systems, which exist in various guises, just like AEGIS has different baselines. There is even a SEWACO version for subs).
 
@Penguin

Is it as easy to implement the SM-6 with its added antiship and surface to land capabilities on top of BM/surface to air interception to other radars than SPY-1/A/B/2 and APAR as it was for the SM-2 ans SM-3?
 
In September 2011, Raytheon announced successful testing for a prototype dual-band datalink, allowing ships that use either Lockheed Martin’s SPY-1 AEGIS system, or Thales Nederland’s APAR radars, to employ the full range of long-range Standard Missiles for air defense. That matters, because the SM-x family also includes a number of options with missile defense capabilities…
The new dual band datalink is designed to be a drop-in replacement to the existing communications link currently used in the Standard Missile family airframe, which is focused on S-band. On the other hand, many modern naval radars like Thales’ APAR and Raytheon’s own SPY-3 use X-band frequencies. A dual S-band/X-band datalink seems minor, but the effects of adding and integrating it are not.
Raytheon’s SM-2 is currently its biggest seller by far within the Standard Missile family, and it equips a wide variety of American and international customers. SM-2 Block IIIB is the US Navy’s standard, with a dual semi-active radar guidance/ infrared seeker. SM-3 Block IIIA equips AEGIS ships operated by other navies, and can home on Interrupted Continuous Wave Illumination radar modes. It also works with the Thales APAR active array X-band radar carried by Dutch LCF and German F124 air defense frigates, which deploy it. A datalink swap within SM-2 missiles may broaden choices and ease integration.
The SM-6 adds a booster to give it longer range and last-stage ballistic missile defense (BMD) capabilities, and adds an active guidance seeker that lets it choose between semi-active guidance and independent flight. A datalink swap within SM-6 missiles lets Raytheon continue to offer its newest air defense missiles to new ships with X-band radars.
For longer-range missile defense, Raytheon’s SM-3 is currently the most tested naval offering in the world – and test results have been good. The missile uses inertial guidance, with transmitted updates from the ship’s combat system. It’s also the most widely sold BMD missile, with the most investment and a very attractive upgrade path that promises big improvements in range, seeker performance, and kill vehicle performance. That makes it very attractive, especially for navies that already use the compatible MK41 vertical launch system. But what if they don’t use the AEGIS combat system, or the SPY-1 radar, like American destroyers and cruisers?

The new Dual-Band Datalink currently offers its biggest benefits to this group of customers, by easing SM-6 and SM-3 integration. That keeps their ships current, ensuring that existing customers remain happy and continue to buy new defensive weapons.

Examples exist on both sides of the Atlantic. Dutch ships have participated in US missile tests, and in 2009, a joint U.S.-Netherlands study concluded that SM-3 missiles could be integrated with their air defense ships’ more advanced SMART-L/APAR platform, giving those ships independent missile defense capabilities. Germany (F124 Sachsen ) and the Netherlands (De Zeven Provincien ) have 7 frigates between them that carry the SMART-L volume search radar, the X-band APAR fire control radar, and the SM-x compatible MK41 vertical launch system. Denmark will add 3 more APAR-equipped Iver Huitfeldt frigates to this group by 2013.

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/raytheon...andard-for-the-standard.472255/#ixzz4VaoNJLZj
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/raytheon’s-datalink-a-new-naval-standard-for-the-standard.472255/#ixzz4Vanxchal

@Penguin

Is it as easy to implement the SM-6 with its added antiship and surface to land capabilities on top of BM/surface to air interception to other radars than SPY-1/A/B/2 and APAR as it was for the SM-2 ans SM-3?
Why would it be more difficult for SM6 than for SM-3? The active radar homing implies you don't need APAR for illumination during the missile flight, so in that sense it actually becomes easier.
 
