What's new

Remembering Akbar Bugti

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
Govts like humans make mistakes. Errors of judgements by dictators have a greater & often longer lasting impact than others.

Upon reading this article one cannot help but wonder if a needless martyr has been created in a region where people have long memories...


DAWN.COM | Provinces | Remembering Akbar Bugti


Akbar Shahbaz Khan Bugti — or Nawab Bugti as he was more familiarly known — devoted his life to the Baloch cause and ultimately became the undisputed martyr of the Baloch people.

He lived and breathed honourably and gracefully. Naturally, as one would expect after decades of tribal, political and public life, there are those who love him and those who criticise him, the praise and slander each creating its own version of the man. Most criticisms were manufactured.

He was beloved. Bugti always sat amongst his people on a Balochi hand-made mat. Friends and visitors found his warmth engaging and his interest genuine. Stories abound of how the late Nawab Bugti would offer spicy food to his guests.

Against overwhelming odds created overtly and covertly by the establishment, Bugti continually had to navigate the shifting sands of intrigue and sabotage.

After the killing of his beloved son, Salal Bugti, in June 1992, he chose to remain in the besieged Dera Bugti compound with his people. Nawab Bugti kept the Bugti tribe united and maintained the Baloch code. He tried to unite Baloch nationalist parties as well in 2004, calling for a unified and single Baloch nationalist party. But Islamabad’s continued meddling in Balochistan’s social, tribal and political affairs, state-sponsored conspiracies and repeated attacks on his life slowed down the process of Baloch unity.

Having immense experience in politics, Bugti never saw armed struggle as the only solution to the Baloch question. He began negotiating with Islamabad. He prepared a set of reasonable and justified demands in consultation with veteran Baloch leaders and nationalist parties. He appointed his representatives to the parliamentary committee on Balochistan.

Bugti and other Baloch leaders worked with incredible patience. It was a slow process of dialogue with little chance to get political and economic relief for the Baloch people. For the people of Balochistan, it was a momentous occasion. Many saw the dialogue as the beginning of a new era for Baloch-Islamabad relations. But as expected by Nawab Bugti, Sardar Ataullah Mengal, Nawab Marri and other Baloch nationalists, Islamabad and its ruling civil-military establishment betrayed the Baloch.

Military and paramilitary forces were simultaneously harassing Baloch people. Several hundred political activists ‘disappeared’ and were tortured when Baloch political parties were talking to the Balochistan Committee formed by parliament. Talking to a journalist, Nawab Bugti in January 2005 said: 'How can negotiations on political issues continue with the government in this situation? A military operation and negotiations cannot continue side by side. If the authorities launch an operation, then with whom will they hold negotiations?'

Nawab Bugti pointed out that Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri had already made it clear that he had nothing to do with this dialogue and Sardar Ataullah Mengal had also disassociated himself from the process in protest against the arrest of party workers and for other reasons.

The world watched incredulously as Pervez Musharraf declared an all-out war on Balochistan — on Dera Bugti, Kohlu, Makran, Jalawan and particularly Nawab Bugti. Tanks rolled into Dera Bugti and other parts of Balochistan in January 2005, prior to the so-called attack on Musharraf in December 2005 in Kohlu district.

In March 2005 forces began to smash Bugti’s house and Dera Bugti town, killing dozens of civilians and leaving him besieged in a few rooms without electricity and water. Then Musharraf came up with a more inhuman plan to use all available air and ground power to eliminate Nawab Bugti. His associates planned a so-called visit to the remote town of Kohlu, bordering Dera Bugti district, to find an excuse to escalate the military operation against the Baloch people and their leaders.

After the so-called pre-planned attack on Musharraf on Dec 14, 2005, indiscriminate bombing compelled all Dera Bugti inhabitants to flee their homes. According to an Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre report 160,000 people were displaced during the conflict. Nawab Bugti, as a proud Baloch, moved to the mountains to protect his homeland.

Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti was killed on Aug 26, 2006. His death was followed by massive anti-government protests in Pakistan and media coverage worldwide. The Musharraf government refused to accept responsibility for the killing of Nawab Bugti and his associates.

No doubt, it was a well-planned murder of a respected veteran Baloch leader by a military dictator. In December 2005 addressing a newspaper editors’ meeting in Lahore, Musharraf had thundered 'There are two or three tribal chiefs and feudal lords behind what is going on in Balochistan. The past governments have made deals with them and indulged them. My government is determined to establish its writ. It will be a fight to the finish.'

Pervez Musharraf and the military leadership were not prepared to concede to Balochistan’s genuine economic and political demands. Instead of addressing Baloch grievances politically and through negotiations, the military-led government resorted to greater use of force. Musharraf added fuel to the fire when he declared: ‘Don’t push us. It isn’t the 1970s when you can hit and run and hide in the mountains. This time you won’t even know what hit you.’ The comment provoked a strong reaction from Baloch leaders.

Nawab Bugti was prepared for the consequences. During an interview in April 2006, Bugti had predicted his death at the hands of Pakistan’s armed forces. ‘They have been given instructions that myself and Nawabzada Balach Marri — the two of us should be wiped out.’

Islamabad’s incorrect policy of Baloch suppression has proved to be a failure. The killing of Baloch leaders has dealt a body blow to the fragile Baloch-Islamabad relations. Three years after the death of Nawab Bugti, Balochistan’s state of affairs represent a worsening scenario. Human rights violations are growing, tensions between Islamabad and the Baloch people have mounted, economic activities are at a dead level and poverty has increased manifold. All development activities have been halted.

