What's new

Senator Kerry to visit flood-affected areas in Pakistan

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
Senator Kerry to visit flood-affected areas in Pakistan

The United States has thrown its full weight behind Pakistan's move to hold a conference at the United Nations this week as part of efforts to rally greater international support for Islamabad's daunting flood relief effort.

Senator John Kerry, who heads the Foreign Relations Committee and co-authored a major multi-year $7.5 billion aid bill for Pakistan, said the United States has immediately accepted Islamabad's proposal for the international meeting, which is due to take place on Thursday.

He said Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi had asked for a meeting at the UN later in the week.

“Secretary (of State) Hillary Clinton has quickly accepted to be there in person as will (Special Representative) Ambassador (Richard) Holbrooke, and they are going to try to rally other people to the cause,” Kerry said.

The legislator told Washington-based Pakistani journalists before leaving for the South Asian country that he would have a first -hand assessment of the worst natural disaster to hit the country as well determine its impact on the region, where the US has high-stakes engagement for a successful outcome of nine-year old Afghan conflict.

The Democratic senator, who is due to meet top Pakistani political and military leaders during his visit, said the upcoming UN meeting is not specifically a donors conference but an “effort to try to really mobilize people to understand what is at stake.”

“My visit is really also geared to try to raise the understanding that this is not just about floods, not just about displaced people and the misery that comes with this, which is critical, but it is really about Pakistan's ability to move forward (economically) and to survive the difficult situation,” he elaborated, citing the challenges the country was already confronting because of its “stressed economy.

The United States, he stated, “is squarely there” to assist Pakistan, in the face of the unprecedented monsoon flooding that has afflicted 20 million people over 150,000 sq km of the territory.

“And we are proud of that,” he declared.

“The United States is clearly committed to the people of Pakistan in terms of (dealing with) the disaster. No question about that. That is why we have already committed $ 76 million, that is why (US) helicopters have already resuced some 3000 people, supplies have been delivered, half a million meals have been provided. All of these are very direct efforts,” Kerry noted.

“We are there. This relationship is important. We will continue to try to build this relationship,” he added.

Kerry reported widespread recognition of Pakistan's anti-militant progress and support for the ally on the Capitol Hill in this hour of great challenge.

“There is good sense in Congress that the government of Pakistan has made progress (in the fight against militants), taken significant steps, has really tried to address some of the concerns in the last year (or so). Is the job finished ? No, it is not. But there are tangible efforts that have been made that a lot of people would not have anticipated over a year ago,” he remarked.

DAWN.COM | Pakistan | Senator Kerry to visit Pakistan's flood-affected areas
 
I despise this senator, but at least he has personal experience (from his service as a riverboat officer in the Vietnam War) at assessing the security and human needs of flood-prone areas. He didn't have to do this; his seat is secure, he's nearly as rich as Zardari, and spends as much time as he wishes in France. But even Kerry acts on his pangs of conscience for great human suffering. How many Pakistanis on the streets of Lahore, Islamabad, and Karachi can say the same?
 
I despise this senator, but at least he has personal experience (from his service as a riverboat officer in the Vietnam War) at assessing the security and human needs of flood-prone areas. He didn't have to do this; his seat is secure, he's nearly as rich as Zardari, and spends as much time as he wishes in France. But even Kerry acts on his pangs of conscience for great human suffering. How many Pakistanis on the streets of Lahore, Islamabad, and Karachi can say the same?

The response for the 2005 quake was overwhelming, since it was a sudden strike, in this case, the slow pace of the buildup led many to believe it wasnt as severe, however, I myself was involved in collecting donations and supplies from Lahore, and we collected a lot in a single day.
Karachi however, is truly a portrait of shame.. very little contribution, and very little care for any of their fellows.
 
Santro, do you realize how great the need is? That it takes a minimum of 250 tractor-trailers'-worth of cargo every day to supply the needs of the refugees?
 
Santro, do you realize how great the need is? That it takes a minimum of 250 tractor-trailers'-worth of cargo every day to supply the needs of the refugees?

Yea, we sent 45 the first day from lahore..
 
45 tractor-trailers is ten times the aid delivered by aircraft thus far. Can you over-supply the areas you can reach now so you can divert to more needy areas once the roads re-open later?
 
Im not managing it buddy, and frankly, Id rather let people who know ho to do that job, my contribution was collection and mobilization, the rest..distribution.. is upto the currently hapless government.
 
The response for the 2005 quake was overwhelming, since it was a sudden strike, in this case, the slow pace of the buildup led many to believe it wasnt as severe, however, I myself was involved in collecting donations and supplies from Lahore, and we collected a lot in a single day.
Karachi however, is truly a portrait of shame.. very little contribution, and very little care for any of their fellows.

I don't agree to your assesment fully.

The difference in 2005 was trust factor. today no one trust govt. and is not willing to pay a single penny to any fund organised by govt.
In 2005 earth quake President's releif fund was the biggets fund.
How many of us who contributed in 2005 President's releif fund would like to contribute to President's fund today?
I don't think today, govt. even have courage to launch any fund with the symbol of president. Any such effort will only bring shame.
 

Back
Top Bottom