What's new

Reports from 2011 that Pakistan has the capability to produce themonuclear weapons/hydrogen bombs

PAKISTANFOREVER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 15, 2015
Messages
17,371
Reaction score
-6
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Pakistan
Sorry if this has already been posted but this news from 5 years ago is independent confirmation of Pakistan's ability to develop thermo nukes and h-bombs. Like to hear the opinions of our professional analysts:

ISIS Reports

Pakistan Doubling Rate of Making Nuclear Weapons: Time for Pakistan to Reverse Course
by David Albright and Paul Brannan

May 16, 2011

Download PDF


Construction of Pakistan’s fourth plutonium production reactor at Khushab proceeds quickly; when finished, the three new Khushab reactors will allow Pakistan to double its annual output of nuclear weapons. The United States should condition a fraction of its military aid on Pakistan halting production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.

New Satellite Image of Fourth Khushab Reactor
Newsweek has published an article examining Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program that includes new GeoEye commercial satellite imagery from April 20, 2011 of the Khushab military nuclear site (see figure 1). Newsweek shared this imagery with ISIS, and we provided our assessment.

The April 20, 2011 image shows significant progress in the construction of a fourth plutonium production reactor at the Khushab site (see figure 2). On February 9, 2011, ISIS released a report featuring satellite imagery from January 15, 2011 showing what ISIS assessed was excavation for a new reactor (see figure 3). In the April 20, 2011 image, the frame of the reactor building and the main reactor hall are visible. At least three cranes and construction material surround the new building construction. It is not clear from the image if there are any reactor vessel components in the center of the main reactor hall.

The precise pace of construction of the fourth reactor relative to the other Khushab reactors cannot yet be determined from the images—though construction has progressed significantly since January 15, 2011. ISIS noted in a June 21, 2007 report that Pakistan was constructing the third reactor much more quickly than the second. It may be building the fourth reactor quicker than the third one. Nonetheless, the fourth reactor will likely take a few years to complete.

The pace may also depend on Pakistan’s overseas illicit procurement of goods for this reactor. Pakistan was recently implicated allegedly operating an illegal network in the United States to procure goods for its Chashma nuclear power reactor project and perhaps other reactors and plutonium separation plants. The equipment included calibration and switching equipment, radiation detection equipment, and nuclear grade resin used to further purify coolant water.

By comparing satellite images, the fourth reactor under construction appears to be a duplicate of the second and third reactors at Khushab. Figure 4 shows the second, third and fourth reactors at different stages of construction. The dimensions of the main reactor halls are the same, as are the dimensions of the entire reactor buildings. The location of structures adjacent to the fourth reactor building is also the same as the ones near the third and fourth reactors.

The Khushab nuclear site originally contained one heavy water reactor, which Pakistan stated was operational in 1998. Sometime between 2000 and 2002, Pakistan began building a second heavy water reactor at the site. In 2006, Pakistan began construction on a third reactor. In early 2010, ISIS reported that commercial satellite imagery from December 2009 showed vapor rising from the cooling towers of the second reactor, indicating that it was starting operation.

Excessive Stocks of Plutonium
Pakistan’s construction of these new reactors at the Khushab site will result in a dramatic increase in its plutonium production capability. Combined, the three new reactors will be able to produce enough plutonium for over 12 nuclear weapons per year, depending on the reactors’ size and operating efficiencies. 1 This compares with Pakistan’s current estimated production of enough weapon-grade uranium and plutonium for about 7-14 weapons per year. 2 These three new reactors will roughly double Pakistan’s annual ability to build nuclear weapons to about 19-26 nuclear weapons per year.