In September 2011, Raytheon announced successful testing for a prototype dual-band datalink, allowing ships that use either Lockheed Martin’s SPY-1 AEGIS system, or Thales Nederland’s APAR radars, to employ the full range of long-range Standard Missiles for air defense. That matters, because the SM-x family also includes a number of options with missile defense capabilities…
The new dual band datalink is designed to be a drop-in replacement to the existing communications link currently used in the Standard Missile family airframe, which is focused on S-band. On the other hand, many modern naval radars like Thales’ APAR and Raytheon’s own SPY-3 use X-band frequencies. A dual S-band/X-band datalink seems minor, but the effects of adding and integrating it are not.
Raytheon’s SM-2 is currently its biggest seller by far within the Standard Missile family, and it equips a wide variety of American and international customers. SM-2 Block IIIB is the US Navy’s standard, with a dual semi-active radar guidance/ infrared seeker. SM-3 Block IIIA equips AEGIS ships operated by other navies, and can home on Interrupted Continuous Wave Illumination radar modes. It also works with the Thales APAR active array X-band radar carried by Dutch LCF and German F124 air defense frigates, which deploy it. A datalink swap within SM-2 missiles may broaden choices and ease integration.
The SM-6 adds a booster to give it longer range and last-stage ballistic missile defense (BMD) capabilities, and adds an active guidance seeker that lets it choose between semi-active guidance and independent flight. A datalink swap within SM-6 missiles lets Raytheon continue to offer its newest air defense missiles to new ships with X-band radars.
For longer-range missile defense, Raytheon’s SM-3 is currently the most tested naval offering in the world – and test results have been good. The missile uses inertial guidance, with transmitted updates from the ship’s combat system. It’s also the most widely sold BMD missile, with the most investment and a very attractive upgrade path that promises big improvements in range, seeker performance, and kill vehicle performance. That makes it very attractive, especially for navies that already use the compatible MK41 vertical launch system. But what if they don’t use the AEGIS combat system, or the SPY-1 radar, like American destroyers and cruisers?

The new Dual-Band Datalink currently offers its biggest benefits to this group of customers, by easing SM-6 and SM-3 integration. That keeps their ships current, ensuring that existing customers remain happy and continue to buy new defensive weapons.

Examples exist on both sides of the Atlantic. Dutch ships have participated in US missile tests, and in 2009, a joint U.S.-Netherlands study concluded that SM-3 missiles could be integrated with their air defense ships’ more advanced SMART-L/APAR platform, giving those ships independent missile defense capabilities. Germany (F124 Sachsen ) and the Netherlands (De Zeven Provincien ) have 7 frigates between them that carry the SMART-L volume search radar, the X-band APAR fire control radar, and the SM-x compatible MK41 vertical launch system. Denmark will add 3 more APAR-equipped Iver Huitfeldt frigates to this group by 2013.

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/raytheon’s-datalink-a-new-naval-standard-for-the-standard.472255/#ixzz4VaoNJLZj
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/raytheon’s-datalink-a-new-naval-standard-for-the-standard.472255/#ixzz4Vanxchal


Why would it be more difficult for SM6 than for SM-3? The active radar homing implies you don't need APAR for illumination during the missile flight, so in that sense it actually becomes easier.
I have posted the same article in another thread, so i am aware of the Data link.. thanks
My question is for the initial semi-active homing that needs the radar, because as you said active homing mode does not really need a radar, actually it will be an extension to the radar range,since the SM-6 has the Over the Horizon (OTH) capability, but there are just two radars that can operate it in its initial semi-active homing mode SPY or APAR.. or can it start with its active homing mode from launch?
 
Last edited:
German Navy will not modernize Smart-L on F-124, cause they will be obsolete after 2020, Marine will equip them with new exoatmospheric radars, exo-atmospheric interceptors and data link sytems connected to NATO Missile Defence Center Ramstein. Dedication for contenders is in preparation.
Frigate Captain Uhl said that only Ramstein Center decides which NATO unit will intercept incoming missiles.
Now, mainly US destroyers are responsible for interception.
From 2025 on also Belgium ships could engage incoming ballistic missiles.
Belgium joined October 2016 the 2015 founded Marine development group, which is led by Germany , Netherlands and Denmark and is responsible for integration and network technology for US-made exo-atmospheric interceptors.

http://www.marine.de/portal/a/marin...EvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/#Z7_B8LTL2922LF0A0IEENH55I1O13

1280px_20160711_160709-bmd-def-architecture.jpg
 
I have posted the same article in another thread, so i am aware of the Data link.. thanks
My question is for the initial semi-active homing that needs the radar, because as you said active homing mode does not really need a radar, actually it will be an extension to the radar range,since the SM-6 has the Over the Horizon (OTH) capability, but there are just two radars that can operate it in its initial semi-active homing mode SPY or AP|AR.. or can it start with its active homing mode from launch?
Early SPY-series radars are search and track radars and do NOT illuminate for SARH missiles. Essentially, it performs the same task as SMART-L. For target illumination, the US ships use he AN/SPG-62 Fire Control Radar. The Dutch, German and Danish ships use APAR, which can also acts as (second) search/track radar at the same time. Only with the dual band (S/X) AMDR aka AN/SPY-6 will AEGIS ships be able to use the X-band for target illumination. This will be with the new Flight III Arleigh Burke class destroyers.

