What's new

Rare Photos show Indian soldiers' lives behind World War I trenches

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
In 1915, as World War I lurched into its second year, the British government's India Office reluctantly allowed an American photographer to accompany two infantry units, Lahore and Meerut and the first and second Indian Cavalry Divisions, to the war in France.

The son of an American minister from Ontario, HD Girdwood was something of a veteran India hand. He had first visited the country in 1903 for the Delhi Durbar and returned several times afterwards for more photo assignments. He was in India when the war broke out.

After he pestered officials and promised to contribute his photographs for propaganda, the India Office allowed him to travel to France. He arrived in France on July 22, 1915, having received permission to shoot only for 15 days. He later got permission to photograph Indian soldiers as they recovered from injuries at Bournemouth and Brighton.

Popular cinema suggests that World War I had nothing but a continuous series of soldiers lying in sodden trenches crawling with leeches and lice, who from time to time emerged to shell opposing trenches. This is partly true. Both the Allied Powers’ and Central Powers’ soldiers had begun to entrench themselves as early as September 1914, just two months after the war began, and the last trenches were cleared only after the war ended in 1918.

But soldiers did not spend all their time in the trenches. They regularly retired from the front lines to rest at more securely held ground behind.

The India Office restricted Girdwood to the rear, which is why so many of his photographs depict soldiers at leisure. They cook, wrestle, play music or football. While it later emerged that several of his combat photographs were staged, we don't know whether this was true of the rest of his images. The deceptive tranquility of some of these images might have something do to their eventual use for propaganda. Several of the photographs have extensive captions, written in blandly optimistic tones. These, presumably, were meant to keep spirits up.

This April, the British Library digitised their Girdwood Collection. This is a selection from their archive, along with the original captions.

1404158986-714_WWI-10.jpg


Indian cavalry playing football at the front, Estrée Blanche, France. July 25, 1915

1404155960-572_WWI-1.jpg

Indian cavalry troopers preparing a meal, Estrée Blanche, France. July 25, 1915


1404158228-1380_WWI-5.jpg

Sikhs singing religious chants in a French barn, Le Sart. July 24, 1915

1404158282-423_WWI-6.jpg

Gurkhas wrestling on the regimental transport mules, Le Sart, France. July 24, 1915




 
Last edited:
1404156221-129_WWI-2.jpg


A hero - Bal Bahadur, Brighton, England. 1915


Text beneath image: “A hero – Bhaz Gul of the 59th Sinde Rifles, who was promoted in the field for gallantry at Neuve Chapelle. The story of his gallant exploit is as follows. With an officer and two other men he was in a captured German trench at Neuve Chapelle, when volunteers were called for to rescue some wounded men who were in front of the trench. He volunteered and although exposed to a heavy fire, succeeded in rescuing one man, and went back again to rescue a second, when he was hit by a German bullet, and severely wounded.”
 
Hindus , Muslims and Sikhs.. all "Indians". Sent to fight a war that had NOTHING to do with them.

At that time, they were all subjects of the British Empire, which was at war. Perfectly okay.
 
Hindus , Muslims and Sikhs.. all "Indians". Sent to fight a war that had NOTHING to do with them.
True. But these soldiers were given a lot of benefits too like being given agricultural land, pensions. The ones who became officers were treated with much respect, there children received free education besides other benefits.
 
Hindus , Muslims and Sikhs.. all "Indians". Sent to fight a war that had NOTHING to do with them.

True. The war had nothing to do with "India" as such but we are talking about an age when nationalist leaders ( for example Gandhi) felt obliged to get an opportunity to serve under the crown. Gandhi even criticized Bal Gangadhar Tilak for his conditional support for Indian recruitment for war. It was also the time when native princes wanted titles of the empire like Rao Saheb, Rao Bahadur, Khan Bahadur, Order of the British Empire or Kaiser E Hind more than anything else and helped the empire with whatever they could.

Social aristocrats, Intellectual elites (like the Tagore family in Bengal) walked close with the empire as their mercantile interest primarily depended upon the British patronage. Militant nationalist spirit was at such a tender age at that stage then that except few no one questioned the Indian participation in the war which was not the case during second world war.
 
Hindus , Muslims and Sikhs.. all "Indians". Sent to fight a war that had NOTHING to do with them.

What other sources of employment were available back then ?

1404158113-864_WWI-4.jpg


Indian Corps Signal Section putting up a telegraph line, Merville, France. August 5, 1915
 
Hindus , Muslims and Sikhs.. all "Indians". Sent to fight a war that had NOTHING to do with them.

Many people used this as an employment opportunity,under the Raj Employment Opportunities for Indians were very less
 
800px-Indian_Army_QF_3.7_inch_gun_battery_Jerusalem_1917.jpg
QF3pdrHotchkissMesopotamia1917.jpg


Shahamad Khan was in charge of a machine-gun section 150 yards from the enemy's position, covering a gap in the New Line at Beit Ayeesa, Mesopotamia on 12th/13 April 1916. After all his men, apart from two belt-fillers, had become casualties, Shamahad Khan, working the gun single-handed, repelled three counter-attacks. Under extremely heavy fire, he continued to hold the gap, whilst it was being made secure, for three hours. When his gun was disabled by enemy fire, he and the two belt-fillers continued to hold the ground with their rifles until they were ordered to retire. Along with the three men who were sent to his assistance, he brought back to his own lines, his gun, ammunition and a severely wounded man. Eventually he returned to remove all remaining arms and equipment, except for two shovels. But for his action, the line would undoubtedly have been penetrated by the enemy.

First recipient of Victoria cross from my city Chakwal in
First Battle of Ypres


Khudadad khan


Action_by_Sepoy_Khudadad_Khan_VC_Ypres.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 10pounderMountainGunEastAfricaWWI.jpg
    10pounderMountainGunEastAfricaWWI.jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 22
  • Hodsons_Horse_France_1917_IWM_Q_2061.jpg
    Hodsons_Horse_France_1917_IWM_Q_2061.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 31
  • IndianArmyMGCrewFlanders1914-15.jpg
    IndianArmyMGCrewFlanders1914-15.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 27
  • 800px-2nd_Indian_Cav_Div.jpg
    800px-2nd_Indian_Cav_Div.jpg
    125.6 KB · Views: 17
  • 754px-Indian_bicycle_troops_Somme_1916_IWM_Q_3983.jpg
    754px-Indian_bicycle_troops_Somme_1916_IWM_Q_3983.jpg
    109.4 KB · Views: 26
  • 220px-Naik_Shah_Ahmad_Khan,_VC,_89th_Punjabis,_1916_copy2.jpg
    220px-Naik_Shah_Ahmad_Khan,_VC,_89th_Punjabis,_1916_copy2.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 27
I see faces of traitors-
The same traitors who killed our freedom fighters-

People say there were no other sources of employment then- when you have ghairat in you- you dont go out looking for employment under occupation- you go out fighting for your freedom-

We brownies were used at cannon fodders in their imperial wars- and yet some people feel proud of that-
 
I see faces of traitors-
The same traitors who killed our freedom fighters-

People say there were no other sources of employment then- when you have ghairat in you- you dont go out looking for employment under occupation- you go out fighting for your freedom-

We brownies were used at cannon fodders in their imperial wars- and yet some people feel proud of that-
In that sense, every one in this subcontinent played the part of a traitor in some way. Even the nationalist leaders to the administrative bureaucrats, service class and artisans or peasantry.
 
In that sense, every one in this subcontinent played the part of a traitor in some way. Even the nationalist leaders to the administrative bureaucrats, service class and artisans or peasantry.

Yeah lets agree we were slaves and british subjects for a reason- that exact reason-

The amount of so called brave people that fought for the queen- had they fought against the queen- things would be different-
 

Back
Top Bottom