Pakistan appears to want the plutonium to improve the quality of its nuclear arsenal and build a new generation of lighter, more powerful weapons. Plutonium-based weapons can have more explosive yield in smaller, lighter packages than weapons based on weapon-grade uranium. Pakistan appears to want warheads small enough to fit on cruise missiles it is currently developing. It also may want larger yield (50-100 kiloton) fission weapons that can cause far more damage to Indian cities than its current relatively low-yield weapons. In addition, plutonium-based fission weapons could enable Pakistan to build deliverable thermonuclear weapons (i.e., hydrogen bombs). Thus, the recent activity at Khushab should be viewed as further evidence of an accelerated nuclear arms race between India and Pakistan.

In total, through 2010, Pakistan has produced enough weapon-grade uranium and plutonium for roughly 100-170 nuclear weapons. Based on available information, the number of deployed weapons is probably less. Assuming that about 30 percent of its stock of weapon-grade uranium and plutonium is located in its weapons production pipeline, stored, or otherwise unused in weapons, Pakistan has an estimated total of 70-120 nuclear weapons. It can currently add to that stock at the rate of about 7-14 warheads per year and that value will go up to 19-26 warheads per year when all four Khushab reactors are operational.

Risks of Nuclear Explosive Stock
Pakistan’s great increase in production of plutonium is by itself an inherent nuclear material security risk. The construction of these new Khushab reactors also further complicates attaining a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT). Already, Pakistan is the sole nation blocking the negotiations of this important treaty at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.

Recommendation
The Obama administration should publicly insist that Pakistan halt construction of these new reactors at Khushab. Congress should condition a fraction of U.S. aid on Pakistan announcing a moratorium on further construction and agreeing to a FMCT.



Figure_1_copy.jpg

Figure 1. An overview of the southern part of the Khushab nuclear site in Pakistan showing the location of the new reactor construction. The first Khushab reactor cannot be seen in this image. It is located several hundred meters north of the heavy water production plant.





Figure_2-2.jpg

Figure 2. April 20, 2011 image of the construction site for the fourth reactor at the Khushab site. The frame of the building can be seen along with at least three cranes and construction materials surrounding the building.





Figure_3.JPG

Figure 3. January 15, 2011 commercial satellite image showing excavation for the fourth Khushab reactor.





figure_4_reactors.jpg

Figure 4. A comparison of the second, third, and fourth Khushab reactors at different stages of construction. The dimensions of the buildings are nearly identical, and the location of adjacent towers and stacks is also the same.

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...nuclear-weapons-time-for-pakistan-to-rever/12

:pakistan:
 
Pakistan should not wast its time in " geting F16 J10 abc euro fighters " promote its nuke assets.
 
19-26 weapons a year?? booom:pakistan::victory:. i'd love to see the increasement
 
[QUOTE="Shah Xaib, post: 8386053, member: 176497"]increasement[/QUOTE]

What is that ?
 
To contain Pakistan united state sud support Pak to be member in N supply group so Pak sud have more energy to head slowly towards develope country its already proven that Pakistan Nuclear is safer as any country.
Mean while Pak sud not compromise its defence specially when colation force is supporting TTP and indians who have many assests in Afg to destable Pak CEPEC and paying poor afghani to fire on borders.
N reactor is vunerable for Pak.
 
Well thermonukes are the need of the hour minding the size of India's metropolitan areas. It also marks the next logical step for Pakistan's nuclear program and also India claimed to have test at least one fission boosted device ( a crude form of thermonuke) in May 1998 thus it is natural for Pakistan to pursue themonukes and a device with same size and mass as fission device but with much higher yields thus making our missile delivery systems more effective and even allow to reduce the weight of warheads and thus increasing the effective range. But unfortunately Pakistan's pace of progress is slower than expected and it must be raised so as to address all the threats and also to maintain a credible minimum deterrence.
 
Last edited:
Cough cough* and we are struggling to generate enoughnpower. I'm out of power since morning though. We are piss poor country, why do these journalists have to show as mighty nuke power
 
Cough cough* and we are struggling to generate enoughnpower. I'm out of power since morning though. We are piss poor country, why do these journalists have to show as mighty nuke power

Because we must act like one, so that word will hear what we said. It is hour of need that we upgrade our foreign policy based on regional power.
 