AN/SPG-62
SPG-62-terminal-illuminator.jpg


Apar
220px-APAR.jpg
 
German Navy will not modernize Smart-L on F-124, cause they will be obsolete after 2020, Marine will equip them with new exoatmospheric radars, exo-atmospheric interceptors and data link sytems connected to NATO Missile Defence Center Ramstein. Dedication for contenders is in preparation.
Frigate Captain Uhl said that only Ramstein Center decides which NATO unit will intercept incoming missiles.
Now, mainly US destroyers are responsible for interception.
From 2025 on also Belgium ships could engage incoming ballistic missiles.
Belgium joined October 2016 the 2015 founded Marine development group, which is led by Germany , Netherlands and Denmark and is responsible for integration and network technology for US-made exo-atmospheric interceptors.

http://www.marine.de/portal/a/marin...EvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/#Z7_B8LTL2922LF0A0IEENH55I1O13
That is not what the German article of 21.12.2016 below actually says. It does not say that the German Navy will NOT modernize Smart-L on F-124. Quite the contrary.

It says

Die drei Fregatten der „Sachsen“-Klasse besitzen seit ihrer Indienststellung das Luftraumüberwachungsradar „SMART-L“ des Herstellers Thales Nederland. Dessen Reichweite von rund 400 Kilometern deckt zum Beispiel weit mehr als die gesamte deutsche Küste von Emden bis Usedom ab. Das System aber wird ab circa 2020 veraltet, fachlich korrekt „obsolet“, werden: Die niederländische Marine, die ebenfalls das „SMART-L“ nutzt, wird dann ihre vier damit ausgestatteten Schiffe auf eine neuere Variante umrüsten. Dänemark überlegt, für die drei auch mit „SMART-L“ ausgerüsteten, modernsten Fregatten seiner Marine gleiches zu tun. Daraus wird für die Deutsche Marine absehbar ein technisch-logistischer Engpass entstehen.

Um dem vorzubeugen – und zugleich den NATO-Auftrag Raketenabwehr zu erfüllen – hat die Bundeswehr beschlossen, das Weitbereichsradar der „Sachsen“-Klasse nicht nur zu modernisieren, sondern zugleich sein Einsatzspektrum zu vergrößern: Es soll nicht mehr nur wörtlich im Luftraum um sich herum angreifende Flugzeuge und Raketen entdecken und verfolgen, sondern künftig auch vor ballistischen Flugkörpern außerhalb der Atmosphäre, also im Weltraum, warnen können.

Integrierter Planungsprozess und Rüstungsprozess der Bundeswehr sehen jetzt vor, eine Leistungsbeschreibung zu erstellen, die wiederum potentiellen Herstellerfirmen marktverfügbarer Technologien ein Angebot ermöglicht. „Jetzt schließen sich Produktauswahl, Vertragsgestaltung und Umsetzung an. Ab 2021 könnte dann das neue Radar auf den deutschen Fregatten eingerüstet werden“, schätzt Fregattenkapitän Uhl die jetzt folgenden Schritte ab.

Which in English is:

Since their commissioning, the three frigates of the "Sachsen" class have been equipped with the air space monitoring wheel "SMART-L" of the manufacturer Thales Nederland. Its range of around 400 kilometers covers, for example, far more than the entire German coast from Emden to Usedom. The system, however, will become obsolete from about 2020, professionally correct: "The Dutch Navy, which also uses the" SMART-L ", will then upgrade its four equipped ships to a newer version. Denmark, for the three most modern frigates of its navy equipped with "SMART-L". This will create a technical and logistical bottleneck for the German Navy.

In order to prevent this - and at the same time to fulfill NATO's missile defense - the Bundeswehr decided not only to modernize the wide-range radar of the "Saxony" class, but also to expand its range of applications. It is no longer literally in the airspace around itself Attacking and prosecuting attacking aircraft and rockets, but can also warn against ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere, that is, in space.

The Bundeswehr's integrated planning process and armament process now provide for the development of a service description, which in turn enables potential manufacturers of marketable technologies to offer an offer. "" From now on, the new radar could be equipped on the German frigates "", estimates Fregattenkapitän Uhl the following steps.

