PTI head Imran Khan's old pics

Discussion in 'Members Club' started by Raja.Pakistani, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. Omar1984

    Omar1984 ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    12,315
    Ratings:
    +0 / 12,514 / -0
    People also used to call Muhammad Ali Jinnah arrogant, but would an arrogant person work day and night in his final stages of tuberculosis for his people and his country?

    Would an arrogant person do this, just to protect his people living miles away who he doesnt even personally know?
    [​IMG]


    If you dont want to support Imran Khan then who will you support? Altaf Hussein? Nawaz Sharif? Asif Ali Zardari? Our choices for a leader is limited. Imran Khan is the only one who wont sell his country for a few dollars.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  2. iioal malik

    iioal malik FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    825
    Ratings:
    +0 / 231 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Muhammad Ali Jinnah was revolutionary leader who could be hyper at times but never arrogant!liyakat ali khan was another leader of Jinnah's legacy but if we even try to compare imran khan with them we won't be doing any justices to Jinnah's Legacy,Imran khan have Long way to go b4 we even think about him at their class,

    When we look at the current leaders who could be considered for all the problems in pakistan is Nawaz Sharif...I won't go into details cuz i know he's not ur fav leader...I look at leader's by their track record in 62 years history of pakistan after Muhammad Ali Jinnah,n liyakat ali khan,for me the only man who could bring pakistan out of this dark hole is Nawaz Sharif ,Period!

    N plz stop putting Altaf hussian's name into the leaders list his name could be up there on the top of pakistan's terrorist list!!
     
  3. Omar1984

    Omar1984 ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    12,315
    Ratings:
    +0 / 12,514 / -0
    Nawaz Sharif made Pakistan almost bankrupt in the 90's, did Kargil, and then told his soldiers to surrender after one phone call from Bill Clinton.

    If just one phone call from a US president can have such an affect on him, imagine what else he will surrender to U.S.

    And he has palaces and mansions in Saudi Arabia. That guy spent just way too much money on his personal lifestyle when he was Prime Minister of Pakistan.

    And he has become anti-army now. We can't afford to have an anti-army leader. Army is the only strong united organization left in Pakistan today.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  4. iioal malik

    iioal malik FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    825
    Ratings:
    +0 / 231 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I wouldn't go far enough to say that ur a teen age cuz ur posts are more then 8 an half thousand..but definitely i am wasting my time by talking to some1 who is very unformed never done any research on his countries history n less knowledge about ground realities..

    Nawaz sharif stood up for Pakistan against U.S and the world he's the only reason why we call our self nuclear power today!Bill Clinton went thru all the options to stop him Strategically when that didn't work he proposed money but it was Nawaz sharif who denied everything for the sake of our mother land n went on n did wht he thought was better for our country

    If today pakistan is going thru all wht's happening there, Army is the only 1 to blame ..It was our head of a army who destabilised the .democratic system when he removed seating Prime Minster who had the two third majority in 1999.it was your army man who was shaking from his head to tow on only 1 U.S phone call after 9/11 and agreed to support U.S without the will of the people of pakistan and he is the only reason why pakistan is suffering today cuz of his unquestionable ruling on pakistan for 8 years. N i would not go far enough to say who was involve in all the assassination from Liaquat Ali Khan to benazir bhutto..

    Army needs to get it's act together b4 something big happens in pakistan...This is where Nawaz sharif is different then others when he talks about army shouldn't be involved in internal affairs army should be on the borders protecting pakistan.......
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. RexImperio

    RexImperio FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2015
    Messages:
    104
    Ratings:
    +0 / 59 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Please tell me I am not the only one who thinks Imran Khan REALLY resembles Muammar Gaddafi in the second last picture.

    Nawaz Sharif wasn't solely responsible for the economic crisis in the 98s. The fact that Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto would only be able to hold their position of PM for roughly 2-3 years before being forced out of power proved to be a decisive factor in thwarting any economic plan developed by the other. Despite that, The KSE reached new heights and M-2 Motorway was constructed. Moreover, large-scale industrialisation and privatisation proved to be beneficial as the economy now grew at an appropriate level. Moreover, his 'Yellow-cab Taxi' plan also proved decisive in tackling unemployment.

    Moving on, Nawaz Sharif was not responsible for Kargil War. Even India knew that General Musharraf was responsible for this which is why Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee felt shocked when President Musharraf shook hands with him in SAARC 2002 Summit. In comparison, Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif had a friendly visit to the house of Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

    Moving on, read some history. The phone call from President Bill Clinton was not to force Pakistan to 'surrender'. He threatened of dire consequences if Pakistan used nuclear weapons. Moving on, even your beloved Musharraf claimed that he had been forced to join the US War on Terror after a threatening phone call from U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, not the President.

    Finally, he has the money and he can use it how he likes. Imran Khan has a 400 kanal plot in Bani Gala, go talk about that.