What's new

PDF Warning Points and Bans

@Syed.Ali.Haider After the last episode, it's kinda amuse me to see who likes the wildest of posts on this forum and the results are more than often revealing.

The idea of a muslim men f*cking hindu/Indian girls certainly raise some hormonal level of few Analysts on the forum.

But then lets not deny them the right to disown their action, they may have not read it well. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't @Mugwop a woman herself?

@Joe Shearer The same analysts do go on rampant distribution of negatives, though themselves thanking posts of high perversive content.

@WebMaster Do we have some mechanism in place to discourage such TTA who promotes filthy thoughts among members?

View attachment 332252

Where is this thread?

I would like to remind everyone of the forum rules:

https://defence.pk/rules/

PROFANITY
Using partial masking (such as asterisks or punctuation marks) to byp*** the profanity filter is prohibited and will result in the same action as if the actual word had been typed.

Source: https://defence.pk/rules/#ixzz4JbdEf800

@waz @WAJsal
 
Where is this thread?

@waz @WAJsal

Here it is https://defence.pk/threads/muslims-are-treated-very-well-in-india-says-actor-emraan-hashmi.448217/

But it seems the post doesn't break any rule. Endorsed by TTA and ignored by mods. So let it be.

Just look at @Mugwop . He/She liked post saying "hundreds of hindu/Indian girl f*cked by Imran" but negatively rated a rebuttal in similar sense but with even lower tone.

upload_2016-9-8_2-37-30.png
 
@Syed.Ali.Haider As I said, there could be an explanation, and really there is.

The only explanation needed is that the forum is run as designed by the management and title holders, and it is best to accept it as such.

Where is this thread?

I would like to remind everyone of the forum rules:

It depends on who is saying the profanity. Some are exempt as a matter of granted privilege, and that must be accepted.
 
Last edited:
The only explanation needed is that the forum is run as designed by the management and title holders, and it is best to accept it as such.

Hardly any post to engage with, few are, but in privileged sections. I am junior. So no other way to get amused than seeking classy explanations. Your's one is boring. :D

So time to take a hike from forum, before I be told to told off.
 
Hardly any post to engage with, few are, but in privileged sections. I am junior. So no other way to get amused than seeking classy explanations. Your's one is boring. :D

So time to take a hike from forum, before I be told to told off.

Discretion is the better part of valor, indeed.
 
Here it is https://defence.pk/threads/muslims-are-treated-very-well-in-india-says-actor-emraan-hashmi.448217/

But it seems the post doesn't break any rule. Endorsed by TTA and ignored by mods. So let it be.

Just look at @Mugwop . He/She liked post saying "hundreds of hindu/Indian girl f*cked by Imran" but negatively rated a rebuttal in similar sense but with even lower tone.

View attachment 332257
This part bothers you because it's about hindu girls but the rest doesn't because it's about muslims.
"Pakistani actresses are dying to do lick pick with indian actors" deserves a negative rating because its a insipid shaming technique used by hindu supremacists to irk Pakistanis. Actors work for Money
Btw why is my gender always so important in a discussion? lol
 
This part bothers you because it's about hindu girls but the rest doesn't because it's about muslims.
"Pakistani actresses are dying to do lick pick with indian actors" deserves a negative rating because its a insipid shaming technique used by hindu supremacists to irk Pakistanis. Actors work for Money
Btw why is my gender always so important in a discussion? lol

:lol:

Please continue. Sorry that I engage you, my bad.
 

Back
Top Bottom