As rightly pointed out by a foreign diplomat, Nawab Bugti ‘was a wise, learned man. They (Islamabad) could have utilised him to reach out to the Baloch, but they didn’t’.
The writer is a former senator.
 
He lived and breathed honourably and gracefully.

Hogwash - he ran private jails and was responsible for driving out thousands of Bugti's with whom disagreements crept up and who refused to accept his dicatorial rule.

Many of them were finally able to return after the government released Dera Bugti from its clutches.

Bugti was a typical Feudal lord whose authority could not be challenged by those he 'ruled over'.

This article is nothing but propaganda by a politician to whitewash this mans crimes.
 
So Mr Third Eye, Would you consider Lt.Gen. Shahbeg Singh, Jarnail Singh Bhinderawale Indian martyrs??

Needless martys created unnecessarily to misguided cause predestined to failure.

Thats just the fear I have expressed in post # 1.

But where is the connection ? I have just produced an article from a Pk daily.

Someday we may be able to rise above me Vs you in everything.
 
So Mr Third Eye, Would you consider Lt.Gen. Shahbeg Singh, Jarnail Singh Bhinderawale Indian martyrs??

I think what third eye was trying to say is not the he thinks Bugti is a martyr, but that Bugti may have been needlessly made into a martyr by the events that unfolded.

P.S: Lets stick to the topic please and not make it about others.
 
Idont think Bugti's death was desired by PA. I think either there was an accident or he himself contrived it to be so. Nobody in their right mind would want to kill a 79 yrs old man.
Araz
 
I think what third eye was trying to say is not the he thinks Bugti is a martyr, but that Bugti may have been needlessly made into a martyr by the events that unfolded.

P.S: Lets stick to the topic please and not make it about others.

AM,

Never mind.

Often reactions are tempered by the colour of the flag below a persons name & less by the content of what he writes.
 
Bugti was not killed by Pakistan Army.He was hiding in a cave protected by his guards.PA officers went in for negiation but he fired on them and few rocks exploded and he was killed there along with few PA Officers inside.
 
Its ironic that when someone dies, then all the good deeds or good things about the dead are remembered, while they are alive then non is said.

And the bad deeds are forgotten.
 
As per the autopsy of Mr. Bugti, his head was recovered from his chest, due to the fall of a large boulder on his head when explosives in his cave exploded.

There are two theories for the explosives, one is when the army officers were going inside the cave, a booby trapped mine or any other explosive material exploded and the cave roof gave way, as the bodies of the army officers & jawans were at the start of the cave, they were recovered first most probably on the first day & army guys reached the body of bugti & his guards on the 3rd day.

2nd theory is that bugti blew it himself as he was in no mood to give up. He himself preferred to die as he was one stubborn tribal elder who would have preferred as his tie was already up.

We do have to remember one Lt Col, a Major & Captain died with some other ORs, 6 or 7 in total.

So the logic is, he was not murdered at least. Otherwise the army officers would not have been killed, the only casualty would have been then Mr. Bugti & his men.
 
This tribal system in Balochistan should go now. :angry:
 
There are two theories for the explosives, one is when the army officers were going inside the cave, a booby trapped mine or any other explosive material exploded and the cave roof gave way, as the bodies of the army officers & jawans were at the start of the cave, they were recovered first most probably on the first day & army guys reached the body of bugti & his guards on the 3rd day.

2nd theory is that bugti blew it himself as he was in no mood to give up. He himself preferred to die as he was one stubborn tribal elder who would have preferred as his tie was already up.

There is a third theory as well that Bugti was killed by his Marri guards.

Bugti was in the Marri area and it is said that he was protected by guards from Balach Marri. Officers from PA were invited to initiate talks with Bugti but the Marri guards blew up the cave.

This article is written by Sanaullah Baloch who thinks Sardari system is right for Balochistan.

Our media need to promote POV from other segments of Baloch society as well.

The Bugti elements control only a part of Balochistan but there are people like Jamali and Jam Sadiq as well.
 
This tribal system in Balochistan should go now. :angry:

It should be removed from the whole country; why only balochistan? If there is one thing i like about india its the land reforms where they have basically rooted out feudalism. We need to do the same and get rid of the chowdhry's; nawaz's and zardaris we have who are pillaging the wealth of this nation...
 
It should be removed from the whole country; why only balochistan? If there is one thing i like about india its the land reforms where they have basically rooted out feudalism. We need to do the same and get rid of the chowdhry's; nawaz's and zardaris we have who are pillaging the wealth of this nation...

Seriously..

What is the hitch ? Why has it not been done so far ?

This eats into the vitals of a nation / society.
 
I think, from the article, the way islamabad handled balochistan is not right, just the way india is handling kashmir. But both might have other reasons to the way they are and is handling balochistan and kashmir respectively. Indian may have pakistan in kashmir, pakistan may have india(which i doubt). But only way to make a happy union is to, understand the indigineious popluations voice. May be something short of complete freedom( which doesnt make sense in todays progressive world). Mushraf did and said what a dictator was supposed to do. But now an democartic pakistan should follow the path of discussion and reconcliation with balochs so that they remain loyal to you. Gun's are never a solution.
 

Back
Top Bottom