Conclusion: they';ve opened the door for modernizing the radar fit of the Sachsen class, incuding via upgrading SMART-L in exactly the same as the Dutch and Danish are planning. I doubt that NOT using SMART-L would be cost effective (assume for a moment that it would be dismounted > what radar would be fitted instead? AN/SPY-6? > and how would that talk to SEWACO FD?). Also, modernizing that radar does not mean the nations also actually acquire SM-3 and/or SM-6 missile at the same time or at all. Further, what radar do you think is on the UKs Daring class and the Italian/French Horizon ships? S1850M = a modified SMART-L. These are the ships for which an BMD-capable version of Aster-30 is being developed... From a European point of view the modified SMART-L makes perfect sense.

See (and translate)
http://www.marine.de/portal/a/marin...EvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/#Z7_B8LTL2922LF0A0IEENH55I1O13
 

This says:

Bis Mitte kommender Dekade will die Marine die neuen Sensoren einführen. Als ein Anbieter gilt der französische Konzern Thales, dessen niederländische Niederlassung auf Marine-Radare spezialisiert ist. So nutzen sowohl die niederländischen Fregatten der De-Zeven-Provincien-Klasse, die dänischen Schiffe der Iver-Huitfeldt-Klasse sowie die deutschen F124 das Smart-L-Radar von Thales. Die Niederländer haben mittlerweile für ihre vier Schiffe die modernere Version Smart-L EWC geordert, die zur Abwehr von ballistischen Raketen geeignet ist. Zwei weitere Radare des gleichen Typs wird die niederländische Luftwaffe erhalten.

Als einziger deutscher Anbieter verfügt offenbar nur Airbus DS Electronics and Border Security – die zukünftige Hensoldt GmbH – über das notwendige Know-how, um die von der Marine benötigten Hochleistungssensoren zu bauen. So hat das Unternehmen unter anderem die Radare für die neuen Marineschiffe der Klasse F 125 entwickelt und könnte womöglich auf Basis bestehender Produkte auch eine Lösung für die F 124 finden.

Ob Deutschland ähnlich den Niederlanden die gleichen Radare wie auf den Marineschiffen auch für die bodengebundene Luftverteidigung verwenden will, konnte der Sprecher des BMVg nicht beantworten. Zeitlich würde ein Beschaffung beider Teilstreitkräfte möglicherweise harmonieren, denn auch die Luftwaffe will laut Planung um die Mitte der kommenden Dekade das Luftverteidigungssystem TLVS/Meads einführen.

Which translates to:

By mid-decade the navy wants to introduce the new sensors. Thales, a French company whose Dutch branch is specializing in marine radar, is one of the leading suppliers. For example, the Dutch frigates of the De-Zeven-Provincien class, the Danish ships of the Iver Huitfeldt class, and the German F124 use the Smart-L radar from Thales. The Dutch have now ordered the more modern version Smart-L EWC for their four ships, which is suitable for the defense of ballistic missiles. Two other radars of the same type will be given to the Dutch Air Force [i.e. landbased].

As the only German supplier, Airbus DS Electronics and Border Security - the future Hensoldt GmbH - apparently has the necessary know-how to build the high-performance sensors required by the Navy. For example, the company has developed the radar for the new Marin ships of class F 125 and could possibly find a solution for the F 124 on the basis of existing products.

The spokesman for the BMVg could not answer whether Germany, similar to the Netherlands, wants to use the same radars as on marin ships for ground-based air defense. At the same time, the procurement of both partial forces would possibly harmonize, since the Luftwaffe also plans to introduce the TLVS / Meads air defense system around the middle of the next decade.

So, they have Thales Netherlands (market leader) as well as a single German supplier, plus any possible other non-German / non-Dutch supplies (unspecified). Airbus DC would have to develop a new radar, whereas Thales has already a fully developed product, that is orderer by the Dutch..
 
SMART-L makes perfect sense

I am not the Marine expert and I am not sure whether on the 6000 ton F-124 class is deck space for VLS- SM3 as it is in the 7000 ton F-125.

New radar could be TRS-4D as in F-125 and GEDIS KORA18 data link.
Would make sense cause F-125 has provision for VLS ( SM3 ? ) and official Marine Website say "Exoatmospheric detecition and Interception".
If the systems will be integrated to Ramstein Ballistic Missile Defence Center , systems must more capable then it is published up to know in open sources.


Baden%2Bclass.jpg

 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom