What's new

secret cia files prove america helped saddam as he gassed iran

iranigirl2

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
1
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
United States
The U.S. government may be considering military action in response to chemical strikes near Damascus. But a generation ago, America's military and intelligence communities knew about and did nothing to stop a series of nerve gas attacks far more devastating than anything Syria has seen, Foreign Policy has learned.



In 1988, during the waning days of Iraq's war with Iran, the United States learned through satellite imagery that Iran was about to gain a major strategic advantage by exploiting a hole in Iraqi defenses. U.S. intelligence officials conveyed the location of the Iranian troops to Iraq, fully aware that Hussein's military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin, a lethal nerve agent.


The intelligence included imagery and maps about Iranian troop movements, as well as the locations of Iranian logistics facilities and details about Iranian air defenses. The Iraqis used mustard gas and sarin prior to four major offensives in early 1988 that relied on U.S. satellite imagery, maps, and other intelligence. These attacks helped to tilt the war in Iraq's favor and bring Iran to the negotiating table, and they ensured that the Reagan administration's long-standing policy of securing an Iraqi victory would succeed. But they were also the last in a series of chemical strikes stretching back several years that the Reagan administration knew about and didn't disclose.


U.S. officials have long denied acquiescing to Iraqi chemical attacks, insisting that Hussein's government never announced he was going to use the weapons. But retired Air Force Col. Rick Francona, who was a military attaché in Baghdad during the 1988 strikes, paints a different picture.

"The Iraqis never told us that they intended to use nerve gas. They didn't have to. We already knew," he told Foreign Policy.

According to recently declassified CIA documents and interviews with former intelligence officials like Francona, the U.S. had firm evidence of Iraqi chemical attacks beginning in 1983. At the time, Iran was publicly alleging that illegal chemical attacks were carried out on its forces, and was building a case to present to the United Nations. But it lacked the evidence implicating Iraq, much of which was contained in top secret reports and memoranda sent to the most senior intelligence officials in the U.S. government. The CIA declined to comment for this story.

In contrast to today's wrenching debate over whether the United States should intervene to stop alleged chemical weapons attacks by the Syrian government, the United States applied a cold calculus three decades ago to Hussein's widespread use of chemical weapons against his enemies and his own people. The Reagan administration decided that it was better to let the attacks continue if they might turn the tide of the war. And even if they were discovered, the CIA wagered that international outrage and condemnation would be muted.

In the documents, the CIA said that Iran might not discover persuasive evidence of the weapons' use -- even though the agency possessed it. Also, the agency noted that the Soviet Union had previously used chemical agents in Afghanistan and suffered few repercussions.

It has been previously reported that the United States provided tactical intelligence to Iraq at the same time that officials suspected Hussein would use chemical weapons. But the CIA documents, which sat almost entirely unnoticed in a trove of declassified material at the National Archives in College Park, Md., combined with exclusive interviews with former intelligence officials, reveal new details about the depth of the United States' knowledge of how and when Iraq employed the deadly agents. They show that senior U.S. officials were being regularly informed about the scale of the nerve gas attacks. They are tantamount to an official American admission of complicity in some of the most gruesome chemical weapons attacks ever launched.



Read the whole article here


Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran - By Shane Harris and Matthew M. Aid | Foreign Policy
 
Top secret memo documenting chemical weapons use by Iraq, and discussing Iran's likely reactions (Nov. 4, 1983)


mw7u.jpg




is2k.jpg




wu5k.jpg





http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articl...rica_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran?page=0,3
 
Who needed these documents to know that .
When usa ambassador in un denied iraq use of chemical weapons and then claimed it was iran that used chemicals agent like mustard and nerve agent against iranian cities , who needed more proof that saddam did that with USA blessings
 
Who needed these documents to know that .
When usa ambassador in un denied iraq use of chemical weapons and then claimed it was iran that used chemicals agent like mustard and nerve agent against iranian cities , who needed more proof that saddam did that with USA blessings

To this day that's their "Official story" that Iran gassed it's own people!!!!

People still believe these retards....



On 21 March 1986, the United Nations Security Council made a declaration stating that "members are profoundly concerned by the unanimous conclusion of the specialists that chemical weapons on many occasions have been used by Iraqi forces against Iranian troops, and the members of the Council strongly condemn this continued use of chemical weapons in clear violation of the Geneva Protocol of 1925, which prohibits the use in war of chemical weapons." The United States was the only member who voted against the issuance of this statement.
 
The U.S. has accused Iran of using chemical weapons as well, though the allegations have been disputed. Joost Hiltermann, the principal researcher for Human Rights Watch between 1992 and 1994, conducted a two-year study that included a field investigation in Iraq, and obtained Iraqi government documents in the process. According to Hiltermann, the literature on the Iran–Iraq War reflects allegations of chemical weapons used by Iran, but they are "marred by a lack of specificity as to time and place, and the failure to provide any sort of evidence".


:hitwall:
 
Iraqi army demonstrated how truly effective chemical warfare can be to route enemy strongholds and defensive positions, allowing numerically inferior units to overcome and defeat a numerically superior and well defended unit on high ground. However, it was their small yield capacity that limited their use and overall effectiveness of mustard agent in the war, but in localized areas of operations it did prove effective.
 
All these documents didn't prove crap. I mean seriously its just analyzing info on the war between Iran and Iraq and how Iran will respond to Iraq's use of chemcial weapons. Nothing about U.S.
 
Iraqi army demonstrated how truly effective chemical warfare can be to route enemy strongholds and defensive positions, allowing numerically inferior units to overcome and defeat a numerically superior and well defended unit on high ground. However, it was their small yield capacity that limited their use and overall effectiveness of mustard agent in the war, but in localized areas of operations it did prove effective.


Yes, Indeed it was very effective.....


In a declassified 1991 report, the CIA estimated that Iran had suffered more than 50,000 casualties from Iraq's use of several chemical weapons, though current estimates are more than 100,000 as the long-term effects continue to cause casualties.


"Very localized" attacks...













Kurdish civilians.
 
All these documents didn't prove crap. I mean seriously its just analyzing info on the war between Iran and Iraq and how Iran will respond to Iraq's use of chemcial weapons. Nothing about U.S.

Subsequently, a decision was made at the top level of the U.S. government (almost certainly requiring the approval of the National Security Council and the CIA). The DIA was authorized to give the Iraqi intelligence services as much detailed information as was available about the deployments and movements of all Iranian combat units. That included satellite imagery and perhaps some sanitized electronic intelligence. There was a particular focus on the area east of the city of Basrah where the DIA was convinced the next big Iranian offensive would come. The agency also provided data on the locations of key Iranian logistics facilities, and the strength and capabilities of the Iranian air force and air defense system. Francona described much of the information as "targeting packages" suitable for use by the Iraqi air force to destroy these targets.

The sarin attacks then followed.



By 1988, U.S. intelligence was flowing freely to Hussein's military. That March, Iraq launched a nerve gas attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja in northern Iraq.


Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran - By Shane Harris and Matthew M. Aid | Foreign Policy
 
Subsequently, a decision was made at the top level of the U.S. government (almost certainly requiring the approval of the National Security Council and the CIA). The DIA was authorized to give the Iraqi intelligence services as much detailed information as was available about the deployments and movements of all Iranian combat units. That included satellite imagery and perhaps some sanitized electronic intelligence. There was a particular focus on the area east of the city of Basrah where the DIA was convinced the next big Iranian offensive would come. The agency also provided data on the locations of key Iranian logistics facilities, and the strength and capabilities of the Iranian air force and air defense system. Francona described much of the information as "targeting packages" suitable for use by the Iraqi air force to destroy these targets.

The sarin attacks then followed.


Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran - By Shane Harris and Matthew M. Aid | Foreign Policy

Subsequently, a decision was made at the top level of the U.S. government (almost certainly requiring the approval of the National Security Council and the CIA). The DIA was authorized to give the Iraqi intelligence services as much detailed information as was available about the deployments and movements of all Iranian combat units.

They've been doing this for years since the war began. Supplying intel.
 
What's so new about that? :|

I think we all already know the answer.
 
And yet Iranigirl is one of the brain trust that claim Iraq had no weapons of mass-destruction....are your mullah masters unable to keep their mental disease straight? Did Iraq have this....or was the claim of wmd's a lie? They are mutually exclusive dumazz (I know you are far too tarded to understand mutually exclusive....so I will spell it out. A. They had gas and used it ...had wmd's. B. didn't have gas and didn't use it. Didn't have wmd's. Which genius? declare your position instead of spewing Ahmantards idiocy).
 
And yet Iranigirl is one of the brain trust that claim Iraq had no weapons of mass-destruction....are your mullah masters unable to keep their mental disease straight? Did Iraq have this....or was the claim of wmd's a lie? They are mutually exclusive dumazz

In 2003, Iraq didn't have any WMDs, you are gonna prove otherwise?
Dick Cheney and Bush lied and fooled the whole world to justify the Iraqi attack. Please don't tell me that Iraqi war was not based on lies, that's not something we claim, but your own politicians and media too.

Iraqi army demonstrated how truly effective chemical warfare can be to route enemy strongholds and defensive positions, allowing numerically inferior units to overcome and defeat a numerically superior and well defended unit on high ground. However, it was their small yield capacity that limited their use and overall effectiveness of mustard agent in the war, but in localized areas of operations it did prove effective.

It was used mostly on civilians and despite high casualties, and would you please explain how Iraqi units 'defeated' Iran after using chemical warfare? It was just an act of cowardliness and out of desperation, not power. Also, Iraq was not outnumbered by Iranian troops, Iran barely had an effective army in 1980 and during the course of war, while at the end of the war in 1988, Iraq had 1,000,000+ active troops in the army despite its nearly 500,000 casualties in the war.
 
In 2003, Iraq didn't have any WMDs, you are gonna prove otherwise?
Dick Cheney and Bush lied and fooled the whole world to justify the Iraqi attack. Please don't tell me that Iraqi war was not based on lies, that's not something we claim, but your own politicians and media too.
So when your tard-master claims the Iraqi's gassed you....he is lying in front of Allah? Because gas is a wmd, and they kinda have to have it to use it.....are you able to follow? Or do I need to attach pics?
 

Back
Top Bottom