What's new

Raytheon Set to Modernize Navy’s Tomahawks with maritime strike capability

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
ARLINGTON, Va. — Raytheon Missile Co. is planning to upgrade some of the Navy’s Tomahawk cruise missiles with a maritime strike capability when the missiles come up for their recertification beginning in 2019. The company considers a Tomahawk with moving-target capability to be a weapon that will add value to the Navy’s drive to increase and distribute the lethality of its fleet.

The Block IV version of the Tomahawk is a net-enabled weapon that can loiter and be retargeted in flight via a two-way data link. It is guided by a jam-resistant Global Positioning System and delivers a unitary warhead. It is approaching the end of its 15-year warranty period and the Navy will be funding a recertification to extend the warranty to the missile’s full 30-year life this year. The recertified missiles will return to the fleet beginning in 2020.

The price of a Block IV, which is in production through 2019, is approximately $1.1 million. Raytheon has not yet priced out the recertification, but the company’s estimate is one-quarter to one-third of the cost of a new missile, Dave Adams, senior program director for cruise missile programs, told reporters Jan. 11 at the Surface Navy Association National Symposium.

The Block IV, which entered service in 2004, has gone through two major upgrades in the years since, with the maritime strike capability becoming a third, said Christian Sprinkle, Raytheon’s business development director for the Tomahawk.

The Tomahawk Strike Missile, as the modified Block IV might be called, features enhanced communications and navigation suites and sensors to home in on a moving target at sea. The company is starting discussions to determine which sensors will be included in the terminal seeker head, Adams said, with the likely choice being a combination of an active and a passive sensor.

“The Navy is very focused on the modernization and recertification of the Tomahawk,” Adams said.

Retired Vice Adm. Thomas Copeman, former commander, Naval Surface Forces and now a Raytheon official, called the Tomahawk Strike Missile a “poster child” for the Navy’s initiative to increase the distributed lethality of the fleet — greatly the number of ships armed with a long-range anti-ship missile — saying then the missile would represent an “exponential increase in the striking power of the U.S. Navy.”

In another development, the Navy and Raytheon have demonstrated the ability of a ship’s crew to perform Launch Platform Mission Planning (LPMP), complete mission planning in real time to hit a time-sensitive target. Mission planning normally is conducted by shore-based mission planners. In November, the crew of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Pinckney fired two Tomahawks on successive days using LPMP, which Adams said enables “better, faster, and more efficient mission planning.”

http://seapowermagazine.org/stories/20170111-tomahawk.html
 
NSM (185km)
Harpoon block II+ ER (248km)
SM-6 (240–460 km)
LRASM (560 km, maybe 930km or in due course even 1,600 km)
Tomahawk Block IV (1,700 km)

That's a nice layering of missiles for use against surface ships.
 
NSM (185km)
Harpoon block II+ ER (248km)
SM-6 (240–460 km)
LRASM (560 km, maybe 930km or in due course even 1,600 km)
Tomahawk Block IV (1,700 km)

That's a nice layering of missiles for use against surface ships.


is any of those hypersonic? or all surface skimmers? I don't know so I am asking
 
is any of those hypersonic? or all surface skimmers? I don't know so I am asking
NSM, Harpoon: high-subsonic sea skimmer (NSM: 1,077 km/h, Harpoon: 864 km/h). Harpoon can also perform final approach pop-up manoeuvre ending in high-dive (near vertical) onto target. In Pop-Up attack mode, Harpoon first jumps to 1800m height at a 7 degree angle then swoops down into the enemy ship or detonates over it, destroying its superstructure and electronic system (this takes into account that a single Harpoon will unlikely fully destroy or sink a large tonnage surface ship);
SM-6: supersonic (Mach 3.5), 0-34,000 m atltitude
LRASM: high-subsonic, flies to target at medium altitude then drops to low altitude for sea skimming final approach (Can autonomously locate enemy ships and avoid neutral shipping in crowded areas along the way. Can coordinate with Recce/EW platforms and other LRASMs. Aside from short, low-power data-link transmissions, does not normally emit signals. This, combined with the low-RCS airframe and low IR signature, reduces detectability.)
Tomahawk Block IV Mod: subsonic (about 890 km/h). Terrain hugging / Sea skimmer. Can perform final approach pop-up manoeuvre ending in high-dive (near vertical) onto target.
 
NSM (185km)
Harpoon block II+ ER (248km)
SM-6 (240–460 km)
LRASM (560 km, maybe 930km or in due course even 1,600 km)
Tomahawk Block IV (1,700 km)

That's a nice layering of missiles for use against surface ships.

To add to that, JSOW C-1 achieved IOC last year with the capability to hit ships. The Strategic Capabilities Office is also developing the surface launched ATACMS missile to hit ships as well.
 
To add to that, JSOW C-1 achieved IOC last year with the capability to hit ships. The Strategic Capabilities Office is also developing the surface launched ATACMS missile to hit ships as well.
I focussed on ship-launched missiles and, as I understand it, ATACMS would not be shipbased (well, unless you deckparked it on a large amphibious ship (T-ESB, LPD, LSD, LHA/D). As Strategic Capabilities Office director William Roper said: "In a lethal war zone, land-based missile batteries have one huge advantage: They can’t sink. That’s something our enemies have exploited for years. Now the US military will seize that advantage for itself."
http://breakingdefense.com/2016/10/army-atacms-missile-will-kill-ships-secdef-carter/
 

Back
Top Bottom