Because we must act like one, so that word will hear what we said. It is hour of need that we upgrade our foreign policy based on regional power.
Lol and show our selves as agressors ?
And generate negative publicity thus reducing the prospects of joining NSG and other forums, plus creating hurdles for local Pakistanis to travel abroad and making them viewed that with suspicion !

Why do you think Israel keeps silence on this matter ?
 
Uranium based weapons were the best we could get in the 80's so they worked well for us in the 90's and 2000's but Plutonium based nukes require less fissile material, are lighter which means our missiles can travel longer and their yield is higher than those of the Uranium based weapons.

World also needs to understand that we are facing an acute shortage of electricity, nuclear power can help us solve that and that is why we are building these new reacotrs. :angel:

The Obama administration should publicly insist that Pakistan halt construction of these new reactors at Khushab. Congress should condition a fraction of U.S. aid on Pakistan announcing a moratorium on further construction and agreeing to a FMCT.
Yeah that worked so well for the US in the 90's when we rolled back our program and avoided nuclear tests even after Indian tested their stuff.
ISIS Reports
I don't trust you ISIS, you murdering maniancs. :rofl:
 
Lol and show our selves as agressors ?
And generate negative publicity thus reducing the prospects of joining NSG and other forums, plus creating hurdles for local Pakistanis to travel abroad and making them viewed that with suspicion !

Why do you think Israel keeps silence on this matter ?

Due you ever travel abroad? All above statement we already facing and by doing this will not change anything.
 
Sorry if this has already been posted but this news from 5 years ago is independent confirmation of Pakistan's ability to develop thermo nukes and h-bombs. Like to hear the opinions of our professional analysts:

ISIS Reports

Pakistan Doubling Rate of Making Nuclear Weapons: Time for Pakistan to Reverse Course
by David Albright and Paul Brannan

May 16, 2011




Construction of Pakistan’s fourth plutonium production reactor at Khushab proceeds quickly; when finished, the three new Khushab reactors will allow Pakistan to double its annual output of nuclear weapons. The United States should condition a fraction of its military aid on Pakistan halting production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.

New Satellite Image of Fourth includes new GeoEye commercial satellite imagery from April 20, 2011 of the Khushab military nuclear site Newsweek shared this imagery with ISIS, and we provided our assessment.

The April 20, 2011 image shows significant progress in In the April 20, 2011 image, the frame of the reactor building and the main reactor hall are visible. At least three cranes and construction material surround the new building construction. It is not clear from the image if there are any reactor vessel components in the center of the main reactor hall.

The precise pace of construction of the fourth reactor relative to the other Khushab reactors cannot yet be determined from the images—though construction has progressed significantly since January 15, 2011. ISIS noted in a report that Pakistan was constructing the third reactor much more quickly than the second. It may be building the fourth reactor quicker than the third one. Nonetheless, the fourth reactor will likely take a few years to complete.

The pace may also depend on Pakistan’s overseas illicit procurement of goods for this reactorallegedly operating an illegal network in the United States to procure goods for its Chashma nuclear power reactor project and perhaps other reactors and plutonium separation plants. The equipment included calibration and switching equipment, radiation detection equipment, and nuclear grade resin used to further purify coolant water.

By comparing satellite images, the fourth reactor under construction appears to be a duplicate of the second and third reactors at Khushab. the second, third and fourth reactors at different stages of construction. The dimensions of the main reactor halls are the same, as are the dimensions of the entire reactor buildings. The location of structures adjacent to the fourth reactor building is also the same as the ones near the third and fourth reactors.

The Khushab which Pakistan stated was operational in 1998. Sometime between 2000 and 2002 reactor at the site. indicating that it was starting operation.

Excessive Stocks of Plutonium
Pakistan’s construction of these new reactors at the Khushab site will result in a dramatic increase in its plutonium production capability. Combined, the three new reactors will be able to produce enough plutonium for over 12 nuclear weapons per year, depending on the reactors’ size and operating efficiencies. 1 This compares with Pakistan’s current estimated production of enough weapon-grade uranium and plutonium for about 7-14 weapons per year. 2 These three new reactors will roughly double Pakistan’s annual ability to build nuclear weapons to about 19-26 nuclear weapons per year.

Pakistan appears to want the plutonium to improve the quality of its nuclear arsenal and build a new generation of lighter, more powerful weapons. Plutonium-based weapons can have more explosive yield in smaller, lighter packages than weapons based on weapon-grade uranium. Pakistan appears to want warheads small enough to fit on cruise missiles it is currently developing. It also may want larger yield (50-100 kiloton) fission weapons that can cause far more damage to Indian cities than its current relatively low-yield weapons. In addition, plutonium-based fission weapons could enable Pakistan to build deliverable thermonuclear weapons (i.e., hydrogen bombs). Thus, the recent activity at Khushab should be viewed as further evidence of an accelerated nuclear arms race between India and Pakistan.

In total, through 2010, Pakistan has produced enough weapon-grade uranium and plutonium for roughly 100-170 nuclear weapons. Based on available information, the number of deployed weapons is probably less. Assuming that about 30 percent of its stock of weapon-grade uranium and plutonium is located in its weapons production pipeline, stored, or otherwise unused in weapons, Pakistan has an estimated total of 70-120 nuclear weapons. It can currently add to that stock at the rate of about 7-14 warheads per year and that value will go up to 19-26 warheads per year when all four Khushab reactors are operational.

Risks of Nuclear Explosive Stock
Pakistan’s great increase in production of plutonium is by itself an inherent nuclear material security risk. The construction of these new Khushab reactors also further complicates attaining a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT). Already, Pakistan is the sole nation blocking the negotiations of this important treaty at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.

Recommendation
The Obama administration should publicly insist that Pakistan halt construction of these new reactors at Khushab. Congress should condition a fraction of U.S. aid on Pakistan announcing a moratorium on further construction and agreeing to a FMCT.



Figure_1_copy.jpg

Figure 1. An overview of the southern part of the Khushab nuclear site in Pakistan showing the location of the new reactor construction. The first Khushab reactor cannot be seen in this image. It is located several hundred meters north of the heavy water production plant.





Figure_2-2.jpg

Figure 2. April 20, 2011 image of the construction site for the fourth reactor at the Khushab site. The frame of the building can be seen along with at least three cranes and construction materials surrounding the building.





Figure_3.JPG

Figure 3. January 15, 2011 commercial satellite image showing excavation for the fourth Khushab reactor.





figure_4_reactors.jpg

Figure 4. A comparison of the second, third, and fourth Khushab reactors at different stages of construction. The dimensions of the buildings are nearly identical, and the location of adjacent towers and stacks is also the same.

:pakistan:
Well, since no one else has given you any thanks so let me thank you for this great revelation.
BTW its really heartening to watch that people are not giving thanks to deserving posts

Cough cough* and we are struggling to generate enoughnpower. I'm out of power since morning though. We are piss poor country, why do these journalists have to show as mighty nuke power
discussing Electricity is irrelevant here on PDF. If you want join some low class civilian forums
 
Well, since no one else has given you any thanks so let me thank you for this great revelation.
BTW its really heartening to watch that people are not giving thanks to deserving posts


discussing Electricity is irrelevant here on PDF. If you want join some low class civilian forums
How long have younbeen in this forum for d day or two perhaps ?

Due you ever travel abroad? All above statement we already facing and by doing this will not change anything.
Do I travel abroad? Yes, I was born and raised abroad( irelevant) and nownaince I'm in pak I make frequent vists too.

Lol. Yes we can we act smart and not show nuke as silver bullet to everything, nothing is set on stone
 

Back
Top Bottom