What's new

Real figure of defence budget : 675 Bn

sparklingway

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
3,878
Reaction score
0
Real figure of defence budget

Saturday, June 12, 2010

By Ansar Abbasi

ISLAMABAD: Principal Economic Adviser to the Finance Ministry Saqib Sheerani has said the total defence budget for the next fiscal year is around Rs 675 billion and not Rs 442 billion.

Talking to The News, Sheerani said the defence budget was not reflected under one head in the budget but was distributed in three different heads. He was explaining why the IMF shows Rs 593 billion as the total defence spending for the outgoing year as against Rs 378 billion shown in the latest budget books.

He explained that for the outgoing fiscal year, Rs 378 billion was shown under the main head of the defence budget whereas over Rs 200 billion was reflected under two other heads — pension spending and war on terror contingency head.
He said the government had also to pay for some legacy expenditures like purchases of some defence hardware for which the deals were struck during the Musharraf tenure.

He said now like the present concluding fiscal year, the next budget too contained the total allocation of the defence budget in three different heads. He said besides Rs 442 billion that is announced as defence budget for the next fiscal year, almost Rs 225 billion was also allocated for pension and under the head of the war on terror contingency.

The IMF website reflects Rs 593 billion as defence spending but the number announced in the budget is Rs 378 billion for the outgoing fiscal year. Similarly, the finance minister announced 4.1 per cent GDP growth for the year ending June 30, 2010 but the IMF website reflects 3 per cent GDP growth rate.

In yet another case of budget contradictions, the announced budget shows 5.1 per cent budget deficit for the outgoing year but the pre-budget cabinet meeting that approved the budget 2010-11 was shown the deficit of 5.3 per cent by the Finance Ministry’s summary.

Whether one calls it a jugglery of words or budget fudging but Secretary Finance Salman Siddiq sees these contradictions as a matter of routine. “This is just a mathematical thing,” he said, adding like Japan, Pakistan is following a system where the figures get matured and final in three years.

He explained that like Japan, Pakistan follows a system where the GDP gets finalised in three years. In the first year, the figures are estimated and in the following year we get the provisional figures while in the third year the final figures get matured.

Referring to the contradictions in the figures as reflected in the budget, the IMF website and the cabinet summary, he said the figures really don’t matter as the IMF precisely knows that our fiscal deficit is Rs 783 billion.
 
War on Terror is reimbursed twice as much in $ value, so it is not an expense, but reimbursements.
 
Based on the real figures, the defence expenditure amounts to 20.71% of the Federal Budget up from 20.14% of the Federal Budget from last year. It also stands at 4.47% of GDP up from 4.04% of GDP last year.
 
its almost 8Bn USD.

now i think we can put some money in R&D.
 
its almost 8Bn USD.

now i think we can put some money in R&D.

NESCOM budget comes under Cabinet Division. Similarly SPD is under Cabinet Division alongwith KRL. This is merely what the Ministry of Defence is utilizing. Actual expenditure if we include all other strategic bodies and institutes is far higher.
 
Ansar Abbasi

what more one can say - got a burr up his aXX for the govt/establishment/armed forces - a taliban 'sympathiser'!!!
 
Ansar Abbasi

what more one can say - got a burr up his aXX for the govt/establishment/armed forces - a taliban 'sympathiser'!!!

Ansar Abbasi and Shaheen Sehbai are the two least credible figures but the man being quoted is the Principal Economic Advisor and the author of the Economic Survey as well, not the usual unknown source. The Principal Economic Advisor is the one who can gets budgetary allocations released on time or delay them for you, a very big figure in the economic planning.
 
War on Terror is reimbursed twice as much in $ value, so it is not an expense, but reimbursements.

Rs 225 billion was also allocated for pension and under the head of the war on terror contingency.

most of this is re-imbused thru CSF, CISF funds provided by the US.
 
About 1/3rd of it is all going towards either pensions or War on Terror Contingency. It seems a lot but the figures don't reflect the situation on ground.

However the IMF chains Zardari has tied us to, may not agree with any justification.
 
Please elaborate as to what is your understanding of the system of exchange value among different currencies.

Dollar has weaken against other currencies in the world but in Pakistan it was kept high , SBP kept on buying from Open market to keep its demand high.
Pakistan makes Payment to IMF in rupee so devalue rupee is their demand.
 
Dollar has weaken against other currencies in the world but in Pakistan it was kept high , SBP kept on buying from Open market to keep its demand high.

Because of a balance of payment crisis and excessive borrowing from the SBP, the rupee was obviously going down. A worsening economy will most definitely imply a weakening currency except in very rare circumstances.
 

Back
Top Bottom